Magnetism and Endless Source of Electricity

Sorry, I thought I was in the physics and science section when I created this thread.

Regards,

Lee

Imagine the ionosphere rotating west to east at a slower rate than the planet due to frictional forces between particles traveling in the same direction.  Yet, imagine a single electron colliding with an atom and displacing an electron from the nucleus of the atom.  This newly displaced electron will in turn displace another electron from another atom and the process gets repeated endless number of times.  This flow of electrons from west to east could be significant enough to make a contribution to the overall magnetic field of the planet.  But, as you said there are more than one factor contributing to Earth’s magnetic field.

Yes, what is the driving force?  I think plasma, zero energy, ether & dimensional windows are the final pieces to the puzzle.  I also think that Tesla discover the answer during his Colorado Springs experiments in the early 1900’s.  Perhaps if one studies whatever information is available about these experiments in conjunction with Walter Russell Vortex theories the answer may show its face once again.

Regards,

Lee

Then a flow of negative charges - electrons - would constitute a negative current. Electrons and ions can both form currents. Electrons drift through a wire very slowly, and this is what creates the magnetic field around a wire. Likewise, a plasma flowing through a pipe also represents a current that establishes a magnetic field. Current is only defined by how much net charge passes by a point during a certain interval of time. Whether that net charge consists of just electrons or ions doesn't matter, 1 Coulomb of charge per second = 1 Amp. Like a pound of feathers versus a pound of lead, both weigh the same. What Lee was pondering is whether ionic current flows in the ionosphere could contribute to the geomagnetic field.

I guess "has to be" implies different things to different people. It's more in the style of scientism, the orthodox scientific community, to discard experimental data that contradicts the status quo. To the contrary, for me "has to be" points towards a testable hypothesis formulated from a given set of assumptions and reasoning. If I lose my keys and assume only three spots where they could be, but fail to find them in the first two spots, I can formulate a reasonable hypothesis that the keys have to be at the third spot. So I test this hypothesis by taking a look, and if they are still missing, my hypothesis has failed. A revised experiment would then require taking into account prior data, expanding my assumptions, and improving my reasoning. Hypothesis is the "best guess" that is to be empirically tested. That the earth has an internal source of energy is my best guess. Further data would either support or contradict this guess, and I would not irrationally reject data that contradicts it. 

I have a digital copy of Tesla's Colorado Springs notes if you (or anyone reading this) are interested, just email me with a request.  So plasmas, vortices, zero point energy, ether, and dimensional windows... garnish with parsley and it would make a fine dish! But seriously, I share your hunch about these being essential ingredients. Plasmas - highly mobile charged gas, good for creating nonlinear fields, Vortices - converging flow around a null point, good for creating a local singularity, ZPE - tremendous energy flux that needs only to be biased away from statistical canceling to tap into, Ether - the substrate to be manipulated by those nonlinear fields, and Dimensional Window - the entry point of energy from beyond our dimension pried open by a critical stress in the ether.

As far as I can tell, gravity corresponds to compression or rarefaction in the ether beyond the universal ambient levels. The centers of stars and planets have sufficient ether stress to pry open that dimensional window, which is why I suggested that earth - or the Sun at least - must have an internal energy source beyond the more mundane causes. And I think this can be replicated in the lab using those ingredients you listed. Not  just with vortices, but other methods of stressing the ether  - rapid current convergence, rotating magnetic fields, electromagnetic standing waves whose electric or magnetic components are cancelled out, and so on. Now we just need a hundred grand and some body guards to test this hypothesis, haha.

No kidding, that model shows just how backwards and ignorant the main thrust of "standard science" truly is. I've been following James McCanney's work for a while, along the lines of Velikovsky and the Thunderbolts site, and it's tragic that something making this much sense gets so much resistance.

Wasn't it Telsa that came up with the idea of putting a large insulated conducting plate at some distance in the air (say with a large tower) and then connecting this to the ground in some fashion?  I believe this was one of his electrical generation patents. 

I've often thought Tesla's idea was sound, although I question how much electrical power this method would yield?  Perhaps one could put a panel on their rooftop and have enough to power a small lightbulb, but certainly nothing adequte for today's power needs.  I'd still like to test this idea at some point just to see if it actually collects electrical energy similar to a solar panel.  It might make a good/interesting "poor man's" solar panel.  It still seems like there should be an easier way.  What you're refering to with hot air balloons and laser sounds like it would probably work on a much larger scale, but then considerations of atmospheric conditions might be an issue to deal with.

Yesterday I was going over some of the C's and I came across this text which caught my attention:

08.17.96
Q: (L) All right, let's get on to our questions here. Let me ask about the tetrahedron. Terry, you ask it, because you know more about it. (T) The Tetrahedron, triangle mathematics that Hoagland is working with in conjunction with the Mars/Cydonia region where he supposedly discovered this...
A: Energy consolidator. EM Wave capturer.
Q: (T) Ok, so it’s an EM wave capturer. Does it also emit EM waves?
A: Close. Channels and enhances, when used properly, and in pristine conditions.
Q: (T) Hoagland is not talking about... whatever he's talking about, as far as the mathematics go, of the tetrahedral triangles within the sphere, which I'm assuming this planet is calling the sacred geometries, but are physics-type things of different densities, which may not actually be right. OK, this doesn't apply just to Mars, this is, every sphere has these same properties...
A: Yes.
Q: (T)... a golfball, a base ball; I know they're not perfect spheres, they have dimples; all the way up to the sun, and so forth and so on, of any size, made out of any material, as long as it's a sphere, it will have the same properties.
A: No. Must be magnetized.
Q: (T) OK, it's a magnetized sphere; something that has a magnetic field around it.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is the tetrahedral configuration a property of the magnetism?
A: No.
Q: (T) OK, my question is, the sphere has to be able to generate a magnetic field, like the earth has a magnetic field, like Mars generates a magnetic field...
A: Or be magnetized by installation of internal magnetic generator.
Q: (L) OK, what's the purpose of this? What's the purpose of these tetrahedrons? What are the...
A: Purpose is not proper term. It is a reflection of universal balance.
Q: (L) OK, well, this guy J__ says that they are designated by different monuments on the planet's surface...
A: Nonsense!!! Artificial constructed tetrahedrons are placed on strategic locations on the planet's surface in order to utilize magnetic fields properly.
Q: (L) Who places these artificially constructed tetrahedrons at these points?
A: The artificial constructors.
Q: (L) And who are they?
A: Whomever they may be. Nineteen degrees north and south.
Q: (T) Those are the numbers that Hoagland came up with, with his stuff. On most of the planets, and our sun, we seem to have major events happening, or have happened...
A: Hawaii.
Q: (T) Yes, Hawaii, Puerto Rico... let's see, 19 degrees north and south, Phillipines, I think, is somewhere close, on the south side. Major volcanos... (F) Phillipines is on the north side, that's not in the Southern Hemisphere... (T) I'd have to pull out a global map to see what the 19 degrees are. On Mars, Cydonia resides at approximately 19 degrees, the Giant volcano, the dead volcano on Mars is approximately 19 degrees, the stuff that they found on Venus, the major things, are at approximately 19 degrees. The sunspots are approximately 19 degrees, the red spot on Jupiter... (L) Do the tetrahedrons spin within the sphere? Do these power points of the tetrahedron spin?
A: Energy fields flow in balalnce.
Q: (T) Is there... now, am I correct in the fact that there's a direct relationship here to the real Hebrew Star of David, to these tetrahedrals?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Yes. So that that symbol is not a religious symbol, as such, but a very important... (L)...power symbol.
A: Yes. So is pentagon.
Q: (T) So is the Pentagon? These are part of what humans describe as the sacred geometries.
A: Yes. You as Atlanteans knew this, and lived by it in many ways. For example, the pyramid recharges by capturing exactly half the energy points, thus allowing a positive imbalance buildup to be captured, then expended.

The last line that talks about how the pyramid structure allows for a "positive imbalance buildup to be captured, then expended" caught my attention.  This I assume is regarding the tetrahedron EM energy form that surrounds this planet and others.  Something regarding this idea of pyramids being the relics of ancient EM power collectors seems to resonate.  Using pyramids or other monolithic geometric structures around these areas at 19 degrees north/south might be one of the ideal ways of generating EM power for on-planet purposes. 

Ryan

Jeffrey,
you are being picky on the comment above.  Montalk knows an electron is a particle.  To be more exact than your comment an electron is a negatively charged particle.

Now, that's talking from both sides of the mouth.  You say that electricity is the movement of charges (transfer of energy) caused by disturbances in the electron cloud and not the movement of electrons (mass) from one atom to the other.  Yet, you state that E=MC2.  Energy is equal to a mass traveling at the speed of light squared.  That implies that in order to transfer energy or do work mass must be moved.  In the case of electricity what mass is been moved for the transfer of energy to occur, namely electricity?  I am still open to new ideas but you need to be more specific when making a claim.

Very interesting articles.  Thanks for sharing.

Regards,

Lee

Here is something that has baffled me for quite some time.  We know how to make a magnet utilizing electricity and a paramagnetic element or compound such as iron and some special ceramics.  But, what about a permanent magnet?  Where is the energy source coming from that substain the magnetic field?  What other process other than current flow is keeping this magnetic field going?  How are these paramagnetic substances aligning the uneven number of electrons in the last orbital and hold them in position without the application of electricity (or at least that's the way it seems!)?

Regards,

Lee