Creating One's Own Reality - The Deception Of The "New Age" (Page 1 of 4)

Here is one more excerpt I transcribed on the topic of the New Age movement. Chiappalone seems to have disappeared after 1999, and then his wife Amitakh reemerged with the new last name Stanford, and began writing on www.xeeatwelve.com and a site she references called the Nara Site but I don't know the address of it. Her material expands on the topics discussed here. I kind of prefer her writing style to his, but it is all very intense material and worth reading at least once. It is a different perspective from MANY that I have encountered before.

"The Falsehood Of Oneness

Reading so-called New Age Literature, one is overwhelmed by the articles which stress the oneness of human beings, the oneness of man and nature, the oneness of the universe and the single purpose of it all. And even those who admit that massive physical changes are to occur stress the oneness of the movement to new heights of consciousness and awareness. This sort of oneness is utter rubbish.
In fact, anyone with any sense of reality would realize that the continual need to be indoctrinated with these points is in reality, a pointer to their untruthfulness.
If these points were true, no one would need to have them repeatedly presented and rammed down their throats. What is happening is that the evil essence, via its various modes of operations, is trying to program, pollute and indoctrinate beings into believing these false statements.
These false statements deny basic Truths which are essential to the understanding of what is really going on.
They deny these things:
The two basic ontological races: Divine and evil.
The existence of the demiurge.
The existence of the war.
The resolution of the war.
The Finality of this plane.
The Judgement.
The Transmutation.
The gross exploitation of the Divine Beings by the evil beings.
The spiritual assassination.

If all these things can be denied and True Beings made to forget, then the exploitation can continue unabated.
Hence, the aim is the very opposite to that of the Light whose aim is to awaken beings to what is really going on.
Next time you see the oneness being stressed ask yourself these questions, if you still need convincing:
"Where does all the evil come from?
Where does all the pain and suffering come from?
Why are people less and less aware?
Why are there more and more degenerates inspite of this assertion that we are all improving?"
These claims one oneness, of elevation of consciousness, of earthly emotional love, of peace, of joy and contentment are in marked contrast to the reality this plane is experiencing and will experience.
There is fear, pain, punishment, exploitation, hunger, degeneration, regression, repression and death in greater amounts than ever before. Every day the place comes closer to the brink of self-extermination.
Another false claim by the evil side states that if one perceives evil and its effects it is because the perceiver has created evil within himself. This is also a lot of rubbish.
Again I repeat: "Blind and evil is the fool who cannot perceive the evil essence." One cannot create the external evil. By stating this evil ones are trying to mock those with true perception.
Do not be fooled and do not fall into this obvious trap.
"
- Making Sense Of The Madness, J. S. Chiappalone 1986

please discuss.
Tim

A short review of my posts would reveal that I don't subscribe to the YCYOR party, however I don't follow the cosmology put forth by Amitakh either.

1.  It is just a reincarnation of gnosticism which has some very interesting points but has problems as well.  Specifically I think the concept of a single evil "demiurge" is a cover for a race of negatively-oriented beings which seeks to control the planet.

2.  I think her cosmology is very fatalistic and leaves little room for hope or escape from the current situation.

3.  I just get bad vibes from the followers of Amitakh.  Seems a bit cultish to me.

This material may be just as imbalanced as the New Age movement it derides. The extreme dualism it expresses is no different from the overly simplistic system of judgment that fundamentalist Christians employ. No doubt Chiappalone and Amitakh can see things the average person cannot, such as the predatory nature of the Matrix and its demonic operators. But this material  demonstrates what happens when one accesses supernatural powers of perception without being mature enough to handle it without getting all fanatical, persecutory, contemptuous, self-righteous, and crazy eyed about it.

It makes good points and covers stuff the New Age wouldn't touch with a ten foot crystal wand, but I would rather extract the good points than limit myself to this one-sided paradigm. I think it appeals to an battle-eager mentality that prefers simplistic clarity over complex accuracy.

As for the New Age YCYOR belief, experience itself shows that while hyperdimensional manipulation through artificial and negative synchronicity does exist and is quite common, it is also true that our own thoughts, emotions, and intent shape the probability of our experiences. Dark forces do not have complete control over our personal slice of reality. But neither are we complete creators of our own reality. It's in between and variable depending on your frequency and awareness.

I've never read the stuff but from what was quoted here, there does seem to be, as tenetnosce put it, "fatalistic" overtones.

I also agree with each person's view thusfar although the views may seem to be different.  Even Hourthirteen, I agree because I understand the level integration spoken of.  From a 5d/6d vantage point we do create our own reality to a great extent although there may be some things happen that we didn't plan on it's never anything we aren't able to handle.  Using the example of choosing our parents shows where Hourthirteen is coming from.  BTW, thank you for showing that external consideration.

When I say YCYOR is not true I'm speaking specifically from a consciousness (3d) vantage point.  I can sit here all day long and believe that I can create hundred dollar bills out of thin air but it's just not going to happen.  I also know of certain physical things that are used against me specifically that my consciousness sees as a free-will infringement.  I will show frustration over these things sometimes but I know/understand the other levels and almost always act from those higher vantage points.  I just like thinking from all the levels I know of.

The issues I see with saying "All is One" or "YCYOR" are not that they aren't true.  It's that rarely does the person that speaks of these things add the level they are speaking from.  "All is One" is a 7d or God level of view.  "Light and Dark are the same" is also a view from that vantage point.  It's great to know and understand that vantage point.  And I use it when I feel it fits the discussion at hand.  Which I do feel it fits 'here' since we are talking about specific "create your own reality" viewpoints in a broad sense.

What I personally try to steer away from is level jumping to these higher levels (and sometimes lower levels) without providing a clear cut path of transition.  I don't see doing that as being considerate of others although I will not judge another if they do it.  I may point it out if it's specifically related to something I've posted and jumps levels beyond the point I may have been making.  Sometimes the level jump is something that connects well.  Sometimes it just dilutes the point and diverts attention.  Disernment and external consideration are needed when deciding when and where to use the different levels of concepts.

But again, this is just how I see it and what I try to hold myself to.

Greetings, I have some comments to add here that I feel are appropriate. My husband has been reading the Chiappalone material, which I find very dogmatic. I don't like any texts that are dogmatic, and I try to keep an open mind about everything I read. In fact, I do not read much, and I see most of the material I read as falsehoods and distractions. It makes for quite a simple and sometimes unsatisfying life, however, I also know that when pleasure is found it is sincere. I feel that truth is only something I can know experientially, however, I have personally experienced much deception.

I want to know how others are going about in this situation. I can state, that I think the major newspapers and media are 100 % fatalistic, and they proclaim such facts, that our world is a dying planet. I do not know about this one way or the other, I only know some limited things from my own experience. I know that the people that I interact with, who often are kind in their speech, are known to later display injustice in their actions. I have always aligned myself with truth, and have always been a sincere and kind indvidual, my entire life.

In fact, as a young girl I often was maliciously tricked by others who who saw that my doubting of any presence of evil, was a good reason for them to deceive me. These are actions that I have experienced multiple times, and I can no longer allow others to use or abuse me with a sound conscience.

In light of my own personal experiences, displaying the straightforward, yet deceptive acts of evil, I cannot help but see it in our world, working to fool others. What I want to know is, why did we decide to be born into such a place of trickery? When I read other material discussing this, I am pleased to see that there are other likeminded individuals, who see a larger schema at work to deceive many. Though, I still do not know what their aim is either, why would such belief systems, as the YCYOR groups distribute  such texts freely? I am confused, because I do not know what benefit it has for the readers, or even the larger systems that created such a deception in the first place. When I consider, that the deception, is from some larger source, I feel utterly again confused, I think that a truth may be possible that we, as a human race are being entirely manipulated and deceived. I can see this in even our own media, discussing dire and eerie facts, only to again, disinform and distract. I do not like living in this world of lies, it is ultimately unsatisfying, especially being a person who is aligned with truth.

I want to find other truth seekers, and talk about our experiences. How many times have you been deceived, or found yourself in an awful circumstance? Can you honestly state that that is something you created? I now know that no one can, and I am confused about what to do about this end conclusion. Amitakh's material discusses that true light beings may be offered some sovereignty - HOWEVER, if we were unknowingly born into this trap, how can we state that the next stage will not be a further trap?

Your comments are always appreciated! Peace, Tracy

I understand.  I try to see where everyone "is coming from".  I mean by that their views held and how they present themselves (your perspective).  By adding in the "chose your parents" part I can tell you are speaking from a soul level.  It's like getting a pair of everyone's shoes so I can understand that person.  I can put on their shoes whenever I read their posts and feel/see from their perspective.  I may take their views and put it through my own filter but I always keep a copy undistorted.  It's just something I've always done even as a child.

By external consideration I mean keeping the reader in mind when posting.  Just stating a viewpoint without offering the background to that viewpoint is in my view selfish.  There may be someone that doesn't understand the viewpoint.  A different example but showing the idea in action, is my posts about the higher and lower, intellectual and emotional centers.  If I just used H.E., L.I., etc without offering the meaning behind those abbreviations then I am not being considerate to the readers.  I take the same view when offering concepts.  Of course, as can be gleemed from this exchange, I'm not always successful since you did not know what "external consideration" was referring to.  But I especially think it's imperative to exercise external consideration for the reader when dealing with concepts that can be taken different ways depending on the vantage point.  YCYOR is one such concept I think falls in that category.  The reason I think it's imperative is because someone may actually agree with another viewpoint if explained properly without taking away from the viewpoint they already hold.  And many disagreements can be circumvented if one uses disernment when giving one's points of view.  The end result is that I can agree with all the viewpoints in this post even thought they seem to be somewhat opposing one another.  And I can explain why I agree with all the viewpoints.

Hi Tim,

Just some of my observations here for what they're worth.  I think what you'll find in the particular forum is that the most active members are past the point of needing the type of material you mention.  That doesn't mean there's anything against offering it up for discussion.  That's a good thing as I see it.  It's just that I don't see too many active members that are in need of the transition material from "new-age" to a more discerning viewpoint.  So the viewpoints offered are most likely going to be about the issues within the material and not the valid points it contains.  There are many authors of such "new-age transition" material out there.  You'll find references to those scattered around the forum.  Some great quotes are still in use from such material even when the followings of any particular group may have strayed off course.

For me personally, I have nothing against the material whether fatalistic or not.  I hold the idea that all material has value in some context.  But also, for me personally, I'm not going to read it because I don't feel I require that type of material at this point.  I think others may take the same view.  From your quote in the first post it does have parallels to a lot of other material.  Valid parallels.  I'm sure others see it.  But the concetration will be on what is off with any particular material unless simply quoted in context of another post.

I can tell from your post addressed to Montalk that you understand a lot and will fit right in here.  And concerning the different material and how people react to it, I always remember that none of us can trully know beyond a shadow of a doubt that any particular belief is an absolute truth.  We just don't have the vantage point to say with 100% accuracy.  In other words, if the material is benefitial to you don't worry about what others say about it.  Get what you can from it and move on when your own growth shows you that you should.  But I think you already know that.