Natural Mystic wrote:Wouldn't "our own truth" be built upon real truths?
Well it could be, but it doesn't necessarily have to be. What I'm getting at is that there are things called Universal Laws that fall into the category of "absolute truth", or just truth. As it was wisely pointed out, "absolute truth" is somewhat redundant. Truth is truth, no matter how you look at it, or even if you choose to ignore it. Universal Law still applies to you, even if you do not believe that it is true. Your not believing in it does not make it any less true.
What I am NOT saying is that there is no such thing as relativism. I think that -most- things are relative. My suggestion is to call them what they are. . beliefs, ideas, opinions, experiences, or whatever.
Calling something that is inherently relative a "truth" is part of this Newspeak, newagey gobbeldygook that gets our neurons crossed. Learning to be precise with language is one of the -key- tools to attaining any sort of real liberty.
As an example, aliens, referring specifically to other-than-earth intelligences, either exist or they do not exist. They don't exist for me and not exist for somebody else. When somebody says they don't "believe" in aliens, what they are really saying is that they do not acknowledge aliens as part of their experience. And perhaps they are better off for that. But what they are ALSO saying is that EVERYBODY else who has had an experience of an alien encounter is either a liar, or delusional, and that is, in my opinion, a ridiculous assertion to make, especially in light of the tremendous amount of sound, documented evidence to the contrary.
Same goes for people who don't "believe" in other dimensions, or life after death, or government conspiracies, or any number of other subjects that compose the topics of this forum.
It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.