Re: Stuart Wilde
As to the costs of his courses / seminars and club etc. Money is fairly relative; personally I wouldn't consider someone who pays out $3000 on a yearly membership fee as "rich".
Well, maybe you wouldn't, but I would. ! The average blue collar/manual labor/retail/office admin person doesn't have $3,000 lying around to throw around on conferences and workshops. And those who do are usually considered "well off." At least, in America they are. So if anybody here has that kind of money to throw around after the monthly rent/mortgage, house/yard upkeep, bills, food, clothes, toiletries, car payment(s), gas, insurance, and all the rest is paid, then congratulations, that puts you in the "well off" category.
Charging for his teachings certainly isn’t something I would resent him for. And although the subject of money in spiritual matters is debatable...I wouldn’t have a problem charging people for my time.
Hmm, well for me personally, I don't "resent" Stuart for charging for his time. However, I do scratch my head over how high those costs are. Seems quite pricey!
On the subject of Stuart's abilities and knowledge, I still continue to believe he is legit. And although most of his recent stuff has a very "out there" nature, I feel it's important to keep in mind the angle of his approach - his perspective. (And I suspect it is his "perspective" that he teaches on his seminars and clubs. Maybe an obvious thing to say. But sometimes when I read Stuart’s stuff, I think "Hey, yeah that is true – [i]from a certain point of view[i]").
See, that's similar to what I was thinking too........Everybody has their own truth and reality view. All these different spiritual people each have their own "thing" that they are able to see and do......and while the core thread that runs among all of them is very similar, the rest is completely different. None of them match up to each other!
Example: Ellie Crystal, over at www.crystalinks.com. She has her thing with "Z," the dude who speaks to her and has been around in her life since she was a kid, I believe. She has her whole schtick about reality being a grid program, and how Z is the creator, and how Z is about to pull the plug on the whole deal any day now, and we are currently at the end of the program. Ellie comes across as VERY intelligent, and very sane. She's a smart, psychic woman who lives in Brooklyn, NY, and she definitely has her viewpoints and perspective on this reality. She's as certain about her Z/Reality Grid Program viewpoint as Stuie is about his "Morph World" "Tall Boys and Girls" and "Camelots," and yet, almost NONE of it matches up to each other!!! The only common thread that they both have is that this reality is coming to a close...........very, very soon, and we're in the process of shifting over. That's it. All the details that fill in their respective views are completely different.
So, where does that leave us, the reader?? ! Very confused, that's what!!
But it does give one pause, doesn't it?
And those are just two comparison examples offhand. There are so many people out there who have their "schtick" that they believe in, whether they got it through psychic intuition, a vision, visiting higher realms, channeling some entity, ingesting hallucinogenic plants, or who knows what. Each view is usually so detailed, and yet they're all vastly different from each other and don't even remotely resemble each other. So what's going on here then?
For me, Ellie's viewpoints and her way of seeing the world meshes a little better with me than Stuie's does. I don't buy into the "Z" thing, it seems....sketchy, at best. But in general, the rest of what she observes is a bit better than what Stuart is saying, to me. I've never resonated with Stuart's whole Morph world, and all that it entails. It's always felt wrong to me, and I've shied away from reading about it and avoid it. I'm more interested in his other ideas. I did once have an experience with what he later wrote as being the "etheric protector dogs." And I did have something that could only be called "Judgment by the Tall Boys" as he also later described. But me being, well, me, doesn't trust anything 100% or take anything at face value. Something could have manipulated me to have those experiences, knowing that I would later cross Stuie's write ups that described it to a T. So who knows. Maybe it was real. And maybe it wasn't. Only time will tell.
And that's my two cents. ![]()
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----