Topic: Mass control
I was just listineng to Dennis Kucinich giving a speech to Franklin Pearce College.
http://www.kucinich.us/about.php,
check out his vision compared to Dubyas.
its under his bio
spirituality - physics - conspiracy - philosophy - wisdom - and more...
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Noble Realms → Conspiracy → Mass control
I was just listineng to Dennis Kucinich giving a speech to Franklin Pearce College.
http://www.kucinich.us/about.php,
check out his vision compared to Dubyas.
its under his bio
wow, a politician who isn't entirely preoccupied with total war..
I heard Noam Chomsky speak a couple of weeks ago in London someone asked the question 'what is the difference between Bush and Kerry?' and he said not a lot both come from wealthy backgrounds, educated in the same university, memebers of same elite clubs, funded by the same people, same ideas on foreign policy, domestically trying to be different but upon closer inspection not really.
I hadn't even heard of kucinich. I thought it was funny they had an audio stream of how to pronounce his name. Incredible he has got where he has with his views on the world. All is not lost for America..
When I first heard about Kucinich, I was impressed with his ideas. And when people asked me who I liked in the "race", I said "Kucinich". If they even knew who he was, they'd say he had no chance, implying that he was beneath consideration. Like a football team with no super bowl prospects. The masses only care about being on the winning side, no matter who leads them. It's about popularity, always. kerrybush is a a two-headed coin on a string pulled away at the last minute by someone in the shadows. What a con. What a crock. You know what democracy is? Two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. Anarchy Now! Don't vote--it only encourages them. Insist on "None Of The Above" being placed on the ballot.
I think it's simplistic to call Bush and Kerry two sides to the same coin. Whomever the supposed shadow government tries to get elected, they're going to have one hell of a time trying to keep the people of this country from reclaiming the true democrasy that they've let slip away.
Bush gets a lot of people's sympathy for being uhh.. such a big kid, to be honest. Kerry though he comes from a similar background, can't be considered 'just a big kid' and expect to get where he wants to go politically, so he's going to have people expecting direct action and answers from him, whereas it seems like most people have just tried to let Bush do his thing for some rediculous reason.
Anyone who wants to take the reigns of presidency in this country in 2004 is taking on a huge burden, one way or the other. I think the key differece between Bush and Kerry is that Kerry as far as I know doesn't have direct commercial/familial ties to some of the other 'power players' behind the Farce in Iraq.
Anarchy is not an option. Anarchy in the US isn't very likely. Too many people have miliary connections in this country. (Is anyone on this board not at all connected to the military, if not from past service then from family members?)
The military itself has become a back-burner kind of issue lately, especially because they've been made fools of by the very ellected officials whom most of the non-military people are complaining about too. There are comments of covert civil war going on in the administration of all the 'top players' in the US government right now. Which wouldn't surprise me. But it's not the kind of thing that would ever be broadcast widely in the US or otherwise. (Think about it, peacelovers, if any power in this world knew the US had some serious infighting going on, and had serious details, what would the oportunistic military do? Start sending troups in to 'help keep the peace' and before you know it, a chunk of the country is no longer part of the US.)
Besides, most elites know that no one rules the world by themselves, not even discorporeal entities.
Why do the truly simple accuse everyone else of simplistic thought? Alright, then. How about: kerry & bush are two faces of the same person? If you really believe there is a difference between kerry & bush, you should be watching fox news. If you think the people can take the country back, you should be running for office, or supporting a "viable" candidate. When you have a little more insight into realpolitik, such as the inescapable, provable fact that the "US" is no longer part of the US, you'll realize what some already know. The fix is in. You are controlled now, but you don't know it. As to anarchy, I speak of personal anarchy, more in line with libertarianism. Your freedom ends where another's begins. And by the way, the only reins a president takes are the ones placed on his neck. What is simplistic is blind acceptance of ANY corporate media-delivered "information".
Why are we supposed to believe Kucinich's words? This is just another distraction and way to give off responsability (energy)... (and if he can really create changes, he'll never be allowed by the powers-that-be to access presidency, so what's the point anyway?)
Did I say to believe Kucinich? We're talking about positing a reasonable facsimile of an authentic human as a contender against the two worst choices since "spam or clamato?". We're not talking about establishing the King of Truth. bush is going out. I'd prefer to feel better about the means to accomplish this than I would if we end up with kerry.
Someone with a last name like Kucinich will never be elected president. If your name is too difficult to pronounce, people won't remember it, and you don't have a chance then. Sad but true.
There is really no way to repair the system by working within it. Those days are long gone. The only way is to let the system be destroyed, and it will in time. It'll crumble under its own rotting structure. The new consciousness evolving on Earth won't allow such a corrupt system to remain. People won't give their power away to leaders to make their decisions for them. People will be self-sovereign, and it will probably be something like a libertarian utopia. This can and will happen if you believe it, because if you can't envision such a state it probably means you don't really want it. And those who want to remain in the old system will.
seeker,
When those of us who shift into 4th Dimensional 'earth' do so, there's still a dichotomy present in polarities.
1.) STS drachonomonoids + whoever else
2.) Humanoids that are 95% + STS (shifted)
VS
3.) Humanoids that are 50% + STO (shifted)
4.) STO entities other than human (Feline, Avian, etc)
This leads me to believe that those of us who believe we will be entering a "utopia" aren't necessarily correct...partly though. The C's said it would be a "leveled playing field". So conflict between the polarities are still present. What this means to me is that the societies that form will indeed be libertrarian and utopian within their cultures, but battles, wars, etc, will still occur between these societies composed of separate polarities in the macrocosmic field. Just on a higher plateau. The white-pieces on the chess-board, where we are concerned, now start to move.
So 'camelot' is restored but 'heaven on earth' perhaps is only a half-truth. The battle within is over after 3D.
BB,
From what I've read, Gaia is going to shift to 4D STO, and those with a STS orientation will go elsewhere to further their path. As I understand it, the mix between STS and STO only occurs in 3D ("the dimension of choice") while, in 4D, entities are aware of their polarity and, shall I say, can't fool each others. So Earth itself could become like "utopia", although we will then be conscious of, and have to deal with, metaphysical battles occuring on an universal (or galactic?) level.
(Nonetheless I understand the concept of "utopia" or "heaven" is one frequently used by STS forces to stroke our ego and its need for pleasure and comfort).
Ya, that sounds more correct than what I was visualizing.
I wonder in what manner the 'conflict' between the two occur.
BB, I think ermolai is more correct. As far as I know, 4D STO is not in direct contact with 4D STS, and STS can't exist in the vibrations that would be the realm of 4D STO Earth. However as I understand it from the Cassiopaean channel, 4D can "see" entities of other vibrations only when they are focused on that vibration.
As for the "battle" I always figured it was a like a battle of consciousness, in the mind, sort of like we experience when we are deciding something and we weigh the good and bad sides. Different identities in our mind fight each other and then one wins and our brain chooses which action to take. That's just my idea though, and I could be wrong. Sorry to the original poster, this thread's been totally derailed hehe.
Sometimes my regular 3D concepts blind me from what I learn in regards to higher-densities. This is one of those topics that I don't think I can theorize in regards to...the dynamics at play, the non-linear foundation, and the division of the Universe in regards to awareness, where wishful-thinking is separated from objective-thinking. It's like hitting a wall when you realize even at your highest-potential, you still need to evolve up a level, a grade, to even concieve of it.
Why do the truly simple accuse everyone else of simplistic thought? Alright, then. How about: kerry & bush are two faces of the same person? If you really believe there is a difference between kerry & bush, you should be watching fox news. If you think the people can take the country back, you should be running for office, or supporting a "viable" candidate. When you have a little more insight into realpolitik, such as the inescapable, provable fact that the "US" is no longer part of the US, you'll realize what some already know. The fix is in. You are controlled now, but you don't know it. As to anarchy, I speak of personal anarchy, more in line with libertarianism. Your freedom ends where another's begins. And by the way, the only reins a president takes are the ones placed on his neck. What is simplistic is blind acceptance of ANY corporate media-delivered "information".
First of all, lay out the realpolitik so we can all read what your point is. This is a fair move on any book, and I might add that countless others have posted extreemly anarchistic thoughts on the internet without haveing 'the man' show up at their door, so try not to worry about how safe it is to do so.
Second, exactly what are you saying when you say the US isn't part of the US anymore? What defines the US first of all? Seriously, when you get right down to it. Define the US. Is it the Fed Gov? The State Govs? Is it the corporate elites? maybe wallstreet? The secret masters? The not so secret masters?
Kunsiniches people came in two types that I've met. The first was male, agressive spouting platonic dailogues as being important, and mix up of various historical ideologies to promote his agenda. The covers of his booklets, and the inside, were full of christian releigious references. The female that I spoke with in his camp was what some of us call zombified. And that to me is a clear sign of not cool, thank you.
Also, if the fix is in, what is the fix? Vet's call male sterilization the fix.
To say that anyone's freedom ends where another's begins makes me think of elitism. Assuming somehow that people who think differently from you don't get it?
There are two kinds of people. The kind who divide the world in two (along arbitrary lines, i.e. political, racial, social, cultural, religious, ad nauseum). And the kind who don't. The first type likes to debate all issues. The second type knows there are no arguments perfect enough to serve as proof. I try to stick to the latter group, but I suppose the heat today has me in a testy mood. I could never explain what has taken me many years to sort through. Fortunately, much of it is now instantly accessible via internet. The sorting, however, still takes patience. Who really runs the world? It's a Google away. The true state of the USA corporation? Google it. Surf the net, and in the same way a surfer finds the great waves, find the sites that will inform you. Ignore the left/right, up/down, black/white noise that abounds (and which, with diligence, you will eventually recognize). Politics is politics because the real story can't be told to the hoi polloi. It's show business for ugly people. It's about slavery and prostitution and murder and revenge from the supernatural top to the mundane bottom. 87 levels of puppetmastery at last count. And all the patriotic jingoism of a thousand raygun funeral marches won't magically transform this country into what it was promised to be, but was never intended to be. Dennis Kucinich is not responsible for the effect his "people" have on you. The "fix" is a gambling term for a fixed event. The outcome is known in advance, because someone's taking a dive. And why on god's green golfball would you think that the clearest, fairest definition of freedom I have ever heard had anything to do with elitism? My definition calls for the highest respect for all fellow humans, the opposite of elitism. "You laugh at us because we're different. We laugh at you because you're all the same."
Noble Realms → Conspiracy → Mass control
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.