1 (edited by tenetnosce 2006-11-04 11:20:40)

Topic: Is Bush schizophrenic?

Last week I came across a word, metonymy, that I never heard of before.  I posted it in the "Logical Fallacies" thread, but here I want to focus on the medical definition.   From Stedman's:

me ·ton ·y ·my

In schizophrenia, a language disturbance in which an inappropriate but related word is used in place of the correct one.

I think the relevance to Bush is self-evident. 

Now, many years ago I had a friend who ended up developing schizophrenia, who did this very thing.  Back then we all would tease him about being dumb, even though he was a very intelligent guy.  He just used words incorrectly ALL the time, which made him sound stupid to others. 

The weird thing was that, right up until he had a massive breakdown, nobody really suspected a thing.  Especially me, who had seen this guy pretty much every day for over six years.  I just thought he was unusual, which is actually very common amongst my friends.  But now that I look back I can see how he was having spells and hiding them from everybody else.  He would frequently take off for a couple days, or just hole himself up in the bedroom, not talking to anybody.  I just thought he needed alone time.

He also, despite endless prognostications about "peace and love" was a very spiteful person, with many personal vendettas against people he imagined were trying to "bring him down", which in the end served to be his undoing.

What is even scarier, is that years after the breakdown, when he was still leaving demonic-voiced messages on my VM, I ended up calling his mom just to nose around a bit.  She told me that the whole family thought he was fine, that the schizophrenia was under control, and that he even had a steady job and a girlfriend!

Any thoughts?

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

You could have something there. I have a bi-polar friend who has the same symptoms. She does this all the time. Even though being very intelligent and creative, she uses words incorrectly all the time. When I mentioned one time that my son was ambidextrous, she asked what that meant. After that, she kept using that word incorrectly, like,"  Look, Im smoking my cigarette and driving at the same time, Im ambidextrous!"  I would get really embarassed for her, because she would be really loud and obnoxious about it. Her family all act like everythingis peachy-keen, she's on her meds, blah, blah. Her poor husband, I can tell he lives in hell. roll

In man's analysis and understanding of himself, it is as well to know from whence he came as whither he is going.   Edgar Cayce

Beliefs are tools for social conditioning, rather than expressions of inner realization or inner truth.   unknown
Ad Verecundiam

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

I think the question about knowing if Bush is schizophrenic, delusional, or whatever, is beside the point.

This would have to be diagnosticized by a psychiatrist.

I think he is more of a psychopath, of at least son of a psychopath. Psychopaths always elude the clutches of psychiatric diagnosis.

He is more like a cult victim, he was convinced by others that he is doing god's will in leading the world into the final battle of good and evil, armageddon.

One thing that would be quite important to do is to find as many reasons to impeach him (war crimes, lying, anticonstitutionnal actions, tyranny, etc.) and take this to the senate or wherever else you have to make this claim for immediate impeachment of Bush (and Cheney must go also). In this context, then it is truly important to make a psychiatric diagnostic of George W.Bush.

And by the way, why not try to shed light on Israel's power in the USA and global medias? In 9/11 tragedy and QUI BONO? And expose this info so that everyone who can see what's happening?

4 (edited by lyra 2006-11-04 18:10:50)

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

druid wrote:

I think the question about knowing if Bush is schizophrenic, delusional, or whatever, is beside the point.

Yup.  I mean, how can somebody be schizophrenic when they're not even real?   

wink

Just sayin'.

So how does one define real?  In this sense, a "real" George W. Bush would mean he's the same free thinking, flesh and blood person that popped out of Barbara's womb over 40 years ago.   A real person, with flaws and all, including psychological issues as it's been presented.

But he's not.  "Flesh robot," "cyber genetic organism," "reanimated puppet pawn," however you choose to define it might be more accurate.  Key word here being "reanimated."  As in, no longer fully alive and free thinking and in control of himself. 

I think a lot of people, on NR included, are "aware," but there are many things they're in denial about.  Including the nature of this reality and what's really going on here.  Just because somebody is paraded before you as your president doesn't mean he's real.    People are chasing their tails over whether Bush is schizophrenic, a psychopath, an alcohol-addled bumble brain, but they're failing to realize.......He's not even real.    Not in the way you mistakenly believe he is.   Have we all taken a good look at Laura lately?  Does that look like a real person to you...or a Stepford Wife? 

"Let's give Laura some hobbies, something noble and matronly, such as libraries and literacy to make her endearing......and believable......to the public..."

And Bush?  Cheney?  Condolizard?   Yeah.  THEY'RE  real.  roll

But, that's just my 2 cents.  Take it or leave it.

"It's a Barnum and Bailey world
Just as phony as it can be
But it wouldn't be make believe
If you believed in me."

- "Paper Moon", Ella Fitzgerald

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

lyra wrote:

So how does one define real?  In this sense, a "real" George W. Bush would mean he's the same free thinking, flesh and blood person that popped out of Barbara's womb over 40 years ago.   A real person, with flaws and all, including psychological issues as it's been presented.

But he's not.  "Flesh robot," "cyber genetic organism," "reanimated puppet pawn," however you choose to define it might be more accurate.  Key word here being "reanimated."  As in, no longer fully alive and free thinking and in control of himself.

All other evidence aside, just because somebody is a sociopath doesn't mean they're not human.

BUT, especially in the case of G.W., the alternatives you suggest certainly make the explanation more comprehensible!

In the case of my friend, I've wondered if the voices he was listening to didn't come from somewhere

Maybe the physiological mechanisms that are associated with schizophrenia are capitalized on for mind-control, overshadowing, etc. . . ?

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

Often, schizophrenics (especially paranoid schizophrenics) say that 'little green men tell them to do antisocial things'... That's what I learned in studying psychology for bcc (I quit, this domain is too f*#'crazy, co-opted by pathocracy for sure).  I think a schizo has his head in the bee-hive of lower elementals and that he falls victim of them. Or it can be also dead people attachments. Many illnesses, especially mental illnesses, have their root in a disturbed relationship with the deceased, (Steiner said that and I think he's got a solid point here).

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

tenetnosce wrote:

...just because somebody is a sociopath doesn't mean they're not human.

Well, nowhere in my post did I say that he wasn't human "just because" he's a sociopath.   That's putting words in my mouth.   

So is Bush a schizophrenic?  Well, he's not even real, not in the way that you think he is, so how can he be?  wink  There's no way he can be real, because of who he is.  He's the "president"...........in a reality that no longer uses an actual president to make decisions.   He has to stand up there on his podium and do what he's told and follow their agenda.  For that reason alone he can't be an intelligent, free thinking independent (translations = non-controllable, unpredictable) real person.   

Schizophrenia can be one reason for metonymy, but there are also other possibilities as well.  Sociopaths in general are known to do it.  And probably anybody in general who isn't full "there" does it, whether it's because their soul is fragmented, or they're not souled at all.  We talked about this here on my end, and one thing that came up was that people who aren't all "there" soul-wise, acting on autopilot, do this because their social skills are more like a "Chat Bot" function.   Like a program that's trying to learn and assimilate the language but keeps screwing up.  My brother was always screwing up words, it was a defining trait for him.  He was very smart, but wasn't all there and not fully real, piloted by other "stuff" and behaved sociopathically, so, go figure.  It matches up.   And my friend Mike in California mixed up words ALL the time.  He was another...interesting character.   Was supposedly a walk-in due to soul fragmentation, but had a lot of weird stuff going on in general.  He was simultaneously both a hothead as well as emotionally detached.  He didn't feel remorse about things.   So another case that seems to fit. 

So if Bush is reanimated, and acting on autopilot, then indeed his social skills would be akin to that whole "Chat Bot" program.  Just an idea.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

alien reaction machine awaits trigger-events

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

lyra wrote:
tenetnosce wrote:

...just because somebody is a sociopath doesn't mean they're not human.

Well, nowhere in my post did I say that he wasn't human "just because" he's a sociopath.   That's putting words in my mouth.   

So is Bush a schizophrenic?  Well, he's not even real, not in the way that you think he is, so how can he be?  wink  There's no way he can be real, because of who he is.  He's the "president"...........in a reality that no longer uses an actual president to make decisions.   He has to stand up there on his podium and do what he's told and follow their agenda.  For that reason alone he can't be an intelligent, free thinking independent (translations = non-controllable, unpredictable) real person.   

Schizophrenia can be one reason for metonymy, but there are also other possibilities as well.  Sociopaths in general are known to do it.  And probably anybody in general who isn't full "there" does it, whether it's because their soul is fragmented, or they're not souled at all.  We talked about this here on my end, and one thing that came up was that people who aren't all "there" soul-wise, acting on autopilot, do this because their social skills are more like a "Chat Bot" function.   Like a program that's trying to learn and assimilate the language but keeps screwing up.  My brother was always screwing up words, it was a defining trait for him.  He was very smart, but wasn't all there and not fully real, piloted by other "stuff" and behaved sociopathically, so, go figure.  It matches up.   And my friend Mike in California mixed up words ALL the time.  He was another...interesting character.   Was supposedly a walk-in due to soul fragmentation, but had a lot of weird stuff going on in general.  He was simultaneously both a hothead as well as emotionally detached.  He didn't feel remorse about things.   So another case that seems to fit. 

So if Bush is reanimated, and acting on autopilot, then indeed his social skills would be akin to that whole "Chat Bot" program.  Just an idea.

Yeah, that makes sense Lyra. I keep forgetting that aspect of it all. I think you're right on the money.   I happened to catch a clip of Bush the other day on the NBC Nightly Lies.... out drumming up Rep. support. I saw this one woman reach out and touch his hand and she just acted like she touched the hand of god! EEwww! I thought he was a brainless idiot when he was PUT in office, and he has shown himself to be just that, and people are still gushing over him. My god, its scary to watch.  The man has not one ounce of sincerety in him, you would think more people would see thru that.   So my question is then, is mental illness, such as sociopathy, schizophrenia, etc, really not a  organic"disease" at all, but symptom of soul fragmentation, possession,etc? I mean, I can believe Bush isnt "real" because of who he is, but what about most of the people that walk around us on a daily basis that are termed mentally ill? Inquiring minds want to know.

In man's analysis and understanding of himself, it is as well to know from whence he came as whither he is going.   Edgar Cayce

Beliefs are tools for social conditioning, rather than expressions of inner realization or inner truth.   unknown
Ad Verecundiam

10 (edited by LipstickMystic 2006-11-05 09:44:20)

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder can be cured by clearing out the entity attachments causing the problem and sealing up the holes in the auric field or "egg" that allowed the entities to come through in the first place. I've done this and been able to provide an overnight cure for lifelong mental disorders in various people.

But then, the person who has been cured has to NOT reach out to those same entities that, in many cases, have been their companions for multiple lifetimes. Because if they reach out and welcome them back in, out of loneliness or whatever, the critters will come back.  Many schizophrenics are so accustomed to the voices that they actually freak out and get lonely when all goes silent.

But you can't cure someone who isn't home.  Bush isn't home. There is nothing there but the void. No person inside.  Way beyond psychopath and out the other side into walking black hole.  This is not something that can be cured. There has to be a soul there if there is going to be a cure.

I remember Laura Bush being trotted out about two years ago for a series of interviews - maybe she had a book out or something. In one hour long interview I watched, maybe it was on Larry King, she DID NOT BLINK for an entire hour long interview.  I was so struck by that, I knew she was a lizard anyway, but that was really interesting to see.

So I actually made an effort to watch the next hour long interview she had scheduled with someone, which happened the same week. Again, "she" did not blink for the entire hour long interview.

That isn't possible if you're human. Humans blink.

Lizards don't.

All you have to do when analyzing public figures is to watch and pay attention to the little things. You will see some amazing stuff that makes you go, "Whoa! What IS this reality we've agreed to be in?" 'Cause the weirdness just gets weirder! smile

I agree with you, Tenetnosce, that there may well be something to the idea that certain types of mental disorder are marked by people misusing common phrases and so forth.  I would just argue that in the case of Bush, you're not dealing with an actual person anymore. 

LipstickMystic aka Jennifer

11 (edited by tenetnosce 2006-11-05 11:32:10)

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

lyra wrote:
tenetnosce wrote:

...just because somebody is a sociopath doesn't mean they're not human.

Well, nowhere in my post did I say that he wasn't human "just because" he's a sociopath.   That's putting words in my mouth.

In your quotation of my reply to your post, you neglected to include the phrase "All other evidence aside"  which heavily modifies the phrase "just because". 

lyra wrote:

So is Bush a schizophrenic?  Well, he's not even real, not in the way that you think he is, so how can he be?  wink

Now you are putting words in my mouth.  I never made any claims to Bush's humanity. 

I don't understand how not being a "real" human precludes being schizophrenic.  From what I understand of the reptilians, they all sound schizophrenic to me. 

Just so I'm clear. . . what, exactly, do you think Bush is?

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

LipstickMystic wrote:

But you can't cure someone who isn't home.  Bush isn't home. There is nothing there but the void. No person inside.  Way beyond psychopath and out the other side into walking black hole.  This is not something that can be cured. There has to be a soul there if there is going to be a cure.

I see what you are saying, and it makes sense.  But I wonder. . . if Bush is really some kind of organic robot, it sure seems like "they" botched up the control mechanisms where command of the language is concerned.  Perhaps making him look like a bumbling idiot is the goal.

LipstickMystic wrote:

I remember Laura Bush being trotted out about two years ago for a series of interviews - maybe she had a book out or something. In one hour long interview I watched, maybe it was on Larry King, she DID NOT BLINK for an entire hour long interview.  I was so struck by that, I knew she was a lizard anyway, but that was really interesting to see.

So I actually made an effort to watch the next hour long interview she had scheduled with someone, which happened the same week. Again, "she" did not blink for the entire hour long interview.

That isn't possible if you're human. Humans blink.

Lizards don't.

That's very interesting. . . I wonder if I could find a clip of one of those on YouTube or something.  Anything else to look for?

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

tenetnosce wrote:

In your quotation of my reply to your post, you neglected to include the phrase "All other evidence aside"  which heavily modifies the phrase "just because".

Indeed.  But your final conclusion was "just because somebody is a sociopath doesn't mean they're not human,"........which seemed to be saying that I had somehow implied that.  Which I didn't.   So, I guess there was a miscommunication there.   

Mercury retrograde, anybody?  big_smile


tenetnosce wrote:

Now you are putting words in my mouth.  I never made any claims to Bush's humanity.

True.  But it seemed like only a real human could have issues such as schizophrenia.  There was no mention of the theory of Bush being lizzie in your post.  So, another misunderstanding I suppose.



tenetnosce wrote:

I don't understand how not being a "real" human precludes being schizophrenic.  From what I understand of the reptilians, they all sound schizophrenic to me.

Well, I never considered that possibility.  Always just figured human brain disorders would be limited to humans.  So who knows, maybe that is possible.   But imo, I don't think Reptilians sound schizophrenic.   Sociopathic, definitely, but I don't know about schizo.  wink



tenetnosce wrote:

Just so I'm clear. . . what, exactly, do you think Bush is?

Well, I did already answer that in my original post to this thread.   It was as clear as what Lipstick Mystic wrote in hers, and you didn't seem to have any problem interpreting her post, interestingly enough.   I mentioned several possibilities, including reanimated puppet pawns, flesh robots, and so on.  However I could never say with certainty what he is, because I'm not on the inside with the inside know,  I can only know that he's not "real," not in the way that the average American believes him to be.   And that's based on observation and intuition, "conspiracy research" wink and common sense with what I've come to learn about how this country operates at this stage of the game.  It seems most people believe he's a real, free thinking independent flesh and blood guy, the same guy that he's always been, with a soul, and good points and foibles, and who actually makes decisions about how to run this country, and is truly the one in charge here.  But imo, nothing can be further from the truth.   There's just no way a guy like that, who can barely string together two sentences without botching something up, and who has no knowledge about the rest of the world and doesn't even care to learn, is the leader of the U.S.  My cat is smarter and more sentient than him.  And again, looking at the people around him - Condoleeza, who looks like a lizard straining and bursting at the seams;  Dick Cheney, who always has this evil look about his face;  Laura Bush, the Stepford Wife who apparently doesn't even blink during interviews.  (!!  Thanks LM for pointing that one out.........VERY interesting............) Barbara Sr., another unblinking robotoid in the propaganda commercials during George Sr.'s re-election campaign back in '92, (video clip posted here at NR....) and Bush Sr ..............don't even need to get into THAT one.  !

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

14 (edited by tenetnosce 2006-11-06 00:12:05)

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

lyra wrote:

Mercury retrograde, anybody?  big_smile

Ya. . which is why I was asking specifically what you meant. . I mean I get the general idea. . but "reanimated puppet pawns", "flesh robots" are terms I'm not really familiar with, so I guess what I am looking for is a definition of other-than-human terms that might be used here.  Just want to make sure we are talking about the same thing.   Right now, our ideas of what a "flesh puppet" are could be wildly different, in which case any sort of discussion would be meaningless.

Where my thinking was going with the idea of Bush being schizophrenic is maybe that's one of the traits that are selected for among blue-bloods that allows a manipulator to crack them more easily and take over.  Plus also, I was thinking that maybe doing/taking/creating things which support neurological pathways that are antagonistic to schizophrenia might also serve as another tool to protect against psychic attacks, negative greetings, and that sort of thing.  Just a thought. 

Now as for the idea that our political leaders have all been removed and replaced with clones, etc., I'm not really sure what I think.  I know I haven't looked at all the evidence.  But I always wonder why?  Why go through all the trouble of creating a replica of a person, when you can just control the person directly through other methods?  I mean, ultimately the "clone" Bush would require just as much control (and maintenance) as the "real" Bush does, wouldn't he?  Still a pawn in a larger scheme.

You said, real humans are more unpredictable, and harder to control.  I would agree only to the extent that aware humans are hard to control, but your average sleeper might as well be a clone.  I guess it's true that the real person always has a  chance of waking up, whereas a clone would not.  Or would they?  Whose to say that a soul can't take over a cloned body? 

I just don't think these kinds of questions have been definitively answered yet, so IMO it's a bit presumptuous to say Bush is an "anything", including schizophrenic, because we don't even know how many other choices are out there for "anythings" that Bush could be.  As for those that we do, we haven't yet come to a consensus about what they actually mean yet (think O.P.)
So all we can really do is speculate.

For all I can tell, Bush could very well be a souled man who was just bred, born, and raised to play out the role he is right now by powers that are far beyond him.  His mind is broken/hacked, his soul is hiding in a corner somewhere, and his body is now essentially somebody else's pawn in an agenda for world domination.  Standard vanilla conspiracy theory.

I agree that the President is not really in charge at this stage of the game. . . so why go through all the troubles of cloning him?  Why not just put an idiot in there and trust that he'll incapacitate himself quite naturally?  Easy solution.

Not that I'm saying you're wrong. . it sounds like you have seen compelling evidence of which I am not aware, and if so I'd love to hear about it.

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

15

Re: Is Bush schizophrenic?

Yes, I realize it can be hard trying to grasp what someone like Bush might be, because for the most part, we're going to be confined to the realm of individual theories, intuition, etc. 

I can say this - the parents Bush are both full-blooded lizards who MUST be able to shapeshift, because they barely look human, anyway. (Look at the neck of Barbara Bush; she has that unique thing down at the nape of her neck where it almost looks like she's been stitched together; whenever you see a "seam" like this as the base of the neck, it indicates extremely strong reptilian DNA. And not the nice kind, either. It's kind of like a Frankenstein seam. I think you'll see it in some of the photos in my reptilian photo array in the reptilians thread.)

If the George Bush we're seeing is really their son, then he would have that same DNA. 

But do you remember how many Saddam doubles that Saddam had? (And the one who has just been sentenced to hang is NOT the dude who did the nasty stuff. He's just a mind-controlled stunt double, poor man. The real Saddam is still living in Asia, I believe in Belarus.)

The use of physical doubles was even covered in major newspapers years ago during the Persian Gulf war. These were people who started out looking a little like him and then were forced to get plastic surgery and adopt beards, etc. to look as much like him as possible. They were widely used at public events where Saddam was simply making a speech or doing some minor public relations type appearances. These people were totally known about. I believe at one point he was known to have at least half a dozen such "clones."  (Just like Paul McCartney, by the way, at the height of the Beatles mania. People were seeing "Paul's" of many different heights.)

Now, the interesting part might be, what if they weren't all just regular guys forced to get plastic surgery and conscripted to become Saddam doubles? What if some of them were actual clones?

Taking this a step further, George Bush looks very different if you look at a photo spread of him from day to day, and there has been some research during his Administration about how he is using doubles, too. Again, this was even discussed in the major media briefly, and they quoted "experts" from governmental and military sources who pretty much 'fessed up and said, yes, the use of doubles is widespread. It's no different from the fact that they use multiple motorcades and airplanes to make the "bad guys" think the Pres is headed in one direction, when he's really headed another.  The Bush doubles in these cases are more hired for security, to divert attention from the real Pres, than anything else.

At least that's what we're led to believe.

Again, what if they're not just Bush lookalikes but very real Bush clones?  I believe even among cloning experts they admit that no two clones will look exactly alike.  This might explain how he's a different man in many photographs.  (Shapeshifting might also explain this, so it's hard to know for sure.)

But in talking about the soul aspect of Bush - the man I see on TV and hear on the radio is SO SOULLESS that I have to forcibly change the channel whenever I come across him. He's like one contagious ball of massive Luciferian energy.

Was he always this way?

I didn't get a good feeling about him back when he was running for office, but things have definitely changed, now that he's the puppet in charge of the whole world (at least, the surface world.)

If I were to try to do shamanic healing on him and remove soul attachments, I'd end up having to battle the megademon that is controlling him - and from my brief past run-ins with that level of evil, I think I'd have to say, "Thanks, but no thanks." If the host doesn't exert strong will to drive such a megademon off, then a healer can do nothing for them and might actually die from trying to heal them.

(Been there. Done that. Got the teeshirt.) smile

Bush was probably set up for that level of Luciferian control to overcome him if he truly is from these lizard/blueblood lines, who are natural receptors for demonic entities if they engage in frequent blood ritual. He and his brothers were probably equally prepared in case it was one of the others who became Pres. Right now I think Jebb Bush is also being set up to run for Pres up ahead, so this force might overtake him next.

Of course, it's also possible Bush is a robot, or that a robot or a clone is trotted out for some of his public appearances.....but I'm not so sure about that.  The level of pulsating, horrific evil that emanates simply from the man's voice (even when he's saying stupid stuff that makes no sense) seems pretty consistent to me.

(Keep in mind I'm not political, and I don't vote, and I dont' much like either party, so these are not political opinions. These are energy impressions. smile

It may be purposeful that he has been allowed to become so deeply possessed at that level and be allowed to still mingle with the public, give speeches, etc. - because these entities are always looking for more people to infect.  So a certain amount of interaction with the public with these energies pouring through might be intentional and desired, and the powers that be might not care if Bush's language is so screwed up, because it's more important that this energy be allowed to take root amongst crowds, etc.

As far as I can tell, Bush's energy at this point is very much like Hitler, full on possession by something horrible that wants to gain as firm of a hold here as possible. So far, during this Administration, it would seem that the entities he conveys have managed to gain the most hold among those alleged Christians who hold neo-conservative beliefs.  They're ready to kill the liberals now.  That's a sign of something being seriously f**ked up.

Nice.

LipstickMystic aka Jennifer

PS  I used the word megademon - archdemons and megademons are Luciferian beings opposite the archangels and meta/megaangels in the spiritual hierarchy.  An archdemon is pretty nasty, most of us have made spiritual vows to serve various archdemons in past lives (because many of the critters masquerading as gods were archdemons.) By removing all vows of service to archdemons, you can clear out MAJOR stuff from your life, and it's not hard to do. Just takes spiritual willpower.

But a megademon is more a demonic controller for an entire planet, and this presence is always seeking entrance and influence here through powerful people.  It actually makes a bid for you the minute you start to achieve even a tiny bit of fame, and it's really hard to fight off.  Years ago I walked away from a six figure deal with a major publishing house after the archangel Michael appeared in front of me the day before the contracts were supposed to be signed. He doesn't usually do that, so I took note!

He showed me the chain of energy behind the publishing company - and I was looking right into the gates of hell. The founder of the publishing company had been a big yoga guy, and he still oversees the place now, and yoga entities are very bad news.  (Learned that the hard way years ago; grist for another post someday. Short version: entities in charge of yoga are albino/Nordic ET's tied to the negative reptilians, and yoga poses act as a form of physical conjuring to allow them to take over your energy field in a parasitic relationship. Kids, don't do yoga!)

Anyway, I was shown how heavy the demonic control is over all major media on this planet, and it's this megademonic energy that seeps into a person's psyche the minute you sign a contract with some of these groups.  I believe there are exceptions to this, though. I work with some major newspaper companies right now and I also worked with Showtime TV for years, and in my capacity as a writer (who never actually saw or interacted with her bosses - this was all remote work) I never got slimed by them. Maybe it's the fact that I never speak to them on the phone or see them? Everything is through email. Also, nobody pays ANY attention to my contributions, and everybody is very nice at the places I work with.  So for some reason that megademonic energy isn't getting through, which is good.

But the media companies are heavily overshadowed, and when you start stepping into the reality of potentially becoming "famous," oy vey, the demonic stuff comes out to try to possess you. They immediately try to take ownership of you.  It wasn't just one publishing company I felt this with, either. I met with an editor-in-chief at another house that was interested in me, felt the cold demonic fingers rake across my soul at the meeting, and just never called that editor again (pissed my agent off!)  And there was one other house that the VERY MOMENTS the editor was looking at my book proposal, I experienced horrific astral rape. And I only found out later that it was at the exact time this guy was looking over my proposal and deciding he wanted to "adopt" me as their new mystical writer to do a line of books. Thanks, but no thanks. F**kheads.

I also felt this on about half the major FM radio stations I used to appear on as a psychic reader, and I definitely had to fight it off when I did the two TV appearances on the Fox network and on the Sci Fi network's Sightings show.  The minute I got off the phone with the producers of Sightings, who were perfectly nice in and of themselves, this cold, horrific, demonic force came into my apartment, I started to shake physically, and I felt like I was suddenly outdoors in temperatures of about 10 degrees below zero.  I immediately had to turn up the heat and do major psychic self-defense work, because SOMETHING wanted control over me while I did that TV appearance. Thank God/Goddess I was able to keep it at bay, but it wasn't easy.  The sacrifices we're prepared to make when we're young and stupid to get into "show biz!"  I'm glad I'm not in that reality now.

(Okay, I rambled off topic, forgive the diversion! Always have more war stories to tell. smile

LM