Amitakh Stanford (Page 5 of 5)

That's interesting, because Goro Adachi has become quite adept at nailing what events are going to happen on what days.  He's gotten so good that he can not only pinpoint a week when a specific event will occur, but sometimes within a two - or even one - day range.   And he's not psychic, he just claims to have figured out the way the patterns that make up "the grid" of reality work, which enables him to pinpoint months in advance when stuff will transpire.  Makes you wonder.    His most recent "prediction" (again, based on figuring out patterns in the chaos and decoding the symbology within the events that surround us) was to predict Donald Rumsfeld stepping down immediately after mid-term elections.  And it happened.  Interesting.  I believe in the idea of probable timelines and an open future - things seem variable - but sometimes I do wonder.  I think it is possible to predict thing, and so for me personally, it's one of the criteria I keep in mind when reading the material of someone claiming to be channeling a higher realm entity that's supposed to be able to have access to that sort of information.   It's like, Come on...throw me a prediction.      Show me what you're made of!  haha

I know, and it's all well and good, but again, who can prove it, you know?  That's the problem with after-life discussion.  Sylvia Browne also has quite a lot to say about the workings of the afterlife, and it sounds fantastic on paper when I read it.  But I'll throw a wrench in the works by mentioning the totally fascinating discussion that occurred here on NR not too long ago where we were all pondering the trickery and deception going on in the afterlife.....how souls are being tricked and trapped in these after life realms, thinking they're in some blissed out heaven when in fact, they're actually being herded by higher beings into these false heavens so they can be fed upon.   !!!   It was such a fascinating discussion, and as a direct result of it I now also keep that in mind as a criteria for trying to tell who's who and what's what.   Is the channeling source just spouting feel-good anecdotes about the afterlife that make you feel warm and fuzzy?  Or is it more realistic and balanced?  Because multiple people are confirming that there is a lot of confusion and deception happening in the afterlife..things aren't what we're told they are.   
 

A thought that passed through my mind as I read that is, well, that's fine, but why is it that people have a need for this sort of thing?  It's kind of obvious I guess....we're uneasy, we want answers, we want somebody to tell us that we have nothing to worry about, and everything is going to be okay.  And that's what this material provides.  Supposed answers, and a security blanket of comfort.  It "resonates" because it mirrors beliefs we agree with while making us feel good. 

If I sound lost, like I can't committ myself to any one thing or belief, well, it's because I am!     I don't know what to think about anything anymore.  I can weed out the ultimate obvious hooey from the higher quality material, but even then, who's to say what's the real deal.   What if the truth about reality is so unbelievable that it would cause us to mentally implode if we knew, and all these sources are all disinfo....!

Well, when you think about it those sources are no more "qualified' than say, Matthew, or any material that makes claims about the afterlife, since ultimately, none of them can be "proven."  All of them rely on the reader either "resonating" with the material or not.  And what resonates for each of us is going to be kind of a subjective thing.   

It seems though that a lot of spiritual/new age people want everything to be happy and to feel good....forget any information that might "add confusion" to the mix....even if it has validity.  For me, I'll neutrally listen to both sides of the story, and if somebody has information that says "Hey, things may not be what we're told they are....let me tell you what I heard! (saw, know, experienced, etc.)"  then you better believe I'll be all ears!     I consider it the smart thing to do.  I'm not the sort of person who only wants to hear what's warm and fuzzy, simple and unconfusing.  But I kind of knew somebody would say that this sort of info. is "darkness," and was curious to see if that did indeed come up.  We're all entitled to our views, and I'm not criticizing yours, I'm just saying there may be more to the story is all, and that I don't agree with the idea that to consider another viewpoint would be akin to "darkness" and only be adding "confusion" into the works.   It's not dark or confusing so long as one remains neutral as they listen.   Information is information, nothing more.  Darkness and confusion ensue when one starts emotionally reacting and falling into despondency. 

And here's an idea......you feel that this information is to add confusion during these times.....what if it's the opposite?    Let's say that hypothetically speaking there is validity to the idea that souls are being trapped and lied to and mislead, herded back to the Earth plane to endlessly reincarnate, (again, hypothetically speaking here, because I don't necessarily know or believe that this is the case.....)   And assume that there is a way to break free of this....maybe it's exactly because it's "these times" that something wants us to finally learn this and wake up so we can get out of here.   !   Maybe the time has come to remember who we are and break free.  Now there's a thought.   There's more than one way to look at everything.....

Anyway, this thread has digressed....it was originally about Amitakh, then you asked about Matthew, which lead to this, so, maybe we should step off and let it get back to Amitakh.......

I hope you're right too. 

Read all her articles seems to be a new age gnostic. But, alot of ideas that the creator of this reality is evil is. I don't disagree with them but I guess I sometimes think this all going away is a fantasy. I would assume that the dark creator would have to wake up itself for this to go away.