Lloyd Pye - cool dude! (Page 3 of 3)

Ah.. I kinda see.. but is it based on a schema like the one I posted or is it a completely different animal?

I know of (but haven't tried to draw up) 'personalised' tree of life that through natal horoscopes shows which paths are 'open' and 'blocked' and a couple of shades of gray. This is referred to the GD excersise of 'pathworking'.

Any connection?

So........

How about that Lloyd Pye? 

And how about that Interventionism theory?

The last 8 out of 9 posts have been about nonsense not pertaining to this thread. 

ahem.

!

Let's hear it for Lloyd!  And people who didn't apparently evolve from Neandrathals! 

Excellent point!

You know you're on to something in this world when you just get outright ignored.  It's when they accept you into the fray to be villifed that you're in trouble, because it means you're wrong, and can serve the agenda of being the other half of the "false two choice dichotemy" deal.    On a related note this actually applies to Montalk and his writings.  It's something somebody mentioned to me recently, about how you don't see Montalk being invited on all these "woo woo" radio shows to give interviews about the various topics covered on his site.  His site has been around for years, with these kick ass, detailed and in-depth articles that really dissect the workings of reality, from conspiracy to metaphysics.  And is he "known" ?   Not for the most part.  He's completely ignored.  (lyra looks around the figuritve room after mentioning Montalk's name and hears deafening silence....a pin drops, and it's heard across the room....both the members of mainstream society and the nutters from Coast to Coast all look the other way....somebody starts whistling....another changes the subject.....)  haha   It's true though.   Silence, and being ignored and overlooked often times speaks volumes.

Lyra,
      I became quite enthralled with what I read on Pye's site. It not only appears plausible but probable. I also like the fact we're not dealing with some Phd. toting tool from Stanford and the like. I was a little taken back however when reading Pye's bio and seeing that his first career was in military intelligence. I have grown weary and leary of such types because often in retirement they're second careers often rarely fall to far from the tree. In watching the video snipets on the site I must say I did see and hear a man who to me was very genuine and had a great sense of sincereity in his eyes. I'm not out to shoot the messenger, but I've learned one must scutinize the messenger equally with the message. Any thoughts?

Hi Lyra,

Thanks for the link to Lloyd's site.  Very interesting material.  If you remember I had asked a question here: http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=4530 and you responded by reviving this thread.  That is what is so great about this site.  I've noticed that many things I think about bringing up have already been brought up and addressed in detail.  I was planning to comment on the issues/questions of domesticated plants and animals but you guys (as usual) had already been there.  Thanks again.

Did anyone else happen to notice that he dedicated his book to his parents and "The Invisible College".  I thought that was interesting because I was not familiar with term until I read "The War in Heaven" from another thread which was all about The Invisible College.

In my mind this invites comparison between the two works.

I found both ("Everything you Think You Know is Wrong" and "The war in Heaven") to be very interesting reading material.  I couldn't help noticing however, that even though "The War in Heaven" deals largely with astral realms and Pye's book deals with aliens he doesn't say much towards acknowledging any link between aliens and the astral plane(s). 

The important thing that jumped out me was that both books completely ignored any discussion about spirituality.

It just seems to me that both of the books should have addressed this (spirituality) due to the nature of the subject matter.  Again I found both books very interesting and I couldn't disagree with very much of the content (especially Pye) in either book but I'm always a llittle skeptical of the sources of (channeled) information....not so much because of what they said.....but what they didn't say.

I realize the Lloyd’s book is based on research and not channeled but I’m lumping the two here based on the whole Invisible College connection.

This seems to be common with channeled information…lots of truth with gaping omissions.  I can’t help but find myself questioning the WHY behind omissions in channeled material.

Comments?

Winston