Some thoughts I had recently

Well it appears that Bill O Riley had phone sex with one of his producers while masturbating with a vibrator.  The same Bill O Riley that claims he is a traditional Irish Catholic from Levittown.  The moralist that praises the family, and claims that a high moral standard is very important. 

I see an interesting trend here.  Bill Bennet turns out to be a compulsive gambler.  Rush Limbaugh- who said that all drug users should be locked away- gets addicted to oxycontin, and claims that it is ok for him because he has a problem.  Disgusting.

But what's going on here? I think to myself.  Sometimes I wonder if these people are being exposed to undermine the ideals behind family and traditional Christianity.  As much as I dislike the concept of catechized sheep following a ridiculous programming, at least most Christians believe in the institution of the family and family closeness, and although its usually an ignorant, oblivious closeness, it is still there, and still an impediment to the NWO breakdown of love for other human beings, and frames happiness found in pursuing the love and respect of each other over careers, money and vice. 

One part of me thinks that this is a manifestation of our projected reality again, we're seeing this because most of us are hypocrites that don't live up to a standard we preach therefore our famed humans (which I always have seen as vacuous mirror that reflect back what we are to us, if that makes sense) will take on these characteristics.  But as aforementioned, I do believe that these exposures tend to help, albeit slightly, the agenda of moral anarchy which breaks down any standard we should live to (designed by our inner God- or ourselves because we are God) and makes it instead a standard of avaricious accumulation or self-worship.

Which leads me to another musing I have been having, or rather a bit of gnosis.  For a while, I have heard Buddhists say that everything exists in a balance.  One thing someone said is that the reason there are so many poor suffering people in the world, is because we have it so good.  The reason why they starve is that we waste, came to me the other day.  For example, I see, in numerous places, human beings in my area waste a ton of food, water, paper etc.  And for some reason it just made sense to me that we waste food in an inverse relationship to those that crave food.  Because I threw out a bottle of water, someone in the world did not get that produced necessity, and therefore did not get to have it. 

Next, I read this Bob Dobbs article that was posted under the links section here on this site.  Really interesting read.  One thing Dobbs said that I thought was interesting though is that all technology does not really exist.  For example, he says that when we exchange a message over the internet, it's really telepathic communication, which we always could do, but I guess now we are convinced we can do it.  The technology did not make this a real ability, our imaginations convinced made this ability.  So I guess what he is saying is that the manifestation of external technology is the "below" part of our internal imaginations, which would be the "above" part, in the hermetic phrase "As is above, so is below."  Or that was my spin on it because Bob Dobbs is so off the wall- between crazy gnosticism and his own allegorical interpretation of life- that you can anywhere with it.    I think what Dobbs is really saying by the end is that we create reality and his situation is his crazy model.  Anyway, I really want to know what you people think about this idea or your reactions to the Bob Dobbs article.

I have been introducing myself to Gurdjieff too from the links section.  His style is really tough, but sometimes it is quite poetic and rewarding.  The more I read Beelzebub’s tale, and also about Gurdjieff’s life from his early travels to his times with Ouspensky, it seems like he was conveying the same extremely vague, subtle, complex thoughts that flow through my mind and I can sort of grasp sometimes, but that words and current communications make really tough to grasp, articulate and convey, but Gurdjieff is letting his writing flow straight from his poetic subconscious.  Anyway, if anybody has anything interesting they want to share on Gurdjieff or theories- something far out would be cool, I read some theories on what he meant about the moon- on him please respond.  Personally, I think he was a Gnostic that realized we program belief about the world in ourselves, but that too many of us were unaware that we were programmed as youths. 

This kind of reminded me of On Liberty by John Stuart Mill which I was reading for a class.  Mill talks about how we need to encourage a wealth of opinions in a society and use our mental faculties to sift through what has truth and what makes sense.  It was amazing because Mill says (and this is 19th century England) that there is some truth in everything and we must find it by allowing all opinions to be deliberated upon by all.  Mill predicts a troubling direction for society because he sees people around him programmed into Calvinism for instance, and that they do not think about why they do things of custom and conformity, rather they are (his expressions) ape-like, mechanical and like cattle.  It was so interesting and refreshing to read this kind of thought.  I highly recommend On Liberty- Chapter 3.   

Finally, after listening to that very interesting Jordan Maxwell interview, I went to his website and saw a link for a video about our money being some sort of free will acceptance to let beings drain energy from us.  Immediately something hit me.  Now I don’t know about you, but I have always had a fascination with the one-dollar bill since I learned about the symbols on the back of it.  I still, after years, look into the eye on the top of the pyramid, and some strange feeling of mystical awe comes over me.  This, coupled with the nature behind our money (it’s owned by private banks, which are owned by private individuals, and lent to us, thus really it is a debt which our sovereignty is exchanged for since we borrow the fiat money and therefore become debtors) led me to think that perhaps this is a very important facet of our world.  If these symbols, like all occultists claim, really contain some sort of power, perhaps the one dollar bill, and all money, basically relegates us to committed slaves of occultist power, or slaves to the devil (whoever is behind this).  Because we acknowledge legally (I won’t get into SSN#s admiral courts, etc. I think you all know about that) that we take on this debt (and this debt is the power that their worthless money affords us), we become owned by the owners of the currency and our desire to share that power which it affords us, though by technicalities that we are kept ignorant. So that eye above the pyramid that I get a weird awe-struck feeling whenever I peer back it, really is like looking back to our Gods, which we have ceded part of spiritual sovereignty for in exchange for the power to consume or whatever other power their evil equalizer affords us.  The more and more debt we take on, and the more and more that is never repaid (which it never can be unless we first end the current monetary system), the more and more these spiritually evil forces (whomever or whatever it is- the devil, lizards, our own corrupt natures projected, I’m not sure) can claim we are rightfully theirs, until they control us completely.

edit:

This also may explain why TPTB might be so powerful right now.  If we are exchanging our power to live sovereignly, perhaps this is the secret behind occultism and the kings and dictators of the past.  Perhaps they found a way, a long long time ago, an occult doctrine of some sorts, that explained to them how through ritual and sacrifice, they could somehow take the sovereign power inside us individually, and channel it toward acheiving their dominion over earth.  Only now they discovered s manipulative system that perpetually keeps them amassing power until they have complete reign over the earth.