morningsun76 wrote:Though I wonder how exactly keeping truth under covers is preserving free will.
Adding to what ermolai just said in response, ambiguity also allows the right people to learn the right things in accordance with their choice of interpretation. When you instead try to push an idea upon those who neither need nor want it, they will react in nonconstructive ways like ignoring it, becoming psychologically damaged by it, misinterpreting it, worshipping and preach it without understanding, or lashing out and persecuting the messenger. Ambiguity makes certain ideas blind to the blind.
If 3D is precursor to 4D, and 4D encompasses both STS and STO polarities, then it makes sense that current and future experiences - both individual and collective - serve to kick 3D people further toward the polarity of their choosing. Ambiguity allows both polarities to be served this way.
Example: a strongly STS person may see the Matrix trilogy as inspiration to see himself better than all the other asleep sheep and perhaps feel justified in committing violence upon them to get his way; an STO-leaning person may see the Matrix for its gnostic/transcendental message and be inspired to wake him/herself and others out of the illusion. For everyone else not sufficiently polarized, it was just a sci-fi flick.
Same goes for Wizard of Oz: STS forces use it as a framework for mind programming, unpolarized people see it strictly as entertainment, and STO-leaning ones may perceive the subtle message about how following one's heart can lead to liberation in the end.
It's a trade-off -- to reach the largest number of people, you will need the largest level of ambiguity. And if you make something that is very obvious and direct, it will only be openly received by a small number of people. I don't think you can have it both ways UNLESS something happens to increase mass demand for alternative information. As time goes on, I sense that will happen...earth changes, political turmoil, increasingly blatant maneuvers by the NWO, etc... will cause more and more people to feel the pressure and begin asking questions. It's already happening thanks to 9-11 and the Iraq fiasco.
Now, about making something direct that reaches a small number of people, this may actually be a very effective way of doing things. We already know that "trying to reach the masses" is difficult due to the system being locked down. So going the other route means sending complete, empowering, and direct information to a small number of effective, receptive, and inquisitive people. You all know about the nonlinear "butterfly effect" where small triggers can create huge consequences over time? Well, reaching a quality core of people may be the primary way in which we can salvage the future. This is what ermolai suggested about working in small STO-leaning groups. By choosing quality over quantity, nonlinear/synchronistic/divine factors can help amplify the smallest input into an unexpectedly significant output.
But I think there is also plenty that can be done for people at large as long as it's done cleverly like what's been suggested so far on this thread. To add to that, I think it would be fun to write a concise but hard-hitting flyer containing the essentials of what people need to know, printing it as a sticker, and pasting it up in public restroom stalls. Between reading the flyer and all the "for a good time, call #####" scribbles, I think they'd choose the former 
Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.