32 Students Dead: Shooting at Virginia Tech (Page 6 of 8)

OK-- wow.  Has anyone seen the video this guy shot of himself and sent to NBC?  Apparently he sent Quicktime files of himself and an 1800 pg manifesto to NBC in between shootings!

In one snippet I caught, he said (emphasis mine), "You have enjoyed crucifying me, INDUCING CANCER IN MY BRAIN, and ripping my guts out."  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

I'm not kidding, guys, he said that.  There's lots more.  My mind is reeling.  Watch/ read about it here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18169776/

I watched all they're giving people access to now.  Naturally, the authorities are "being cautious" about what they release, "not wanting to make any more heroes."  This kid is describing his mind control program, and if they released everything, the cat would be out of the bag!

No thanks.  I read about it and saw a couple of still-frame shots.  That was enough for me.  IMO there's no need to watch something like this.  That's just getting all amped up and way too much into the sensationalism.   All I need to know is that there is a video, and that they're really pushing it on the public to watch.  (agenda, manipulation, shock and trauma value, etc.) Those are all the facts I need.  By posting his video all over the media and people watching it and encouraging others to watch it too makes a celebrity out of him.  We live in a cult of celebrity society right now that has made movies about all the major serial killers, turning them into these anti-heroes....and that's something narcissistic sociopaths take note of.   That's why this guy filmed himself and mailed it to NBC.   Because he knew this would be the response he'd get.

??  "All" of us, "whining and complaining" ?? I don't see any of that going on in your Faul McCartney thread:

http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=4276

(or in any of the threads where this subject has come up, for that matter.)   Yeah, you're right, we "better" stop doing all that "whining and complaining" about the subject of Faul.    (And actually, the brunt of the issue seemed to revolve around your insistence that John Lennon was replaced as well.  He clearly wasn't when you line up the pics of him in the 60's with him in the late 70's to 1980.  Same guy.)  But don't mistake a very small handful of people disagreeing with you as being more than it is, ie, "all" these people "whining and complaining." 

But yes, I do agree with this particular statement.  The replacement of people is an interesting subject.

Interesting coincidence:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/ar … ?read=6235

AND this email is going around now
====
Do the Alphabet song and Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star have the same tune?

Why did you just try singing the two songs above?

Did you ever notice that when you blow in a dog's face, he gets mad at you, but when you take him for a car ride; he sticks his head out the window?

Do you ever wonder why you gave me your e-mail address in the first place?

"Smile, It will improve your face value" < BR>

You all hummed the alphabet and Twinkle, Twinkle... Admit it
====

So how many others are going to be triggered?

As I read that I wonder why it is that people don't take responsibility for what they say after the fact?   

I understand perfectly well what you meant.  You're saying that the VT killer could have been replaced.....which in your mind, ties into Faul. "They replaced Faul, people, they can replace anybody"  being the message.  The second part of the message being chastising NR for all the supposed whiners and complainers here who don't agree that Paul was replaced with Faul.

So I understood quite well what you were saying.  Nothing was "taken out of context" as you're now claiming after the fact and there's no "reinterpretation" going on. 

How about choice C?  Neither?  For starters Athenais, I don't go around trying to inflame other posters into getting offended.  I've been around here for 3 years, and anybody else who's been around with me for that long knows I don't play games and don't pull tricks and manipulation.  I'll argue you till I'm blue in the face - on my own, standing on my own two feet.  I don't EVER try to incite others to rally around me.  And I'm quite used to debating alone.   So with that said - In the past on NR, when I've seen posters making exaggeratory statements directed at NR as a whole, lumping people into one group, or just in general sort of reprimanding the group as a whole for something only a couple of people may have been guilty of, or worse......stuff that people on *other* forums may have been guilty of.......then yeah, I'm always the first to pipe up and say something.   I happened to remember your Faul threed and the others like it because I've participated in them.  But I didn't take it personally, although I can see how it comes across that way.

But I would venture to say that you've apparently taken others' disagreements about your belief in "Faul" a bit personally....enough so that you found a way to work it in to this thread, bringing it up from out in left field and labeling those who have questioned you as being "whining and complaining."   That sounds like disgruntled to me.    It also seems to me that you've mistakenly confused the discussion you've had at NR on the subject with possible bad treatment you've received on other forums regarding the topic.  Sort of lumping NR into the same category with all the rest.   

Anyway, and now back to our regularly scheduled sensationalistic distraction tactic news story of the moment while more NWO policies are slipped by us under the radar.....! 

Okay then................since I'm apparently "wildly" misinterpreating your comment, how about clarifying what you meant then?   Instead of all this sort of talk here:

.....just clarify what you meant.  Save us all some time.   I mean, since you did bring the whole subject of Faul up in the first place.

Oh seriously, come on now. This isn't about having "personal issues with you."  (although I'm starting to have them now, by this point......)  It's about a comment that your threw in your previous post that was way out in left field, of which I felt like addressing, and which you're now claiming I "wildly misunderstood" and saying that it's personal issues with you.   

So, if you'd like to offer some quick clarification on what you apparently really meant it would be appreciated.  Then we can all be on the same page and can get back to beating a dead horse with regards to the topic of the shooter.   I think that's fair.

I just watched some snippets of the video. he also said:

"I didn't want to do this but I had to"

"You have vandalized my heart raped my soul and torched my conscience"

"Do you think I dreamed about dying this way in a million years?"

More...

I didn't have to do this.  I could have left. I could have fled. But no, I will no longer run. It's not for me. It's for my children. It's for my brothers and sisters that you f*cked. I did it for them.

He had to do this, or he didn't have to do this?  He said both. 
What children is he talking about?  Children he witnessed being put through ritual abuse?

Do you know what it feels like to be spit on your face and have trash shoved down your throat? Do you know what it feels like to dig your own grave? Do you know what it feels like to have your throat slashed from ear to ear?

Another thing I'm left considering is whether or not some of the people he killed were actually part of the same mind control program.