Re: Pawned

I understand just what you're saying khalil.  The same thing has happened to me and whenever it does my natural thought is "i must be doing everything right... i don't need to change a thing.... all is well".   The feeling is so forgiving and reassuring at those times that we are convinced of our "rightness" and it is only natural that we make the mistake of self justification [in our current beliefs and associations] when it is the spirit's justification we should look for.   Because they are not always the same we learn to incline a listening ear for whatever impression may come with the spiritual embrace.  In your case it may well have been as simple as proving the existence of a wise interior spirit rather than confirmation that all the facets of your then present faith were perfect.   If you think about it, God must meet our souls wherever we're at in order to raise us higher in understanding.  That means entering our lives at the level of our present understanding and associations and inspiring our quest upward and onward.   That doesn't always happen right before the train leaves for the next station.  Sometimes the train waits at a particular station for a while building up the thrust for forward movement.  That building momentum is given soul expression as either satisfaction as we serve in our current capacity or dissatisfaction with our current associations.   Determining the origin of that satisfaction or dissatisfaction is key because without the intervention of spirit the carnal mind can interfer with the souls karmic cycles.  The key is in being in sync with those cycles and being spiritually motivated, at least subconsciously.   

The truth is that we ourselves are not yet spiritually perfected at the soul level.  So, without the refinement of spirit at the soul level our activities and associations are often imperfect too.  We have walked into many culdesacs and taken many wrong turns so we need the guidance of inner- spirit to cut our way out of the undergrowth.  But while these associations [with life's apparent detours] may be imperfect in an ultimate sense, there may yet be some karmic purpose [or a learning purpose without the compelling of the law] being fulfilled in the present associations and so the spirit guides the soul through it in order to balance karma with certain people and/ or to learn what can be learned from a given situation.

The spirit understands the conditioning of our outer minds but when time comes to call a soul home nothing will stop the souls quest for freedom from all limiting conditions [including for you the morman church] and eventually nothing will stop the interior revelation of the spirit to the soul.

Re: Pawned

Whoa, I'm not going to read this topic.

But is Jesus real? My answer is: I don't really care! Seriously, why care about Jesus? Kill your idols... Live your own life... Kill your idols....

18 (edited by shukaido 2007-11-08 16:17:00)

Re: Pawned

Well, I'm glad that at least this thread got de-railed soon enough from a most predictable endless string of bickering about whether Christ existed or not. Trucking out one's faith in God or the absence of God only to be disseminated by strangers seemed to me rather fruitless. After the last time I posted I thought, this is ridiculous, realizing then something of a strong potential for negative influences to polarize readers strongly in one direction or another and turn some completely off to the forum in its entirety. As something of a side note, evidence of this in my mind was a saltcube.com thread that was started some months ago about OBE's. I personally made mention of a link at saltcube.com that pointed directly to a forum member's call for help after experiencing a forced OBE by a demonic entity. By coincidence I no longer consider strange, that member had the same name as my own, his post was written in almost the exact words a persistent "neg" has tried to impress upon me, and this member's experience with demonic assault was once surprisingly similar to my own. Coincidence? Maybe.

Darkness is clever.

Khalil, it is interesting your writing that you now believe that negative influences were somehow authors of this "voice of God" you heard once, which shook you and filled you with good feelings. I wonder, Can darkness accomplish this? Can darkness fill a being with "goodness"? Aside from my idea that it's not really in the interest of higher dark entities to inspire someone with so much "goodness" and run the risk of polarizing them irrevocably into the higher spheres of the positive, I just don't think higher negatively oriented beings are capable of acting from love, but more from "magic" and mystery, and temptations of power, carnal desire, and material things. And if temptation fails, pain and suffering.

Once in a while a similiar type of thought that it was in fact darkness and not light that was originally responsible the heavenly inspiration of my experience will be subtly suggested to me in hopes that I'll accept the invitation to doubt the authenticity of my perception of true light, and therefore assign all of my spiritual experiences to the confines of negative overlordship. I decided to pass on that one. There was a time when I too felt this astonishing presence of "God" about and within me, which spoke, and at the time I wasn't part of any Christian sect or organization. I was baptized a Christian as an infant and began planning my escape from church functions at about the time I was able to tie my shoes. When I began to come into this strange new understanding of some things, which now includes postive and negatively-oriented non-human beings as well as angels, I was as far removed from organized religion as possible. The attempts to bind me to Masonic doctrines were indeed present, as the Ra Material states, the accumulation of light attracts attention. Darkness seems to me to always seek to take credit or authorship of everything, claiming that it was darkness which gave me this thing or that, or that allowed me to get by, and to go so far even as to suggest that it was by permission of darkness which allowed me to experience the true light of my claims. 

I go to church only once in a while now. I go to be in the company of others who share my belief in a greater harmony, and in a personal savior, who is Christ. Who cares if someone else doesn't share my belief? I think the idea that negative entities somehow harness and transmute the authentic feelings of love and joy expressed in churches is equally as nutty as some hold my belief in God and Christ.

Sometimes the minister of my church says things that completely grate me and go totally against this heavenly voice and presence I experienced, which said absolutely nothing about whether I should choose, for instance, to love a man or woman, and go to hell because of it. Once this minister looked directly at me, his facial expression changed dramatically, and he said, "Go home. Admit you were wrong," which relates to something he should have had no knowledge of, but it was then up to me to decide whether or not a shadow or spirit of some thing had momentairly passed over him. By the same token, some of those old ladies at my church have raised five kids, worked two jobs, paid mortgages, put food on the table every night, and know that there's a heaven above without having been abducted or stalked across the United States, as I have, by aliens inclined toward the satanic, or attacked by some Old One, demonic, or angelic being determined to drown me in physical and spiritual bonds, or put out the light of my life. I'm still to a greater or lesser degree monitored and followed around by negative forces, but so what? They were always there. The difference now is that I'm aware of them and have adjusted some of my beliefs and behaviors accordingly. These negative influences were present when I was a practicing Muslim, now that I'm a Christian, and they were there when I didn't hold so much as a religious belief at all. I wonder if it's not more to do with the light of love that seeks expression from within you than whether it's through the lens of Jesus Christ, Mohammed who is the Prophet of Allah, or Buddha that you experience this love and light? It's my belief that they're all just aspects or faces of the same Creator, anyway. Granted, the truly demonic absolutely hate Christ, so I suppose it's true that they will hate me, too.

Khalil wrote:

One thing I know for sure is that I need to get over this. It's all about those I love and not belief systems.

Given what you've written, I would agree with you. If you get nothing from religion, if Jesus Christ isn't your way, then by all means don't follow him. Don't waste your time. Gather to your self what reinforces your personal belief in peace and love, and those things which nourish your soul.

"Oh where have you been, my blue-eyed son? Where have you been, my darling young one?" - Roxy Music (B. Dylan)

19 (edited by nexus 2007-11-08 20:59:16)

Re: Pawned

Your brief comment appears to me as a classic critical thinking error there dante.  It looks like a "straw man" argument.
" Idols are no good." ,   "Jesus is an idol." ,  "kill things that are no good" ,  "kill your idols" ,  "make the only choice you have... it's the idol Jesus OR yourself"

The prime error?   = "Jesus is an idol"
                                  You must choose between him [and similar idols] or yourself"   

I don't believe that presumption or the false dichotomy it presents me with.  Jesus is not an idol.  Jesus never made an idol of himself.  Fools make an idol of him and many have.  See through  that if you will and something of value can be learned from him.  If you're personally disinterested in him, then fine, but Jesus can contribute more to spiritual truth than a straw man can.

Like i said, a subject like this interests me for many reasons, not the least being how people come to their conclusions.  While the two posters above [dante and shukaido] reach very similar conclusions they get there from entirely different routes.  The greater irony is that Jesus taught the same thing about [spiritual] self- reliance.  Can we learn anything at all from other people [including Jesus] or must we mistrust everyone?  Do we come to our own conclusions about people [including Jesus] or do we only see the idols that fools make of them?

A lot can be learned from understanding Jesus.  There's no need to knock him down if you can find out what he really means.

And shukaido you had a lot of good things to say.  But your first paragraph assumes that we must be in error or spiritually ignorant if we discuss a subject that will obviously present dissagreements with each other.  That somehow we are provoking people to polarise themselves into some extreme of the ego in self defence by doing so and that it is therefore wrong to discuss the subject in question.  Jesus had no problem speaking his truth in many forums.  He confronted and was confronted by people.  He took the barbs in return if that is what he got.  That didn't mean that Jesus was polarised in the ego and therefore wasting his energy in ego stoushes with other people.  He didn't tippy toe around important subjects or avoid them.   Like back then we all have a different idea today of what's important or open to discussion.

Re: Pawned

"The winner will be the loser"
~~carefulcarpenter

Fun fact: Great Tits are common in Europe

To know love is to know trust; to know oneself is to know truth
~~carefulcarpenter


1+1=1

Re: Pawned

This subject is no different to any other where people are likely to dissagree.   Why is it that proposing ideas which are in question [and therefore dissagreement] is to be a loser titmouse?  i believe you are saying we can all really only lose by this discussion?  Why?

22 (edited by Khalil 2007-11-09 01:36:49)

Re: Pawned

Well I for one am getting a lot out of this.
This is exactly what I was hoping for, others perspectives, others who have experienced similar events.
Thanks for sharing.
Admittable my original post was a bit of a car wreck but it has taken a turn for the better.
I appreciate the calm manner all have shown.
I'm actually going to read it all again today to perhaps gleem more from it.
I feel like this thread is really helping me understand or work out were I go from here.
I think it is important for people with this type of experience to understand the possibilities.
I feel it is important for me to work out who spoke that day, good or bad.
At the same time, I might also have to leave it behind and move on.
I use to feel alone in this, it's good to know I am not.
It's great to hear others peoples views.
Somewhere deep inside I think I know who it is that spoke and who it is sent me gentle prompts when I was waking up.
At least when I use to ask "Who are you?" in my mind, I felt a  "You know, you know who I am."

23 (edited by titmouse_ 2007-11-09 14:54:51)

Re: Pawned

Nexus and all,

Meaning is so subjective. One who takes a path to know oneself better takes a solitary sojourn. There is no winning. Growth is its own revelation: metanoia (repentance). S/he who loses oneself(old self)shall find oneself(new). The greatest wisdom comes after the fall. Debate, discussion, controversy, struggle--all is helpful when one is prepared to discover new perspectives. This too is not about who wins. Sociopathy is all about winning at all cost. Metanoia is about losing; losing the old beliefs and perspectives and gaining life anew--like a child (of God).

Poetry is a wonderful form of communication between the unconscious higher-self and conscious ego-self. If one wants to see a new world, one can pursue this by seeking to see the world anew. There is no guarantee that personal effort will return the desired effect, yet it opens the pathway to higher growth. This in itself opens doors for communication from the unknown.  Religious leaders are poor examples of the path Jesus took to discover Himself. We all take our own "individual" journies of discovery when things get so uncomfortable that we are desparate for things to change. Church leaders are all about "tradition"; can you see where their path has taken the "collective individual"(oxymoronic)? Surely not the narrow paths of Jesus and Buddha and Krishna and Lao Tsu. Religious leaders have steered the follower away from the "wilderness" of the unknown. Seekers blaze their own paths. This is not the structured path of convention. Winners seldom chose to seek outside convention for they "believe" they have found success. The doubter has the greatest chance for metanoia.

"Success is failure"
~~carefulcarpenter

"The winner will be the loser, by the grace of God(a generic term for the life force which energizes our sojourn), the Father"


"He who knows the Father and the Mother will be called the son of a whore"
~~jc

Seek the one crucified for speaking of love and truth. You may find that He *IS* unworthy of this world. He is the one which *IS* rejected. He never was--He *IS*.


I've said too much. Thank you for your comments.

Fun fact: Great Tits are common in Europe

To know love is to know trust; to know oneself is to know truth
~~carefulcarpenter


1+1=1

24 (edited by aNDRE dILOn 2007-11-09 12:00:30)

Re: Pawned

shukaido wrote:

I'm still to a greater or lesser degree monitored and followed around by negative forces, but so what? They were always there. The difference now is that I'm aware of them and have adjusted some of my beliefs and behaviors accordingly. These negative influences were present when I was a practicing Muslim, now that I'm a Christian, and they were there when I didn't hold so much as a religious belief at all. I wonder if it's not more to do with the light of love that seeks expression from within you than whether it's through the lens of Jesus Christ, Mohammed who is the Prophet of Allah, or Buddha that you experience this love and light? It's my belief that they're all just aspects or faces of the same Creator, anyway. Granted, the truly demonic absolutely hate Christ, so I suppose it's true that they will hate me, too.

I thought your post was great. Especially the material I quoted above. Thank you for sharing it.

Re: Pawned

From you titmouse i thought there had to be a good explanation and that was fine.  Never heard of metanoia.   If it's about losing the old self for the new, then "the winner" is indeed "the loser".   That statement of yours followed by my question and your answer is a classic example why a deeper look is always in order and why the discussions are important.   Jesus did the same thing.  It is written that he spoke to the multitudes in parables but when alone with his disciples [many more than 12 including quite a few women] he "expounded all things". 

Not only that he said the same thing...

"Whoever would save his life [his old beliefs and perspectives of the lower- ego]
  will lose it
  but whoever will lose their life
  for my sake [the ever present, ever new inner- Self]
  will find it again."

Jesus said these things to everyone and then he probably explained them to his friends   He didn't say too much titmouse and neither have you.  My point made about the importance of the open discussion.  Thanks.

26 (edited by titmouse_ 2007-11-10 17:20:12)

Re: Pawned

nexus wrote:

My point made about the importance of the open discussion.  Thanks.

Yes, discussion and dialectic exchange is valuable in the pursuit of truth. OP's, sycophants, the shadow, etc. are eventually tripped up and exposed in this process. Polite discourse is a veil for secrecy. This is why it is so important to love your enemy as yourself; through facing opposition we modify and develope our own truth. Truth will set one free.



"We build a wall around our hearts, one little white lie by one half-truth, until we trust no one; especially not ourselves."
~~carefulcarpenter

Fun fact: Great Tits are common in Europe

To know love is to know trust; to know oneself is to know truth
~~carefulcarpenter


1+1=1