CNN inserted fake images of planes hitting the WTC towers? (Page 1 of 3)

That theory sounds more like an attempt to insert disinformation into the whole 911-Truth movement to discredit the solid questions that have not been answered.

I don't know about that. But in still shot images. MSM journalists, and the papers who have published their photos, have been caught/busted running faked/heavily edited photo's which had been extensively photoshopped. What they were presenting as "the truth", was spruced up with digital editing, like increasing a crowd size in one example. Which was discovered finding the same person in two places in the same photo (rubber stamp tool). Because of that, lack of integrity on the part of people, it's much harder to really trust anything you see.

I've heard from ppl who have been to NYC and seen the vacent spot where the WTC towers once stood. I believe they are gone. I've heard that the planes that were flying were performing beyond spec. One documentary (Loose Change 2nd Edition?), said one of the planes used in the attacks, was listed as still in service. It would be nice to find that reference. What to believe? Certainly not the official story. Maybe TPTB did project holographic images over remotely controled or self guided missiles or something. What happened to the planes and their passengers? I don't know how far you want to take, if you can just stick to the facts, it seems like there's ample evidence to shred the official storyline to peices. I also saw a video clip of a dragon flying in NYC on that day, but personally I don't think the video is real. People are convinced they saw the correct type of passenger airliner bearing the correct markings hit the towers. There's video from multiple angles besides eye-witness reports. That doesn't mean that CNN wasn't playing doctored video clips. It's he-said she-said who you gonna believe? This stuff needs some kind of evidence to back it.

Bottom line is: planes or no planes, it is not planes but explosives of a still unkown nature that caused the collapse. Note the big difference between the collapse of WTC7 (classic demolition for the purpose of everyone intelligent enough to see) and the WTC collapses which are very different from classical controlled demolitions. what kind of explosives can cause that? Thermite can cut through steel like butter but it doesn't explain the explosions that shattered everything to pieces; even bones to less than a centimeter long were found on tops of nearby buildings.

-no plane in Shanksville, that's for sure.
-missile-like craft in pentagon, for sure. To be noticed by fringe, so that they will be terrified by this crude evidence of an 'inside job'.
-bombs of an unknown nature (MM says H-bombs in the bottom of the building. what??)
-WTC7 for the fringe to witness and be certain that it was an inside job. Silverstein the 'bad jew' of the story, gaining insurance money (this 'insurance money and Silverstein 'slipup' is merely covering up the real reasons)

I always thought that those who did the 911 job wanted us to notice it was unusual and that it was an inside job. The 911 pseudo-attacke was ridicule (think of WTC7, why did they pull it except to make us talk about it?) When I saw 911 truth video, Loose Change and so on, i said to myself: this whole plot seems to be thought up by the three stooges! This is ridiculous, it must cover up something else, they can't be this stupid...

Whatever they used was powerfull enough to turn all of that concrete into the famous dust clouds that blanketed the streets.

It was also enough to turn the rare metals from the computers and such into micron size particles, etc.

For all we know it could have been built this way, with someone just waiting to "pull" the twin towers, and I wouldn't doubt it.

Yes, though I meant "pre-fitted" with the explosives. Although not impossible, it would probably be pretty hard to outfit the two buildings with enough explosives on every level, under the noses of the people working there.

Im not a structural engineer, but I believe that with the proper structural knowlege you would not need to rig the whole building with explosives, just certain key structural points.  For instance most of the evidence suggests the structural columns in the basement were destroyed moments before the plane even hit.  if they got the central column to collapse inside the building without evidence of the collapse seen on the outside it could perfectly explain how the building collapsed.  If you look at the WTC towers there were actually three sections to it.  There were actually two special floors that isolated each of these sections from each other so in some ways each section acted as an independant structure.  If key structural areas on these floors were hit with thermite it could also lead to a structural collapse.