Topic: David Icke - general discussion

This topic opened to continue discussion about David Icke started here: http://montalk.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=642

2 (edited by thoth 2004-09-22 19:39:17)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

morningsun76 wrote:

Icke is definitely something of a crackpot whose website links real stories alongside those from nonsense sources.  Ditto with his books IMHO.  He's interesting for providing some original and thought-provoking material but must be taken with an entire shaker of salt.

David is one of my heroes, and I've seen him speaking at two venues in the US. He is what he is, and he doesn't care if you agree with him or not. Sure, I don't buy into everything he writes (and he is, IMHO, a little too obsessed with the reptilians), but he remains an amazing source of information about the global elite power structure and the machinations of the NWO mob. As far as his website linking to both real and nonsensical stories, David has often said that he isn't much interested in telling people what to believe by offering only selected sources of information, but rather letting people decide for themselves. The material linked to on his headlines page, whilst always being alternative in nature, is often not related to David's own ideology.

lyra wrote:

I have wondered recently why he has taken to posting articles on his headlines page from flippin' PRAVDA.   Pravda is the Russian equivelant of the Weekly World News.    Stories of the most whacked, stupid things that you know are fake, translated into bad English.    I'm thinking that Mr. Icke is no longer directly involved in his headlines page, and that whoever works for him is posting all that Pravda nonsense.

Agreed: I skip over the Pravda links. Silly Russians ;-)

3 (edited by lyra 2004-09-22 21:11:40)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

David is one of my heroes as well, and I NEVER use that word.   But the man singlehandedly led me on my conspiracy research path.    "If it wasn't for him...."    Until I picked up a copy of "The Biggest Secret" I never noticed the repeating symbolisms all around us in corporate logos, etc.    Just something as basic as that, whoosh, over my head.   We're conditioned to not question things, and to accept the world as is.   Mr. Icke gets you to begin questioning and to look closer.    He's not necessarily putting out original information most of the time either;  his work is compilations of others before him, recommendations, web links, quotes from other authors books.   But the thing he does differently is that he's speaking the loudest..........and he's the most relentless.   He will not stop, and will not back down, and he will not shut up or sit down or take it back.   He relentlessly goes on speaking tours, radio shows, interviews, he endures criticism that remains to this day.  But he keeps going.  You have to admire that.   In "Tales From the Time Loop", he delves into for the first time what happened when he had his revelations back in '91 I believe it was, and started talking about all of these things he talks about.   He gets into how it felt to be the laughingstock of England, what it did to him, his marriage, and his family and how he kept going.   He's very personal and personable in that book, very open, the TOTAL antithesis of the typical Brit.    He's really more like an American trapped in a Brit's body when you think about it, with his fighter spirit, open friendliness, fiesty unconventional viewpoints and deep rooted spirituality.   Those are not typical British traits.

And no, I'm not on the David Icke payroll, I just really admire the man!  big_smile

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: David Icke - general discussion

aaronfirebrand wrote:

But are you and thoth saying that Pravda is less reliable than most amerikan newspapers? I'll take Pravda over the NYTimes any day.


No....didn't say that.   Fallacy of logic!   smile   The Icke headlines page, as far as I know, doesn't publish stuff from NY Times either.   It usually does alternative media material, a lot of Rense stuff, (I know, I know, many out there feel that Rense is pretty 'out there' as well, and I understand.....)  Alex Jones, and all the major alternative sites, etc.   So I was a little surprised when he suddenly began posting Pravda material.   There's "alternative media".......and then there's tabloid.   But maybe it's like Thoth said, maybe he's just offering up a variety of information for people to consider, even if it doesn't reflect his own views.    I would just think he'd be worried about posting tabloid stuff, because it could discredit the headlines page as a whole.   (Then again....some would say the reptilian blood drinking shapeshifters thing is pretty tabloid in itself, eh?  big_smile wink  )

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

5

Re: David Icke - general discussion

lyra wrote:

Mr. Icke gets you to begin questioning and to look closer.    He's not necessarily putting out original information most of the time either;  his work is compilations of others before him, recommendations, web links, quotes from other authors books.   But the thing he does differently is that he's speaking the loudest..........and he's the most relentless.   He will not stop, and will not back down, and he will not shut up or sit down or take it back.   He relentlessly goes on speaking tours, radio shows, interviews, he endures criticism that remains to this day.  But he keeps going.  You have to admire that.

All very true, but the one other thing he does so well is pulling all of these separate works, written by various other authors, into a reasonably coherent whole, and so presently a worldview that is very different from the one we thought we knew.

lyra wrote:

He gets into how it felt to be the laughingstock of England, what it did to him, his marriage, and his family and how he kept going.

I must confess that I saw him give his now infamous TV interview on the Terry Wogan show (page 22 of Time Loop), and--at that time, when I was only 16 or so--I thought that he was very strange indeed. Here he was, former soccer player turned sports commentator suddenly espousing the divine nature of the color turquoise and proclaiming himself a son of the "Godhead". It was just too much of an extreme, one-eighty degree turn to really absorb, especially for the very conventional thinking British public (myself included at that time). I remember when Wogan said something like, "They aren't laughing WITH you David, they are laughing AT you," in reference to the studio audience's very audible laughter. I felt really sorry for him because I thought that making fun of a guy who was clearly mentally ill was about as acceptable as making fun of any other mentally or physically handicapped person. But how refreshing it was to see him on a more recent TV interview on the This Morning show. This time around, he made the people interviewing him look totally stupid and uneducated. Funny how things come full circle, eh?

lyra wrote:

He's very personal and personable in that book, very open, the TOTAL antithesis of the typical Brit.    He's really more like an American trapped in a Brit's body when you think about it, with his fighter spirit, open friendliness, fiesty unconventional viewpoints and deep rooted spirituality.   Those are not typical British traits.

You know, I really, really, really, really wish that wasn't true. I do. In defence of the British, they aren't particularly stupid people. They are just closed minded. I've always been quite frustrated by the wasted potential inherent in them. I think this is one of my unresolved "issues". Oh well! hmm

Re: David Icke - general discussion

Well I finally did it. I've finally gotten around to reading a David Icke book. I've been avoiding him for many years because I thought he was a little too 'far out' for my liking. But this last couple of years I've come across the subjects that David talks about from so many other different sources that I've decided to take him completely seriously - reptilians and all!

Anyway I've been reading 'Tales from the Timeloop' and I've just hit upon an idea...

Naturally one of the chapters that interested me most was his recounting of his ayahuasca experience in Brazil. He mentions the guy who have him the ayahuasca was called Zoe.

Now I actually know Zoe. He was facilitating the first Heart of the Initiate workshop I attended so i spent a week with him and also have had some email contact with him although not for quite a long while.

It's Zoe I have to thank for putting me on to Cassiopaea website and if it wasn't for researching those topics I probably would never have found Montalk. So I guess Zoe is the reason I'm here!

Anyway I have a feeling that if I could get enough people together (say around 15-20) I could probably get him to put on an ayahuasca workshop for us.

So how about Noble Realms goes to Brazil?

How many people here would be interested? Obviously the price would be the sticking point for a lot of people. It aint gonna be cheap. It's the flights that are often the killer. I think the absolute minimum price would be around $1500 but it's more likely to be closer to $2000 or $2500 (that's all inclusive).

Anyway if I can get around 15 people that would seriously be interested in going to Brazil to do ayahuasca I'll drop Zoe a line and see if we can work something out.

Anyone interested?

Andy

Join me in Peru to celebrate December 21st 2012 - Visit: http://2012awakeningretreat.com/

7 (edited by lyra 2004-10-18 18:14:14)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

Not to put a damper on things, but I'm one of the people out there who's leery of Ayahuasca.  I've never been into mind altering substances in general anyway.  Had the opportunity to do things like E, or LSD, or other hallucinagenics, but never wanted to. I realize that Ayahuasca is different, but I lump it into the same category.

I think before anybody jumps on the Ayahuasca bandwagon they might want to read "the other side's" opinion, those people who've done it and have had questionable experiences and troubles afterwards.  It's not all a walk in the park you know, and I think people need to realize that.  There was a poster named JT who used to post here and he did A.  He posted his experiences which I found interesting. (do a search for this....)   What stood out for me about his account was how he said that it took him literally **five years** to get himself back on track again after doing it.   Five Years!!!!    What he saw / experienced during his trip rendered him nearly incapable of dealing with the "real world" once he "came back", to paraphrase what he wrote.   And THAT'S a point that's not being talked about here.  Again, A. is some heavy heavy stuff.  It's not to be taken lightly from what I've been reading.  It's not just something that disillusioned Westerners should do because they're feeling disenchanted with their lives, or want to have some cool, trippy "shamanic" experience.   People need to do ALL the research into this, and get the perspective of both sides.....fully absorb what they're about to embark on, and I mean, REALLY absorb it.  Most people say they've thought about something only to crawl back with their tails between their legs after the fact. 

Then, after that doing the research into both sides and all the possible negative side effects, make a judgement based on sound mind.   Just my 2 cents.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

8 (edited by Lakme 2004-10-18 19:40:08)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

morningsun76 wrote:

"Icke is definitely something of a crackpot whose website links real stories alongside those from nonsense sources.  Ditto with his books IMHO.  He's interesting for providing some original and thought-provoking material but must be taken with an entire shaker of salt."

No offense to morningsun76, but to be labeled a "crackpot" in this "upside-down, inside-out world", is to me a badge of honor, and I say thank you to David Icke and all those other "crackpots" out there who are relentless in their pursuit of truth as they see it, and who are striving to get valuable information out to others about the "real world" we all live in.

In spite of all the ridicule and obstacles thrown his way by powerful mainstream forces and others, Icke and others like him continue to write, speak out, and spread the word of truth as they understand it, about this concept of "reality" we've all been so successfully "sold" in the best way they can.  To many, like myself, who are in various stages of the awakening process, Icke is helping to further that process along in a big way, especially in promoting the concept of thinking for yourself, something many have "forgotten" how to do. 

In a world overwhelmingly populated with the mostly "asleep," "hypnotized," and mind-controlled -- and one where truth and awareness are in a constant struggle just to see the glimmer of light in a place so full of darkness -- I believe Icke is to be commended for his courage and sheer relentlessness in the face of such indefinable adversity in continuing his valiant efforts to enlighten so many about this "3-D reality."

I, for one, applaud his courage, and am thankful to have come across his works.

9

Re: David Icke - general discussion

I visited David Icke's website yesterday and read an article about how you computer mouse can transmit your brainwaves to the internet. He then  "proved" it with a cheap card trick which I have seen on numerous humour sites.

The trick is you are asked to select a card and then place your head against the mouse concentrating on it. Then another set of cards are displayed and mysteriously the one you chose is no longer there. This is because the second set of cards displayed does not contain any of the cards from the first set, but it uses the same numbers on different suits.

Re: David Icke - general discussion

Ayahuasca wrote:

Anyone interested?

I would be, but not until early next year.

lyra wrote:

What stood out for me about his account was how he said that it took him literally **five years** to get himself back on track again after doing it.   Five Years!!!!    What he saw / experienced during his trip rendered him nearly incapable of dealing with the "real world" once he "came back", to paraphrase what he wrote.

I think it would always be appropriate to have sufficient mental conditioning before doing any type of personal consciousness exploration. What you wrote does testify to the power of Ayahuasca as a very potent means of accessing the higher levels, however.

"Fear is the great barrier to human growth. Unknowns create fears. When these Unknowns become Knowns the fears diminish and disappear, and we are able to cope with whatever confronts us." - Robert A. Monroe

Re: David Icke - general discussion

Alushe wrote:

I visited David Icke's website yesterday and read an article about how you computer mouse can transmit your brainwaves to the internet. He then  "proved" it with a cheap card trick which I have seen on numerous humour sites.

David doesn't have that much input into the website, he's too busy with other projects. Those articles that appear on his headlines page are often a real mish mash of different subject matters, some of them humorous like the one you mentioned, and none of which were written by or directly associated with David.

"Fear is the great barrier to human growth. Unknowns create fears. When these Unknowns become Knowns the fears diminish and disappear, and we are able to cope with whatever confronts us." - Robert A. Monroe

12 (edited by Ayahuasca 2004-10-19 01:39:01)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

lyra wrote:

I think before anybody jumps on the Ayahuasca bandwagon they might want to read "the other side's" opinion, those people who've done it and have had questionable experiences and troubles afterwards. It's not all a walk in the park you know, and I think people need to realize that.  There was a poster named JT who used to post here and he did A.  He posted his experiences which I found interesting. (do a search for this....)   What stood out for me about his account was how he said that it took him literally **five years** to get himself back on track again after doing it.   Five Years!!!!......Again, A. is some heavy heavy stuff.  It's not to be taken lightly from what I've been reading.

You're absolutely right Lyra. Aya is not to be taken lightly and never in a million years would I say to anybody they should take it lightly. However I still recommend it to just about everyone who is interested in taking it so long as they are of a sound and strong mind.

I read about JTs experience and I wrote my own opinion about aya when I joined this forum which you can find at http://montalk.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=477

Ayahuasca is absolutely NOT a walk in the park!! and I don't know a single person in the world who has done Aya that would say that it is. However, experiences like JTs are exceptionally rare. Obviously it is possible, but you're probably just as likely to die in a plane crash getting to Brazil.

I know a lot about aya. I've read several books on the subject of aya and other hallucinogens. I'm probably not an expert on the subject but I know a lot more than most, and I wouldn't recommend something like aya if I didn't consider it to be relatively safe.

I will say that an ayahuasca experience can be extremely intense. It is not for people that are easily freaked out. It really is like taking the Red Pill sometimes, and although that might sound cool, it can also be quite scary. Although saying that, aya is almost always extremeley gentle with first-timers. I absolutely 100% believe that aya is a spiritual teacher and like all good teachers it knows what the student needs.

I've taken aya 10 times now and each time has been with a group of around 25 people.  So collectively that's 250 aya experiences that I've been involved with and I've never known anyone to have a terrible experience. Often many of those people have been first timers and have known very little about aya before they took it.

lyra wrote:

It's not just something that disillusioned Westerners should do because they're feeling disenchanted with their lives, or want to have some cool, trippy "shamanic" experience.

From my experiences I've never known anyone just looking for some "cool, trippy "shamanic" experience". Most people who come to ayahuasca are long-term spiritual seekers, looking to take their experience and knowledge to a new level, which is exactly what David Icke said about himself. I think that would probably describe just about everyone in this forum.

Also the shaman from Columbia I was with in July said he thought it was good that westerners were becoming interested in ayahuasca, and he positively encourages it so long as people realise how sacred it is and have only pure intentions.

More than anything an Ayahuasca experience is about love, and that's something more westerners need to really and truly understand. I totally understand what David Icke is saying when he wrote "Infinite love is the only truth; everything else is illusion". I had an experience very similar to that myself and I know so many other people who have experienced the same. The love that I experienced while on aya was unlike anything I've experienced ever. That kind of love just doesn't really exist in this 3d realm, and when you experience it - it changes everything!

lyra wrote:

People need to do ALL the research into this, and get the perspective of both sides.....fully absorb what they're about to embark on, and I mean, REALLY absorb it.

I totally agree, people should definitely research it, because I virtually guarantee the more research you do, the more likely you will want to take ayahuasca. I used to be very scared of hallucinogens myself when I was younger and it was only through researching and gaining knowledge about the subject that I decided it would be safe for me to go ahead and experience them.

If anyone wants to reseach then I recommend the following books:

Breaking Open The Head
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ … 28-0408623

Food of the Gods by Terrence McKenna
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de … mp;s=books

DMT: The Spirit Molecule
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de … mp;s=books

Ayahuasca Reader : Encounters with the Amazon's Sacred Vine
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ … 28-0408623

Ayahuasca Visions
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de … s&st=*

Ayahuasca: Human Consciousness and the Spirits of Nature
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de … mp;s=books

The Antipodes of the Mind: Charting the Phenomenology of the Ayahuasca Experience
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de … mp;s=books

There is also a few short articles about aya on the Heart of the Initiate website written by Ralph Miller:

Ayahuasca: The Univeristy of Gaia
http://www.heartoftheinitiate.com/articles_gaia.htm

Letting Go
http://www.heartoftheinitiate.com/articles_letgo.htm

Remembering
http://www.heartoftheinitiate.com/artic … bering.htm

The Gathering
http://www.heartoftheinitiate.com/artic … hering.htm


Andy

Join me in Peru to celebrate December 21st 2012 - Visit: http://2012awakeningretreat.com/

13

Re: David Icke - general discussion

I am a proponent of the use of psychedelic substances in the expanding of consciousness.  I think it may help to examine how these substances work before we go off labeling their usefulness.

Ayahausca is a brew which contains an MAOI inhibitor.  MAOI's, or Monamine Oxidase Inhibitors, break down DMT (Dimethyltrypatine) when it is orally ingested, therefore Ayahuasca is simply a compliment to DMT- the psychoactive component in the Ayahuasca brew- derived, in most cases, from Mimosa Hostilis Root Bark, although DMT is found in many places throughout nature including us! 

DMT is an endogenous hallucinogen (produced in the human body), and IS actively transported across the blood-brain barrier, only to be broken down as fast as it is produced.  It differs from seratonin, I think, by only one tryptamine group.  When one intakes a psychoactive substance such as mushrooms, LSD or DMT (tryptamines), or phenathylamines MDMA and Mescaline, that these chemical compounds make it across the blood brain barrier, bond to a certain type of seratonin receptor and procede to either A) block seratonin from bonding or more effectively B) tweak these receptors, but we're not sure exactly how or what these compounds do in order to produce the varied results encountered.   

We know that DMT is endogenously produced in the human body, but broken down, usually, before psychoactive effects result.  Some postulate, and it seems likely, that DMT is responsible for some schizophrenic behavior and Near Death Experiences, but of course we can't prove that yet.  It is likely that DMT release is what causes alien abduction scenarios which mimic common features of reported DMT experiences.  We also know  that DMT is produced in higher quantities at around 4 am which makes it an even liklier cause of purported alien abductions since so many take place at night.         

We also are pretty sure that DMT originates in the Pineal Gland.  The Pineal Gland comes into existence around the 48-49th day of pregnancy (the same amount of time Buddhists always claimed it took for the soul to enter the body!) and DMT could be produced slightly after.  Therefore, it is quite possible that our cognitive processes begin with a dose of DMT.  It is also interesting to note that flouride essentially damages or hinders the Pineal Gland from producing melatonin, an important hormone which regulates many bodily process and induces sleep.

On a personal note, I have not tried DMT or it's oral version- ayahuasca- yet, but I have tried other substances.  MOST of the time, if one does not have any history of mental illness and is fully aware and studied the effects of the drug, the overall experience ranges from innocuos to positively life-changing.  I have tried LSD and pscilocybin mushrooms, and I would say that what these drugs effectually do is lead one to instant Gnosis (or experiential knowledge of truth).  Whereas some may need to live 30 years to realize that self interest and avarciousness is the thrust of a powerful- what you people may term STS oriented- ego, on LSD or mushrooms, often people realize this in one night.  As Huxley said: (paraphrasing)  When you eat, you don't go to an elaborate banquet every night, you usually eat sparingly and commonly.  Psychedelics are a buffet and bring you to the same place- but quicker- that daily meditation will bring you.  In this fast paced world, that is something I value greatly, and if the stigma attached by society did not exist, and these substances were used as sacramental voyages, I think we would have a much richer society.  Pitchers have pitched perfect games on LSD, computer programmers have heralded it as the substance which ignited their technological ideas, and indigenous tribes in South America claim that by drinking Ayahuasca, they were given all their extensive botanical knowledge.

These drugs are not for everyone, some are not far enough along and others are past the point of necessity (though few I would say), but I think that most people on this board should see how easy it is to create a new reality based completely on belief. A few trips into hyperspace will do you well.  But I cannot stress INTENTION enough.  Most people just want to have a good time and they blow off these powerful experiences and get the sensual pleasure they crave.  Some have beliefs they want affirmed and so they are, as Hitler was convinced that he was God.  But for the truly open minds who use the experience to understand the depths of their own identity and the fragility of their beliefs, for those who have studied these drugs and use them with caution and respect, I consider them a vital sacarment that should be investigated for potential benefits.

14 (edited by Ayahuasca 2004-10-19 13:19:12)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

AZ1 wrote:

But for the truly open minds who use the experience to understand the depths of their own identity and the fragility of their beliefs, for those who have studied these drugs and use them with caution and respect, I consider them a vital sacarment that should be investigated for potential benefits.

Nicely said AZ1, I agree with you totally. I think the reason that most people have negative attitudes towards pyschoactive drugs is because they've long been demonized by the mainstream media and then society.

Is it any wonder that the illuminati controlled media don't want people to take psychoactives when they are by far the best tool for waking people up out of the reality they are trying to condition us to believe in.

You rarely hear positive stories about people taking psychoactives when the reality is that the positive stories far outweigh the negative ones.

I think Bill Hicks said it best with

How about a positive LSD story, that would be newsworthy. Don't you think? Anybody think that? Just once, to hear a positive LSD story. "Today, a young man on acid, realised that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration. That we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves... here's Tom with the weather."

I think it's a shame that most people are extremely ignorant about the benefits of these substances, especially now that there is so much information about them out there.

My advice to everyone on this forum would be to forget everything you think you know about these substances and do some serious research about them. If you have negative opinions about them then chances are that's because of media conditioning. When the media or society say that something's bad for you then usually the opposite is true.

But as Az1 said. They are not for everyone and bad things can happen particularly if you don't take sensible precautions.

My advice to anyone trying psychoactives for the first time would be:

1) Avoid them if you are suffering from any kind of mental illness

2) Always start with low doses. Don't go in there all gung-ho taking a large dose and thinking you can handle it because chances are you will get your ass kicked. If you decide to repeat the experience then steadily increase your dose each time until you reach a level you're happy and comfortable with.

3) Never take them alone until you feel experienced with them. Have someone with who you trust and ideally they should be sober and know what to do should your trip turn bad. Also make sure you take them in a place that is familiar and that you feel comfortable in. Never do them in a public place or anywhere with lots of people around. Tripping can make you paranoid in the presence of other people particularly if you don't know them.

4) As AZ1 said, always have a strong intention as to what you want to learn or take out of the experience. Don't just take them to 'get high' or whatever.

5) I guess I should also say that psychoactive drugs are illegal in most countries so be extremely careful if you decide to take them. I don't want to be held responsible for people going to prison!

6) If you go picking magic Mushrooms in the wild make sure you know EXACTLY what you're picking and that they are the right ones. There are many different species of mushrooms out there, not many of them are magic and some of them are lethal. I would never go picking for the first time unless you're with someone who is already experienced at identifying the correct type.

If you follow these simple guidelines then you really shouldn't have any problems and chances are you will have a few positive life changing experiences.

If people want to know what they should start with then my advice would be to start with pscilocybin Mushrooms because it's much easier to control the size of the dose and in my opinion a much much nicer trip.

You never know with an LSD tab how strong it's going to be. I also think a mushroom trip feels very natural, obviously because they come from nature. LSD feels quite alien and strange to me. Also a mushroom trip is usually over within about 4 hours, or even much less with a small dose. Whereas as LSD trips can easily last 12-24 hours.

A good place to find out more about psychoactives is Erowid:

http://www.erowid.org/psychoactives/psychoactives.shtml

But there are hundreds more sites if you do a bit of Googling.

For people that want to research the subject further then three books that I really recommend are:

Food of The Gods by Terrence McKenna

Breaking Open The Head by Daniel Pinchbeck.

DMT: The Spirit Molecule by Dr. Rick Strassman

Andy

Join me in Peru to celebrate December 21st 2012 - Visit: http://2012awakeningretreat.com/

15 (edited by bumblebee 2004-10-27 09:17:53)

Re: David Icke - general discussion

Came across a David Icke Ayahuasca trip report by Zoe7 a while ago.
source: Zoe7 - Back from the Beyond

"Anyway, of all the ayahuasca experiences I have helped facilitate, David Icke’s was by far the strangest. Then again, Icke is an unusual individual, considering the beliefs he expresses in his books. During his first experience, as is customary, we engaged in a small ceremony involving a visualization to connect with our higher selves. After the exercise I instructed him to mentally project his intention for the night’s journey into the cup of brew, as I explained to him that according to Cleve Backster’s research, as well as the ideas of some shamans, plants can sense a human’s intent. After these preliminaries he ingested the brew, which he commented had a flavor similar to some liquor he’d tasted before, and then he walked to his mattress and laid down, waiting for the effects to come on.

I turned off the lights of the large circular ceremony room and sat near his mattress in case he needed anything during his journey. The entire room was pitch-black except for the sound system’s tiny red and green LEDs. And during this experience, some of the things that transpired defy explanation.

Roughly forty minutes into his ayahuasca journey, David called me over, said that he was already feeling the effects, and asked me to walk him over to the bathroom. As mentioned previously, sometimes ayahuasca induces vomiting and/or diarrhea, and I reasoned that it was because of this he needed my help.

But to my surprise as soon as he walked into the bathroom and shut the door behind him, he began to do something I had never before heard anyone do: scream. Imagine what I was thinking. I mean Tarzan had nothing on this guy–what a set of lungs! I wondered why he was having this reaction. He yelled, “Aaaarrh!“? six times, one right after the other. Each scream must have been a good twenty to thirty seconds long. And in-between these, I would gently knock on the door–so as to not agitate him more than what he apparently was–and ask, “Oh, David… Daaaaavid… is everything okay in there?“? Then, right after the sixth scream, he gently opened the door and calmly walked out of the bathroom with a look on his face as though nothing had happened and said, “Hi there mate. Can you walk me back to my mattress now?“?

About an hour into the experience, David decided to stand up for a few moments. I noticed this and immediately stood at attention, in case he needed anything. After a few moments of standing still and looking around the room–which was pitch black–suddenly, the lights on the side of the room we were in flickered a few times and then remained on.

As this was happening we both looked at each other, perplexed. Since I had never heard of an occurrence like this in an ayahuasca ceremony, I was probably more surprised than he was. I walked over to the switch and flicked it on and off a few times, but to my surprise the lights always remained on. Eventually, after flicking it a few more times, the lights finally went off. When they did, a single word popped into my head: “poltergeist.“? "

source: Zoe7 - Back from the Beyond

Zoe7: Zoe7 psychonautic accounts seem to be a bit technical and far out. While this is appealing to me, it doesn't go into questions like how to deal with the real world out there. Questions I myself find of some importance. No word on how these personal insights into the real world could help/correlate with the perception of the hidden world.

the eyes of truth are always watching you