Alex Jones on CNN! transcript (Page 1 of 2)

Good question... any guesses on what is up with the timing on this? Since the possible timeline shift last fall, numerous things seemed to have gotten moved up to spring 2006... particularly March. 

So now March is here and the theme seems to be "destruction of the old order." We had V for Vendetta out on March 17th (destruction of fascist government), Charlie Sheen doing his thing (further destruction of the official 9/11 story), Da Vinci Code movie coming out in a month or two (destruction of the Church), and The Secret out recently plus the Celestine Prophecy next month (destruction of limiting belief systems). A lot of mile markers in a short span of time signifying some new phase.

Sheen has had years to do what he only did this past week...interesting timing. I wonder though what motives there could be behind this. On the positive side, it's further steps towards emboldening people to wake up and resist deception. Maybe it was just good timing, maybe Sheen is part of something and is playing his role as planned, maybe it's the manifestation of the timeline shift towards a more positive reality than otherwise.

On the negative side, maybe since the President's incompetence is so suspiciously obvious, there might be an agenda behind the mounting anti-Bush movement -- it could be a reaction to an intentional problem that will set the stage for an engineered solution. So like the UFO "coverup" the secret government uses the official government to play the role of denial and suppressor while simultaneously funding and steering the fringe at a controlled rate towards desired ends.

I don't know... guess we'll see where this goes. For those mad as hell about the 9/11 lie, this turn of events with Sheen on CNN is a real godsend. I can only hope that similar things happen to the other institutions of deception, like the Church, Science, Education, etc...

United 93 - The Movie

http://www.flight93.net/index.php

This sounds promising

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11 … on_cnn.htm

So when this whole Charlie Sheen thing broke last month, I was intrigued...yet leary.  I knew it was all too good to be true, and "something" was going to happen to Charlie Sheen in the coming months as a result of it.   Overall, the entire situation struck me as being planned.

Well, that something happened, but now that I've read up on it, it seems that this something was the plan all along, rather than something that would spontaneously generate after he came forward regarding the 9/11 conspiracy.

See, the biggest thing I couldn't get over was, "Why now?"  September 11th happened almost five years ago.......and the dude's coming forward....now?  Saying the things that some of us were saying back then?   What took him so long?  Why the wait?  Why now?

Oh, because he didn't have a wife and two kids back then, nor a serious gambling habit, kiddie porn habit, etc. and so on.    In other words, stuff that could become a tangled mess.

And I don't get into all this in a celeb gossip way - it's purely because I was following the Sheen/911 story with interest, and just knew something was going to happen.  Call it intuition, I don't know.   So, I'm talking about all of this due to the REALLY far out, "woo woo" implications of it all, which I'll get to in a second, rather than celeb gossip.

Denise Richards, his wife, is asking for a restraining order on Charlie, and the Smoking Gun has got a copy of the 17 page legal document that she filed in SoCal:

From www.thesmokinggun.com:

Then the document gets into his conspiracy nutto "interests."   And this is what interested me, and I was wondering if this would be included in the doc:

Okay, this is what I'm interested in.

Vaccines being poisionous.........I'm behind that.

9/11 being a conspiracy.....absolutely.   

So at first it might seem that the guy is being set up in order to discredit him.

But not so fast.  It seems to be deeper than that.

Within the other 17 pages of the document is very detailed (and believable) account of this guy's completely mentally unstable behavior.  Violence, threatening to kill her................not necessarily denying that he had the prostitute killed who sold her story to the National Enquirer last year. (I hadn't heard about that....but apparently she turned up dead after her story was published.)  Denise had reason to believe he was behind it, after all the times he threatened to have her killed, telling her things like "You're f*cking with the wrong guy" and "You don't know who you're dealing with..." etc.  When Denise point blank asked him if he had the prostitute killed, he would only say "No comment."  So, yeah.  !   I mean, you read the document and you seriously feel sorry for this woman.  Bad, bad situation for any woman to be in.

And after reading the entire thing, what I concluded was that it almost seemed to me that his coming forward now about 9/11 was done deliberately to coincide with his life having a meltdown in a very serious way.  These are serious claims she's making about him, it's not like, Oh, we're incompatible and the relationship's not working, I want a divorce.  No, it's the guy can't lay of the drugs, gambling, prostitutes and kiddie porn, in between verbally abusing her and threatening to have her killed every week.   It just seems to me that "something" wanted him to come forward, seeming like he was going to be the celeb spokesperson for the 9/11 Conspiracy movement....spearheading a campaign movement of sorts.......only to be made to look like a complete nut job.   

I mean, do you see what I'm getting at here?

I know that it sounds so far fetched, but this is what I'm seeing.  And I knew it last month when this story first broke with Charlie going on Alex Jones.   Charlie didn't just wake up one morning and "decide" to go on the Alex Jones radio show.  Hello.   Celebs don't just do that!  Come on now.   If it seems too good to be true, then it usually is.

So yeah, it's totally eye rollingly transparent what's going on here.   Take a guy who's completely mentally unstable, and choose him to be the celeb spokesperson for the 9/11 conspiracy movement.  And time it so that when he goes forward, he does it right as his personal life is imploding and some very incriminating and embarrassing accusations are going to go public.  Denise Richards has the proof to back up her claims as noted in the legal document.  It's not just some crazed wife making up wild tales.   So, things are not looking good for Charlie.

See, Charlie could have come forward, oh, say 4 or 5 years ago.  When the public needed to hear this the most.  And when his personal reputation was only moderately in shambles.   Now his whole life has totally imploded in a very bad way.   Bad timing!

But, that was obviously somebody's plan. 

Alex Jones has talked about how dragging Charlie's personal life into the debate is of course, completely irrelevant, and it's also a fallacy of debate.  Don't tear down Charlie's 9/11 argument by taking on his personal life.   That's what's known as a Straw Man.  Huge blunder in debate.

And while that's all very true and well and good, the fact is, Charlie's life WILL be scrutinized, regardless of whether it's relevant or not.  That's just what people are going to do.   You can complain about it, point it out, scoff at it.......but it doesn't change the fact that people will still do it.  Whether right or wrong, it is what it is.   And something knew that, and that's why I have my theory that all of this was planned.   The timing is impeccable.   And they, whoever "they" are, decided to kill several birds with one stone as well.  It's not just 9/11.  It's the vaccines issue too, which is mentioned several times throughout the document.   Charlie couldn't just argue the facts about vaccines.  Nope.  He had to get all crazed and violent about it, to the point where their children's pediatrician "fired" them and refused to be their doctor because of his temper and phone threats.    So what is that going to do for helping the anti-vaccine movement?   People will of course focus on his negative violent behavior, and attempt to discredit anybody who supports the anti-vaccine movement as being crazy.   And this isn't "slippery slope" theorizing, this is based on the way it goes out there in the world.

This is why these movements get labeled as crazy.   It's because too many people involved in them act like crazies. 

But, that's the plan.  So we really shouldn't be suprised.  "Nothing to see here folks, move it along..."

(ps.....I logged back onto the 'net just so I could add this....I don't want to sound like I'm all emotionally caught up in this, because I'm not.   Even if it sounds like I'm choosing sides and/or even "judging" Charlie Sheen, I'm not.  In fact, when I read through the document at Smoking Gun, the first conclusion I had was to sit back and think "Wow.  That dude has some major negative entity attachments going on."  Negs especially attach to those who are hard core drug users, and he fits the profile.  So it's in my belief that his compulsions and addictions aren't even entirely his own and his behavior is being manipulated by something else.  After reading through it all I concluded that he's not the sole pilot behind the wheel.)

Well, don't hold your breath, because I doubt he will.   In analyzing what he's said on Alex Jones, as well as what was disclosed about his personality in the document on Smoking Gun, Charlie seems to be the nuts-and-bolts conspiracy guy.   Guns, gas masks, 9/11 as a government plot, coupled with accusations that he has the mentality of "Don't f*** with me or I'll have you taken out."  He's got a nuts and bolts conspiracy personality, not wishy washy New Age personality prone to moaning about something, least of all UFOs.  It's all about reading people. 

And actually, if anything, Charlie would most likely be the guy with a sniper rifle plucking the UFOs off one by one.  But moaning about them?  Nah.  Not his style. 

Yeah, see, what I'm thinking, (and I know this sounds a bit nutty on the surface, but, the timing is just so weird that this theory begs to be considered) but it almost seems that:

A.  Charlie was being programmed by "something", who knows who or what, to be all zealously ("violently") into the conspiracy stuff, and...

B. ....whoever was programming him, might have also been influencing his behavior in his personal life and personal relations, causing him to go completely nutto aggro, and be engaging in illegal and embarrassing/questionable activities, all with the plan to have him come forward with his 9/11 commentary right at the same time that his personal life implodes.

Yes, I know, some would say it sounds nutty, but what are to make of the timing of it all, you know?   And if it seems far fetched that a person could be used in such a callous "pawn-like" way, where their personal lives could be steered and directed like that, as if they're nothing but a puppet on a string, then we have to realize that it happens all the time, every day.  And especially if someone isn't in control of their own self, due to heavy drug use, etc.   It leaves them wide open for anything to get in and take over.  Whether that something be negative entities.......human mind control handlers with an agenda, (or both!) etc. and so on.  Hollyweird stars are especially susceptible to programming and handlers it seems from the research.   Anything is possible.   

And it also might be far fetched to think that something would go to such great lengths to create a pawn like that all in the name of further derailing the growing 9/11 conspiracy movement, (and other movements on a lesser sub note, including anti-vaccines)  but seriously, you never know, right?   As crazy as it all sounds, I just keep coming back to the fact that a well known, high level celebrity actor came forward and loudly started challenging the facts on 9/11......an unusual behavior in itself.....but doing so four and half years after the fact.....and right as his personal life was about to implode from behind the scenes!   

Don't know what to make of it.  But something is suspicious.