Topic: The Wisdom of Walking Away and Mythology
After reading through a blog about "the only winning move" over at in2worlds (http://in2worlds.net/thoughts), I got to thinkin'...
The gist of her thought was: (in the spirit of the movie "War Games") the only winning move is not to play the game.
Walk away.
As I said, I got to thinking: many of our myths contradict that wisdom. Deeply held archetypes all say, "Fight, you coward!...It ain't over till it's over!...Charge!"
There are stories of wise ones walking away as well. Our civilization has non-violent heroes, but they are rarer. The wisdom appears most conspicuously, to me, in the Tao: yield and overcome.
But stay-and-fight programming is more ubiquitous. Take the story of Jesus. He purposely got into arguments with Fundamentalists and atheists, challenged church authorities, and even sacrificed himself for his cause. (As the official story runs). Half of the New Testament is he said/she said. From a certain perspective, it is the story of a serial arguer. That's trivializing things, but really much of the text has that feel.
Even politically fringe movies like "V for Vendetta" are, basically, all about fighting. V, instead of spending years underground, could've walked away. Did explosives need to be set in order for people to stop fearing their government? Do the people need to make the government afraid of them in order to stop fearing their government?
Is it one or the other?
There is a balance to be struck, surely, between walking away and digging in for a scrap. Or is there?
Are all these stay-and-fight mythologies just mythologies of the ego? Stemmed from a juvenile wish for payback?
How much was V motivated by vengeance, and how much by egalitarianism? The title is "...for Vendetta."
Where is the myth of the one who walks away? Even Buddha stayed to face Mara. He didn't walk away. He didn't flatten Mara with an uzi, but the story is of staying and facing the music.
Where is the myth of the one who walks away?
but you can avoid its teeth.