1 (edited by feedbaxlow 2007-07-25 17:46:28)

Topic: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

[moved here from the Stuart Wilde thread - montalk]

Thanks for a good belly laugh nexus! smile

Greycat,
I appreciate your remarks, a reminder how complicated it can get or appear to get.
I haven't seen the Ra material or Topper's, but have spent many a night reading LK's Cassiopean stuff.
I agree that judgment in general is dangerous, especially on conventional or typical grounds.
And of Stu W. are especially tricky. I don't actually care about Stu to be honest.
I think some of the points that have come up in this topic have merit of their own outside of or including him.

I have to wonder what Psychic slime influence could be brought to bear on us when extremely clear minded.
Lately has been the intuition that compassion for "the slimer" short-circuits that.
I have seen that it is when you want something: ie: power, money, credibility, sex, self gratification etc etc.
is when you are vulnerable. not when you are just here listening.
maybe i am so inconsequential i don't merit the slime smile
But i have had to wade through a few million gallons of it nonetheless to get where i am now (where ever that is)
so i can't say that there isn't at least the impression of some "outside" forces acting here at times.
I just refuse to believe it in the long run.
I have had the strange fortune to encounter several instances of dark magic used against me by real people
and one thing the Africans told me is:
if you don't believe in it, i wont work. (I know... easy to say)
But perhaps i have had no choice but to make a career out of "not believing it'
Perhaps after struggling with the slime for so long i have built up some transparency to it?

I just feel that is too easy to blame our problems on someone/something else
rather than take responsibility for what we are "manifesting".

I don't mean that in a judgmental sense like we are partly evil and deserve to be slimed at all.
We are actually innocent, just blurry in vision and wobbly in mind...trying to convince ourselves that we are innocent doesn't seem to work... and takes quite a bit of trial by fire to prove to ourselves and
to rise above our own feelings of guilt and inferiority... so projecting these "felt failings" on others is easier than looking here.

Look around... who is actually taking responsibility for their experience?
Hardly anyone... but obvious masters. How did they get that way?
Not by fighting etheric monsters, but facing their own demons and embracing them in self compassion.

I will say it again. We do not need to look anywhere else to find these demons-
All the greed, ego, pride and false judgments are right here (nobodies fault!) waiting to be seen through...
and let go of in one gulp, not a long and torturous process
but a simple stopping and looking and listening without judging or blaming or rationalizing or running away in numbness.
It takes quite a bit of  willingness to face "our own work", or what we have left undone.
It isn't hard or easy, but we are much less likely to blame anyone at those moments
because the shadows flee that kind of energy and there's nothing left to "fight" or blame anyone for.

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

I do my best to keep everyone amused

3 (edited by lala 2007-07-26 16:21:35)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

feedbaxlow wrote:

I have to wonder what Psychic slime influence could be brought to bear on us when extremely clear minded.
Lately has been the intuition that compassion for "the slimer" short-circuits that.
I have seen that it is when you want something: ie: power, money, credibility, sex, self gratification etc etc.
is when you are vulnerable. not when you are just here listening

You are forgetting an important one: guilt. Guilt is going to create idiot compassion from the slimee toward the slimer.-lala

don't judge a book by its name

4 (edited by nexus 2007-07-27 01:43:56)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

That's a good point lala.    Love and compassion can express in many different ways.  It's easy to get the idea that we must set our mind and heart in a certain way and then go out and express the same to everyone.  But each person we meet is an individual.    So really we have to let go of our preconceptions about how to act.  Yes we have some good examples and guidelines from history's best "lovers" [eg. Jesus and Guatama] but they did not always suffer fools.  Some people were healed and praised while others were rebuked.  It all depended on where the master felt the person was coming from in consciousness.  So although some superb guidelines are given for our inter- personal interactions [eg. the Sermon on the Mount which is Buddhism at it's best]  the inner God consciousness should be the ultimate guide.

I think it's important to realise that we must be "wise as serpents and harmless as doves".   This entails realising that not many people on earth are fully God realised.  Also, in a darkened world inhabited by karma beings,  not everyone's consciousness is relatively good and relatively evil either.   Some people on earth are absolute evil incarnate.   We've all met people in situations where you cannot let down your guard.  You just know there is danger.  It may not be physical danger but it may be astral, where you sense that you could be breached and penetrated  [by forces controlling the other person] if you are not carefull.   Sometimes, to act firmly is to be God in action.   Sometimes.

One more comment that is relevant to lala's post...  I know that not everyone here is a fan of Jesus [some believing he never existed] but he gives a definition of "unconditional love" on his website  www.askrealjesus.com  His definition explains why he confronted some people in a very firm way and rebuked them.  [ please don't try this at home without some level of spiritual integration  smile ]

In the question / answer section Jesus explains that he was not "conditioned" by THEIR state of consciousness. ie.. Rather than give up on people caught in the traps of very dense consciousness he [ as the embodied Christ] was willing to speak into their OUTER ear what they would not hear in their INNER ear from their own Christ Self.  These people were controlling the masses through a dead letter religion. They had turned a deaf ear to the inner Spirit and had effectively silenced it.  Their own ignor-ance [of the inner spirit] was taught to their followers so that they effectively neutered the Spirit within the masses.  This state of affairs was the basic reason for Jesus' public mission.  The controllers of the people would not acknowledge the living Word [the Spirit] within themselves nor in Jesus when confronted by him.  Rather than acknowledge the Christ in Jesus and make the necessary changes they fully rejected him and conspired to murder Jesus to silence the Christ.  They would have no changes thank you very much.  Their lower ego's were in charge.

Before reading that explanation of 'unconditional love' i had not thought about it like that.  Jesus' willingness to awaken them to their inner Spirit was not conditioned by their unwillingness to accept truth nor conditioned by anything they might say about him or do to him.  Gentle love and absolute tolerance of everything is not the middle way.   If it was then change would not always have the catalyst it needs.

5 (edited by feedbaxlow 2007-07-27 10:59:07)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

well something resonates there and it's raises a good question

what is compassion?
this is one of the most misinterpreted concepts period!

It's easier to say what it isn't.
it is not feeling guilty in the least.
it is not something you "should" have
especially for some and not for others.
Either you have it or you don't
It is not something that is static or a steady kind of "state".
It is fluid and feels of clarity
As in the definition of good, is merely the absence of intention to harm or compete with or obstruct.
"goodness" is almost identical in definition but applied differently:
It's what is when we are empty of motive or intent. stillness.
relaxed and open. energetically reset and alive, intelligent.

Compassion is not trying to do anything our of guilt or realizing the  privileged life we have  and feeling obliged to share...
Compassion is just seeing no difference between self and another.
no distinction or differentiation- resting in "at oneness".
(in this direct feeling of contact a slight smile often plays at the edges of the lips)...
a warmth toward life itself and everyone because we have no beef (with people or the universe) no resistance to what is,
no agenda to become better or fix something. IT'S ALL FINE.
compassion is lack of separation and the best energy is shared out of that.
patience with any form, energy or momentary configuration or limitation thereof.
Seeing "what is" in another being and not resisting or judging.

Is guilt a state in which we slime ourselves or attract the same?
Guilt only happens while separated from what is, or it would not be there.
There is suggested a duality in which true compassion could not exist

6 (edited by lala 2007-07-27 18:15:07)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

feedbaxlow wrote regarding compassion:

As in the definition of good, is merely the absence of intention to harm or compete with or obstruct.
"goodness" is almost identical in definition but applied differently:
It's what is when we are empty of motive or intent. stillness.
relaxed and open. energetically reset and alive, intelligent.

This view makes compassion a passive quality, or actually, a non-quality, a type of neutrality. My experience of true compassion is that it is very active, and is very intense on an energetic level. Don't compassion and goodness have forward movement, intent and intelligence just like the other side of duality? Every discussion on NR forum seems to come down to this same question: are good and evil real on a qualitative level or is everything just a shard of consciousness colored by a different aspect of energy that we interpret with the mind? Is the soul a real and valid spiritual construct that experiences not on just this plane of existence but in other realms as well? And does it matter what the soul experiences, as in can it be violated and harmed and do we have the right to not prefer certain harmful or "evil" experiences as individual souls? Otherwise why would we bother incarnating and trying to do things and achieve things other than survival during this incarnation? If everything that "is" is just something we must accept and not judge, try to change, obstruct or interfere with-where is the positive and active experience of goodness? Why not just become robots like we are being indoctrinated into becoming, anyway?
I do remember reading Castenada saying something about Don Juan saying that a sorceror cannot have compassion, along the lines of that to have compassion you have to be able to see yourself as the other person, to put yourself in their shoes, and that when going along the lines of sorcery you have to totally own your path of power and of not being sucked into the human drama. Similarly, if every time we see someone less fortunate than us, we think: there for the grace of god go I, this is not compassion, it is basically guilt about being somewhere else on the continuum that is not such a hard physical act of survival.
So I think that there is a big gap between true compassion which is active, and guilt which is a reaction about owning your own level of power in 3-D.
But, I do not accept everything without judgment that is applied to my spiritual experiences here on earth, and this is part of having compassion for myself as an incarnated being: I do not wish to suffer and I do not want to allow others to cause suffering in other beings.-lala

don't judge a book by its name

7 (edited by nexus 2007-07-27 23:19:15)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

True lala,

I believe it is a popular misconception that virtual nothingness is the goal of self- realisation.  Rather,  it is the lower- ego that must shrink to nothingness so that the true Self can be the active principle in our lives.  Ghandi said [something like] : "my goal is to become nothing".   Saint Clare the franciscan nun called herself the "tiny one" and she used to say in prayer :
           
            "I nothing,  Thou All."     She obviously found the ALL in all within.

She wrote :  "Place your mind before the mirror of eternity!
                      Place your soul in the brilliance of glory!
                      And transform your entire being into the image
                      of the Godhead Itself through contemplation"      [Guatama Buddha taught the same
                                                                                                     calling the "Godhead" the "Buddha"]   

St Clare called the process of self realisation "building the interior castle".
The"castle" is already within us but self- realisation is about making the higher Self consciously manifest.
                                                                                                     
I agree with lala that the self- realised spiritual Self is passionate in it's activity.  That active Self is not merely the 'good' polarity in the duality of consciousness.  It is beyond ego perceptions of 'good' and 'evil'.  It is above and beyond both human 'good' and human 'evil' as they are percieved by the carnal mind.  It is God in action.  That activity does not always conform to people's expectations either.   That is why it is so easy to miss a true spiritual Adept when one appears and that is why they are almost universally rejected.

The concept of "desirelessness" refers to the desires of the pseudo- self,  not the higher Self.

The word "desire" has it's root in the words DEITY- SIRES.  When clearly understood it communicates the concept that the spiritual- Self projects the seeds of divine ideas into our minds [incarnate in the womb of the cosmic mother/ matter].  There is a definite Higher- Will involved in this process and love is the motive energy required to make divine ideas active in our lives.  It is the true "passion of the Christ" as distinct from the lower 'passions' of the lower- ego and the body.

As we 'still' the demands of the lower- ego self [and transmute them] we can more easily discern the higher Will and recieve the inner love to give expression to it.  This is not 'separation consciousness'.   It is an acknowledgement of the fact that our gift of self and freewill is soul consciousness.  It is only by proving our soul's oneness of purpose and vibration with the Higher Self that we unite spiritually.   This is achieved by degrees and that is why a spiritual teacher can be helpfull.

8 (edited by feedbaxlow 2007-07-29 01:24:55)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

lala wrote:

Otherwise why would we bother incarnating and trying to do things and achieve things other than survival during this incarnation? If everything that "is" is just something we must accept and not judge, try to change, obstruct or interfere with-where is the positive and active experience of goodness?

Lala- survival is not neutral or passive, it's negative... it has violent intent lurking within.
Survival becomes: Eat or be eaten, kill or be killed.
Observing is active and results in freedom (immediately or eventually), goes beyond mere survival.

Apparently, we "bother" incarnating because we cannot do otherwise given this deeply conditioned process of interpreting what we see and hear from our programming. It is very difficult to "see" or hear things without interpreting from previous associations.
For westerners: Judeo-Christian's false religious indoctrination biases us!
It's everywhere. TV movies school parents church society. All saying: you must be something.
You cannot do nothing.
Why not? Because then you would be beyond the reach of hive mind that needs your agreement to control you and make their mass of unconsciousness "choice"! You MUST believe, worship, spend, dream, love... or you are not defined.
Do something, anything. A desperation "to be" is the basic underlying motive that fuels "life" and rebirth into another round of competition, conflict and violence. (violent because: if i identify with self, nation and race, that makes me defensive and dangerous. That identifying makes for the need of negative "survival").
It is possible to see this and rest tranquil... stop and observe.
This "not doing" is the greatest "act" possible.
Every act of so called "goodness" and compassion comes out of this seeing clearly.
It takes a great amount of energy to simply observe in presence!!!
Try not reacting to things (like my previous post)... it isn't easy, it takes inward presence...
or great passion and patience for truth
What the Buddha called right action comes from right understanding.

If you are a part of this culture there is nothing more frightening to you than to be invisible, nobody, without identity.
Don't you see that we are conditioned by this... unless you grew up in a cave?

It's very subtle, but we feel the guilt you mentioned before.
On some level, we feel we should be "doing" something to be worthy.
Is it because the culture had been divorced of the sacred feminine? (so called "passive" because is not reactive or "doing") Intelligence that just is, without the need "to become" to perceive rightly.
awareness sees this neurotic need "to be" and "to do" and acts by dropping it, allowing energy to be freed up.
This freed energy allows more awareness.

Awareness allows perception. Seeing IS changing! It is dynamic. It is never done yet there is nothing specifically "to do".
"passive" or "active" are just words, the truth goes beyond duality.
Can't be understood verbally, until it's experienced, like anything else learned directly...like riding a bike.
the "gateway" is when the the "me" is in obeyance, not trying...just open and receptive
words are dualistic by nature
so cannot express the ultimate reality that is, witnessing all this
what is comprehending this

lala wrote:

to have compassion you have to be able to see yourself as the other person, to put yourself in their shoes, and that when going along the lines of sorcery you have to totally own your path of power and of not being sucked into the human drama. Similarly, if every time we see someone less fortunate than us, we think: there for the grace of god go I, this is not compassion, it is basically guilt

Agreed!
Because Casteneda was writing fiction to get his point across, he used the words "sorcery" and "power" but they aren't necessary for this quote to work!

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

feedbaxlow:

Lala- survival is not neutral or passive, it's negative... it has violent intent lurking within.
Survival becomes: Eat or be eaten, kill or be killed.

This is a powerful statement, and it seems right to me, but it is disturbing in the sense that it implies that we are born into a state of negativity upon incarnation. How can we become observors without ending up on the street and starving to death? Or maybe that is just a part of that that is. But when I started to wake up recently, I freaked out on the harshness of the survival thing.-lala

don't judge a book by its name

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

(I will touch on a couple of different posts so I hope it flows)

I agree lala,

It IS a powerful statement, because not only is THAT battle outside you, it is inside you as well.

Until you awaken you are living by one set of wisdoms. The wisdoms that TPTB can manipulated. They are that wisdoms of the 3rd D, that affect the body, the hormones the cravings that are insatiable that can keep distracting you. The are the ones that bring about the business of "if it feels good do it" as well as "if you hit me then I'll hit you back". That help you feel good too because you can be a "good person having "compassion" on whom you want. They are the wisdom from below(here in 3D)

All these distractions keep you from waking. They keep you from seeing you have choices.They are reactionary.

The awakening brings about the journey on the "Right Path". Which is the "wisdom" from above(4D) and higher. Compassion is a key understanding to this I think. I also think this type of compassion that feedbaxslow is getting at is a key component to Unconditional Love. It gives you choices, lets you see you can be IN the world but NOT OF THE WORLD. That it doesn't have to be negative.

Glimpses of "The Heavens" have caused a lot of people to be sad and think negatively about the world when thy come back. They get caught up in the "lack" here instead of using it as the encouragement to "keep on keeping on."

At the moment of awakening begins the battle between the "ego" that currently is and wants to protect and survive VS the "ego" you can become. I think the lower ego is what creates the "babbler" all the mental chatter that keeps you from being able to be a silent observer, doing this nothing. It is incessent and within us and it is the hardest to practice on. But if we persevere it gets easier and becomes to do this with the world.

Whatever station you are at when you awaken, you need not feel like that has to change either to show you "get it". This isn't I'm holier than thou or I'm higher now and you are somehow less.  You see the world for what it is. You now don't respond out of guilt or fear or shame but observe and respond/act out of love.

You can best affect people at various stations NOT by preaching the/your truth but by being in their lives and accessible.

This way when people want to curse you, you can bless them. When people bless you, you can receive with thankfulness and when you bless someone you can bless without expecting a return.

Suddenly you are working out your truth and living in the world but not being of the world.

Simple?Yes. easy? Nope.

Peace,
Teddy

"It means the Matrix can't tell you who you are" - Trinity

11 (edited by lala 2007-07-29 10:25:57)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

nexus said:

Before reading that explanation of 'unconditional love' i had not thought about it like that.  Jesus' willingness to awaken them to their inner Spirit was not conditioned by their unwillingness to accept truth nor conditioned by anything they might say about him or do to him.  Gentle love and absolute tolerance of everything is not the middle way.   If it was then change would not always have the catalyst it needs

I feel that the statement about absolute tolerance of everything not being the middle way is where my heart is going at this point. This is part of compassion being an active priniciple rather than a neutral quality that one develops as a response
to negativity, therefore it is creative.
One thing though nexus, since I am following the dialogue on the "debunking jesus" thread (which is also a very good thread, indeed) is that people use the fact that Jesus got angry at the moneylenders in the temple and so forth and also the old Hebrew establishment, as an example that Jesus was just a man with human qualities, rather than using the fact that he wasn't all cooled out with bland nothingness all of the time as an example that he was goodness in action mode. So, it is always by the yardstick of appearing to have human emotions according to written accounts, that the Christ energy incarnate is measured as falling short of divinity, rather than seeing the so-called negative emotions as being used in the service of good. History is materialist anyway.-lala

don't judge a book by its name

12 (edited by khatru 2007-07-29 14:18:45)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

lala wrote:

feedbaxlow:

Lala- survival is not neutral or passive, it's negative... it has violent intent lurking within.
Survival becomes: Eat or be eaten, kill or be killed.

This is a powerful statement, and it seems right to me, but it is disturbing in the sense that it implies that we are born into a state of negativity upon incarnation. How can we become observors without ending up on the street and starving to death? Or maybe that is just a part of that that is. But when I started to wake up recently, I freaked out on the harshness of the survival thing.-lala

I find it hard to think of surviving as a negative, certainly not when viewed subjectively. :~)
Survival is the prime directive that's coded into every living thing, at least on a material level. Consume the energy to replicate, mutate, evolve, carry the physical body forward and maintain representation in 3D Now. From our perspective of sentience it goes beyond mere replication of our physical lineage, to the point where some of us believe we've reached beyond the need to pass along our genetic information (being obsessed with such distractions as personal ascension). Even there, however, we're still driven to survive, but at that point it becomes a drive to maintain, evolve and keep possession of our subjective drop of consciousness.

I've always liked this little essay on the subject, from the forward to Psilocybin - Magic Mushroom Grower's Guide by by O.T. Oss & O.N. Oeric (aka Dennis and Terence McKenna). Here's Terence "channeling" the mushroom being:

[size=16][center]The mushroom speaks, and our opinions rest upon what it tells eloquently of itself in the cool night of the mind: [/center][/size]
"I am old, older than thought in your species, which is itself fifty times older than your history. Though I have been on earth for ages I am from the stars. My home is no one planet, for many worlds scattered through the shining disc of the galaxy have conditions which allow my spores an opportunity for life. The mushroom which you see is the part of my body given to sex thrills and sun bathing, my true body is a fine network of fibers growing through the soil. These networks may cover acres and may have far more connections that the number in a human brain. My mycelial network is nearly immortal, only the sudden toxification of a planet or the explosion of its parent star can wipe me out. By means impossible to explain because of certain misconceptions in your model of reality all my mycelial networks in the galaxy are in hyperlight communication across space and time. The mycelial body is as fragile as a spider's web but the collective hypermind and memory is a vast historical archive of the career of evolving intelligence on many worlds in our spiral star swarm.

Space, you see, is a vast ocean to those hardy life forms that have the ability to reproduce from spores, for spores are covered with the hardest organic substance known. Across the aeons of time and space drift many spore-forming life-forms in suspended animation for millions of years until contact is made with a suitable environment. Few such species are minded, only myself and my recently evolved near relatives have achieved the hyper-communication mode and memory capacity that makes us leading members in the community of galactic intelligence. How the hypercommunication mode operates is a secret which will not be lightly given to man. But the means should be obvious: it is the occurrence of psilocybin and psilocin in the biosynthetic pathways of my living body that opens for me and my symbiots the vision screens to many worlds. You as an individual and man as a species are on the brink of the formation of a symbiotic relationship with my genetic material that will eventually carry humanity and earth into the galactic mainstream of the higher civilizations.

Since it is not easy for you to recognize other varieties of intelligence around you, your most advanced theories of politics and society have advanced only as far as the notion of collectivism. But beyond the cohesion of the members of a species into a single social organism there lie richer and even more baroque evolutionary possibilities. Symbiosis is one of these. Symbiosis is a relation of mutual dependence and positive benefits for both of the species involved. Symbiotic relationships between myself and civilized forms of higher animals have been established many times and in many places throughout the long ages of my development.

These relationships have been mutually useful; within my memory is the knowledge of hyperlight drive ships and how to build them. I will trade this knowledge for a free ticket to new worlds around suns younger and more stable than your own. To secure an eternal existence down the long river of cosmic time I again and again offer this agreement to higher beings and thereby have spread throughout the galaxy over the long millennia. A mycelial network has no organs to move the world, no hands; but higher animals with manipulative abilities can become partners with the star knowledge within me and if they act in good faith, return both themselves and their humble mushroom teacher to the million worlds all citizens of our starswarm are heir to."

To bring this back to SW, perhaps this is something along the lines of what he has in mind with the ayahuasca ceremony. It's an opportunity to plug into the higher functioning mind of another being - alien to us, but Gaian nonetheless - and the opening of networks within the mind, along with a connection to the local matrix of Life (as opposed to the pseudo matrix that's being imposed on us).

As cosmic as the mushroom mind's explanation of itself and it's purpose is, it doesn't end there. In a physical sense the consumption of one species by another is all about the absorption of energy, in this case solar energy that's been stored in it's many earthly vessels. The species that are physically absorbed for their energy still manage to survive, genetically on the material plane, and also in the format of their subjective, group consciousness....their devic consciousness continues to manifest itself physically, but it is also is evolving it's unique facet of awareness.

On another level is the survival of consciousness, which, if one is to find negativity in the struggle for physical survival, the absorption of one consciousness by another must seem the ultimate in negativity. There are the realms described in War in Heaven, where larger beings are consuming the astral essence, along with the consciousness of lesser, weaker spirits. These beings become larger and larger themselves, too bloated to incarnate as only one unit of humanity, so in order to hang on to their fat drop of consciousness, they need to incarnate in a fragmented manner as many different, but similar humans (OPs), all of whom are plugged into that single, carnivorous mind.
Then there are the realms that are being pursued by those on the path of personal ascension. The difference is choice and quality of absorption, but ultimately, it's absorption just the same. The micro reflects the macro. All things of Earth are one thing, scrambling to maintain the presence of a unique facet of perception by consuming and absorbing each other's physical vessels. In the macro all things are One, and One will become One again.

In the meantime we get to play here in the sandbox of subjectivity, and in the life and death drama of the material order. We get to extend this drama into the higher realms, taking our acts to the realms of pure consciousness. It's a game we play, and like the  truest of athletes, we've submerged ourselves in the competition, becoming obsessed and possessed by this sport, and we'll play to "win"... to survive, until the game is over (and we start a new one).

"The truth of sport plays rings around you...going for the One"
-Yes

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

khatru wrote:

The species that are physically absorbed for their energy still manage to survive, genetically on the material plane, and also in the format of their subjective, group consciousness..

yyeeccchhh, this literally made me sick to my stomach-not that it may not be a valid reality, but the thought that we are just another life form that must struggle for survival on not just a physical but on a consciousness and metaphysical level is horrifying to me. Is that all you think the ascension movement is about-people trying to hang onto and preserve their individual drop of consciousness? Is it all just one big predatorial food chain in and out of the body? Kill or be killed and if you can't cut it be absorbed and "die" as an individual consciousness on every level of being? Isn't that kind of like a metaphysical Darwinism? One of you other geniuses please argue out of this corner... Is that all every quest for spiritual life comes down to-people trying to become a rigid sort of immortality, like an archetype or a god for a few thousand millenia to prevent from being absorbed into the slurry of one big consciousness meld for awhile. I don't find this uplifting on any level. I know that Terrence McKenna did a lot of work with making alternative states of consciousness available and user-friendly to the general population, and advocated for everyone's right to do so. But isn't this absorb or be absorbed thing (it's like the science fiction movie "The Blob") in essence, nihilistic? Is that the spiritual "surrender" people keep talking about all the time? i don't want to be absorbed, or absorb the consciousness of another being, although if I say that I would commune with those essences without actually absorbing them, you would probably say that that is an illusion of separation concept that arises out of duality. I have to keep my belief in the individual soul essence and positive development of a spiritual ego in order to keep from going stark raving mad on this plane.-lala

don't judge a book by its name

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

As Don Juan said when you take the life of an animal, you thank it, and welcome it back into the source. You do this because you too know that one day you will give your life back to be worm food for the planet.
      Same goes for lettuce, which is alive as well.
      With true knowledge of this, there would be alot less folk waddling towards the McDonalds, I think.       
      I don't think this sick. What IS sick is that modern culture is so removed from death that it is petrefied by it. Squeamish of it to the point where it will do whatever it takes to cover it up and make it unreal.
     Thats the real perversion.
     There are some people who won't even eat meat off the BONE. Hamburgers, fine, but if it LOOKS like it once lived, they freak out.
     Long ago our religions waged war on nature. Before that, we were reliant upon our food sources. We never took too much, or we would go hungy next season. We RESPECTED the act because it was in our face and a matter of our own survival. We were part of the circle.
   It's funny this topic came up. Because just today as I was riding my bike down the street I thought that, when I die, if I had a choice of how my body was disposed, I wanted a big ditch dug and me thrown, unceremoniously into it. Cover it up and be done with it.
   It seems, even in death we try to seal ourselves away from the worms with pretty plastic coffins.
   Not me. I'm worm food. And I'm ok with that.
   Everyone on this forum is going to die.
   Even if you graduate to 4D and have a pretty new body, that too will change and die, so they say.
   And I like the idea of taking life seriously enough to know that your death is just to the right of you.
   Doesn't leave much time for dilly dally does it?

15 (edited by khatru 2007-07-30 04:31:42)

Re: SURVIVAL of the entity- Ascension?

lala wrote:

khatru wrote:

The species that are physically absorbed for their energy still manage to survive, genetically on the material plane, and also in the format of their subjective, group consciousness..

yyeeccchhh, this literally made me sick to my stomach-not that it may not be a valid reality, but the thought that we are just another life form that must struggle for survival on not just a physical but on a consciousness and metaphysical level is horrifying to me.

I'm sorry if I upset you. sad
One time I had a vision (so to speak) while sitting on the roof of my house during a lunar eclipse. I find eclipses of any type carry a strong potential for accessing the parts of myself that just know "stuff". I'm sure there are people around NR who understand the energy of them much better than I do, but for me, at the very least, just that there's a period of physical alignment of the three celestial bodies is enough to inspire me to reach inside for something deeper. That night there was supposedly a 4th alignment, that with the galactic center, the central sun.

What I saw was a dance of three living beings.
Sun was glorious and absolutely in love with Earth. There are countless stars but so few with an actual third dimensional lover who is teeming with life on this plane. Sun is all about Earth, so special and rare, a delicate jewel hanging in space, irreplaceable and precious.
Earth was simply mother, female in every way, driven to experience all she can while she can. All Earth is doing from that point of view is taking the energy of her lover and using it in creating and birthing all the millions of species in her every nook and cranny, everyone of them clawing their way into 3D awareness. Together they take starlight and weave it into the patterns of organic life. This is how she experiences the material plane. Every one of the billion, billion organisms birthed by her are intrinsically connected to her. She sees, feels, hears, touches, emotes with every nuance of every one her creatures as they experience their reality. We and all the teeming organisms around us are Earth's 3D sensory organs...and maybe 4d as well.  Without life Earth would be blind and deaf at this level of reality. We help carry her memory as well.

The same as we're multidimensional, so are the celestial bodies. Our tiny micro droplets of energy are mirrors of the patterns and tones of stars. We're made of the same stuff. We're all surfing through eternity together.
The fox doesn't really kill the rabbit, and the rabbit doesn't really kill the lettuce. It's a mutual agreement between them. We all get to be here and experience this beauty and stretch our sentient wings because of these agreements. Most of all we agree because we are the organic body of Earth and without her we'd have none of this. There's nothing negative about any of it, it's all an expression of Love.

([size=10]The moon's bit would be a distraction to this conversation[/size])

lala wrote:

Is that all you think the ascension movement is about-people trying to hang onto and preserve their individual drop of consciousness? Is it all just one big predatorial food chain in and out of the body? Kill or be killed and if you can't cut it be absorbed and "die" as an individual consciousness on every level of being? Isn't that kind of like a metaphysical Darwinism?

I think the ascension movement is several different things, and one of those things is ego and another is fear. Fear of death, a loss of control, fear of the loss of self. Ego that needs control and feeds off of the dreams of becoming super beings, invincible, immortal, able to conquer all evil and injustice with a compassionate thought. Do you see any of this coming from the "I'm on the verge of ascension" crowd?

If it was only so easy, all this mess we've made could be healed by a single thought from any of the lightbeings of the higher orders. But, somehow they never seem to do this, we make whatever darkness we want down here and no one stops us. Maybe that's how the game is played...you have to get into the inside to change the direction of the evolution. We have to become Earth to dream heaven back into earth.

It's also about a few, very true to heart and highly evolved beings who believe they're ready to pull all the pieces of their many selves together and coalesce into their Oneness. Maybe the ones who truly understand the process will do this and stay here afterward. Hundreds, maybe thousands of Christs walking the planet. That would surely have a positive effect. 

I also think ascension is about the Earth's changing vibration and who's going figure out how to ride that wave. That ascension is really the one I think we've all showed up for.


lala wrote:

One of you other geniuses please argue out of this corner... Is that all every quest for spiritual life comes down to-people trying to become a rigid sort of immortality, like an archetype or a god for a few thousand millenia to prevent from being absorbed into the slurry of one big consciousness meld for awhile. I don't find this uplifting on any level.

:>) But you don't have to do anything you don't want to do. On the grandest scale I bother with, the universe will expand and contract and fragment into infinite shards over and over again. You don't have to be god, you can be a bug or cobweb or an army or anything you want. It's all cool. Obviously you're not ready to melt into One. Hey, me either. I can fully understand where you're coming from, probably we're just puppies in all of this. We want to roll around in the grass and be all about puppy love. We can't even imagine being a big dog yet, and don't like thinking about it either. It's just that when you start getting closer, these thoughts sneak in more and more often. I think it's why we keep jumping back into forgetfulness. 

lala, you mentioned earlier about "waking up" to the harshness of survival. All these adjustments to our attention happen to us in increments. Unless you decide to stay at a frequency that's creeped out by dark thinking about the most basic exchanges of life's energy, you'll surely wake up to another level of attention that says all of it's good. Because it is all good.


lala wrote:

Is that the spiritual "surrender" people keep talking about all the time? i don't want to be absorbed, or absorb the consciousness of another being, although if I say that I would commune with those essences without actually absorbing them, you would probably say that that is an illusion of separation concept that arises out of duality. I have to keep my belief in the individual soul essence and positive development of a spiritual ego in order to keep from going stark raving mad on this plane.-lala

Well that whole bit you're responding to is about as macro as I get. Maybe in a few millenia of holding your energy together, and falling apart and pulling together, and communing with everything you've been attracted to and then experiencing everything you could imagine experiencing times a billion, you might feel a yearning to go back, plug into the wholeness, be wiped clean by the bliss of it. Maybe you can be the last holdout.

I also have questions about what people are talking about when they say "surrender". I think it's just letting go of a little of the force we exert that keeps the rest of the universe from flooding over us and sweeping us away on a wave of ecstasy. Just a little bit of surrender there, let the light in, let the sound wash over us, remember our true reality with no fear, no ego, even for a moment or two. It doesn't mean we have let ourselves surrender to the point that our droplet of self washes into the sea.