Re: JonBenet's killer found...how do the conspiracies tie in....if at all?

right you are, lyra

but what's that healing business about?  ramblings of a lunatic?

http://people.aol.com/people/article/0, … 92,00.html

and about the name thing, mel gibson mentioned that in conspiracy theory except "sirhan sirhan" didn't fit the mold

(just random thoughts that should probably be ignored)

Re: JonBenet's killer found...how do the conspiracies tie in....if at all?

lilmomma wrote:

ramblings of a lunatic?

Yeah, pretty much.


lilmomma wrote:

and about the name thing, mel gibson mentioned that in conspiracy theory except "sirhan sirhan" didn't fit the mold

Well like I mentioned earlier, three names are used IF the person has three names.  If their birth name is only two, then that's what has to be used.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: JonBenet's killer found...how do the conspiracies tie in....if at all?

I actually got a peek at the circus at the courthouse today.  They had all their tents set up and satellite dishes.  I swear, it really did look like a circus.  They had little white tents all over the place, a coffee stand (the peanut and cotton candy booths weren't ready when I was there); clowns walking around in uniforms.  The only thing missing was the elephants.

Its all so funny.  Everyone knows Santa did it.  I mean..Christmas...funny old man breaking into everyone's house...giving candy and toys to young children...c'mon it's obvious! big_smile

Never Give Up!

Re: JonBenet's killer found...how do the conspiracies tie in....if at all?

Re: Cathy O'Brien, MKULTRA, Project Monarch -- I HIGHLY recommend reading the following "Cosmic Awareness" channeling, saying that what Cathy O'Brien claims is true, plus lots of great stuff, about the New World Order, etc... Definitely a must-read.

http://archive.tc/?x=669

20 (edited by lyra 2006-09-08 05:43:54)

Re: JonBenet's killer found...how do the conspiracies tie in....if at all?

Mindfield wrote:

Re: Cathy O'Brien, MKULTRA, Project Monarch -- I HIGHLY recommend reading the following "Cosmic Awareness" channeling, saying that what Cathy O'Brien claims is true, plus lots of great stuff, about the New World Order, etc... Definitely a must-read.

http://archive.tc/?x=669

Interesting read, I just finished perusing it.  It seems from what I've gathered that Cathy has indeed been a victim of MC, no doubt about that, which I did agree with in my earlier posts.   I had been questioning whether she really experienced everything she claims she did (and it seems she very well may have) but most importantly, the role of Mark Phillips in Cathy's life.  He's consistently portrayed as being "former" CIA, and as her rescuer, who was on the lam, de-programming her.   Some food for thought that comes up when you do the research is that:


- Once in, always in.  There's really no such thing as being "former" CIA;

- Phillips may be Cathy's newest programmer. Instead of being "freed," the programmer has only changed hands.  Cathy's odd behavior, noted by those who've met with her and Mark, seems testament to this.  There's a detailed piece about this in the Universal Seduction series.  When I get home later I'll look it up, and possibly see about getting it posted here.  It's always good to have multiple perspectives on a situation.

- Phillips' odd behavior also seems to indicate that things aren't what they seem to be.  Again, I'll provide the material when I get home tonight for some illustration.

- The fact that in the early stages of their escape, nobody killed them, and they were alllowed to start running around the country, flying, driving, staying at hotels, giving speeches and appearing on radio shows without being killed.  What all of this might mean is that Cathy has been "allowed" to be what's considered a controlled leak, which serves a variety of purposes.  Everything from gaining the upperhand on what the public is going to hear, while possibly inserting disinformation into the works to send people scrambling down the wrong path - or get them to look in one particular direction and not another.  And so on. 


Again, I don't doubt that Cathy was abused and mind controlled, but I just had doubted how much of her story is really accurate, and again, the situation with "who is Mark Phillips really?"  I've read other excerpts from the Cosmic Awareness channelling and found it to be one of the more legitimate-sounding channeling sources, (in fact I've even quoted one of their sessions before...) but you never know.  What's weird about this particular session is that the Awareness talk an awful lot like a normal person, even using the casual slang.  They also seemed to hold the mainstream conspiracy view on the subject, agreeing 100% with the O'Brien material, and not mentioning ANY funny stuff that has surrounded the entire situation....which there apparently is a lot of.  So I'm wondering if that particular session may have been colored by the channeler's personal biases and viewpoints which lean in the direction of enthusiastically supporting the Cathy and Mark story as presented.  A higher awareness who's outside of 3rd density and can see a much broader view would certainly have insight that we, the average person, don't.  And all that's really found in that particular material is everything we the general public already have access to.  There's nothing in there that one wouldn't be able to find in the conspiracy literature.   If anything, it only serves to reconfirm what the channeler, and those involved, already knew.    Anyway, my above points are just something to keep in mind.   Be back later with some Universal Seduction excerpts....

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----