Thanks for that response, Lyra.
Dunno about in the US but at school we were never really taught how to discern genuine information from rubbish, so up until recently I haven't really tried to pick out facts for myself, normally I would either completely believe or completely dismiss whatever I was reading. Aaaaaanyway.
I do think that the cats having alien DNA idea is plausible, because the ideas put forward seem to correspond to my experience (I've always had cats). Then again, I'm open to this cat-theory being incorrect, because there is no way to tell for sure. I was also thinking that it could explain otherwise inexplicable, vehement cat-hating. A lot of people find cats repellant for no apparent reason.
Re the pigs theory. I've heard that in some cultures that used to practice cannibalism, the name they had for human meat translates to "long pork". 
I'm interested in what these metaphysical peeps would have to say about the advent of dinosaurs...
Thanks for posting that link, the article was fascinating if nothing else, and there are so many google-tangents to go on from there. 
And yeah, I didn't automatically think that by posting a link you were endorsing channeled material in general, or that particular source. Just curious about how to pick out what is plausible...I saw an article written by Montalk which breaks this process down, but haven't been able to find it.
I was getting at the claims about the Dulce base in particular. I have no experience, therefore have no gut-feeling yard stick to apply to this. Although, having read some other information from different sources, a lot of details from different sources correspond. Maybe consistencies will have to do.