The Secret Covenent (Page 1 of 3)

Thanks Abrashea!    Well..........I just found out that this document is most likely a modified version of something that was called "The Protocols of Zion."  To sum it up in the Reader's Digest Condensed version, the Nazis / Illuminati / Brotherhood / whatever you want to call it came up with a false concocted story that back in 1897, a bunch of Jewish Elders got together and had a meeting where they outlined their plot to take over the world.   The outcome of this meeting was supposed to be some big plan called the "Protocols of Zion".   The Nazis then used this claim about the meeting, and the alleged "Protocols of Zion" agenda to fuel their mission against the Jews.   The rest is history, as we know what happened to the Jews during WWII.

It seems though that the plans outlined in the alleged "Protocols" was really in actuality the Illuminati / Brotherhood agenda.   But twisted and turned around to be pinned on the Jews.   So the above thing that I posted, (which I found over on the Goro Adachi forum, because someone posted it there) is sort of the "best of" parts of "Protocols", extrapulated and re-worded.   In the above version I posted, it's supposed to be in reference to the Brotherhood factions which have controlled the world, NOT the Jews, so, I do want to get on here and state that in no way shape or form was I endorsing the "Protocols of Zion" Nazi propaganda.   The actual Protocols document is very long and wordy, and goes on for over 20 chapters.

SO.....with all that said.........:)    I still think this is "Covenant" document is highly relevant, as it does outline extremely well what the secret Brotherhood factions have been doing for millenia.   It's a good reminder about what's going on in our world lest we get TOO complacent with our DVD's and TV and entertainment and forget.

I'm curious. Is the "smoke-screen" viewpoint I use shared by anyone else?

I mean, by realizing this, I no longer look at the conspiracy theories anymore. Not because they aren't true but rather because it is like describing the shell of an egg. Pointless.

It is even more clear that human-organizations are not our enemies but rather puppets of the same illusional crisis-filled care-packages from higher dimensional beings, that label earth as their fridge. Humanity as their source of water and protein.

The above as you have brought in lyra is interesting in describing the state-of-mind of "higher-ups" and simplifies humanities state currently to some deranged agenda...but I don't know what it is, but I no longer feel like it's beneficial for any of us to discuss it any further.

We all have real important things that are clear now. Or becoming clear. We have theories being brought up of free-energy and that which is plainly unimaginable to present day folk. I just came from a forum where they were based on conspiracy-theories...which is fine because it is a start. A start to a journey of finding answers and re-evaluating our self-concepts and intermingled programming. However they do not search to truly progress past the lessons, but make grande plans that could only be done in the Iron Age...but the Iron age will be over before they even get a chance to implement any of their changes. Everything is progressing as we reach the shift, including activation of the "glorious" 12-DNA strand structure and all of the wonders that which only exist as myths and legends.

However I guess considering there is probably going to be countless of billions dead from the upcoming cataclysm, it's only good-fun to spend all our time speaking about the Prior di Zion and bush-brothers drinking spiked serpent-blood...

I sense this forum is a symbol of higher-purpose, beyond such smoke.

I agree Cameron, and I would never want to impose my beliefs on anyone. In fact, I find myself being very comfortable with the way-of-things presently here.

"bit soupy" -> Do you even agree it's just a "bit" soupy? I mean, we have 8-years until a shift occurs, if you believe such a thing. Personally I believe it could not be a cataclysm unless we all manifest it.

But speaking of conspiracies...isn't it the top of the smoke? How can it be beneficial for US here any longer? When one seeks a journey such as we do, such as Monty, we first see conspiracies (beginning of smoke) and then head our attention down to the fire (truth).

Why go back and look at the smoke when we have found the fire?

Just sharing my honest thoughts...

I think Cameron said it very well, Blackbox --  Speak for yourself.   Just because you personally are "tired" of a topic or find it "pointless" doesn't mean everybody else does too.   This forum doesn't revolve around what you deem to be appropriate material.   This forum is for EVERYBODY involved.   And there should be topics for EVERYBODY, again, like Cameron pointed out.   Also, who are you to determine what topics should or shouldn't be talked about "any further" ?  "I no longer feel like it's beneficial for any of us to discuss it any further."  I mean, what is that, anyway?   Seriously?   Talk about trying to take over and control a forum.....holy cow.       

It's comments like yours that help slowly stifle forums, because other posters see the kind of response you just gave and then become afraid to post something out of fear of being ridiculed, mocked, judged, critiqued or condescended, having people like you telling them that whatever they posted is "pointless", or deciding on behalf of everybody else what topics shouldn't be "discussed any further", and what subjects are good or not good enough.   It's one thing to point out your opposing viewpoint in an intelligent, constructive and productive way.   It's another thing entirely to tell somebody what they posted is pointless, or nicely "suggest" to them not to discuss something anymore, encouranging them, and others, not to post in the future out of fear that whatever they have to say won't be "Good Enough", or up to the standards of what "Blackbox" deems appropriate.

So, sorry Blackbox, I disagree with you.   I'm sorry you find my posting "pointless", but I know others enjoyed it.   My first inclination after reading your response was to throw my hands up in the air and say, "You know what, forget it!  I'm not posting anything anymore."    But then I reaalized, hmmm.    That's probably what you want.     

I hope that my response will ensure that other posters don't hold back from posting after reading your response.   If someone finds something to be worthwhile, they should post it, and if there's a topic somebody would like to see covered they should start a thread about it......and not worry that someone else will criticize them for it.   I know I appreciate anybody who posts and contributes anything on this forum.   This forum is brand new, and any material is good to try to get things off the ground.    Even if it's something I already know about, I realize that everybody is at different levels in our learning.   We're not all on the same page, so it's good to have something for everybody, whether you're a beginner or advanced.

Sigh. I really didn't mean to imply what you're going on a tangent about.

However you definately went at it in a rude way.

My post wasn't to make ANYONE afraid. In fact, I'm one of the nicest, charming, and receptive people you'll ever meet. What I was trying to do was see if others thought the same way...

I've been stepping through the journey like many here probably have, do, or will go on. What I have learned: the priceless things that may seem obvious and yet it took hours upon hours of reading are little sayings like "As above, So below" and I thought that some others here on the forum would have thoughts to add to mine.

I think that we're headed to a time of lies being peeled off the planet by the symbology of wars and deciet, destruction and chaos, etc etc, and conspiracy theories or anything of the sort seem to bring more headaches than resolution. I've been there. I've been "die-hard" for some of the concepts as they were required to analyze for my intuition and research to resonate the beneficial from the smoke.

I enjoyed your post too lyra but it triggered me to write my response. Why did it trigger me to respond? Because even though it has many things said that make me "nod", it is ultimately subjective. It ignores hyperdimensional politics. It ignores puppeteers. I think this, from being a montalk reader, needs to be noted and conspiracy topics to be given caution. Not to be disregarded but to be shown it's "shallow" characteristics.

I think it is rather posts like yours that feed the "strifle". Not because you are not a good person or intelligent but rather because you placed judgment on me.

Judgment on my intentions and judgment on my character.

Very presumptious. Advise you check your batteries.

Nobody said that the Covenant was the end all be all of what's happening with reality.    It was meant as food for thought.   Something interesting to think about.  If you didn't like it, you could have skipped over it.   

Judgement was placed based on the posts you've written.  Sure, I don't know you in real life, but there have been more than one post from you where you demonstrated an inability to consider others on this forum.   First, when you started talking all the "C's" lingo;  I politiely jumped in and gave a quick background explanation on what you were talking about for all those members who have never heard of the C's or the Cass group.  I didn't want people to feel left out or confused.   You then said you were "puzzled" that there would be montalk readers who hadn't read the C's material, and the way in which you said it was kind of in a "Duh" way, kind of like, "Who here WOULDN'T be familiar with the C's????" as if the two groups were mutually exclusive, and all the montalk readers were former Cass Chat members.    Which as we all know is NOT the case.   This forum isn't an offshoot of Cass Chat.    So that was the first thing.   The second was in jumping on here calling my post "pointless" and trying to tell me that *you* feel that this stuff shouldn't be discussed anymore.   

I noticed you didn't address that point in your two responses --  the fact that you tried to dictate what should or shouldn't be discussed here.   It STILL boggles my mind that someone would have the nerve to say that.   So please, don't be turning this around on me saying that I'm the one causing strife.   Go back and re-read your post.   

Lest this thread degenerate into nonsense fighting, this is all I have to say on the matter.   It was never my intent when I started this thread to have a fight.  I  just wanted to post something interesting, some food for thought, that's all.