• Registered: 2006-05-21

Topic: NASA 'moon landing' tape

This morning I read in my local newspaper that Nasa has reported that the original tape of the first 'moon landing' has gone missing. I doubled up with laughter when I read it. A historical document of the first magnitude has 'gone missing'! Does it lay around on a shelf?

Are they indeed afraid that someone might want to look at it, examine it more closely and reveal it for the sham that it is? Take it home Buzz, and don't tell anyone you have it!

Now, if it was one of our fringe buddies who managed to get his hands on it then that would be interesting!! But I doubt it.

  • From: The Present
  • Registered: 2005-06-19

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Are you suggesting man never went to the moon?

Vincit omnia Veritas: Truth conquers all.
  • Registered: 2006-05-21

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Hi Matt,

Some conspiracy researchers suggest there is evidence to consider the possibility of the first moon landing being staged.

Bruce

  • Registered: 2005-10-16

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

matt_d82 wrote:

Are you suggesting man never went to the moon?

I am.  tongue

"The unknown does not incite fear, but dependence on the known does." - J. Krishnamurti

visavis's Website

  • From: The Present
  • Registered: 2005-06-19

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Ok, but why do you think that?

Vincit omnia Veritas: Truth conquers all.
  • Registered: 2005-10-16

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Gut feeling mostly.  More research is required.  It's about in line with other clandestine/conspiratorial facts, events and (political) structures that have been confirmed.

"The unknown does not incite fear, but dependence on the known does." - J. Krishnamurti

visavis's Website

  • From: East Coast
  • Registered: 2006-08-06

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

There is actually quite a bit of conflicting information in those tapes.
Wind blowing the flag, when supposedly there's no wind on the moon.
wrong angles of shadows. staged at area 51?
A lot of europeans believe it was staged.

feedbaxlow's Website

8 Reply by Xenopope (edited by Xenopope 2006-08-18 23:29:59)

  • From: NOTHING
  • Registered: 2004-09-03

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

matt_d82 wrote:

Ok, but why do you think that?

Secret Space presents the evidence which makes this argument.

http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=3803

The space program was forced to have readied this evidence as a safeguard to negate the possibility of a failed moon landing being televised nationwide. It dosen't necessarily mean there was no real moon mission. Possibly that the moon landing was failed or even merely not 'satisfactory'.

I am as is Void.
  • From: IL
  • Registered: 2006-05-24

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Xenopope wrote:

It dosen't necessarily mean there was no real moon mission. Possibly that the moon landing was failed or even merely not 'satisfactory'.

.....or they didn't want the public to see what they really encountered/saw/found there, so they created the "public release" version of events, and then the "real" version is somewhere under lock and key (like many of NASA's other discoveries).

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." ~ Mark Twain
  • Registered: 2004-10-26

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Pinkrlyq--I tend to think that your take on it is right.  There was a book called
The Spaceship Moon written in the 70's which had some of the FM unedited communications
transmissions from the moon which had the astronauts gasping at what they were seeing.
One of the astronauts was later quoted as saying that they were "warned off in no uncertain
terms" by whoever or whatever was there.  The astronauts also did some soundings on
the surface using the same techniques that oil prospectors do on earth.  The results were
unexpected:  the moon was ringing like a bell. 

I would encourage interested people to read lyra's post on "Who built the Moon?" and the
subsequent posts after that.  Verrrry interesting to say the least.

TP

11 Reply by Pinkrlyq (edited by Pinkrlyq 2006-08-22 11:26:25)

  • From: IL
  • Registered: 2006-05-24

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Hi Tom smile

Yeah, I'd followed the link Xenopope listed above to Lyra's post, and it's extremely fascinating stuff.  I used to think it was all just a bunch of bunk... too Star Wars "death star" kind of conspiracy theory, but then a few years back, I'd read Jim Marrs' book, Alien Agenda, and one of the chapters talks about the seismic experiments the astronauts conducted on the moon, leading to the "hollow moon theory".  Had me scratching my head because I'd been seeing/reading things on the internet years ago about how people thought the tapes of the first landings had been faked.  So, the only conclusion that makes sense to me is that they're both correct.  Most of the disinfo that our gov't puts out, it seems, centers around only giving the public half truths and faking the rest with very boring, unimaginitive filler fluff.  The real truth is often times stranger than fiction.

Another quirk about our moon is the "coincidence" that we only ever see one side of it... It rotates at a rate that keeps only one side of it visible..... but that side is strewn with craters from impacts... never made sense to me, and when I'd asked my Astronomy professor about it, he'd told me that I was only the second person ever to pose that question to him and informed me that at some point in the past that the moon did have a faster rotation speed, but that now it's slowed down to a point that just so happens to be perfectly in line with our ability to only see one side.  Yeah, sure, I thought.  I think Pink Floyd had it right:  "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."

~Pinky smile

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." ~ Mark Twain
  • Registered: 2005-10-16

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Pinkrlyq wrote:

Another quirk about our moon is the "coincidence" that we only ever see one side of it... It rotates at a rate that keeps only one side of it visible..... but that side is strewn with craters from impacts... never made sense to me, and when I'd asked my Astronomy professor about it, he'd told me that I was only the second person ever to pose that question to him and informed me that at some point in the past that the moon did have a faster rotation speed, but that now it's slowed down to a point that just so happens to be perfectly in line with our ability to only see one side.  Yeah, sure, I thought.

Pinky, wow I was thinking about posting that exact observation a day or two ago.  It's messup up isn't it, from a physics standpoint?  How many other planets have flippin moons which don't spin?? 

I wonder if it's related at all to the earth's year being increased from 360 to 365 days several thousand years ago.  Hmm... maybe energy transference between the two bodies?  (Maybe not, that doesn't sound like it would compute, even if a transference of energy/force was possible.)  Any astronomers / physics ppl have any thoughts on this?

"The unknown does not incite fear, but dependence on the known does." - J. Krishnamurti

visavis's Website

  • Registered: 2004-10-26

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Yeah, what a coincidence...and the moon is just at the correct distance and the correct size to
blot out the sun.  Curiouser and curiouser as Lewis Carroll would say.

The great occult teacher and writer Manly Palmer Hall wrote a criptic note at the end of one
of his monographs:  The moon is a skull.  At the time I read it I thought he was just being
mysterious or poetic.  Maybe not.

  • Registered: 2006-02-06

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

Well, you know thats a good question about only seeing one side of the moon.  I always wondered about the sun. Why is it hotter at sea level, but the closer you get to it, the colder the air is? Why doesnt it heat up outer space? Or did I miss the answer in science class?

In man's analysis and understanding of himself, it is as well to know from whence he came as whither he is going.   Edgar Cayce

Beliefs are tools for social conditioning, rather than expressions of inner realization or inner truth.   unknown
Ad Verecundiam

15 Reply by lyra (edited by lyra 2006-08-24 07:05:34)

  • lyra
  • lyra
  • Naked Emperor Pointer Outer
  • Offline
  • From: my own private idaho
  • Registered: 2004-03-25

Re: NASA 'moon landing' tape

treehugger wrote:

I always wondered about the sun. Why is it hotter at sea level, but the closer you get to it, the colder the air is? Why doesnt it heat up outer space? Or did I miss the answer in science class?

From:
http://www.whyy.org/tv12/franklinfacts/APR1200ff.html


Why.org wrote:

"One of the questions I get all the time goes something like this: Why does it get colder as you go higher in the atmosphere? Shouldn't it get warmer since you're getting closer to the sun? The fact is that as you go up from the ground, it does get colder, but through no fault of the sun.

The key to explaining this is that the gasses that make up the atmosphere - mainly oxygen and nitrogen - aren't particularly good at absorbing sunlight - that it, energy from the sun pretty much passes right through the air to the ground. The ground takes in that energy, and warms up. Then the ground heats the air above it. So the farther you get from the ground, the colder it tends to get.

This basic principle is fundamental to meteorology: In general, the sun heats the ground, and the ground heats the air."

Let's hear it for Google!   Who needs libraries anymore!  big_smile

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

lyra's Website