Topic: Is selfishness the fundamental engine of destructiveness?
Today I had this thought: that people act destructively less because they are ignorant of the destructiveness of their actions, but more because they believe they can stem off the destructive effects of their actions.
If that's even 51% true, what does that mean?
Philosophies like Buddhism name ignorance as the prime cause of pain and destructive behaviors. And I think that sounds sound, but as I think thoroughly about my own history of destructive behaviors and the histories of others, ignorance doesn't explain it.
When I've done wrong I knew it was wrong. I wasn't ignorant. I couldn't necessarily clairvoyantly see the tiny Butterfly effects of my choice, but I could definitely see the potential, immediate as well as distant negative consequences. I still did the wrong because I believed I could dodge the bullets.
You could still argue that it was selfishness driving me since, while I believed I could dodge the hurt, I wasn't exactly concerned with saving others from hurt.
Even if selfishness is the fundamental engine of destructiveness, I still think this is worth considering: that there sometimes exists an insane conviction of invulnerability that helps decide upon a negative path.
I've never studied black magic, but from reading about it I glean that black magicians don't believe that their spells won't bend back upon them--but they believe there are ways AROUND magical backlash.
Right now there's a Ponzi (pyramid) scheme collapsing in the US called "12 Daily Pro." The president of the company will probably be jailed or heavily fined. She promised investors 12% interest per day, but it appears that that figure was based only upon the pyramid scheme and that those at the top were making big bucks while the newer recruits were being bilked. Mathematically it was doomed to fail, I understand. But it could run for a while. And while it ran, the president deposited huge amounts of money into her personal bank account and allegedly benefitted from the interest.
Did she not understand that it was mathematically doomed to fail (if that is true)? Or did she believe she could stem off the collapse by recruiting more and more people at the bottom? Did she know it would collapse and selfishly decide to bilk others, suffer a penalty, but ultimately profit?
Selfishness may underlie, or be beside, this issue, but still it is interesting. Selfishness may be the unconscious component for most here, and the conviction of invulnerability may be the conscious component.
But where does it arise from? How do you become convinced that you can escape consequences? ...If you're at the top of a pyramid, commanding an army below you, then there you go--an army of protectors could convince you. But this isn't a pattern that crops up only in the top member of top-down systems; it crops up in quite ordinary people.
but you can avoid its teeth.