Seditious Rosie (Page 1 of 2)

They allow people that the general public won't like to talk about it so it can be said but rejected and they can move on to the next thing. Jordan Maxwell has said that the occult elite like to show the victim what they have done to it but watch them edit it away. It's just like all those other things the tv is showing of the truth in the beginning they have someone talking about the hidden things in this reality and than at the end they bring in the shills who debunk it. They give it to you and than they take it away so they remain safe. I think this relates to free will they need us to help them keep this going. The people reject the truth about this place and they get to keep it the way they like.

I think that if they let us see that kind of thing, it MUST be in their interest, it's just that we people are always a "ball rebound" later than them...
I was reading about Illuminati ten years ago, and there was only a few sites to talk about it, it was a kind of secret thing.
Free Masonery was still secret and there was not a lot of famous people claiming to be a part of it, and musea and TV speaking about it. "They" felt the wind coming their way at that time and thought about what to do later.
Letting people know that shit will angry them and they will feel terrible about who governs them. A good civil war would certainly serve NWO interests, as war always serves them.
We should care about very simple things between us humans like togetherness and let them throw their shit on TV and media.

Thanks for those vidlinks PJ, a few I had not seen. Rosie has been talking about this stuff for a few weeks now I take it.

I haven't kept up with all the developments, but it should be obvious for people with 2 brain cells to rub together that when the pundits and polits are this defensive, that there is something being hidden, and should be investigated.

She may continue on with this, but I think she just may be branded a nut- we will see what happens when she gets Prof. Jones, or whoever might be able to back her up, to talk.

In any case, she deserves respect for going out on a limb, especially with the daytime audience.                  J

If they've "allowed" it to happen, it's for the express purpose of having her be called crazy for having her views.  This type of thinking is way too prevalent, so they may want to let her be a whipping boy for us conspiracy theorists just so we'll see what happens to people who stand up.

I saw that too, Treehugger.  What's funny is that when you watch it, there is NO mention of her "losing it."  It's about who should distance themselves from her politically.  Typical sensationalism with no substance to back it up.

Wow! Did Rosie write that? 
If so, she's a lot more right on than I'd've ever known,
since I don't watch tv.

This may be an example of what Dr. William Deagle was talking about
in his videos:  "Hey Deagle!  How come you're still alive?  I'm surprised
they're letting you tell us this stuff!"  To which Deagle replied something
to the effect of:  They know a lot of people are waking up and are
starting to question what's going on and they're afraid what might happen
if some people like Bill Clinton and others were to BOLT and spill the
beans.  So they let me "shake the tree" while still calling me a fringe
conspiracy freak, and they watch what happens.  And I might add, they
incorporate that data into their supercomputer to be able to predict how
people are going to react in situations.

This may show that Rosie just might want to be some sort of a Crusader.
For Truth.

I know this post is a little late to the game for this thread, where the last post was in April, a month before Rosie even left The View.  And now it's oh, you know, like, November.    But when I stumbled across this thread I just had to note this:    Rosie coincidentally popped her top with Elisabeth Hasselback in May, resulting in her "early departure" from the show, and guess what?  Suddenly the engineering expert had to be canceled - this was the dude who was scheduled to go on live television, on a show watched by millions, to explain how the planes could not have possibly taken down the WTC's singlehandedly.   So, amazing "coincidence" that she pops her top and gets quit/fired days before it happened.

So then regarding her departure itself, there were several stories floating around about what happened.  First it was that Rosie quit early because of the brawl and didn't want to come back to even finish her final three weeks.  But then Rosie later was quoted as saying that she purposely instigated the brawl, actually asking Elisabeth to pick a fight with her about something and push all her buttons so she could fight and have a reason to leave earlier than planned. (!)  When I read that I thought What??? Why would she do that?  It makes no sense, and somehow I didn't believe it.  The brawl certainly looked spontaneous and authentic to me. Also, that totally contradicts the "poor me" victim thing she was doing on her website, where she was milking her fanbase's sympathy for the way Elisabeth was treating her and the way ABC handled the whole deal.  Then it was revealed that The View actually fired Rosie as a result of her tempestuous antics, and didn't want her to even finish out those final three weeks.  So if that's true, then why would Rosie say that she had made a deal with Elisabeth to create the brawl?   Is Rosie you know....really kind of a little bit crazy in the noggin?   And then again, isn't it amazing timing that it all went down just before the engineering expert was due to come on the show?

And if the brawl truly was spontaneous, and not planned as Rosie claimed, then did "something" program her to go down in flames just before the guy was scheduled to appear on the show?   And if she really did instigate the brawl on purpose, then why would she sabotage the engineeering dude's appearance on the show?  I mean, that would have been a really big deal for him to be on.  It supposedly meant so much to her to have her point of view validated and for America to know the truth.  So, does that mean she really isn't a 9/11 truth movement person as claimed, and instead is somebody who's actually - knowingly - inserted into the works to discredit the movement?  Rosie is supposed to be a liberal after all, not somebody prone to all that Ra! Ra! Ra! pro-Bush, "believe anything they tell us and blindly follow and support them no matter what they do"" sort of person.  Right?  ??    Or is she not who we think she is?    If she isn't who people think she is, then maybe when it was within days of the engineering dude coming on the show, "stuff" was like, "Okay, the charade has gone on long enough, we never truly intended for an engineering expert to appear on the show, it's gone too far, we need to stop this before it actually happens."  Then boom...next thing you know, she's gone three weeks early and the whole thing is canceled.

Nothing is what is seems to be, that's for sure.   

All in all, I'd say that while I like that Rosie was talking about this, I think she actually did more harm than good for the movement.  The way she went down in flames like that kind of negated anything positive that may have been developing.  It gives the skeptics more fuel for their fire when a crazy acting person has become one of the major truth-movement spokespeople.