Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

Dude, the dragon is the archetype for absolute and masterful power in many eastern religions.
Reptillian royalty are 22 feet tall with winged appendages, or dinosaurs.
Their species, is not compatable with the primate species at higher levels of development.
The story so far is, that they put us here as a food supply, and then a thing called freewill came along...


...and the rest is history.

all religion is a "tool" to tend the "crops".

47

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

montalk wrote:

I'll just conclude with a reminder to everyone else that you cannot reason with those incapable of reasoning, especially if their ignorant mode of operation is the very source of their pride, identity, and self-validation. Because anyone who deeply prides themselves on being a skeptic, who hinges their very identity on that concept, has something of themselves to lose by capitulating to opposing viewpoints. If their ego survival is threatened by the mere existence of opposing viewpoints, it is no wonder that rather than defending their viewpoints through sound reason, thorough research, and proper debate etiquette, they shrewdly sidestep points they cannot refute and resort to logical fallacies like ad hominem attacks to give themselves the illusion of victory, when the joke - and the pity - is actually on them.

Thank you, Montalk! Well said.

Much that comprises life is invisible, "unprovable," hidden -- yet, like the air we breathe, ultimately undeniable. Though I have not personally seen a reptilian, they certainly seem to exist and have considerable influence over affairs on Earth. Gargoyles, for instance, are prominently displayed on churches in Europe, despite having a decided lack of visual appeal -- at least to this human.

Much of the proof that something reptilian lurks around inter-dimensionally has already been offered by the many excellent posts on this thread.  Suffice to say, where there's smoke there's likely fire, and the smoke billowing from the reptilian saga around the earth -- across continents and cultures -- is certainly sufficient for me to say they likely exist, have cleverly manipulated reality at various points in time (sufficient to cause them to be fearfully worshipped and believed to be gods), and have not particularly demonstrated behaviors that suggest they have humanity's best interests at heart.

“You who have the light, what are you doing with it?” ~ Paul Claudel

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

It seems to me that the direction of this thread was actually intended to be in regard to the nature of belief systems?


From post #8

vaccime wrote:

My main interest here is to debate on the method that is being used when saying you know the truth, and launch unbelievable theories with 100% certainty, but without being able to meet the burden of proof. ( like in the truthism.com website) .  Why not leave some space for doubting? Doubt is the main engine of knowledge. If one believes everything that he is told to be true, it's not good.

The original poster is not really interested in reptilians.

From post #27

vaccime wrote:

I shall research the Reptilians as much as I'm going to study the Waspinator Giant Ants from Mars, when , as I can see, many guys here are also infected with faithful beliefs in religious creatures, same as existent as the old man who brings presents called Santa Clause.

And this is why. I think? Also from post # 27

vaccime wrote:

How can you study that which does not exist? When I say that God does not exist this is not just an oppinion, and surely it's not an informed rebuttal of the claim that God exists. I's a philosophical position of ideological correctness defaulted by the obvious impossibility of the single alternative . [ there is no 3-rd possibility ( either God exists or not. since he cannot exist, it defaults to a certain non-existance, same as the square circles.)]

Hmmm. How can you determine whether something exists if you are not willing to study it i wonder? I came up with a 3rd possibility through the studying.....

Anyway, as far as the methodology of belief systems... i find it helps to consider my own as much as possible. I think it makes sense to contemplate why i like apples if i want to know why you like oranges.... regardless of whether my intention is to increase my understanding or " win a debate ". Research seems important for either.

I would like to confirm that this is MY OPINION. It may change in the future despite whatever % of certainty i currently attribute to it.

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

[center]A Blast From The Past:[/center]


http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=2029

11   23   11

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

It's good that you want to be yourself, free of the religious dogma and distorted beliefs that so many people cling to throughout the world. Uncluttering yourself, freeing yourself of limiting beliefs and viewing the pointless games people seek to engage in with an eye of objectivity is a great task...just be careful not to lose yourself.

"Don't eat any wooden nickels."

51 (edited by khatru 2007-06-01 13:17:12)

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

vaccime:

I'm going to go out on a limb and (for purposes of writing this post) assume that you're a real person somewhere, and that like most of the participants to NR, you're on a some sort of voyage of discovery....even though it seems at least as likely that you're simply a list troll who's come in with the full moon.

I like NR because it's a place where people go to discuss the nature of consciousness. If there's a "faith" prevalent here, it has little to do with god or archangels or reptilians, and a lot to do with the belief that consciousness is a real thing, that it's tangible and energetic, though not in a way that can be measured in volts or foot/pounds. This doesn't mean that it can't be studied and understood in ways that reveal its properties and the universal laws which apply to it.

It's not that the zeal to promote your immunity to the meme of god-belief is a bad thing. It's simply a level of being that your consciousness is attempting to navigate. What do we really know for sure? Certainly you don't know, and can't prove the non-existence of, a supreme being...just as no one can provide you with the proof of it's existence either.
What you don't seem to understand is that there's an equal amount of dis-empowerment associated with absolute disbelief as there is with absolute belief. Your power as a thinking, animate, evolving being lies in between these polarities.
When you make statements like this:

vaccime wrote:

How can you study that which does not exist? When I say that God does not exist this is not just an oppinion, and surely it's not an informed rebuttal of the claim that God exists. I's a philosophical position of ideological correctness defaulted by the obvious impossibility of the single alternative . [ there is no 3-rd possibility ( either God exists or not. since he cannot exist, it defaults to a certain non-existance, same as the square circles.)]

….you sound as if all your logical faculties are disengaged (and the god-faq link doesn’t help your case either).


As Lyra pointed out, if you fancy yourself a debater, at least learn something about debate and logic. You would never tolerate someone from NR making the statement that God exists, and that He exists because it would be impossible for Him not to exist and that it’s ideologically incorrect not to believe in a Supreme Being. It's obvious from your other statements that you would accuse that person of insanity.
But this is how you look here -- as if you're insanely polarized. If you're used to getting away with such silly and hollow statements you must never perform this act anywhere except in front of a home crowd.

Before you even start on the subject of "god, is/isn't" perhaps it would be good to present your definition of god. I’d wager that if you were to define the Supreme Being that you don’t believe in, I would probably agree that I don’t believe in that thing either…though that doesn’t mean that I disbelieve in it. Multiple billions of beings on this planet believe in various interpretations of god. These beings and the consciousness they possess create waves of that (difficult to measure) type of “energy” related to their personal and congregate iterations of god. You can call it insanity, but religion and humanities beliefs in god(s) have enormous power. They help shape the world we live in, and they can kill us.
Beyond this, there are infinite ways to consider the nature of what people like to call god. I'm usually not very comfortable with even using that term. It's narrow and confining and dependent upon a tiny particle of consciousness attempting to describe an ocean of the same from a singular point of view.

About the reptiles:
I'm not sure you're ready to receive the answers to your questions. Are there sentient reptilian beings somewhere in the universe? If you're not too stuck in a Darwinist pattern of believing that all life on earth evolved only on earth, it certainly seems possible. Are they involved with humans and human consciousness and evolution? I don't have any evidence to contribute to your search, though if you go back and re-read the post that Montalk so kindly spent his time on for you, there might be some useful clues there that you've overlooked.

I think it's good that people from your plane of thought show up in metaphysical discussion groups. You create dissonance that helps to stimulate conversation that normally wouldn't occur where certain ideas and values are accepted as benchmarks. It's never a bad idea to occasionally revisit even our most basic paradigms.
On the other hand, there should be some value to you as well. If you're stuck in your polarity, refuse to consider that there is always a universe outside of whatever box we live in, and have only come here because (from the inside of your box) you think you can win a debate that only you are having, that would be too bad...for you.

52 (edited by lyra 2007-06-01 09:43:25)

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

Wanted to comment on this from vaccime's opening post:


vaccime wrote:

I have accidentally stumbled upon the truthism website a few days ago. Indeed, I'm quite surprised about what is written there, with the reptilians controlling the world and creating the humans, as it is said.

Not wanting to make the post longer than necessary, I'd like to jump to the main reason I'm here.
I hope that the answer to my question is not written somewhere like in a faq , because I didn't see one.
Anyway, I apologise if my question is unapropriate before reading the whole forum but it is really too big for me to read before my question is answered.

My question is this :  Assuming the information about the reptilians controlling the world, etc,  is true, all I want to know is : How do you know it? What evidence is there to suggest that this is indeed true? Some ancient paintings and Sculptures? Well.. this could just be considered art..  If we find an ancient sculpture of a giant shark, should we suppose that the world is controlled by sharks?  Excuse me if I may sound offending or ridiculising, but I must assure you that it's not the case and I'm serious in finding out what you have to say about the evidence.

What evidence is there to suggest that what is written about the Inner Earth, the Dinosaurs, and the Reptilians, is true?  Again, you should be the first to accept the fact that such kind of informations can not be easily accepted without extremely strong evidence.  This is exactly what I'm asking for, as a skeptic. I hope that those that are competent in answering my first questions will speak their words.. hopefully read my topic in the first place.

Why would somebody come to Noble Realms, a completely unrelated site that has nothing to do with "Truthism", and use this as their venue to question what's being said on Truthism?

That's like if somebody was "shocked" by the theories/opinions/observations that I note on my website....then runs over to the Rumor Mill News message board forum and tells everybody there to explain/defend the viewpoints on my site.  It doesn't even make sense.   But that's what just happened here.  For 4 pages.   "I have accidentally stumbled upon the truthism website a few days ago. Indeed, I'm quite surprised about what is written there, with the reptilians controlling the world and creating the humans, as it is said..........My question is this :  Assuming the information about the reptilians controlling the world, etc,  is true, all I want to know is : How do you know it? What evidence is there to suggest that this is indeed true?"

The members of NR were put into a position of explaining the views of somebody else's website.  How about asking the guy who runs Truthism to provide his explanations, clarification and defense?

Again, if somebody had a question about the views being presented on my site for instance, why should they run over to somebody else to have them explain it, right?  We should get our information and clarification from the source who's presenting it.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

53

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

//........."""Assuming the information about the reptilians controlling the world, etc, is true, all I want to know is : How do you know it? What evidence is there to suggest that this is indeed true?""".........................hey vaccime.......................what if the so called reptillians were actually human beings that were in denial of their own individual shadow............what if this possibility became too much for an individual to deal with so we began to self project off our reptillian energy onto others............what if this self projected reptillian energy began to accumulate to form a collective entity.............what if this self projected collective entity that we labeled reptillian began to organize itself into an energetic matrix with a hierarchy and lowerarchy..............what if this self projected reptillian matrix then began to breed it's mandatory feeding habits into our prewomb young..............what if it was we ourselves that were responsable for creating this entire dilemma..............what if, etc, etc...............the evidence will come upon processing this aspect of the individual shadow................from there one will be able to see and feel with the necessary clarity to self answer the potentially powerful questions posed..............until then beware of the reptillian trance that seems to get projected with a greater intensity by those who have engaged the awakening process to varying degrees..............some get so caught up in it that they begin to wear the reptillian imprint..............it consumes their thoughts to the point of which one will unwittingly wear the reptillian energy through saturating themselves within their own cerebrospinal fluid................the next instinct is to project it off yet we exist within the smoke, mirrors, and karmic world of a third dimensional reallity...............the whole reptillian agenda is going to remain a mess until a courageous energy formulates of which the front line spiritual masses begin to move forward in the transmutation and processing of this particular archetype within the individual and collective shadow.................the collective reptillian energy will eventually be forced to move once the collective paradigm shift of conscioussness comes our way...............until then we continue to take short yet  progressive steps via potent questioning and self analyzation such as you self initiated.................we'll get there.................by the way this was written by a one time leading reptillian...............me................i still wear the marked patch within my etheric bubble that glazed my eyes upon a full time feeding connection to the grid...............i had to go through a few deaths and layers of horror to get the energetically implanted chords completley detached.................i came from what would be profiled as a powerful family that through generations of experience had blindly threaded their tentacular energetic chords thoroughly within the field of my young self.................each and everyone here has got their own submerged story of this same basic reallity through the maya's standard breeding process.................our Truth has it's savage moments and through knowing this i have compassion for all that are currently combatting this specifically challenging aspect of the liberation process.................i consider it one of the two final hurdles upon the Path as i know it.................of this obstacles greatest rewards is that of sight...............once one becomes able to see the space and transcend the veil then the original question posed becomes decharged through the strength of regaining our heart energy's natural flow............we can then commence through personnal choice to enlist into life's angelic ranks and take to Service as need be.............this would be my own discerned perspective as to the evidence requested in partial story form upon my viewing position within the collective paradigm of humanity..............take it easy comrade///

54 (edited by zenden 2007-06-01 14:39:49)

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

i am NOT offcially on this thread.  oh NOOOOOOO.   but i so enjoyed reading lhs's words/thots and wanted to say something to lhs.


HELLO....BROTHER.        obviously, we are related.   core.

GNOTHI SEAUTON "Know Thyself!"

55

Re: Hello from a skeptical atheist (Do Reptilians Exist?)

Hello again. I want to clarify some things.

-the God Faq was a joke meant to emphasize the methodological importance of the burden of proof. Apparently you guys thought that's an argument against God's existance. I'll leave the God issue for now.

-Lyra your observation from above is tardive,pointless and pathetic. Nobody but you complained about it and you are not even making a good case, because from that website it surely looks as if this forum is connected to it, because there's a direct link to this forum right in the first page. Anyway even if it weren't , I;d say that this place is a proper one to talk about that theory since already some users acknowledged the fact that they belive in the theory one way or another, with varying degrees of conviction. Calling it "completely unrelated " is weird to say the least.

-Khatru: So,, there are people here able to express different views with fairplay and not resorting to complicated words. Thanks for posting.  I'd like to add something but rest assured that the only debate I wanted to win was about reptilians and I did that already.

khatru wrote:

What you don't seem to understand is that there's an equal amount of dis-empowerment associated with absolute disbelief as there is with absolute belief.As Lyra pointed out, if you fancy yourself a debater, at least learn something about debate and logic. You would never tolerate someone from NR making the statement that God exists, and that He exists because it would be impossible for Him not to exist and that it’s ideologically incorrect not to believe in a Supreme Being. It's obvious from your other statements that you would accuse that person of insanity

How nice this may sound, it does not change the fact that I am still the one who is right ; my absolute disbelief is based on reality, and some other's absolute belief is based on pure fantesy and speculation about a speculation.
In other words, I'm still right, how disbeliever I may be. When comparing and Atheist Fundy to A Christian Fundy, one should consider the fact that one is fundamentalist about the reality, and the other one is fundamentalist about fantesy.

I have the weird impression that you'd expect "absolute methodological reciprocity" in this matters. But don't forget that the burden of proof is the core of the method of discerning what is real and what is not, regarding claims. And it resides only on the shoulders of the one who claims, not the one who disclaims. Think about it. Why sould I want to disprove something that obviously exists? I'd only succeed at making a fool out of myself.

khatru wrote:

Certainly you don't know, and can't prove the non-existence of, a supreme being

I did not say "Supreme Being" I said God. With capital G, so I was reffering to Yahwe, the Christian God, and for definition take the general accepted one that is used mostly in discussions.
In fact, the funny thing is that I am now being a cognitivist with regard to the word "god or God" solely for the sake of argumentation. I am in reality non-cognitivist with regard to these words because until now no coherent, non-spiritual definition was given by the supporters of the idea. The idea of an omnipotent, all-knowing creature is pure fantesy. Keeping that in mind you get the point that the expression "Supreme Being" also needs a definition by the proposer.

Let me reformulate,from your point of view so that you'll get my point!!
YOU: "I am certain that you cannot be certain of the non-existance of "a supreme being". Guess what. You just did what you assume that I cannot do. Being certain of a negative is possible.
I can prove that square circles do not exist, because they by definition cannot. Same with "supreme beings" . How the said supreme being would have gotten into existance? Nothing can exist outside the Universe. The Universe by definition is "everything that exists". If a "Supreme Being" could exist, It would necessarily have to exist outside the Universe, otherwise it wouldn't deserve to call it "Supreme". However this is still open for discussion because I do not know what you understand exactly by the SB thing. Some call it Supreme Being, some call it ID , some call it god, some Creator, nonetheless, none of them makes any sense, because before starting to make any statements about it, you must first define it. And since the very definition poses much problems the rest is just speculation about a speculation. There's a principle that says everything must have a cause. However one must not understand the very Universe as being a part of "Everything" but, In my arrogant opinion, the Universe is only the framework where Everything can exist. If you study paradoxes you'll learn that you cannot meaningfully ask "When did time began?" the same as you cannot assert "A SB created the Universe". By this logic gods are killed mercilessly. Just an expression, really, Gods and SBs are so inapt that they can't even die, since to die one must first live/  good luck