Mass control (Page 2 of 4)

Hi Christine. It means that you are free to do anything you like if it does not negatively impact your fellow humans, and they are likewise free to pursue their happiness unless that pursuit reduces your enjoyment of life. The golden rule in practice, not merely an aphorism. Maybe it would be easier to think in terms of apartment neighbors. For the spaces to work for both neighbors, neither can suffer annoyance beyond acceptable levels. A mutual respect for each other forms the border between the neighbors' respective freedoms. The idea of "personal space" taken into the social. I hope I haven't muddled this completely.

It would be a good idea to listen more to people like aaronfirebrand, he understands how things work in your country, its really simple, follow the money! a good example of this is on a great website www.exxonsecrets.org where it shows the money trail of PR front groups calling themselves independant pressure groups set up by the oil industry to lobby congress against environmental issues. The website is layed out as a route map of how the money travels around who benifits from it. It is a great example of how modern democracy works. The emotional rhetoric of speeches which is called the campaigning hides the darker side of interests of your country. I bet you don't hear a lot about the 72 military interventions since WW2.
A vote for Reagan was a vote over throw democratically elected governments in south america and introduce controllable client dictatorships, also he sold a lot of chemical weapons to saddam. A vote of bush senior was to persuade the kuwait to increase its oil production to start a war with iraq, giving a premise for the first Iraq invasion and the start of sanctions that killed well over half a million children from 91-02. A vote for clinton was a reinforcement of this infanticide which Madeleine Albright, when asked if the deaths of deaths of half a million children were a price worth paying for sanctions she said 'We think the price is worth it'. Also a vote for clinton was a vote for the genocide in rowanda; 'after the killings began in early april 1994, the un security council controled by america and britain reduced troop presence from 2,500-270', by the end of april with thousands dead, us/uk secured a security council resloution that rejected the use of the term 'genocide' when referring to rowanda. A vote for Bush was a vote for terror, you kill 15,000 civilians in Afghanistan and iraq and you recruit five times as many terrorists. A vote for kerry is probably a vote for more of the same.
You may guess that I'm not american, but i'm not anti american, as a society you are probably the most loving, giving, open minded, foward thinking nations on the planet. The people in washington need to go and it can only happen if you do somthing about it. Ignorance is not bliss, Ignorance will bite you in the ass and heap bad kama on you. Every little thing you can do helps; going back to the apartment block analogy, unite your apartment block together, have a meeting to clean up the building has an effect. Like aaron says 'don't vote it only encourages them' is true, change has to come from you, it has to happen locally to have a global effect, you can call it anarchy or you can call it having respect for yourself and those around you. Anything that strikes a cord with you, do somthing, any little thing you do will have an effect, otherwise it will chew you up and create a negative energy block inside your auric field. This is how connected we are to everything.....

Hefner was selling nudie mags and he needed a way to add some class, so he he called hedonism a philosophy (which I suppose it is). The freedom idea, in my concept, would result in individual awareness that the only way to improve society is to introduce an improved unit into it. I can only change myself, not others. My actions can show someone a way, but my words cannot. This is why I believe freedom is an action, not a litany. Anybody can say anything. but it doesn't mean a thing. Manifold laws may try to establish what freedom is, but generally confuse the issue (purposely). My definition, once clear to people, is a very easy thing to remember. It's really saying "yes, I have a right to go after what I want (it's important to me), but the other person has the same right, so we stay out of each other's way or we take turns." The only politics necessary are politeness and regard for each other (mostly obsolete now, this used to be the social lubricant but apparently has been replaced by alcohol).

Christine B. wrote  "...actions all impact our fellow man by virtue of the ripple effect. "

exactly. 

where the external saviour myth in that?  He is telling the obvious, dont put him on that high.

Thats why he is using the platform to tell people that they have the power to change.

Good, then how are people bugged?

rlha, you can edit your posts to bunch thoughts together.

When you are born, you awake to 3D first in theta-state. As you grow older, you become accustomed to alpha-state. As you mature, you then focus your conscious to beta-state. By breathing regulation, you can experience these states by slowing down the brain hertz per second of your brain.

In theta-state your mind is heavily open to soaking-in all externalities (hypnosis). Imagine a little robot walking around your room, absorbing all the information surrounding it. The walls, the paintings, the people, the dogs, etc. In every subconscious, there is a database that stores all knowledge, all references.

If a child is struck by the parent when throwing a rock towards the road, he/she notes this. This is an example of a simple program of 'cause' + 'effect' being soaked in to a child.

The 'real I' is what I consider the fragmented essence, the soul free from programming. The artificial I's are hard-wired programming that makes you act unaccordingly to the 'real I'.