16 (edited by z3n3rg 2006-05-03 07:58:43)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

montalk wrote:

Here are some toughies to ponder:

How is knowledge associated with the lower intellectual center different from knowledge of the higher intellectual center? Do both qualify as Light or just the latter?

How does STS love differ from STO love? Do both come from the higher emotional center?

Those are tough ones.  Here are my theories.  Feel free to offer any insights.

----------------------------
Abbreviations used:
Lower Intellectual = L.I.
Higher Intellectual = H.I.
Lower Emotional = L.E.
Higher Emotional = H.E.
----------------------------

2d would be the moving center
3d would be the L.E. and L.I.
4d would be the H.E.
5d would be the H.I.

(The above is just a loose comparison between densities and centers.)

Of course, the centers integrate in differing ways between 3d and 5d depending on the individual and the interactions from higher level entities.  Some in 3d may not have developed the higher centers yet and some may have.  Although 4d is the realm of love and compassion (H.E.) it does have and use the H.I. as well, of course.  5d is the contemplative zone and the balancing zone for the lessons learned in the lower densities but that doesn't exclude the other centers.  It in fact combines all centers into one cohesive unit.  But that can be accomplished in 3d as well.

I see the above density/center comparison as what would be the basic configuration if there wasn't 3d entities interacting with 2d.  Or if 4d didn't interact with 3d and 2d.  And if 5d didn't interact with those 3, etc.  Basically, how it would be given no external interactions except the normal environment.


How is knowledge associated with the lower intellectual center different from knowledge of the higher intellectual center?

The L.I. concerns itself with the mechanics of physical reality.  It seeks to preserve self by gaining knowledge of it's environment.  In our society, these mechanics involve what many refer to as the matrix control system.  The L.I. can reach a 'point of seeing' that there is something beyond it's capacity but it cannot gain access to that directly.  In our society, the connection to physical creation is severely dampened which makes that 'point of seeing' even more difficult.  As StarCat points out, it keeps the L.I. busy in thought loops.

Under proper conditions the L.I. and L.E. can get to the point of appreciation (love) for something it sees as greater than itself.  Watching the movements of the heavenly bodies.  Watching nature in action, and so forth.  This appreciation, as stated before, is the recognition of the quality, value, significance, or magnitude of people and things.  This appreciation leads to development of the H.E. which is a greater love (appreciation) for the magnitude of the reality it finds itself in.  This love for something greater than self leads to the development of the H.I. which is a seeking for knowledge about that "something greater".

So the H.I. would concern itself with the seeking for knowledge about what it senses as greater than self.  It would seek to find out what and how the bigger picture was created.  For instance, after it recognizes the beauty, subtlety and intelligence of the natural environmental systems it would seek to know that higher intelligence.

At higher levels, like 5d, it would seek to learn to emulate that higher intelligence and create it's own natural systems.  It may create a new race of animals on earth that fit in with the current order perfectly.  That kind of thing.


How does STS love differ from STO love?

STS love at a 3d level before recognition of something higher is a self-preservation love.  Once that recognition and appreciation is found it will then seek to expand self to gain more of it's "god" powers.  It recognizes (appreciates, loves) the 'god' or power in self and seeks to expand that.  It also recognizes (appreciates, loves) this power in others and seeks to enslave those others to expand the power of self.

STO love is not achieved until recognition is achieved.  Just as STS, it recognizes (appreciates, loves) the 'god' or power in self and seeks to expand that.  The difference is it's interaction with other-selves.  It recognizes the power in others and seeks to empower others with it's own power (intelligence, energy).  It finds that when it empowers others through self, that itself is empowered even more from within.  A big light bulb goes off.  It finds that no matter how much is given none is taken away from self but in fact even more is given to self from within.  So it expands/empowers self by expanding/empowering others.  With this realization the STO entity can never go back to STS because the STS path doesn't make sense to it.


Do both come from the higher emotional center?

STS love does come from the H.E. center only after recognition of the power within and the choice to expand that power by enslaving of others.  Before this recognition and choice the STS love is from the L.E. center and is basically self-preservation.


Edit:  I realize there's some level of repetition in this.  The reason is that I want to expand each word to ensure the proper definition is included and ensure that the order of the words is as near perfect as possible to convey the different aspects of the concepts properly.

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

I see some good thoughts here.

StarCat

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Thanks z3n3rg for writing these. The thoughts manifested here and your responses to my Dr. Michael Newton topic had triggered smth. as you mentioned. Lots of new views and knowledge had come to me these last days, especially via dreams. There is one I saw a couple days ago which effected me a lot. I saw some little beings I thought as children marching in a school and they were all dressed in red wool, from socks to their hats. Also there was a village where these red wools are produced. I realize they are "raw souls" and understand that if they incarnate on 3D, they can only use their L.I. and L.E. to see/observe/understand what's going on around. So it will be very easy for organised religions to have their control upon earth, because what the religions say is definitely right for these "children-souls". Anyway, it was really impressing scene to see them marching like a hive.

After seeing this dream, I told to a friend "if you're a little child and come to Istanbul from your village elementary school, you get amazed to see the action and chaos of the city and you don't undertand anything. So, you stick to your group and do exactly what your teachers tell you. You can only visit where your teachers take you". Maybe this is another definition for OP's. If the "teacher" is STS guess what happens? Or don't guess, just observe the world.

Thanks again z3n3rg, your info seems to be a "trigger" for me!

Change we must, to live again
- Jon Anderson

19 (edited by z3n3rg 2006-05-04 08:35:42)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

feritciva wrote:

Thanks again z3n3rg, your info seems to be a "trigger" for me!

You are entirely welcome.  It brightens my day when I know that I was able to help someone.  That's really all I want to do is give.  I try to keep the channel clear by constantly giving so that I can constantly receive so I can give even more.  I was going to post this for about a week but kept putting it off.  It's hard sometimes to get the right words down.  But I was gently 'asked' again by some force to post it after I had received an unrelated epiphany.  I was like "ok, ok - thank you - I'll get right on it".  The other reason I have a difficult time posting like this is I don't know if it's true.  I don't want to give false information.  But then I'm reminded that I don't know, consciously, much of anything.  So I have to have faith that if I let the information flow that it won't be harmful.

Your "red wool" dream makes me think of the basal chakra that is represented with red.  It would be the 'moving center', in the scheme layed out in this post.  And it also reminded me that we all are connected to the Infinite Creator.  And some day soon we may find ourselves in 4d, gently speaking to these children-souls to help them learn what we have learned.  To give back to the Creator what was given to us so unselfishly.

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

hi all

i've been reading a few different threads over the last few days - so many things connected to each other

in this topic - i'm not sure how we're defining lower emotional centre and higher emotional centre - same with lower intellectual centre vs. higher intellectual centre  ... i guess it would something like - levels of maturity ?

to me, there's a difference between just intellect - like just cold logic, and real intelligence. intelligence is when you're using both your reasoning capacity as well as your heart - both together ... and to be able to do this in every facet of life - not just one part of life, not just in certain situations, but all the time - that's when you're up on your game ...

i keep saying this - but i think part of evolution, part of progress, part of growth - is the ability to face facts as they are - both about ourselves and about the world outside - the very facing of the fact is what causes a change, what brings light onto what is, whatever it is, and if it's in darkness - then you see it, you've shined a light on it by looking at it ... i think part of the reason why many people are not awake, or wake up occasionally and fall back asleep - is partly because of this - because it's hard to face the facts of the world and facts about ourselves - it's much much easier to escape off somewhere, television, sex overload, or whatever - plus people work crazy jobs with so much routine and it makes their minds and hearts dull - they lose that sense of freshness and wonder about life ...  and we get used to living with problems - we keep carrying our problems with us - that also doesn't help ... just adds to the overall problem ...

one thing about facing the world - with all the madness that's going on - that's really happening right now - it brings a sense of great sorrow - if you have any sensitivity, you know it does. Do you guys know about the genocide that's going on in Darfur right now ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rGD6FhenyU     this is happening today ... it's been going on for thousand and thousands of years, the same thing .. but look - if you face that sorrow - actually sit with it without moving away from it ... at the root of it - is passion ... it lights up inside of you when you realize what you're surrounded by -- maybe i don't need to mention it here, but that's what it is ... it burns you from inside to move towards the light ...

and about facing yourself as you are - when you can do that - when you have an awareness about yourself all the time - that's FIRST & LAST FREEDOM - you're not affraid to face whatever you're finding - you're in a state of flux all the time and you can go with it - that sense of peace, ease about yourself - it's the first step in the process - not something you come upon after years of effort ... like this thing they talk about in meditation ... look - when you meditate, whether you're concentrating on a word, or trying to still your mind - what are you actually doing ? are you not conforming your mind to a pattern ? if you're trying to create silence by using resistence, by resisting thoughts or whatever that comes in your mind - isn't that resistence in conflict with what's actually happening in your head ? all this dulls your mind ... and so does smoking and doing drugs - your mind needs to swift - sharp - if you're going to be able to follow yourself in the present moment - to stay with every movement of thought - have you tried it ? i'm speaking out of experience - not setting myself up as an authority - but offering what i see and asking you to look if you like ...

whether you're STO or STS - to me, it's the motivation behind what you're doing is what's important to be aware of ... whether you're out to SERVE others or out to serve yourself, are you doing it to satisfy some craving for yourSELF ? or are you doing it without motivation  ... someone could be a healer and identify him/herself as a healer - and that identificaiton is what gives this person his/her drive - maybe that's what brings a sense of importance or signficance to this person - maybe that's 1 of the motivating factor of that life - but in that very identification, is there a danger ? ---  take that title away from that person and what happens ? so isn't it possible to be what we are without identifying ourselves with an image ?

that's another reason why i think the world is so divided - it's the SELF that does it - it identifies with a religion, with a country, with a job title --- that's all the action of thought --- there was a thread talking about OPs - whether or not there are beings that are permanently incapable of activing their higher centres - i don't know - but there may beings out there that don't have functioning of fully functioning higher centres (heart, throat, head) ... maybe part of that is because they can't face that void that's inside them - that emptiness -- maybe that's what it is when your centres aren't active -- and it's hard to face. That's why being alone - not isolating yourself from the world, but spending time yourself, being with yourself, is also important ... someone posted a thread about loneliness - there were lots of responses, i didn't read all of them - but i wonder if anyone suggested facing that loneliness ... yes it may be much more complicated than that, but to face the fact without moving away from it - that's so important - i obviously can't stress it enough ...

i read the quote Montalk posted by Mouravieff ... Mouravieff is on the money for the most part - but it's so interesting to me in the way he uses the word "escape", that last sentence, "Escape is possible only via the heart; that is why the cultivation of our emotional life dominates the attention, the pre-occupations and the obligatory efforts demanded by esoteric teachings." Escape from the prison of external man, i guess ... again, with the facing of the facts ...

... checking out the mirror of relationship ...

21 (edited by Hourthirteen 2006-05-04 16:25:14)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Dear Z
I appreciate your post. (which means I agree with it! big_smile  ) LOL...
The P's have always said that Light is information ... very simple and to the point.
I love their definition of LOVE: " We would define Love as Allowing."
Allowing each person to have their own experiences, create their own reality, without our believing we have the right to 'change' them.
Further: They say ALL THINGS come from one of two sources: One is Love ... and the other is Fear.
Past that is the melding of what appears to be the reality of what we perceive is duality...once we begin to understand and 'see' .
Peace,
Summer

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

i didn't read the entire thread carefully before posting my reply - lack of intelligence on my part i guess - Z, i read your response to Montalk's questions ... that's a nice outline - a lot of it makes sense somehow - and i wouldn't have said that i didn't know how we're defining lower/higher emotional/intellectual had i actually read it carefully the first time ...

i also like defining love as allowing - not having any need or desire to change someone ... it really is a fine balance - i guess the most anyone can do is just try to point something out that they see if they think it's beneficial, something that might have value - and that's it ... our progress, our life - it lies in our own hands, no one elses - but we're here together ...

one other thing - i often end up sounding like someone who's had a large impact on me -- i have to find my own voice ... however, since this thread is on love and light, i wanted to share some quotes (which were emailed to me during these last few days) that i think would fit here ... i also just read the thread entitled Liste, Little Man - really liked it - that's also related to what's pasted below:






In the modern world where there are so many problems, one is apt to lose great feeling. I mean by that word feeling, not sentiment, not emotionalism, not mere excitement, but that quality of perception, the quality of hearing, listening, the quality of feeling, a bird singing on a tree, the movement of a leaf in the sun. To feel things greatly, deeply, penetratingly, is very difficult for most of us because we have so many problems. Whatever we seem to touch turns into a problem. And, apparently, there is no end to man's problems, and he seems utterly incapable of resolving them because the more the problems exist, the less the feelings become.

I mean by "feeling" the appreciation of the curve of a branch, the squalor, the dirt on the road, to be sensitive to the sorrow of another, to be in a state of ecstasy when we see a sunset. These are not sentiments, these are not mere emotions. Emotion and sentiment or sentimentality turn to cruelty, they can be used by society; and when there is sentiment, sensation, then one becomes a slave to society. But one must have great feelings. The feeling for beauty, the feeling for a word, the silence between two words, and the hearing of a sound clearly–all that generates feeling. And one must have strong feelings, because it is only the feelings that make the mind highly sensitive.

----

What do we mean by emotion? Is it a sensation, a reaction, a response of the senses? Hate, devotion, the feeling of love or sympathy for another–they are all emotions. Some, like love and sympathy, we call positive, while others, like hate, we call negative and want to get rid of. Is love the opposite of hate? And is love an emotion, a sensation, a feeling that is stretched out through memory?

...So, what do we mean by love? Surely, love is not memory. That is very difficult for us to understand because for most of us, love is memory. When you say that you love your wife or your husband, what do you mean by that? Do you love that which gives you pleasure? Do you love that with which you have identified yourself and which you recognize as belonging to you? Please, these are facts; I am not inventing anything, so don't look horrified.

...It is the image, the symbol of "my wife" or "my husband" that we love, or think we love, not the living individual. I don't know my wife or my husband at all; and I can never know that person as long as knowing means recognition. For recognition is based on memory–memory of pleasure and pain, memory of the things I have lived for, agonized over, the things I possess and to which I am attached. How can I love when there is fear, sorrow, loneliness, the shadow of despair? How can an ambitious man love? And we are all very ambitious, however honourably.

So, really to find out what love is, we must die to the past, to all our emotions, the good and the bad–die effortlessly, as we would to a poisonous thing, because we understand it.

---
One can see that neither emotion nor sentiment has any place at all where love is concerned. Sentimentality and emotion are merely reactions of like or dislike. I like you and I get terribly enthusiastic about you–I like this place, oh, it is lovely and all the rest, which implies that I don't like the other and so on. Thus sentiment and emotion breed cruelty. Have you ever looked at it? Identification with the rag called the national flag is an emotional and sentimental factor and for that factor you are willing to kill another–and that is called the love of your country, love of the neighbor. . .. One can see that where sentiment and emotion come in, love is not. It is emotion and sentiment that breed the cruelty of like and dislike. And one can see also that where there is jealousy, there is no love, obviously. I am envious of you because you have a better position, better job, better house, you look nicer, more intelligent, more awake and I am jealous of you. I don't in fact say I am jealous of you, but I compete with you, which is a form of jealousy, envy. So envy and jealousy are not love and I wipe them out; I don't go on talking about how to wipe them out and in the meantime continue to be envious–I actually wipe them out as the rain washes the dust of many days off a leaf, I just wash them away.

---

Training the intellect does not result in intelligence. Rather, intelligence comes into being when one acts in perfect harmony, both intellectually and emotionally. There is a vast distinction between intellect and intelligence. Intellect is merely thought functioning independently of emotion. When intellect, irrespective of emotion, is trained in any particular direction, one may have great intellect, but one does not have intelligence, because in intelligence there is the inherent capacity to feel as well as to reason; in intelligence both capacities are equally present, intensely and harmoniously.

...If you bring your emotions into business, you say, business cannot be well managed or be honest. So you divide your mind into compartments: in one compartment you keep your religious interest, in another your emotions, in a third your business interest which has nothing to do with your intellectual and emotional life. Your business mind treats life merely as a means of getting money in order to live. So this chaotic existence, this division of your life continues. If you really used your intelligence in business, that is, if your emotions and your thought were acting harmoniously, your business might fail. It probably would. And you will probably let it fail when you really feel the absurdity, the cruelty, and the exploitation that is involved in this way of living.

Until you really approach all of life with your intelligence, instead of merely with your intellect, no system in the world will save man from the ceaseless toil for bread.

---

The very first thing to do, if I may suggest it, is to find out why you are thinking in a certain way, and why you are feeling in a certain manner. Don't try to alter it, don't try to analyze your thoughts and your emotions; but become conscious of why you are thinking in a particular groove and from what motive you act. Although you can discover the motive through analysis, although you may find out something through analysis, it will not be real; it will be real only when you are intensely aware at the moment of the functioning of your thought and emotion; then you will see their extraordinary subtlety, their fine delicacy. So long as you have a "must" and a "must not," in this compulsion you will never discover that swift wandering of thought and emotion. And I am sure you have been brought up in the school of "must" and "must not" and hence you have destroyed thought and feeling. You have been bound and crippled by systems, methods, by your teachers. So leave all those "must" and "must nots." This does not mean that there shall be licentiousness, but become aware of a mind that is ever saying, "I must," and "I must not." Then as a flower blossoms forth of a morning, so intelligence happens, is there, functioning, creating comprehension.

---

How do emotions come into being? Very simple. They come into being through stimuli, through the nerves. You put a pin into me, I jump; you flatter me and I am delighted; you insult me and I don't like it. Through our senses emotions come into being. And most of us function through our emotion of pleasure; obviously, sir. You like to be recognized as a Hindu. Then you belong to a group, to a community, to a tradition, however old; and you like that, with the Gita, the Upanishads and the old traditions mountain high. And the Muslim likes his and so on. Our emotions have come into being through stimuli, through environment, and so on. It is fairly obvious.

What role has emotion in life? Is emotion life? You understand? Is pleasure love? Is desire love? If emotion is love, there is something that changes all the time. Right? Don't you know all that?

...So one has to realize that emotions, sentiment, enthusiasm, the feeling of being good, and all that, have nothing whatsoever to do with real affection, compassion. All sentiment, emotions have to do with thought and therefore lead to pleasure and pain. Love has no pain, no sorrow, because it is not the outcome of pleasure or desire.

---

Truth, the real God–the real God, not the God that man has made– does not want a mind that has been destroyed, petty, shallow, narrow, limited. It needs a healthy mind to appreciate it; it needs a rich mind–rich, not with knowledge but with innocence–a mind upon which there has never been a scratch of experience, a mind that is free from time. The gods that you have invented for your own comforts accept torture; they accept a mind that is being made dull. But the real thing does not want it; it wants a total, complete human being whose heart is full, rich, clear, capable of intense feeling, capable of seeing the beauty of a tree, the smile of a child, and the agony of a woman who has never had a full meal.

You have to have this extraordinary feeling, this sensitivity to everything–to the animal, to the cat that walks across the wall, to the squalor, the dirt, the filth of human beings in poverty, in despair. You have to be sensitive–which is to feel intensely, not in any particular direction, which is not an emotion which comes and goes, but which is to be sensitive with your nerves, with your eyes, with your body, with your ears, with your voice. You have to be sensitive completely all the time. Unless you are so completely sensitive, there is no intelligence. Intelligence comes with sensitivity and observation.

---

The word is not the thing. The word passion is not passion. To feel that and to be caught in it without any volition or directive or purpose, to listen to this thing called desire, to listen to your own desires which you have, plenty of them, weak or strong–when you do that, you will see what a tremendous damage you do when you suppress desire, when you distort it, when you want to fulfill it, when you want to do something about it, when you have an opinion about it.

Most people have lost this passion. Probably one has had it once in one's youth–to become a rich man, to have fame, and to live a bourgeois or a respectable life; perhaps a vague muttering of that. And society–which is what you are–suppresses that. And so one has to adjust oneself to you who are dead, who are respectable, who have not even a spark of passion; and then one becomes a part of you, and thereby loses this passion.

---

In the state of passion without a cause there is intensity free of all attachment; but when passion has a cause, there is attachment, and attachment is the beginning of sorrow. Most of us are attached, we cling to a person, to a country, to a belief, to an idea, and when the object of our attachment is taken away or otherwise loses its significance, we find ourselves empty, insufficient. This emptiness we try to fill by clinging to something else, which again becomes the object of our passion.

Examine your own heart and mind. I am merely a mirror in which you are looking at yourself. If you don't want to look, that is quite all right; but if you do want to look, then look at yourself clearly, ruthlessly, with intensity–not in the hope of dissolving your miseries, your anxieties, your sense of guilt, but in order to understand this extraordinary passion which always leads to sorrow.

When passion has a cause it becomes lust. When there is a passion for something–for a person, for an idea, for some kind of fulfillment–then out of that passion there comes contradiction, conflict, effort. You strive to achieve or maintain a particular state, or to recapture one that has been and is gone. But the passion of which I am speaking does not give rise to contradiction, conflict. It is totally unrelated to a cause, and therefore it is not an effect.

J. Krishnamurti

... checking out the mirror of relationship ...

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

i didn't read the entire thread carefully before posting my reply - lack of intelligence on my part i guess - Z, i read your response to Montalk's questions ... that's a nice outline - a lot of it makes sense somehow - and i wouldn't have said that i didn't know how we're defining lower/higher emotional/intellectual had i actually read it carefully the first time ...

i also like defining love as allowing - not having any need or desire to change someone ... it really is a fine balance - i guess the most anyone can do is just try to point something out that they see if they think it's beneficial, something that might have value - and that's it ... our progress, our life - it lies in our own hands, no one elses - but we're here together ...

one other thing - i often end up sounding like someone who's had a large impact on me -- i have to find my own voice ... however, since this thread is on love and light, i wanted to share some quotes (which were emailed to me during these last few days) that i think would fit here ... i also just read the thread entitled Liste, Little Man - really liked it - that's also related to what's pasted below:






In the modern world where there are so many problems, one is apt to lose great feeling. I mean by that word feeling, not sentiment, not emotionalism, not mere excitement, but that quality of perception, the quality of hearing, listening, the quality of feeling, a bird singing on a tree, the movement of a leaf in the sun. To feel things greatly, deeply, penetratingly, is very difficult for most of us because we have so many problems. Whatever we seem to touch turns into a problem. And, apparently, there is no end to man's problems, and he seems utterly incapable of resolving them because the more the problems exist, the less the feelings become.

I mean by "feeling" the appreciation of the curve of a branch, the squalor, the dirt on the road, to be sensitive to the sorrow of another, to be in a state of ecstasy when we see a sunset. These are not sentiments, these are not mere emotions. Emotion and sentiment or sentimentality turn to cruelty, they can be used by society; and when there is sentiment, sensation, then one becomes a slave to society. But one must have great feelings. The feeling for beauty, the feeling for a word, the silence between two words, and the hearing of a sound clearly–all that generates feeling. And one must have strong feelings, because it is only the feelings that make the mind highly sensitive.

----

What do we mean by emotion? Is it a sensation, a reaction, a response of the senses? Hate, devotion, the feeling of love or sympathy for another–they are all emotions. Some, like love and sympathy, we call positive, while others, like hate, we call negative and want to get rid of. Is love the opposite of hate? And is love an emotion, a sensation, a feeling that is stretched out through memory?

...So, what do we mean by love? Surely, love is not memory. That is very difficult for us to understand because for most of us, love is memory. When you say that you love your wife or your husband, what do you mean by that? Do you love that which gives you pleasure? Do you love that with which you have identified yourself and which you recognize as belonging to you? Please, these are facts; I am not inventing anything, so don't look horrified.

...It is the image, the symbol of "my wife" or "my husband" that we love, or think we love, not the living individual. I don't know my wife or my husband at all; and I can never know that person as long as knowing means recognition. For recognition is based on memory–memory of pleasure and pain, memory of the things I have lived for, agonized over, the things I possess and to which I am attached. How can I love when there is fear, sorrow, loneliness, the shadow of despair? How can an ambitious man love? And we are all very ambitious, however honourably.

So, really to find out what love is, we must die to the past, to all our emotions, the good and the bad–die effortlessly, as we would to a poisonous thing, because we understand it.

---
One can see that neither emotion nor sentiment has any place at all where love is concerned. Sentimentality and emotion are merely reactions of like or dislike. I like you and I get terribly enthusiastic about you–I like this place, oh, it is lovely and all the rest, which implies that I don't like the other and so on. Thus sentiment and emotion breed cruelty. Have you ever looked at it? Identification with the rag called the national flag is an emotional and sentimental factor and for that factor you are willing to kill another–and that is called the love of your country, love of the neighbor. . .. One can see that where sentiment and emotion come in, love is not. It is emotion and sentiment that breed the cruelty of like and dislike. And one can see also that where there is jealousy, there is no love, obviously. I am envious of you because you have a better position, better job, better house, you look nicer, more intelligent, more awake and I am jealous of you. I don't in fact say I am jealous of you, but I compete with you, which is a form of jealousy, envy. So envy and jealousy are not love and I wipe them out; I don't go on talking about how to wipe them out and in the meantime continue to be envious–I actually wipe them out as the rain washes the dust of many days off a leaf, I just wash them away.

---

Training the intellect does not result in intelligence. Rather, intelligence comes into being when one acts in perfect harmony, both intellectually and emotionally. There is a vast distinction between intellect and intelligence. Intellect is merely thought functioning independently of emotion. When intellect, irrespective of emotion, is trained in any particular direction, one may have great intellect, but one does not have intelligence, because in intelligence there is the inherent capacity to feel as well as to reason; in intelligence both capacities are equally present, intensely and harmoniously.

...If you bring your emotions into business, you say, business cannot be well managed or be honest. So you divide your mind into compartments: in one compartment you keep your religious interest, in another your emotions, in a third your business interest which has nothing to do with your intellectual and emotional life. Your business mind treats life merely as a means of getting money in order to live. So this chaotic existence, this division of your life continues. If you really used your intelligence in business, that is, if your emotions and your thought were acting harmoniously, your business might fail. It probably would. And you will probably let it fail when you really feel the absurdity, the cruelty, and the exploitation that is involved in this way of living.

Until you really approach all of life with your intelligence, instead of merely with your intellect, no system in the world will save man from the ceaseless toil for bread.

---

The very first thing to do, if I may suggest it, is to find out why you are thinking in a certain way, and why you are feeling in a certain manner. Don't try to alter it, don't try to analyze your thoughts and your emotions; but become conscious of why you are thinking in a particular groove and from what motive you act. Although you can discover the motive through analysis, although you may find out something through analysis, it will not be real; it will be real only when you are intensely aware at the moment of the functioning of your thought and emotion; then you will see their extraordinary subtlety, their fine delicacy. So long as you have a "must" and a "must not," in this compulsion you will never discover that swift wandering of thought and emotion. And I am sure you have been brought up in the school of "must" and "must not" and hence you have destroyed thought and feeling. You have been bound and crippled by systems, methods, by your teachers. So leave all those "must" and "must nots." This does not mean that there shall be licentiousness, but become aware of a mind that is ever saying, "I must," and "I must not." Then as a flower blossoms forth of a morning, so intelligence happens, is there, functioning, creating comprehension.

---

How do emotions come into being? Very simple. They come into being through stimuli, through the nerves. You put a pin into me, I jump; you flatter me and I am delighted; you insult me and I don't like it. Through our senses emotions come into being. And most of us function through our emotion of pleasure; obviously, sir. You like to be recognized as a Hindu. Then you belong to a group, to a community, to a tradition, however old; and you like that, with the Gita, the Upanishads and the old traditions mountain high. And the Muslim likes his and so on. Our emotions have come into being through stimuli, through environment, and so on. It is fairly obvious.

What role has emotion in life? Is emotion life? You understand? Is pleasure love? Is desire love? If emotion is love, there is something that changes all the time. Right? Don't you know all that?

...So one has to realize that emotions, sentiment, enthusiasm, the feeling of being good, and all that, have nothing whatsoever to do with real affection, compassion. All sentiment, emotions have to do with thought and therefore lead to pleasure and pain. Love has no pain, no sorrow, because it is not the outcome of pleasure or desire.

---

Truth, the real God–the real God, not the God that man has made– does not want a mind that has been destroyed, petty, shallow, narrow, limited. It needs a healthy mind to appreciate it; it needs a rich mind–rich, not with knowledge but with innocence–a mind upon which there has never been a scratch of experience, a mind that is free from time. The gods that you have invented for your own comforts accept torture; they accept a mind that is being made dull. But the real thing does not want it; it wants a total, complete human being whose heart is full, rich, clear, capable of intense feeling, capable of seeing the beauty of a tree, the smile of a child, and the agony of a woman who has never had a full meal.

You have to have this extraordinary feeling, this sensitivity to everything–to the animal, to the cat that walks across the wall, to the squalor, the dirt, the filth of human beings in poverty, in despair. You have to be sensitive–which is to feel intensely, not in any particular direction, which is not an emotion which comes and goes, but which is to be sensitive with your nerves, with your eyes, with your body, with your ears, with your voice. You have to be sensitive completely all the time. Unless you are so completely sensitive, there is no intelligence. Intelligence comes with sensitivity and observation.

---

The word is not the thing. The word passion is not passion. To feel that and to be caught in it without any volition or directive or purpose, to listen to this thing called desire, to listen to your own desires which you have, plenty of them, weak or strong–when you do that, you will see what a tremendous damage you do when you suppress desire, when you distort it, when you want to fulfill it, when you want to do something about it, when you have an opinion about it.

Most people have lost this passion. Probably one has had it once in one's youth–to become a rich man, to have fame, and to live a bourgeois or a respectable life; perhaps a vague muttering of that. And society–which is what you are–suppresses that. And so one has to adjust oneself to you who are dead, who are respectable, who have not even a spark of passion; and then one becomes a part of you, and thereby loses this passion.

---

In the state of passion without a cause there is intensity free of all attachment; but when passion has a cause, there is attachment, and attachment is the beginning of sorrow. Most of us are attached, we cling to a person, to a country, to a belief, to an idea, and when the object of our attachment is taken away or otherwise loses its significance, we find ourselves empty, insufficient. This emptiness we try to fill by clinging to something else, which again becomes the object of our passion.

Examine your own heart and mind. I am merely a mirror in which you are looking at yourself. If you don't want to look, that is quite all right; but if you do want to look, then look at yourself clearly, ruthlessly, with intensity–not in the hope of dissolving your miseries, your anxieties, your sense of guilt, but in order to understand this extraordinary passion which always leads to sorrow.

When passion has a cause it becomes lust. When there is a passion for something–for a person, for an idea, for some kind of fulfillment–then out of that passion there comes contradiction, conflict, effort. You strive to achieve or maintain a particular state, or to recapture one that has been and is gone. But the passion of which I am speaking does not give rise to contradiction, conflict. It is totally unrelated to a cause, and therefore it is not an effect.


J. Krishnamurti

... checking out the mirror of relationship ...

24 (edited by z3n3rg 2006-05-07 12:43:09)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Hourthirteen wrote:

The P's have always said that Light is information ... very simple and to the point.
I love their definition of LOVE: " We would define Love as Allowing."

oceanchild wrote:

i also like defining love as allowing - not having any need or desire to change someone ... it really is a fine balance - i guess the most anyone can do is just try to point something out that they see if they think it's beneficial, something that might have value - and that's it ... our progress, our life - it lies in our own hands, no one elses - but we're here together ...

I agree.  Thank you both for bringing that word out as I feel it's quite important.  It's an allowing and an acceptance of all else.  Speaking of the fine balance, it is also giving everything it's due.  I think that is acceptance in action.  Give a lie what it asks for, the truth.  Give everything what it asks for.  It's hard to know what is being asked while in 3d so right now it's a lot of learning.  But as we learn we can then put that into action and show that we have learned.  For instance, by making this thread I'm asking for thoughts from others.  I'm asking for different perspectives.  If I wasn't asking the thread would not exist.  Those that see this asking and are able to or wish to give will do so.  Free-will is maintained and we all are expanded for the experience of the gentle interaction with each other.

Oceanchild, I'm about to read the rest of your post.  Just wanted to get those thoughts out before I lost them.


Edit:

Those quotes are beautiful.  I only wish I could use words to express myself that clearly.  Those quotes have expanded and touched on many of the more subtle aspects of these things we call 'love' and 'light'.  Thank you for sharing.  Thank you everyone for sharing your self.

25 (edited by z3n3rg 2006-05-07 16:31:45)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Was thinking more on the L.I. and L.E. and the differences.  Figured I'd expand those thoughts out some more.

A good way of seeing these lower centers would be to look at the typical male and typical female of modern society (keep in mind the word 'typical').  Males predominately think in linear logical format.  Females are predominately emotional and think alot based on those emotions.  The male would represent the L.I. and the female would represent the L.E.  Both are caught in loops.  And the loops are reactionary.

A female will have an emotional (chemical) reaction based on eternal stimuli or how she perceives the external stimuli.  These chemicals flood the body and trigger certain thoughts that are connected to the same emotion but involving memories.  So the female then floods the physical system with even more chemicals due to the connecting thoughts associated with a particular emotion.  These chemical reactions are addictive in many cases.  Thus a typical female gives more weight to her emotions than to linear logical thought.  In a typical female then, the L.E. usually dominates the L.I..

A male learns systems.  Systems of society.  Systems to interact and progress in society.  Emotions are a product of a male's perceived prowess (or lack thereof) in utilizing the L.I. to learn the systems and compete with other males.  More weight is givin to thought than emotion.  Thus in a typical male, the L.I. usually dominates the L.E..

The battle of the sexes, as it were, is because both these avenues are taught for each and society rewards both.  The loops that are taught in society exist for both and keep the individual on a treadmill of thought and/or emotion.  Put a female in a crowded room, say a social event.  The emotional loops will play themselves out over and over for each other-self the female compares herself to.  Put a male with other males and have a female walk by and the thought loops play themselves out depending on how each male perceives self and the others.  The male seeks money, houses, cars, prestige, etc for the main purpose of impressing females which in turn shows that he has learned and dominated the systems via the L.I..

It's a divide and conquer technique both individually and collectively.  The L.I. and L.E. are divided in each individual depending on sex.  One will usually dominate the other keeping the individual off balance.  These predominant off-balance loops created by society keep males and females divided and most are unable (unwilling) to understand each other.  So within and without a dividing of the lower centers is maintained ensuring that a balance isn't reached.  If a balance is reached then the individual moves away from the dynamics of society and starts seeing the bigger picture.  The seeing of the bigger picture (recognizing the essence and the interconnectiveness) will start to develop the H.E. which leads to developing the H.I.  This is what society is meant to stop.

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Wow !    ** PERFECT **

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

27 (edited by fandango 2006-05-07 18:09:52)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Hi OP

you wrote:

- The woowoo monster has certainly twisted these concepts to get people to basically do nothing.  The new-age movement is more like the new-age inaction.  It's a level jumping without the necessary steps in between.  Just give a higher level concept without the necessary steps and you turn would be fighters into ohm'ing vegetables -

I really enjoyed the substance of your opening post. The ideas expressed there and how you expressed them was fantastic.

My only observation aside from those above is that you could have achieved the same thing without the first paragraph. People do what they want to do even when they think they don't want to. The "new age movement" and "woo woos" you seem to castigate, judge and ridicule, are such wide sweeping labels as to lose any real meaning. One of the biggest obstacles, imo, is not monsters twisting concepts but the obsession some people have with labelling everything. Everything must go into a box, and we must group things together, slap a label on it, either with our approval or disapproval, then we can REALLY know who we are for and we are agin, or, perhaps, more importantly who is agin US.... THEM, of course.

Labels are one of the "monsters" of twisted concepts because they masquerade as communication but deep down they are tools of division.

Blessings on your paths and thanks for your great message.

28 (edited by z3n3rg 2006-05-07 21:23:30)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

fandango wrote:

The woowoo monster has certainly twisted these concepts to get people to basically do nothing.  The new-age movement is more like the new-age inaction.  It's a level jumping without the necessary steps in between.  Just give a higher level concept without the necessary steps and you turn would be fighters into ohm'ing vegetables

My only observation aside from those above is that you could have achieved the same thing without the first paragraph.  People do what they want to do even when they think they don't want to.

The "new age movement" and "woo woos" you seem to castigate, judge and ridicule, are such wide sweeping labels as to lose any real meaning.

I appreciate your view.  It may seem like castigation, judgement and ridicule but it isn't.  The opening paragraph is an introduction to where the rest of the post is heading.

The "sweeping labels", as you label them, are not my own.  Ok, the "monster" part was but that was just to add personification to the "woo-woo" part which are the actions taken based on the new-age movement (the sound 'woo-woo' also reminds me of a ghost).  The ohm'ing vegetables could also be viewed as castigation but it's nothing more than a visualization.  A 'compare and contrast' tool.  Picture non-moving entities ohm'ing next to entities striving with vigor and resolve.  That's constrast.  And here are the meanings of those labels.

New Age Movement:  A possible counter-intelligence-operation that basically does damage control on spiritual concepts that some started to get out into the public sphere.  By different twists of logic, creating gurus, and other such projects the movement was able to grab a good number of people that were disenchanted with modern religion and modern society.  At the same time they were able to dilute the effect the higher spiritual concepts could have had for a large number of people.

Woo-woo:  Until coming to this forum about a month ago I had never heard of the term.  As I currently understand it, the concept is the actions that resulted from the many teachings within the new age movement.  The teachings themselves may not be bad or incorrect.  However, the necessary steps to make the actions effective have been left out thus creating what results in inaction.  Or more correctly, ineffectual action.  For instance, visualizing light in the chakras.  Since light is knowledge, visualizing light without the knowledge may produce some feeling but does nothing to help the entity learn the lessons.


One of the biggest obstacles, imo, is not monsters twisting concepts but the obsession some people have with labelling everything.

I understand and agree when used in a particular context.  However, in our current 3d state labelling is necessary.  Since 'new-age' and 'woo-woo' are "labels" for concepts that are understood and accepted by most on this board then it is much easier to use those terms than to write out the full definition of the concept everytime we need to refer to them.  Communication would actually break down considerably without proper use of labels.  Instead of using the label "bird" I could say a flying entity with fluffy appendages (which are still labels).  But bird is accepted and understood by most and is easier to use in communication.

Everything must go into a box, and we must group things together, slap a label on it, either with our approval or disapproval, then we can REALLY know who we are for and we are agin, or, perhaps, more importantly who is agin US.... THEM, of course.

Again, I understand and agree when used in proper context.  In this case, you have mistook my labelling for something it is not.  The labels are an introduction to the important concepts that follow.  Look at the concepts in the rest of the post.  There is no "Us vs Them" theme.  Nor do I follow an "Us vs Them" mentality in the way you describe.  Using comparing and contrasting (CnC) in order to learn is very important and should not be discarded because someone may label that CnC tool as an "Us vs Them" mentality.  Black words on white paper is much easier to read than black words on black paper.  I am not going to feel bad because I called the words black and the paper white.  Look at the overall post.  Look at the posts I made following that one.  If the "Us vs Them" theme is not present then it wouldn't be correct to view the opening paragraph as such.

Labels are one of the "monsters" of twisted concepts because they masquerade as communication but deep down they are tools of division.

Yes, when labels aren't used in proper context or are used for emotional manipulation.  "New-age" and "woo-woo" are labels the same as "bird" is a label.  If someone uses those labels to make themselves feel superior to another then that is their choice.  Our whole language is made of labels.  "Bird" doesn't describe that entity's essense in any way.  "Tree" doesn't describe that entity's essense.  "Human" doesn't describe that entity's essense.  "God" doesn't describe that entity's essense.  Some would use these labels to feel superior or inferior.  Some would use these labels to emotional manipulate another.  Some would use these labels to learn about the nature of the reality they find themselves in.  Look for the fruit and you will know how someone is using the labels.


Edit:

After thinking about this a few more minutes I realize there's a lesson here for me.  If that first paragraph can cause an emotional reaction then it's up to me to keep even better watch on the words I use so that doesn't happen.  I've had it happen a few times already where my first few sentences were taken out of the full post context and concentrated on.  That takes away from the main point of the post and at this point I can only assume it's my fault.  I don't want to cause a reaction that causes someone to concentrate on something other than the reason I had for posting.  It dilutes the points and misdirects attention.  I apologize for that and will work on balancing those aspects so this doesn't occur again.

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

z3n3rg wrote:

Woo-woo:  Until coming to this forum about a month ago I had never heard of the term.  As I currently understand it, the concept is the actions that resulted from the many teachings within the new age movement.  The teachings themselves may not be bad or incorrect.  However, the necessary steps to make the actions effective have been left out thus creating what results in inaction.  Or more correctly, ineffectual action.  For instance, visualizing light in the chakras.  Since light is knowledge, visualizing light without the knowledge may produce some feeling but does nothing to help the entity learn the lessons.

Woo-woo is a thing. It's the weird, the paranormal, the unexplained, and usually orchestrated by higher entities to get targets to sink into a fearful or paranoid low frequency, to get them to obsess in circles and get all worked up.  Overall though it's a fun term that relates to the weird and unexplained.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

30 (edited by GrapeCaoDizzle 2006-05-07 23:31:42)

Re: Love and Light: The Practical Guide

Ignorance and Knowledge are one in the same.

The universe is infinite, therefore there are infintie possibilities and therefore infinite knowledge. If one possess knowledge in any single; significant form, then he is ignorant.

The darkness is the light.