1 (edited by onionworld 2006-04-18 18:14:38)

Topic: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

Question: So did we creat the Illuminati?

David Icke: The Illuminati is also an illusion. And what this voice in Brazil was telling me over these hours was that many of the characters that are actually in positions of power manipulating this world are actually projections. And what it was said was think of the agents, the so-called sentient programs in the movie. Who came in and out of the matrix and took different physical bodies at will. They weren't actually consciousness as we understand consciousness. They were programs, sentient programs they were called. And what it was saying to me is the reason that these people, these manipulators are actually very demonstrably without emotion is because they are, if you like, computers, computer programs. A computer does not have emotion. It deals purely with, if you like, the mental, symbolically. It doesn't have an emotion, you program something into a computer, it doesn't make an emotional assessment, it just carries out the programing, which is what it said these people are. And, because of the illusory nature of the holographic reality, if you can project these holographic figures as a thought field in a way that humans will observe them into holographic reality, it means that the people will not be able to tell the difference between something that has conciousness as we know it and something that is a projection, it will seem the same to them. And in the same way as is happening now, they're putting digital figures into movies with human actors and you can't see the join. The only difference Nicole is that we are seeing this process as a three demensional hologram verses two demensional cinema screen."

Download the interview here (the quote comes about 43 min into the interview): http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W46GIX9I

David Icke just described Organic Portals, IMHO. Please consider something he said: "many of the characters that are actually in positions of power manipulating this world are actually projections", that is how OPs are described here also:

"From mechanic to professor, salesman to actor, pizza man to president, OPs can be found in every level of mainstream society. In general, whether they work in business, science, government, or religion, they tend to occupy the upper management positions. This is because their lack of compassion, knack for deceit, and hive mind nature allows them to make it to the top in every common institution or corporation.

They are favored for advancement by other OPs already established in higher positions. From such positions, they are able to implement Matrix control tactics in very effective ways. In schools, for example, they are instrumental in enforcing oppressive educational climates, influencing school board decisions to adopt sterile teaching regiments and programs for indoctrinating or preoccupying them with garbage."

http://montalk.net/matrix/62/matrix-age … sis-part-i

In my mind all of this contradicts Icke's "water droplet" theory.

"People don't realize who we really are, everything that exitsts. We're like, we're like droplets of water in an ocean of infinite consciousness. And if you look at an ocean, it's made of droplets. Every droplet may appear to be a droplet when you hold it in your hand but every droplet is the ocean because it's connected to the ocean." - David Icke from his video "Ruled by the "Gods"".

I haven't been able to come to terms with the contradictions and discrepencies in the "water droplet" theory and his "characters that are actually in positions of power manipulating this world are actually projections" comments. Both theories cannot be true. They are in direct contradiction to each other. When David Icke talks about the "water droplet" theory he is talking about the divine spirit that unites us all. The "sentient programs" Icke talks about do not have the divine spirit and therefore cannot be part of the ocean, it's impossible.

What does everyone think?

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

I don't think I can reconcile Icke's words as I've never read any of it except in quotes from other.  But, it's possible I can offer some insight that may assist in further understanding the forces at work.

There are really two types of OPs.

The main type of OP is literally "human".  They are the human vessels meant for 2nd density incarnates that are graduating to 3d.  They have the 3 lower centers.  Lower intellectual, emotional and moving centers.  They do not have a defined soul.  But they can easily develope a soul imprint due to their capacity for intelligence and emotion.  Humans have large brains and they have the working parts for chemical reactions we all know as "emotions".  Soul matter is drawn to intelligence and thus a soul imprint can be formed.  This main type is not that noticable.  They are your ordinary human.  They just don't have the higher centers and as such do not have a drive towards spiritual endevours.

The other type, the type that are without compassion, knack for deceit, occupy upper-management, oppressive, abusive, etc are the "defective" OPs.  They represent a much smaller portion of the OP population.  Some call them pyschopaths.  They seem to lack true emotion and/or are simply the ones being used by higher level sts to control the grid.  Not many are needed in this role at this time since power has been solidified so well into the hands of a few.  These OPs can control large numbers of normal OPs because they have the backing of 4d sts.

As far as the drops in the ocean, I guess we can stretch that since soul matter is found at all density levels.  Animals have souls.  Inanimate matter has recyled soul matter.  The difference we are dealing with is one of 'level of developement'.

In this respect, I would say that the "sentient programs" do have the divine spirit as does everything.  It's just not developed.  It's more of an imprint or maybe a small gathering of soulness.

Make any sense?

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

z3n3rg wrote:

I don't think I can reconcile Icke's words as I've never read any of it except in quotes from other.

Please download and listen to the interview! It's really quite interesting: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W46GIX9I

z3n3rg wrote:

But, it's possible I can offer some insight that may assist in further understanding the forces at work.

There are really two types of OPs.

The main type of OP is literally "human".  They are the human vessels meant for 2nd density incarnates that are graduating to 3d.  They have the 3 lower centers.  Lower intellectual, emotional and moving centers.  They do not have a defined soul.  But they can easily develope a soul imprint due to their capacity for intelligence and emotion.  Humans have large brains and they have the working parts for chemical reactions we all know as "emotions".  Soul matter is drawn to intelligence and thus a soul imprint can be formed.  This main type is not that noticable.  They are your ordinary human.  They just don't have the higher centers and as such do not have a drive towards spiritual endevours.

The other type, the type that are without compassion, knack for deceit, occupy upper-management, oppressive, abusive, etc are the "defective" OPs.  They represent a much smaller portion of the OP population.  Some call them pyschopaths.  They seem to lack true emotion and/or are simply the ones being used by higher level sts to control the grid.  Not many are needed in this role at this time since power has been solidified so well into the hands of a few.  These OPs can control large numbers of normal OPs because they have the backing of 4d sts.

As far as the drops in the ocean, I guess we can stretch that since soul matter is found at all density levels.  Animals have souls.  Inanimate matter has recyled soul matter.  The difference we are dealing with is one of 'level of developement'.

In this respect, I would say that the "sentient programs" do have the divine spirit as does everything.  It's just not developed.  It's more of an imprint or maybe a small gathering of soulness.

Make any sense?

Thank you for that. It doesn't make much sense to me. I'm new to this theory and I'm not sure whether or not I even believe it. It kind of seems to me like the old trick of religion, we're better than others because of this that or the other.

4 (edited by montalk 2006-04-18 20:54:01)

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

onionworld wrote:

David Icke just described Organic Portals, IMHO.

Yes, Icke wrote about this in "Infinite Love is the Only Truth":

Think of horses on a carousel. Whether anyone is sitting on them or not they still go round with the rest. Our 'physical' bodies are biological computers reading software programs and they are running all the time. The question is whether self- aware consciousness chooses to experience this illusory world through one of those software carousel 'horses' (human bodies) or not. If it doesn't, the 'body' will still play out the program, because it is a biological computer capable of 'thought' (assessment of data). But it will be nothing more than software without consciousness as defined in this book. Everything you see in the Matrix is part of the program, including your own body. The exception to this is your consciousness, those that have any that is, because, in the way I am defining consciousness in this book, not everyone has. The phenomenon of the 'woman in the red dress' in the first Matrix movie, the woman who was just part of a software program despite appearing 'real', is not confined to a Hollywood sci-fi script. These 'computer' creations, these carousel horses with no rider, are everywhere. There are three main groups of 'people' in the Matrix[...]:

1) First there are the software programs whose only consciousness is the DNA/RNA receiving instructions from the Matrix. They are constructs of mind, not consciousness. All energy/consciousness is Infinite Oneness, but not all expressions of this are at the same level of awareness. The 'human' interactive software programs are sophisticated robots following a 'life' program dictated by the Matrix and their free will is basically zilch. I'm sure you must have met many. They appear to be the same as everyone else in the way they look, but the best special effects studios can now put digital 'people' into advertisements and you can't see the join. There is a television presenter in Britain who is famous for being enormous and she appeared in a commercial with a far slimmer body to sell a food product. You could not see the join and anyone who didn't know what she really looked like would believe the body in the ad was hers. This is why we have to be extremely wary about 'Bin Laden' videos that suddenly come to light at just the right time from the agenda's point of view. Producing a fake Bin Laden saying fake words is a cinch to the state-of-the-art special effects houses. The same principle applies with these 'Red Dress' programs, as I will call them. They are bodies without consciousness, interactive software programs. The lifeless look in their eyes is one way of picking them out, as is the lack of energy coming from them. They resonate to a different frequency to conscious awareness and again you can symbolise them as the horses on the carousel with no one on board. These interactive software programs can malfunction, go off message, and 'hack' into other programs - as with the Agent Smith character in the Matrix movies. A lot of that is going on, too.

2) Other people do have consciousness, but are so entranced and deluded by the Matrix that their DNA programming calls the shots and dictates the path that they take. These horses do have a rider, but the horse is still making the decisions. They go where the DNA program takes them because they don't think they have a choice or don't choose to make one. They can be lovely, caring people and express their consciousness in that way, but they can't see beyond the illusion. These are the main energy source for the Matrix because it feeds off the emotional energies of fear, guilt, and frustration etc., generated by consciousness trapped in this virtual reality prison and identifying with its programmed 'personality'. Once consciousness identifies with the mind and emotions - the software - it begins to resonate to those frequencies and this invariably means an expression of fear. These people, with what you might call 'back seat consciousness', also represent by far the biggest section of 'conscious' humanity. They are the system fodder who overwhelmingly do and think as they are told.

3) The third, and by far the smallest, group are those who are aware enough to see through the illusion and have begun to access the knowing of Infinite Oneness beyond the walls of the software program. This doesn't mean they understand the full nature of life and reality, but they have at least a subconscious knowing that the world is not as it seems. They are the only ones with free will in the sense that they have the awareness and power of consciousness to break the control of the DNA software. They can ride the horse and, in doing so, rewrite the program. These people stand out from the crowd and are dubbed dangerous or mad because they don't see the world like everyone else. The Matrix is a six- stone weakling compared with consciousness in its true power, and this group is like a computer virus that has the means to scramble the program and download another reality. The Matrix targets these people with a vengeance to protect its control and also because if it can manipulate this level of consciousness to become caught in the illusions and succumb to fear, it is a massive potential energy source.

Consciousness has become trapped by the Matrix in a maze of smoke and mirrors that has implanted a false reality. The 'Red Dresses', or software people, are no problem because they just follow the codes. The targets of the Matrix are those with self-aware consciousness who find themselves, for whatever reason, caught in the flytrap. It is in pursuit of these people - this consciousness - that the system of society is so designed in this part of the program. I have been saying in my books for years that the system has been structured to hold consciousness in a prison of the five senses. You can see everywhere that this is so obviously true. But what is this five- sense jail cell? It is a prison of the brain and body - the DNA! While we are focused purely on the five-sense reality we are slaves to the DNA that dictates our thoughts, emotions and actions. The consciousness of most people never gets its hands on the wheel of life because the DNA will not vacate the driver's seat. Consciousness in its reconnected infinite power could easily take control, but it is difficult to do this when you are not aware that you are Infinite Consciousness and you think that the DNA thoughts and emotions you are having are yours. This is how the movie constantly plays out while slumbering consciousness thinks it is calling the shots! The aim is to turn conscious beings into generators of fear in all its forms to empower the Matrix, and to take away freedom and replace it with what I call feardom - domination by fear. One of the major ways this is done is through the software programs that we call 'leaders'. You will recall the emphasis I have placed on the obsession of the Illuminati families with interbreeding and genetics. As I have already suggested, what we call procreation is the recording of two software programs (father and mother) onto one disk - the child. All bodies are software programs and the difference is whether they are pure software (Red Dresses) or whether consciousness is involved. When consciousness expresses itself through the body it rewrites the DNA programming which, in turn, is transmitted to other DNA and to the Matrix in general. These people change what we call the bloodline and, as a result, these Red Dress genetic lines become increasingly less controlled by the dictates of the program. Such people will have a heart dimension to their views and decisions; they will have a sense of empathy, compassion and fairness. They will not, in short, react as a programmed disk in the way the Matrix demands with violence, bigotry and an absence of empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions. The world is awash with this mentality because it is awash with software people.

Onionworld wrote:

In my mind all of this contradicts Icke's "water droplet" theory.

I haven't been able to come to terms with the contradictions and discrepencies in the "water droplet" theory and his "characters that are actually in positions of power manipulating this world are actually projections" comments. Both theories cannot be true. They are in direct contradiction to each other. When David Icke talks about the "water droplet" theory he is talking about the divine spirit that unites us all. The "sentient programs" Icke talks about do not have the divine spirit and therefore cannot be part of the ocean, it's impossible.

Not sure if this addresses your question, but in the same book Icke continues:

Icke wrote:

When I say it's all an illusion and a computer program, I do mean all. It is an apparent contradiction that the earth and the cosmos was supposed to have been created by a loving God and yet what we call Nature is a bloody battle-ground in which one animal's survival is dependent on another's, often grotesque, demise. The voice in Brazil told me that there was no contradiction in this because the law of the wild' was not the creation of a loving God or Oneness in awareness of itself. It was a Matrix software program and, without the control of fear, the relationship between animals, and animals and humans, would be very different.

[...]

The voice in Brazil asked: 'Do you think the Infinite, where you are now, would wish to see anything suffer and live in fear, never mind create a structure in which this happened as a matter of course?' Nature was another holographic projection that was only 'real' because we were conditioned to believe it was (Figure 54, overleaf). The voice said the 'laws' of the natural world reflected the state of being of their creator, the force controlling the Matrix. This was a state of fear and desperation to survive ... a trait of the reptilian brain. (Observe human society and you'll see how it is structured in the same way with people surviving or prospering at the expense of others - 'dog eat dog' and all that.) There were, the voice said, some apparently beautiful expressions of nature on 'Planet Earth' and so long as we realised they were illusions they could be enjoyed. But we should be careful not to become mesmerised by what we see on earth or we would become like a moth hypnotised by a light, trapped by illusions that held us in a disconnected state. The Matrix can be extremely captivating - just look at a clear night sky, or a panoramic landscape. The message was to enjoy what you see, but remember that what you 'see' is merely what you think you see or are manipulated to see.

[...]

Another documentary I saw told the story of Grey Whales which, once again, spent part of the year in warm waters where they were safe, but had little food, and then headed north where there was food, but they weren't safe. Or at least the calves weren't. The programme showed how Killer Whales pursued a Grey Whale calf for six hours as its mother, who was too big and powerful to be attacked, tried to provide protection. The killers sought to separate calf from mother and hold it under the water to drown. The mother fought desperately to save her offspring and help it to breathe but, in the end, exhaustion took over and the Killer Whales lived up to their name. Even after all those hours of pursuit and all that fear and trauma, they only ate the calf's tongue and lower jaw and the rest was left to the scavengers on the ocean floor. It was just another bloody crime-scene in the wonderful world of Nature. What kind of 'intelligence' creates a natural world in which the survival of one depends on tearing another to pieces? What sick mind would design a global life-cycle in which the participants were in a mode of constant fear - humans as well as the animals? Would a loving God do that? No, but the mind behind the Matrix would, and it has.

z3n3rg wrote:

As far as the drops in the ocean, I guess we can stretch that since soul matter is found at all density levels.  Animals have souls.  Inanimate matter has recyled soul matter.  The difference we are dealing with is one of 'level of developement'.

In this respect, I would say that the "sentient programs" do have the divine spirit as does everything.  It's just not developed.  It's more of an imprint or maybe a small gathering of soulness.

Right on, that's a good way of explaining it.

From what I understand, both an inert stone and a person are part of the universal hologram, both composed of a single thought energy that makes them ultimately one. But they still differ in form and function. What makes a human being more than just a sack of minerals are the more developed conscious layers nested within the physical body.

When Icke talks about water droplets as being part of one ocean, he's talking about anything made of consciousness being One with anything else made of consciousness. The paradox is that although everything is made of consciousness, not everything is conscious - although everything is made of thought, not everything thinks. What is conscious and thinks does so because of a "godspark" that endows it with self-awareness and freewill. This is lacking in what Icke calls "projections".

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

onionworld wrote:
z3n3rg wrote:

I don't think I can reconcile Icke's words as I've never read any of it except in quotes from other.

Please download and listen to the interview! It's really quite interesting: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W46GIX9I

I am curious, does David talk about the same thing "over and over" (the few controlling the many) or does he dive into more "spiritual" matters?

Because, I can't listen to him say what he's always been saying. LoL. smile

Thanks

"Beyond the stars a new world awaits me now" - Wintersun

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

There are others who have referred to that order of being as " counterfit " consciousness and made the contrast to fully ensouled beings as " theomorphic." Sometimes that analogy is useful in getting ones mind around the subject. The notions of STS-STO [Predator-Prey] need to be transcended.
They were handed us by channels such as Ra and others not worth mentioning and are part of a highly limiting and infected memetic program in my opinion. There is something not quite right about those terms and the use they have come into. Best call a spade a spade. The Earth became overrun by anti-life forces operating in human form. The predatory patterns in the natural kingdoms were apparently in place by the time mankind gained sentience. There needs to be a study of the Archetypal forces and we need to know the genesis of what exactly set those patterns. By some accounts its a consequence of materialization. This is something Ken Carey went into in his Starseed series of books, but not in much detail.
From one angle this always points back to the Elohim, and to YHWH, the suprasensible Lunar Logos. For those that have read the Emerald Tablets these would be one order of beings that Thoth refers to as the ones that move in "strange angles." Angels of a certain type that is, but exactly what type?? A study of what Steiner had to say on the subject will reveal that mankind would not have developed the consciousness he has currently has if it were not for the fact that these lower forces were taken into his embodiment. When understood in that context some aspects of the material situation on Earth start to make sense, although the picture is far from complete. One major thing that is constantly reinforced by the matrix is the false idea that the material, 5 sense world is all there is. There are all manner of silent memes that are running that seek to deny the existence of the unseen realms that inform this one and the entire population is infected. This is one aspect of the force of denial as it manifests in human affairs, and a consequence of inner dialogue and alien thoughtforms that often times don't originate from the hosts mind. Lots to think about.

StarCat

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

The notions of STS-STO [Predator-Prey] need to be transcended.

From my understanding, and from what I've read, that assessement is incorrect.  STS is both Predator-Prey.  STO transcends that mentality.

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

montalk wrote:
onionworld wrote:

David Icke just described Organic Portals, IMHO.

Yes, Icke wrote about this in "Infinite Love is the Only Truth":

Think of horses on a carousel. Whether anyone is sitting on them or not they still go round with the rest. Our 'physical' bodies are biological computers reading software programs and they are running all the time. The question is whether self- aware consciousness chooses to experience this illusory world through one of those software carousel 'horses' (human bodies) or not. If it doesn't, the 'body' will still play out the program, because it is a biological computer capable of 'thought' (assessment of data). But it will be nothing more than software without consciousness as defined in this book. Everything you see in the Matrix is part of the program, including your own body. The exception to this is your consciousness, those that have any that is, because, in the way I am defining consciousness in this book, not everyone has. The phenomenon of the 'woman in the red dress' in the first Matrix movie, the woman who was just part of a software program despite appearing 'real', is not confined to a Hollywood sci-fi script. These 'computer' creations, these carousel horses with no rider, are everywhere. There are three main groups of 'people' in the Matrix[...]:

1) First there are the software programs whose only consciousness is the DNA/RNA receiving instructions from the Matrix. They are constructs of mind, not consciousness. All energy/consciousness is Infinite Oneness, but not all expressions of this are at the same level of awareness. The 'human' interactive software programs are sophisticated robots following a 'life' program dictated by the Matrix and their free will is basically zilch. I'm sure you must have met many. They appear to be the same as everyone else in the way they look, but the best special effects studios can now put digital 'people' into advertisements and you can't see the join. There is a television presenter in Britain who is famous for being enormous and she appeared in a commercial with a far slimmer body to sell a food product. You could not see the join and anyone who didn't know what she really looked like would believe the body in the ad was hers. This is why we have to be extremely wary about 'Bin Laden' videos that suddenly come to light at just the right time from the agenda's point of view. Producing a fake Bin Laden saying fake words is a cinch to the state-of-the-art special effects houses. The same principle applies with these 'Red Dress' programs, as I will call them. They are bodies without consciousness, interactive software programs. The lifeless look in their eyes is one way of picking them out, as is the lack of energy coming from them. They resonate to a different frequency to conscious awareness and again you can symbolise them as the horses on the carousel with no one on board. These interactive software programs can malfunction, go off message, and 'hack' into other programs - as with the Agent Smith character in the Matrix movies. A lot of that is going on, too.

2) Other people do have consciousness, but are so entranced and deluded by the Matrix that their DNA programming calls the shots and dictates the path that they take. These horses do have a rider, but the horse is still making the decisions. They go where the DNA program takes them because they don't think they have a choice or don't choose to make one. They can be lovely, caring people and express their consciousness in that way, but they can't see beyond the illusion. These are the main energy source for the Matrix because it feeds off the emotional energies of fear, guilt, and frustration etc., generated by consciousness trapped in this virtual reality prison and identifying with its programmed 'personality'. Once consciousness identifies with the mind and emotions - the software - it begins to resonate to those frequencies and this invariably means an expression of fear. These people, with what you might call 'back seat consciousness', also represent by far the biggest section of 'conscious' humanity. They are the system fodder who overwhelmingly do and think as they are told.

3) The third, and by far the smallest, group are those who are aware enough to see through the illusion and have begun to access the knowing of Infinite Oneness beyond the walls of the software program. This doesn't mean they understand the full nature of life and reality, but they have at least a subconscious knowing that the world is not as it seems. They are the only ones with free will in the sense that they have the awareness and power of consciousness to break the control of the DNA software. They can ride the horse and, in doing so, rewrite the program. These people stand out from the crowd and are dubbed dangerous or mad because they don't see the world like everyone else. The Matrix is a six- stone weakling compared with consciousness in its true power, and this group is like a computer virus that has the means to scramble the program and download another reality. The Matrix targets these people with a vengeance to protect its control and also because if it can manipulate this level of consciousness to become caught in the illusions and succumb to fear, it is a massive potential energy source.

Consciousness has become trapped by the Matrix in a maze of smoke and mirrors that has implanted a false reality. The 'Red Dresses', or software people, are no problem because they just follow the codes. The targets of the Matrix are those with self-aware consciousness who find themselves, for whatever reason, caught in the flytrap. It is in pursuit of these people - this consciousness - that the system of society is so designed in this part of the program. I have been saying in my books for years that the system has been structured to hold consciousness in a prison of the five senses. You can see everywhere that this is so obviously true. But what is this five- sense jail cell? It is a prison of the brain and body - the DNA! While we are focused purely on the five-sense reality we are slaves to the DNA that dictates our thoughts, emotions and actions. The consciousness of most people never gets its hands on the wheel of life because the DNA will not vacate the driver's seat. Consciousness in its reconnected infinite power could easily take control, but it is difficult to do this when you are not aware that you are Infinite Consciousness and you think that the DNA thoughts and emotions you are having are yours. This is how the movie constantly plays out while slumbering consciousness thinks it is calling the shots! The aim is to turn conscious beings into generators of fear in all its forms to empower the Matrix, and to take away freedom and replace it with what I call feardom - domination by fear. One of the major ways this is done is through the software programs that we call 'leaders'. You will recall the emphasis I have placed on the obsession of the Illuminati families with interbreeding and genetics. As I have already suggested, what we call procreation is the recording of two software programs (father and mother) onto one disk - the child. All bodies are software programs and the difference is whether they are pure software (Red Dresses) or whether consciousness is involved. When consciousness expresses itself through the body it rewrites the DNA programming which, in turn, is transmitted to other DNA and to the Matrix in general. These people change what we call the bloodline and, as a result, these Red Dress genetic lines become increasingly less controlled by the dictates of the program. Such people will have a heart dimension to their views and decisions; they will have a sense of empathy, compassion and fairness. They will not, in short, react as a programmed disk in the way the Matrix demands with violence, bigotry and an absence of empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions. The world is awash with this mentality because it is awash with software people.

Onionworld wrote:

In my mind all of this contradicts Icke's "water droplet" theory.

I haven't been able to come to terms with the contradictions and discrepencies in the "water droplet" theory and his "characters that are actually in positions of power manipulating this world are actually projections" comments. Both theories cannot be true. They are in direct contradiction to each other. When David Icke talks about the "water droplet" theory he is talking about the divine spirit that unites us all. The "sentient programs" Icke talks about do not have the divine spirit and therefore cannot be part of the ocean, it's impossible.

Not sure if this addresses your question, but in the same book Icke continues:

Icke wrote:

When I say it's all an illusion and a computer program, I do mean all. It is an apparent contradiction that the earth and the cosmos was supposed to have been created by a loving God and yet what we call Nature is a bloody battle-ground in which one animal's survival is dependent on another's, often grotesque, demise. The voice in Brazil told me that there was no contradiction in this because the law of the wild' was not the creation of a loving God or Oneness in awareness of itself. It was a Matrix software program and, without the control of fear, the relationship between animals, and animals and humans, would be very different.

[...]

The voice in Brazil asked: 'Do you think the Infinite, where you are now, would wish to see anything suffer and live in fear, never mind create a structure in which this happened as a matter of course?' Nature was another holographic projection that was only 'real' because we were conditioned to believe it was (Figure 54, overleaf). The voice said the 'laws' of the natural world reflected the state of being of their creator, the force controlling the Matrix. This was a state of fear and desperation to survive ... a trait of the reptilian brain. (Observe human society and you'll see how it is structured in the same way with people surviving or prospering at the expense of others - 'dog eat dog' and all that.) There were, the voice said, some apparently beautiful expressions of nature on 'Planet Earth' and so long as we realised they were illusions they could be enjoyed. But we should be careful not to become mesmerised by what we see on earth or we would become like a moth hypnotised by a light, trapped by illusions that held us in a disconnected state. The Matrix can be extremely captivating - just look at a clear night sky, or a panoramic landscape. The message was to enjoy what you see, but remember that what you 'see' is merely what you think you see or are manipulated to see.

[...]

Another documentary I saw told the story of Grey Whales which, once again, spent part of the year in warm waters where they were safe, but had little food, and then headed north where there was food, but they weren't safe. Or at least the calves weren't. The programme showed how Killer Whales pursued a Grey Whale calf for six hours as its mother, who was too big and powerful to be attacked, tried to provide protection. The killers sought to separate calf from mother and hold it under the water to drown. The mother fought desperately to save her offspring and help it to breathe but, in the end, exhaustion took over and the Killer Whales lived up to their name. Even after all those hours of pursuit and all that fear and trauma, they only ate the calf's tongue and lower jaw and the rest was left to the scavengers on the ocean floor. It was just another bloody crime-scene in the wonderful world of Nature. What kind of 'intelligence' creates a natural world in which the survival of one depends on tearing another to pieces? What sick mind would design a global life-cycle in which the participants were in a mode of constant fear - humans as well as the animals? Would a loving God do that? No, but the mind behind the Matrix would, and it has.

z3n3rg wrote:

As far as the drops in the ocean, I guess we can stretch that since soul matter is found at all density levels.  Animals have souls.  Inanimate matter has recyled soul matter.  The difference we are dealing with is one of 'level of developement'.

In this respect, I would say that the "sentient programs" do have the divine spirit as does everything.  It's just not developed.  It's more of an imprint or maybe a small gathering of soulness.

Right on, that's a good way of explaining it.

From what I understand, both an inert stone and a person are part of the universal hologram, both composed of a single thought energy that makes them ultimately one. But they still differ in form and function. What makes a human being more than just a sack of minerals are the more developed conscious layers nested within the physical body.

When Icke talks about water droplets as being part of one ocean, he's talking about anything made of consciousness being One with anything else made of consciousness. The paradox is that although everything is made of consciousness, not everything is conscious - although everything is made of thought, not everything thinks. What is conscious and thinks does so because of a "godspark" that endows it with self-awareness and freewill. This is lacking in what Icke calls "projections".

That was awesome, thank you. You've given me a lot to think about and I think you did answer my question.

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

That classification scheme is a subterfuge that was given to the new age by Alien intelligences.
It may have been a useful step on the path at one time, but I refuse to accept it.
There is something very " not right " about it. It does not reflect the divine order of things beyond this realm, but something else entirely.

StarCat

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

StarCat wrote:

That classification scheme is a subterfuge that was given to the new age by Alien intelligences.
It may have been a useful step on the path at one time, but I refuse to accept it.
There is something very " not right " about it. It does not reflect the divine order of things beyond this realm, but something else entirely.

After having a night to sleep on it, it strikes me as BS too. Anytime that someone tries to put some people in a "sub-human" category, you have to question their intentions.

And about Icke's idea about the "woman in the red dress" representing something important:

"The phenomenon of the 'woman in the red dress' in the first Matrix movie, the woman who was just part of a software program despite appearing 'real', is not confined to a Hollywood sci-fi script."

Everyone except for Neo and Morpheus in the scene he's talking about where part of the software program, not only the woman in the red dress! And, that program, including the woman in the red dress was created by people in Zion. Everything that happened in that scene was only a simulation of the matrix and it was created by humans from Zion! The analogy Icke is trying to make here falls apart under any scrutiny.

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

Well, I cannot speak for Icke, but my intentions are to incorporate as many observations as possible into a coherent theory, observations that go unacknowledged in more simplistic theories. So for instance, my observations are that a certain spectrum of people have similar flat vibes, similar glib behavioral patterns, similar emptiness behind the eyes, and so on. The question is how to account for this. If you discard a theory as BS, then to avoid throwing the observations out with the interpretation, it would be necessary to come up with a better theory that acknowledges those observations. I've been on the lookout for a better theory, but have so far come up empty handed. Whether something is BS depends on how well it accounts for the facts, not on whether it is politically correct.

The "Red Dress" scene was another training simulator to teach a lesson about the real Matrix. It's like doing a driving simulator and having to watch out for that virtual toddler that might run out in front of you. The point of "beware the toddler in the striped shirt" is that such a thing may happen for real when you're out driving. The "woman in the red dress" was virtual just like all the other simulated people in that scene, but it wasn't until she came along that Neo stopped listening to Morpheus. She simulated the matrix distraction that would have gotten Neo killed by an Agent in the real Matrix. If the simulation were never relevant to the Matrix, Morpheus wouldn't have taken Neo into it in the first place. Well, that's my interpretation at least.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

12 (edited by Risen 2006-04-19 19:34:48)

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

onionworld wrote:

I haven't been able to come to terms with the contradictions and discrepencies in the "water droplet" theory and his "characters that are actually in positions of power manipulating this world are actually projections" comments. Both theories cannot be true. They are in direct contradiction to each other. When David Icke talks about the "water droplet" theory he is talking about the divine spirit that unites us all. The "sentient programs" Icke talks about do not have the divine spirit and therefore cannot be part of the ocean, it's impossible.

Well you knew I had to drop my 2 cents in here, so here goes wink

I believe Icke cleared this up a bit in "Infinite Love".  He explains how the matrix (and therefore the OPs within) is/are  basically a unit of the whole that is in denial.  It claims to be a separate entity, so much so that it has fooled itself into believing it completely.  But it isn't truly separate, and will eventually reintegrate into the whole because there is indeed no separation.

To clarify, he uses the example of a whirlpool (?) in a river.  It is indeed part of the river but if you were trapped inside it you may not realize it!  And in this case, the whirlpool (matrix) is acting as and claiming to be of its own accord.

At least, thats my understanding of Icke's explanation.

This is no time for the righteous
Only the wicked survive
Bake up a batch of the Yellow Cake
Bake up a batch of the lies
- - - - -[ Yellow Cake - Ministry - Rio Grande Blood (2006)

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

Here's the thought I had yesterday, it's brief.

What if the OP-types actually were born with normal souls, as in fully human, but eventually over time got rid of their soul essence through the choices the made and through spiritual lethargy / being overtaken bit by bit.

Two weeks ago I emailed a gifted remote worker I know about this, asking for their thoughts.  Their response was that most all people who don't appear to have a soul started out with one, but it 'left them' (no details on this part), or in some cases it never entered the body.  An another aspect of this phenomenon in their opinion could be due to folks who 'weren't supposed to have stayed.' 

Weird stuff... but some interesting ideas.  cheers

"The unknown does not incite fear, but dependence on the known does." - J. Krishnamurti

14 (edited by lyra 2006-04-19 22:48:58)

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

visavis wrote:

Here's the thought I had yesterday, it's brief.

What if the OP-types actually were born with normal souls, as in fully human, but eventually over time got rid of their soul essence through the choices the made and through spiritual lethargy / being overtaken bit by bit.

Two weeks ago I emailed a gifted remote worker I know about this, asking for their thoughts.  Their response was that most all people who don't appear to have a soul started out with one, but it 'left them' (no details on this part), or in some cases it never entered the body.  An another aspect of this phenomenon in their opinion could be due to folks who 'weren't supposed to have stayed.' 

Weird stuff... but some interesting ideas.  cheers

Wow......I had just talked about this very concept this afternoon actually, and it's something that has nagged at me in regards to the "OP" theory.  As much as I *can* believe in the theory due to what I've seen of the - adults - out there in the world, the fact is, I have to admit that I (usually, not always...) don't see that level of non-sentience and bizarro behavior going on with kids.  It's like, kids are normal.........most all of them........then something happens.  Not all of them will make it to the "finish line" you could possibly say.

I'm leaning more towards this theory, and it feel far more comfortable for me than the other.  Again, only because I've witnessed this discrepancy.   I see that so many kids are "there."   So what the hell happens to so many adults??   

I was talking about this today as mentioned, regarding my mom specificially.  I have zero contact with the woman because she's cuckoo for cocoa puffs, and verbally/emotionally abusive, cold and detached, and just really messed up.   There's so much I could say about her......................she is "by the book" OP, all the way, and has nearly every trait on the checklist, from regularly scheduled energy feedings, big blank "deer caught in the headlights" eyes, no personality of her own whatsoever, and on and on and on.  It's really, really disturbing stuff.   

Yet, I can't say for certainty that she's an OP.

Why?

The one thing that always causes me to hesitate and which really throws a wrench in the works is remembering her childhood school pictures that I saw when I was a teen.  She was "THERE" in those pictures.  She looked normal, and adorable, and totally sweet and nice looking.   Her eyes and facial expression in those pictures are completely normal.

Then by her late teen pics, something has changed.  The metamorphosis has begun you could say.  The face was getting that fixed, stoney, blank look to it that she would be known for by the time I was a kid and teen.

So what the hell happened between the time she was a kid, and the time she was a late teen?

Several major, traumatic things:

- Crazy childhood;  Dad died when she was 2;  her mom had to give her and one of her brothers to her grandparents because she couldn't afford to keep them, and kept the other three that she was able;  During this time her childhood was still relatively happy, she had a good life with her grandparents and brother living in the Catskills mountain area of NY.   But then her mom came back for her when she was 11, bringing her back to Brooklyn, and totally disrupted her life;  Her other two brothers and sister were completely running wild by that point, total hellions, and she was abused as a teen by those other two brothers and just treated very badly overall by the family - she was like the verbal and physical punching bag, and expected to be like the house mouse, cooking and cleaning and doing all that stuff.....at 13.   Her mom had become an abusive alcoholic and totally of NO help whatsoever, and let's just say, life sucked for her, BIG time.  I wouldn't wish her life on anybody. 

- Heavy drug usage.  By the age of 15 she'd drunk herself into a three day coma thing, and was already heavy into dropping acid, smoking pot, doing anything she could get her hands on.  She was too much even for my dad, who was a senior at the time!!  Here was this little 9th grade 15 year old trying to coerce my dad, the bad ass senior, into doing drugs that even he wouldn't do. 

So yes, by the time she was an adult, it was like, Houston, we have a HUGE problem here. 

My mom again, according to any aware person's standards is a textbook OP.   But all this time, I knew something wasn't quite right.  I didn't believe she'd started out that way. 

I think some souls are very....skittish.  Life becomes far more than they can handle, and they bail out.   Drug usage and extreme unhappiness could have called her soul to fragment off.   And what was left was a mostly empty shell that only progressively got worse over the years. 

So yeah, I definitely think there's something to this.  In fact, I think it could be called "the missing link" in the OP theory.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: The theory of Organic Portals and David Icke

Yeah, some shamans believe that if you don't constantly upkeep and "feed" your
soul, it can wander away. Also, of course, terrible trauma can cause it to take a hike, in this view. It certainly is evident that children seem to "feed" their souls without realizing it, and adults are taught to deaden their souls. Even if a person never had childhood abuse, it's possible that through this deadening process, the
soul is not "danced" and nurtured, so it leaves, at least temporarily. Perhaps in some people it leaves for good. It is still out there somewhere, however, in this view.

On the other hand, one of the things that works for me about the organic portal idea as that people always confuse the body with the soul, and I think it would be
so easy to "mimic" the appearance of humanity. As fake worms can fool fish, and
chameleons and octopi blend with their surroundings.


It's not so easy to tell the difference, but both ideas are probably valid, in my opinion.