Reptillians, are they really that bad (Page 1 of 2)

btw you rally should read http://www.sabon.org/reptiloid/index3.html. Lacerta files 1 and 2. They are really interesting and talk about a lot of things relating to the history of the Earth

According to gnostics, the god of the old testament was the demiurge, a false god who, as far as I understand, was pretty much equal with Satan, since in a dualistic world the "good" needs the "evil" and vice versa (so I wouldn't say the "good god" was the Satan of the old testament).

For them the god of the new testament was the invisible one, the unmanifest one, the one who allows all things, who is part of all things (good and evil), who forgives and accepts, and of course doesn't ask people to sacrifice their son just to "test their faith" or other such ridiculous things found in the old testament. All in all, very close to the definition of Prime Creator as defined by Ra and others.

I also believe that one of the primary aim of Jesus was to free people from this false concept of god, to revolt against the demiurge, including this whole concept of worshipping and original sin. This is why the jewish authorities did anything to stop him. I doubt you'd find a quote in the Bible of Jesus explicitely denying Jehovah though, in fact one of the prime treason of the catholic church (founded on the ruins of the roman empire, as most of you here probably know) was to put together the old and new testaments, and of course arrange/censor the new testament so that it didn't look too much in the opposite of the old one. For example, the bible keeps on affirming that we are "born in sin", yet Jesus "died for our sins" and now we have a chance to be "forgiven" if we "repent" (for what?) and become "good christians" (Of course the forgiveness that Jesus talked about was not conditional in any way, just like true love)

Just read the texts on sabon.org. Some nice examples of disinformation there... Especially like how the reptilian says that there is no way to protect ourselves from influences on our mind. Poor little mis-engineered victims that we are

Words like "good" and "evil" may not be a correct word to use, as wandering1 pointed out.   And the reptilian mindset certainly opposes mammalian instincts, like what zonabi said.   So, it's not that reptilians are evil, it's that their way of being isn't compatible with mammalian ways.   They would certainly seem "evil" to us because they supposedly like to snack on people and have no regard for us.  They can do the things they do to us because they have no empathy for us.    With that logic, then it's safe to assume that we humans are pretty damn evil as well in the eyes of the cow, pig and chicken.   

Do I feel reptilians are "really that bad" ?   Well, if what I've read about them is any indicator of the truth, then yeah, I'd have to say they're not conducive to mankind's safety and wellbeing, and should you see one, run the other way.  Quickly.   But then again, I'd also advise the cow, pig or chicken to do the same should it find itself crossing paths with one of us.  And I'd be the first to cheer when one hops the fence at the farm and makes a break for it. 

honestly i think STS and STO can be any kind of life form. or rather any life form can choose STS or STO.

but, i understand what u mean. because of the severed connection between Reptilians and their offspring, causing them to be UNABLE to create the loving nature, would thus cause them to have difficulty to become STO. i guess it would be a real challenge.

there are human mammalian STS, as well as STO. so i am sure there are some Reptilian STO.

the only example i can think of is the the symbolic serpent who freed adam and eve from the control of the "Gods" (Sirians?) in the "bible" or other holy texts. this shows Service to Other to me, but then again we know not their true motives and what REALLY happened, we only have a symbolic tale to go by.

Interesting timing on this........at lunch today I saw a Grandmother holding her baby granddaughter....it was the CUTEST baby I've ever seen.   Fuzzy head, huge blue eyes....she was clutching at her grandmother's shoulder, gazing at everything with huge eyes and her mouth open, a total sense of awe and wonder.   Everybody in the bagel shop was just staring at this baby with glazed over eyes and smiles.   Even guys had stopped eating and were smiling at her!   Her mom and Grandma were very interactive with her, always talking to her, giving her kisses, smiling and laughing.  Even when they sat down to eat and put her back in the stroller they continued to ooh and ahh over her instead of forgetting about her.  As a result, it was THE happiest baby I've seen in awhile.   She had lots of love, that's for sure, lots of affection.  I'm appalled at the way I see most people treat their babies out in public.  The general trend is total indifference.   The parents don't smile, they're not happy, and they certainly aren't happy to have their kids.  Their kids are just an annoyance in the way, an object that interferes with their conversations and with them shopping and eating.  They carry them around in those stupid hand held carrier things so the babies bump around all over the place into their parents' legs and knees and other objects.   You don't see them being picked up and "cuddled", the way the baby I just mentioned was.    You see them being picked up to be "moved" into a place that gets them out of the way of the parents.   It's just appalling.     

I'm going to light a firestorm with this one, I'm sure, but I'll stick my neck out and say what I've seen:   The coldest, least affectionate parents by far are white people.   People of color typically, in general, are warmer and more affectionate and APPRECIATIVE of their children.   They see them as a blessing, as opposed to many white people who have them, but then don't know why they did, and thus treat them as a burdon.    Now, it doesn't mean ALL white people are cold.  (in fact....teh baby I just mentioned was white......fuzzy blonde hair, blue eyes....)  And it doesn't mean ALL non-white people are warm.  But this is the trend I have seen over a lifetime.   In fact....many white parents seem loving and nice on the surface, but when I've looked closer, sometimes its just an act.   There's no actual loyalty towards their kids, no real support going on.  Letting the ball drop........turning around and disowning their kids for stupid reasons............total coldness.....I mean, does this go on in other non-white cultures??   Parents throwing their kids away?   It seems to be such a phenomenon here in America.   Although I know that those in England (ie......more white people!!)  are the same way.   

And how does this relate to this thread?  Well............if it's true that Aryan / White people have off-planetary origins.........(read between the lines on that one.....reptilian genetics....etc.)  then this could very well explain this. 

Just some food for thought............