Topic: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Over the years I have had a lot of trouble communicating with certain of my family.  They simply do not understanding my views on things.  Recently (I don't know why it took me so long), I realised that the reason for their lack of understanding is simply because they have a great deal of difficulty in visualising abstract ideas.

For example they would have difficulty with any conversation about emotions; due to the fact that emotions aren't tangible.  Or taking it further; how an individuals emotional state can create their reality - or cause others to act / react in certain ways.

Anyway - such subjects seem too intangible to discuss with my some of my family and friends.  A common responce from them is - "Well no one can know if that is true until they see it."  Apparently they require direct experience to accept an idea, I always thought that this was simple skepticism.  But now I realise many people just cannot visualise or comprehend abstract concepts.

On some occasions I have found that it sometimes helps to talk in metaphores; however for the most part metaphores go straight over these peoples heads, as they take the metaphore literally - or else cannot relate it to the original subject.

So - what I am asking is this; has anyone found anyway around this?  Is it possible to communicate intangible ideas to people that can only understand tabgible perspectives?

To be honest, I am starting to wonder if this is the root of a lot of mis-understandings.  To use a Steiner term, many people have developed a very Ahrimanic perspective of the world and themselves...and I suspect it is this that gives them a lot of difficulty.

So, any ideas or thoughts?

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

There is something I call "The F Factor" as a result of my many years observation. This is strictly connected with a "virus" that humanity have in their conscioussness. This virus may be described as Archon-mind or entity attachments; these are the concepts that NR helped me to relate.

Anyway, The F Factor is simply fascism. Don't jump to conclusion by thinking about politics or nazis or Hitler etc. As a summary, this is a core belief: "my thoughts, my views, my believes are exactly right, basic and without flaw. this is how the universe is. there is no need for me to learn/change/progress".

Over the years I too tried to communicate with them and found this is simply impossible because of this factor. As Rumi said "whatever you say, you can only tell as the other's understanding".

So there are some people I can speak with some of the concepts that are important for me and there are majority of people I talk on sports, girls, work, business, economy etc. Sad but true.

This was not like that in the beginning of my 20's, when there was a big energy in my veins which try to reach other people and lean on other people to some degree. But I'm in mid-30's now and over the years I found out this energy is precious and I need it myself.

Ooops... did I sound a bit snob & egoist? Or am I using that "F Factor" myself too? Possible. But that's the way it is now.

Change we must, to live again
- Jon Anderson

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Feritciva.....I agree, there are a lot of people with the *F Factor* as you call it.  It took me many years to realize you cannot change these people, you cannot help them look at things differently, they just cant and wont. I dont think you are being a *snob*, you just have an observation about a certain type of people that many of us deal with on a daily basis.

In man's analysis and understanding of himself, it is as well to know from whence he came as whither he is going.   Edgar Cayce

Beliefs are tools for social conditioning, rather than expressions of inner realization or inner truth.   unknown
Ad Verecundiam

4 (edited by lyra 2006-08-02 04:34:31)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Marcus wrote:

So - what I am asking is this; has anyone found anyway around this?  Is it possible to communicate intangible ideas to people that can only understand tabgible perspectives?

For starters, for me personally, the effort isn't worth it.  I don't think people like that can be changed.  I don't think their way of thinking/perceiving can be altered, as I'll outline why in a second.  But just to point out the obvious wink ....your family seems to be an ongoing source of problems and energy drain.   That might be something to pause and take a moment to reflect on.....


Marcus wrote:

To be honest, I am starting to wonder if this is the root of a lot of mis-understandings.  To use a Steiner term, many people have developed a very Ahrimanic perspective of the world and themselves...and I suspect it is this that gives them a lot of difficulty.

And here's where we get to the crux of the issue.   I'll pose a question/idea:   Why is it that you, me, others are able to understand abstract concepts such as emotions and so on.....and they're not?  Is it possible that these people are missing something within them that literally renders them incapable of understanding these concepts?  See, how can a person understand emotions and the like.....if their upper chakra centers are cut off, for instance? (or "higher centers" as some refer to it as.)   You may be closer to the truth than you know when you talk about them in terms of Steiner's Ahriman.  Ahrimanic consciousnes would not be wired in such a way as to EVER be able to "get" the sort of things you're able to discuss.   Granted, I don't know your family, so I just pose this as an idea for you to look into and consider.   But it seems that there's a chunk of the population that are literally incapable of processing this sort of thing.  Call them OPs, or newly incarnated 3rd density souls, I don't know, but it seems that no amount of anything, and no type of approach works for these types.  At that point it's a matter of learning to know when to cut your losses and walk away in order to conserve your own energy.   

Just my two cents!  smile

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

5 (edited by Marcus 2006-08-02 10:20:30)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Thanks for the replies.  I certainly think it is very much a case of being stuck-in-a-rut in the manner in which they think.  And you are right Lyra; they are indeed a constant source of issues for me.  But for the most part I have learnt to grow around that, and in addition many of those issues have been confronted and dealt with.

Where as before I used to get drained by all this stuff, now it really isn't much of a problem for me.  But that said, I am now trying to comprehend how they perceive the world (my family).  It seems to be very rigid, matter-of-fact, and all "Seeing is believing".  And that's fine.  I no longer have any interest in trying to "change" them; they are who they are.  And if in the end I have to walk away - then that is what will happen - I have little qualms about that.

Anyway as said - this isn't about me wanting to change them (and I really want to stress that!), it is more about me wondering if it is possible to communicate certain ideas.  It's almost as though we speak different languages...say a French man and a Chinese man meet - and this is the first time they have ever had contact with the others culture, and language.  They are both a very different sort of people...but ultimately - in the end and with perseverance it should be possible for them to communicate.

What I am trying to work out is if that analogy applies?  Is it simple mis-understanding of each other - confusion arising from the difference in language?  Could this confusion can be alleviated once a common point of reference is reached?

Or is it more a case of - as already mentioned - "Arhimanic consciousness"; because if that is the case communication will probably be all but impossible.  For a person deeply rooted in such a mind-set it would probably take a very strong personal event to occur within their lives, that shook the very foundation of their beliefs...before a change of perspective and awareness could begin.

But to be honest the people I am talking about are not particularly self-aware.  They constantly do and say things - and are totally unaware of their own body, actions and speech etc.  Let alone the repercussions of said actions.  For me that is a worry, because everything we do has an impact upon others, and when we act without consciousness we can deeply affect / scar others without even being aware.  (One of these people I am talking about kept calling a 3 year old a “Bender"  (i.e. gay) every time the kid mis-behaved.  They  didn’t even know what they were saying – and were totally shocked later on when it was pointed out).   (Would you really want such a person around your kids????!)

So - to elaborate, it isn't about me trying to change them - but rather about seeking a common point of reference that can aid as a transition point between two totally different worldviews.  Something tells me that this is indeed possible - but I also wonder just how effective such a thing would be, and indeed if in the long run the amount of required energy would be worthwhile.

And if it's not possible - are their any other avenues that can be taken to facilitate living side-by-side?  (Aside from burying ones head in the sand).

But then maybe at the end of the day it all comes down to an individuals level of self-awareness.  And if they haven't got any of that, no amount of prompting is going to change that fact...is it?

6 (edited by lyra 2006-08-02 11:12:39)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Marcus wrote:

But that said, I am now trying to comprehend how they perceive the world (my family).  It seems to be very rigid, matter-of-fact, and all "Seeing is believing"......it is more about me wondering if it is possible to communicate certain ideas.  It's almost as though we speak different languages...What I am trying to work out is if that analogy applies?  Is it simple mis-understanding of each other - confusion arising from the difference in language?  Could this confusion can be alleviated once a common point of reference is reached?

You know, I really don't know - For myself, I no longer hang around with or have daily exposure to people that  aren't on the same level as myself.   I'm unable to do it, and will just be alone if I have to, versus even attempting to make it work.  For me it's just too much hassle and not worth it.  The answer to your question is probably within your next statement then:

   

Marcus wrote:

Or is it more a case of - as already mentioned - "Arhimanic consciousness"; because if that is the case communication will probably be all but impossible.  For a person deeply rooted in such a mind-set it would probably take a very strong personal event to occur within their lives, that shook the very foundation of their beliefs...before a change of perspective and awareness could begin.......But then maybe at the end of the day it all comes down to an individuals level of self-awareness.  And if they haven't got any of that, no amount of prompting is going to change that fact...is it?

That's what I'm thinking, if indeed Ahrimanic consciousness (or something along those lines) is what's going on.  From what you've described here:


Marcus wrote:

But to be honest the people I am talking about are not particularly self-aware.  They constantly do and say things - and are totally unaware of their own body, actions and speech etc.  Let alone the repercussions of said actions.  For me that is a worry, because everything we do has an impact upon others, and when we act without consciousness we can deeply affect / scar others without even being aware.  (One of these people I am talking about kept calling a 3 year old a “Bender"  (i.e. gay) every time the kid mis-behaved.  They didn’t even know what they were saying – and were totally shocked later on when it was pointed out).   (Would you really want such a person around your kids????!)

......that sounds like they have a looooong way to go - maybe never - until they're going to even get to a point where you could find some sort of level playing ground for communication.   Not to sound egotistical, but I had more self awareness as a kid then what these people you've described seem to have!   yikes.   Hell, even my CAT is more sentient and observent than many people I've crossed paths with in life....seriously, what's up with that?? !    big_smile   (and I'm very serious too when I say that about my cat....complete strangers have pointed out her unusual level of intense observant awareness and sentience.....!)   Which brings it back around to:  Why is that me, you, and others like us, can communicate about these higher, intangible, abstract concepts...even as KIDS.....when these adults you're referencing can't even seem to do it even by this point in their life?  I mean, what's going on here, you know?  Something's missing within them it seems.  Why did you turn out the way you did - self aware, introspective, alert, observant, interested in spirituality and higher concepts - and they didn't?  I think people are either born with it or they're not.  And who knows, maybe adults in their 30s, 40s, 50s and beyond can get a jarring wake up call that flips their world right over and gives them that awareness and higher perspective overnight, enabling them to be able to ponder and discuss intangible abstract concepts, but I don't know if that's necessarily how things work.   It would be interesting to hear from anybody else who's gotten some sort of direct insight into the nature of how higher awareness evolves within a soul.  (sounds like a "Cut and paste some C's transcripts" sort of moment to me!  big_smile  hehe)

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

7 (edited by montalk 2006-08-02 13:03:25)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Marcus wrote:

For a person deeply rooted in such a mind-set it would probably take a very strong personal event to occur within their lives, that shook the very foundation of their beliefs...before a change of perspective and awareness could begin.

Next time you get together, offer to bring some refreshments from the kitchen and quietly slip a hefty dose of hallucinogen into their drinks! Just kidding of course, but that's how some people snapped out of their old world view. If the mind is traumatized by something it is not ready to handle, it can fall into psychosis pretty quickly. Mild psychosis would be incorrectly digesting what was experienced and becoming zealously delusional. Like if an alien were shown to someone who was otherwise stubbornly skeptical, he might just crack and lose all discernment regarding the potential intentions of the alien. Or if someone experiences universal oneness during a trip, he might lose all discernment regarding the practical duality still present within our current level of existence.

Years ago I found it necessary to differentiate between stupidity, naivete, and ignorance. I use these terms in a descriptive rather than derogatory manner. These are, respectively, the inability to understand something, the lack of opportunity to understand something, and the unwillingness to understand something.    There is little hope for stupidity. Naivete is the best because the glass is empty and waiting to be filled. Ignorance is worse because there's no opening a locked door. Over time you can figure out what is the root of someone's irrational resistance to a concept. If stupidity or ignorance, then there's nothing you can do right now except pull back your energies, otherwise you'd be preaching and manipulating.

If willing, you could still probe them through conversation to see what outlines the limits of their understanding. What you will observe is that some people have a fuzzy outline that morphs with the consideration of new ideas. Others will have a very sharp outline beyond which nothing is acknowledged or understood, and that line never changes. That is the main difference between a sentient being and a programmed being. The latter cannot operate outside its programmed boundaries, while the first has the ability, no matter how rarely it manifests, of morphing or transcending its own boundaries. Sentience grows, programs adapt. If you're butting heads with a programmed being, best to just turn your energies towards more productive outlets.

Anyway, it's clear to me that some people simply lack the context and inner development to think at a certain level. Maybe they never had the necessary experience to put something into context, maybe their sentience was stunted at a young age, or maybe as a being their evolution has not progressed beyond that yet. Or perhaps they just don't give a damn. I mean, what would a soul that comes here for the most basic experiences of third density care for transcendental abstract ideas? What would a kindergartner learning the alphabet care about diagramming sentences?

To get an idea of what it's like to be in their heads, try to respond to an abstract question without turning within to think or ponder -- at least nothing beyond pulling up surface memories and programmed memes. Keep your mind at a very superficial and easy state of non-thinking as you speak, letting any challenges to your meme collection pull from it a set of rationalizations. You will notice this is a very easy way to live - you just go on autopilot and lay your seat back for a nap. The machine takes over and you start to atrophy. Or if you were embryonic to begin with, the machine can make you pass for a functional citizen of society.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Hey Marcus,

There's a great line out of the movie "The Last of the Mohicans" which fits my outlook:

"Do not try and understand them, and do not try to make them understand you, since they are a breed apart and make no sense."

Another quote I'd like to bring into this: "Where you stand on an issue depends on where you sit."

I'm at the stage where I no longer bother to explain myself unless I know that the other person is in the right stage/position to understand what I have to say. I've found that I have always been blessed with a profound level of empathy which allows me to understand another person's perspective. I note that this is a trait that I find almost completely lacking from the decision making process of "spiritually impeaded" individuals. Such people tend to be motivated by what they think they can gain from any advantage, and don't understand that sometimes the best thing to do is to exercise restraint and do nothing.

There was once a time when I would try to illuminate some more advanced concepts to a few select people. Most had no idea what I was talking about, but for the few that did the side effect was that they would tend to run with it, far beyond what I would have done. I suppose this is because they don't appreciate the time, energy, and discipline that I've had to develop in utilizing these things, and without the backdrop of hard knocks, it's like handing Pandora's Box to a 9 year old. Then I came across a novel idea - that other people aren't my responsibility, and that someone whose much wiser than me is already looking out for them in a loving way far beyond anything I could ever do, so most of the time I allow them to keep their precious bit of reality. I do this, aware that I have ways of sidestepping it if becomes necessary.

Montalk, I too have a habit of leaving idea-gaps in my wake...  smile

-3G

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

montalk wrote:

What would a kindergartner learning the alphabet care about diagramming sentences?

What would anyone in their right mind care about diagramming sentences?

seeker of truth

follow no path
all paths lead where

truth is here

E.E. Cummings

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

feritciva wrote:

"The F Factor" ....... : "my thoughts, my views, my believes are exactly right, basic and without flaw. this is how the universe is. there is no need for me to learn/change/progress".

My mother in law is The F Factor.

"And your truth will set you free!" Cipher

"The intuitive mind is a sacred gift.  The rational mind is a faithful servant.  We have created a society which honours the servant but has forgotten the gift." Albert Einstein

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

roll

big_smile

"And your truth will set you free!" Cipher

"The intuitive mind is a sacred gift.  The rational mind is a faithful servant.  We have created a society which honours the servant but has forgotten the gift." Albert Einstein

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

If they have trouble with abstract concepts, then concrete examples are needed - things that can be seen or personally experienced. Sometimes even metaphors and analogies are still too abstract because they are indirect. Sharing an anecdote to illustrate your point could help.

Nothing beats personal experience, but not everyone experiences empathy, intuition, introspection, lucid dreams, synchronicities, spiritual epiphanies, or alien and paranormal phenomena. In that case, the only offensive strategy might be using concrete counter examples to reveal fallacies in their assumptions to show there is room for improvement. Even then, some will be so stuck they resort to circular reasoning to stay within the bounds of their programming.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

13 (edited by Barefoot Doc 2006-08-03 07:45:53)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

http://www.solharvest.com/cclosers/RAWi … etheus.pdf
The above book by Robert Anton Wilson explains much about why we can't communicate with others who have imprinted different brain circuits using Tim Learies 8 brain circuit model. Well worth a read.
An intellectual imprinted person cannot communicate with a person who has a heavy emotional imprint and a person who imprinted the higher brain circuits cannot communicate with an intellectual imprinted person.
Its a model but makes sense and i would say the ahrimanic influence wants to keep man in the lower circuits.

Its not like we are fractions of the whole but rather versions of the whole.

14 (edited by titmouse_ 2006-08-03 08:09:54)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Okay, here is an abstract thinking test. Look at Barefoot doc's avatar and describe what you see. Is there only one way to view this?

I'll assume those who do not respond are not capable of abstract thinking and are unenlightened.

Fun fact: Great Tits are common in Europe

To know love is to know trust; to know oneself is to know truth
~~carefulcarpenter


1+1=1

15 (edited by Pinkrlyq 2006-08-03 10:53:37)

Re: How to communicate with people who can't understand abstract concepts?

Titmouse,  there's the obvious rainbow rotating clockwise, and it leaves a black after-image.... but if you shift your focus to the center of said rainbow and just stare, it looks like a rainbow circle with a quickly counter-clockwise rotating black box or prickly star of sorts.... That's all I could come up with.  (I'm a sucker for those visual perception tests.):lol:

Marcus, as far as I've experienced, in the long run, it's sometimes detrimental to yourself to attempt to  force a shift (or broadening) in awareness with most people who aren't ready for it in an energy sense.  They're not even aware of the Self, truly, so when trying to have a conversation with such people about anything necessitating their perspective to stretch outside of their little world, they're literally incapable of such a task.  And what's worse is that they may smile and nod and act as if they're genuinely interested in what you have to say, only to temporarily passify you.  For, the moment that they are out of your presence, they worry about your mental health, and believe that there is truly something wrong with you (wich ironically, only serves to cement their perspective (or lack of one) even deeper).  It's a horrible "catch 22", and will drain your energy and temporarily stunt your awareness (in any on-going efforts to try and "come down to their level" to find a common grounds of communication for the purpose of translation).  What I've had happen to me with members of my own family is that eventually, they got frustrated with me (once they realized that they couldn't change me to see things "normally") and told me to stop talking about such things to them.  They flat out refused to discuss anything "abnormal" and would lecture me for hours about "the real world".  After my initial frustrations, I've now come to believe that thier soul has just not chosen that avenue of awareness for this incarnation.  Their reasons of incarnation are vastly different from my own, and whatever their purpose for coming here, awareness is not among those reasons.  The ability to understand and communicate in abstract is a natural process that occurrs when one is at that certain level of experience (incarnational or otherwise)... then awareness begins to seep in naturally, but there's no way to force the issue before it's time. 

Not sure if that helped at all, but just thought I'd throw my two cents in. smile

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." ~ Mark Twain