Where are the SAFE PLACES??? (Page 1 of 3)

Sounds like prime disinfo to me. First of all, if this guy is really seeing the future, this is just one of MANY possible futures. Maybe this is his future, that he wants to see, and thus that's the future he's going to experience. There are many possible scenarios; the future is not set in stone. Secondly, not all of us are going to experience physical cataclysms, nor are some of us planning on it. It may happen if you're expecting it to happen though. Thirdly, and most importantly, why be so concerned with safety? Are you that concerned about your body and this ephemeral life? If there's a world-wide or even solar-system wide shift in consciousness coming, being safe during an earthquake or flood seems like it'd be the least of our concerns. Personally I'd be more concerned with mental TRAUMA at having your entire perception of reality changed in a relatively short period of time, like the feeling of being on a drug trip for the remainder of your life. Are you ready to handle such an experience? I don't know, sorry if I sound condescending but worrying about being physically safe seems awfully short-sighted to me.

Where are the safe places?

With regards to ones physical location, consider the following:

   -- intuition: does one hear the name of a town, state, or climate zone synchronistically?  does one get negative recurring synchronicity when pondering a move?

   -- research: does one read about earth changes?  what do people say about Florida?  California?  Texas?  The heat?  The cold?  The wind?  The rain?

   -- people: does one's friends or family have similar concerns or support of a particular location?

I was thinking about posting to this topic earlier, but Indigo pretty much said it all!      His post reflects most of the ideas I was already thinking, so all I can say is, I second whatever indigo wrote....

Indigo, great post.  I personally do not fear death, but just because I don't fear death does not mean I should laugh at the face of danger.  If you were living by Indonesia's beach for example and you had read predictions and prophecies of a tsunami that would kill thousands, would you just stay there and not worry about it? this is my dilemma.  Many of us don't fear death, but it doesn't mean we want to die.

You mention Scallion and his maps.  I thought about buying his maps, but then again I don't want to give money to someone that charges you for information that should be free to everyone.  I guess I agree with you on this, and yes he has been wrong before.  The thing is something inside me tells me that these earth changes prophecies are right.  There are just too many predictions and prophecies which connect.  There is something to this and personally I believe that the map of the USA is going to change drastically based on what I have read.

You can't research 'safe places' because they all charge you for this info

I have spent several hours researching this stuff on the net and I found nothing about safe places (except map for sale).

And I was looking for a list of safe places!  This topic pops up in my mind every once in awhile, and I really wonder where it is safe.  I always think Colorado.

Stuart Wilde has a few places listed, doesn't he?  Called Camelots?  (When I read that from Stuart Wilde, it piqued my interest.  The name that I use here, Haven, comes from a desire of mine, when I was in my teens, to create a place that would be called "Haven", and the first area I thought to build this place was Colorado.)

Yeah, yeah, Colorado, Matto Grosso and Mount Shasta, plus I've already started digging in my back garden...just in case!

On a serious note I think predictions must be taken with "a pinch of salt" (i.e: not too seriously) but I am enclined to take the mayan calendar ones into account...just in case!

A further follow-up:

Thanks, Lyra, for the comment about my post being somewhat expository and aligned with many of your views/thoughts (I do manage to convey my thoughts somewhat coherently).

I want to respond to Montalk and Cameron's views, that I agree with them, and that yes, one must really go within and ask themselves what 'feel' or 'intuits' is right/appropriate, where to feel drawn to taking into account all the surrounding issues (like family, vibes etc). 

Add again, the very real and recently more noticable issue of potential future terrorist attack and the subsequent fallout, repercussions like crack-downs on 'dissidents' or 'undesirables' (to include the often over-hyped and scare-mongering theories about modern-day already in-waiting detention/concentration camps replete with chains/box-cars-train-cars/shackles in various key locations like the DIA -Denver International Airport- which get the most conspiracy-circle mentions these days by authors/investigators of the whole NWO issue, like Alex Jones, the late Philip Schneider-most likely-murdered/silenced for his inside-info/intel/experiences, et al.)

Thanks, Doctor DTA, I am pleased that I have added any useful further input.

Subsequently, yes, all these 'safe places' researches take time and money (any one of them requires a purchase of more 'detailed' or 'informed' materials, like maps, guides etc).

I am familiar with the Stan and Holy Deyo cd materials, it may be worth the investment (though I do remember it being somewhat simple and not really all that clinching on where to move to...) I am not really familiar with their website, though I am sure they only offer tidbits to get you interested and hooked into buying further 'more-detailed' materials.

I am also familiar with Red Elk's message (I read some of his thoughts a couple of years ago), and he had interesting input too.

Also, there was a book written in the 1990's called 'Black Day, Bright Dawn' or something similar by another Native American Indian, Sun Bear, which features detailed maps of both Europe, and America (and possibly elsewhere in the world if I remember correctly).  I seem to remember that the 'on-average' more boring rural areas (to me anyway) of the U.S. within the mainland (like the Mid-West, Colorado-though I went there and didn't feel very many good vibes, as many, many peoples are relocating in that over congested, even rurally, area).  With what I want to accomplish and the people I wish to connect with, most of the areas under my current consideration to move to (soon, as in this summer) are the more 'potentially-dangerous' coastal intelligentia/artistic/beautiful-natural-environments-mountains, ocean, forests, lakes, deserts, etc al, areas in both America and Europe (with the exception of New Zealand, a relatively good place from what I gather, though very hard to emmigrate to due to tight/strict laws for foreignors wishing to remain longer that as tourists/90 days etc).

I remember Maine being a suitable place according to Sun Bear (now no longer with us, in this world, if I remember correctly).

The UK does often appear risky.  A reason for the Royals wanting to acquire land elsewhere.

There are numerous other 'safer' type areas in comparison to other places.

It boils down to where you feel drawn to and called to.

Like the way, the Tea Leoni (married to David Duchovney of X-Files fame) character in the widely viewed asteroid impact film 'Deep Impact', depicting an ELE (Extinction Level Event), she goes to stay on the beach with her Dad, and dies when the huge tidal wave hits...

It is right to want to consider potential bodily survival, as that is a natural human instinct.  And it's common sense to want to avoid say, the recent Tsunami disaster, in Southeast Asia, if one could be fore-warned about and prepared for that event actually happening.

-Indigo (still observing)