Alex Jones: Why is anyone still listening? (Page 1 of 5)

Thanks for posting these visvis, I just started listening.  I'll post comments later if anything in particular catches my attention......

I still listen to Alex Jones. Some people think he is a vatican agent or works for the CIA , I have seen no evidence of that sure that clip back from 1999 potrays he in a bad light but it doesn't make him a CIA agent. The shows that I have been hearing from Alex are not fearing mongering so I'm not gonna judge him from something that happened way back when. 

Also Alex Jones has woken alot of people up to the dangers of vaccines, 9/11 , NWO, etc. so I think the good he has done far outweighs any negatives.

calpamu the clip from Bill coopers show which visavis linked to.

Most liars tell truths 95 % of the time. It is strategic. Tell enough truths, spin it and turn it into misinfo/disinfo.

Thanks - link's fixed now.

Does that mean that anyone who appears, on the surface, to be on your side gets a carte blanche?  Hmm, no offence, but that seems like a very dangerous policy you have there, of certain people being "above" the realm in which one can be questioned, because they are exposing things (which have previously been exposed by other researchers anyways), so their intentions must be "good".

A couple of suggestions:
a) The "divide and conquer" mentality so evident in NWO-type policy stretches far beyond the area of political parties and even nations.... and can easily account for controlled opposition even in alternative media.
b) It is often the case that anyone that appears to fight something is in fact lending energy to that very idea and thus in league with it either implicitly or explicitly.  Let's take an example whereby Alex convinced the whole world to be in an agitated state of powerless panic (which he loves to be the maestro of), that "the NWO is coming".  I submit that seven billion minds focusing on the same thing would efficiently produce the very object of focus.  The principle of the manifestation of thought cares not whether the object of meditation is good or bad. 

On the other hand, a state of empowered, action-oriented meditation for change, charged with righteous self-spirit-power from a clear intent & not twisted/harnessed by malevolent entities; would be a very different thing -- especially when followed up by practical action, as opposed to a state of disempowerment.  The object of focus is key - because it is the object of focus which invariably receives energy.

Yes, good point, and I was also thinking that with deliberate intent comes a greater level of calculation, persistence, and leverage in that 5% lie, whereas for one whose 5% consists of "random" errors there is not as much coherence or direction among these mistakes. These are both idealized situations of course, and in reality we could have disinfo agents who have been programmed to be unwitting zealots for false paradigms (true believers in untruth) and innocent researchers who have stubborn subconscious complexes or false root assumptions that create a well-defined boundary to where they are willing to go. But overall, I would say that true disinformation, versus misinformation, is more focused and intentional. You can look at what's wrong with it, and analyze how tidy, directional, organized, and cunning the errors are, or whether they really are haphazard products of naivete or lack of discernment.