Red Flags of Mis or Dis-information (Page 2 of 6)

Where would this fall under channelled material?  A lot of things said by "matthew" seem to resonate with me.

http://educate-yourself.org/mw/index.shtml

Here are two "visual" red flags that I've noticed in regards to either crazy websites, or crazy people in general:

- The infamous "center allignment." !  This one's been mentioned before in other threads, but can't be emphasized enough.  Too many times, paranoia and fear-based low FRV websites are center alligned, instead of left alligned or block justified.   The entire text will be center alligned, and often the font will be all different colors and sizes, lots of bolds, caps and underlines.  The center allignment thing is almost like this psychological need to overcompensate for a mindset that's grossly off balance.   It's a MAJOR red flag indicator.  Not every crazy website will be center alligned, but every site that I've seen that's been entirely center alligned has been crazy.

Also take heed if a formerly left/block justified website suddenly becomes center alligned.   Interestingly enough, the David Icke news headlines page went through this subtle "shift", indicating to me that things had taken a turn over there. 

- The Crazy Eyes.   Too often, authors, speakers and "spokespeople" for polarizing distraction tactic issues have what I call the Crazy Eyes.    Authors that are front and center cranking out diet/health and exercise regime books, financial & money making advise books.....polarizing political issue books, articles and websites, (right wing/left wing, liberal/conservative name calling, slander and finger pointing)........too many of them have the Crazy Eyes.  This intense, yet empty stare.  You know what I'm talkin' about....you've seen them on the covers of all those books at the bookstore.    It's disturbing, and indicates to me someone who has a very high possibility of being programmed and/or even reanimated.   Many new age followers seem to have the crazy eyes as well.   Some have erronously been mislabeled as having "seer eyes!" when crazy eyes would be more like it.

Some may be thinking that "Crazy" is a subjective word.  And it is...to a point.   And crazy may not be the best word for what ultimately amounts to an FRV issue.   To me, crazy is anybody who is out there with a paranoia and fear based FRV, or rabidly promoting material that The Powers That Be want us desparately focused on......money, money, and more money, sex, sex and more sex, diet and calorie counting obsesion and exercise and weight loss and physical image, political issues, left and right, liberal vs. conservative, and so on.    Or in the case of new age "crazy" it's those who, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, are out there promoting material and idealogy that is quite obviously false, and which would actually result in detrimental consequences for the people who follow it.  Yet, they stubbornly adhere to it.

Not every low-FRV person our person spouting disinfo. will have the crazy eyes, but it is one of those indicators I've learned to notice over the past few years.

First time I really noticed the "Crazy Eyes" phenomenon was with one of Suze Orman's books. What the??? I thought. I figured it was a symptom of assertiveness and overconfidence turning into mania. Or if the eyes are windows to the soul, opening the eyes wider may be some subconscious attempt to compensate? I can only speculate. Being high on crack could also do it

The opposite phenomenon, purposeful squinting could be just as much a red flag. News anchors trying to play up their seriousness, politicians like Bill Clinton trying to look empathetic, and actors trying to look hot tend to do it. Someone pointed this out to me today just now, when this very morning I realized the same thing. I guess conspicuously fake body language or the use of Neurolinguistic Programming would be a red-flag.

Yeah, checking in, I agree--he's goofy, but not crazy.  Although he was the first person to jump into my mind after reading your "crazy eyes" post.  Maybe it's exuberance.

The Orman pic is a perfect example.

**

Another webpage-oriented visual red-flag for me--and this could be wholly subjective--is an abundance of ultra-ethereal, spacey, fantastical images.  Many of these pics are beautiful, and I appreciate them, but my quibble with them is in the energetic effect them elicit in me. 

I'm talking about spiritualistic sites with rainbow skies and giant, chiseled angels or beatific, smiling, almond-eyed beings stretching a hand through space.  The feeling I always I get is "this is too perfect."  I feel like I'm looking at an advertising brochure for the next dimension.     

And there is a certain ungroundedness in the websites with all the astral imagery.

**

Last thought...This isn't so much about disinfo, but about sloppiness.  I see New Agey sites, books, and people increasingly saying that quantum physics has proved this or that metaphysical point.  ("Quantum physics tells us...") 

The pattern is using quantum physics to lend credence or weight to their thesis.  I know virutally zip about physics, but the allusions always seem surface and metaphorical to me (while writers represent the connection to quantum physics as deep and literal).

Well, we went to the bookstore tonight, and I gathered up some names!

The Diet and Exercise section can be a scary area in terms of people on the book covers!

Here's the dude I was thinking about earlier, but didn't know his name:

Bill Phillips, "Body For Life" and "Eating For Life"

Ahhh!

Then I found Maureen Kennedy Salaman, author of "All Your Health Questions Answered":

Eeek!

And on a lesser note is Bob Greene, author of "Get With the Program":

Believe it or not, he's not Bill Phillips.  But what's with these brunette diet dudes with the weird eyes and the generic names???

And just because the picture was so damn funny, let's hear it again for Suze Orman!!

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

It's all about the crazy eyes!

Okay, I couldn't resist: