Re: Having children

lyra wrote:

1.  How many abductees find themselves not having kids?   (I'm not saying you're an abductee feritciva, I don't remember whether you've ever said that you have that going on)  But seriously, how many abductees feel that they're here with some big plan, a mission, an agenda they must accomplish, and to do so means....refrain from having kids, because it would get in the way?  How many abductees don't reproduce out of fear of their kids being targetted, since multi-generational tagging and harrassing is "their" mode of operation?  (and they may not even be consciously aware of the reason for their reluctance.)

This is an interesting perspective.  I feel the same way you describe here, but I hadn't connected it to abduction necessarily.  I guess if I had to put it all together I think it's a combination of the above, and that which you mentioned at the beginning of your reply, I just don't feel like this is a world that I want to bring children into.  So I think it's a combination for me, there are definitely some things that need to be accomplished in my life in regards to the upcoming transition.  I don't have a messiah complex over it or anything, but I have do an increasing awareness of my role.  Hopefully when all is said and done, I will be in a world that I do want to raise children in.

lyra wrote:

2.  How much has feminism / the "NWO" (for lack of a better term...hate using cliches like that, but I don't know what else to call it...) affected our ideas of children and family?  This is a HUGE one that has to be taken into consideration with any topic having to do with not wanting kids and a family.  Many don't even realize how much our views on family have been affected and tampered with by a lifetime of media and societal culture, the feminism movement and the conspiracies to destroy the family and tear down society.  (and again, I'm not saying this about you personally, ferit, it's just an idea that I thought of while reading this thread topic.)  Many may deny it, "Oh, I can't be programmed like that!"  but think again.  We're ALL programmed about something, whatever it is.

Yes, and prolly programmed on both ends!  Again I find your perspective interesting.  I totally agree with it, but simultaneoulsy I will admit that I have tended to think that most of the programming has centered around promoting population growth (more serfs to pay taxes) and preserving the family unit (fabulous mechanism for the transmission of abuse patterns).  I've always viewed the breakdown of the family unit as positive.  Though a rough transition, I feel that a more group-oriented approach to life, where we are all brothers and sisters and have equal responsibility toward each other regardless of genetic similarity, would be a more stable approach to raising children and caring for the elderly.


lyra wrote:

Feminism has convinced women to put their careers first, and have kids later....if ever.  It's got women acting like men, trying to BE men, and men wanting to be perpetual teenage boy bachelors who never grow up, and combining both together is a recipe for disaster.    We have a society that pushes the idea of "ME ME ME!!"  and instant self gratification and insatiable ego fullfillment, so kids are now seen as an impediment to personal hedonism.   Kids are a burden.  They get in the way of my personal fun.  I want to devote all my time and spare money to ME ME ME, not a kid.  And I'm not saying this is "right" or "wrong", but it's interesting to stop and think about whether any of us fall into this category, or notice if those around us do.

Personally, I'm still single for lack of presentation with a potential partner that I find suitable for a lifetime committment, rather than some prologation of my bachelorhood!  I do feel that it is important to give proper attention to my own growth before I embark upon taking responsibility for another's.

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

17

Re: Having children

Great discussion. Thanks to everyone for contributing to this thought-provoking thread.

I find that the issue of having kids of not having kids is one of the great "taboos" within the healing/metaphysical community.  Nobody likes to talk about it. And rarely are people honest about their real views on the subject, for fear of other people judging them and going into a "I'm more enlightened than you on this subject" stance. That's the attitude I've found whenever this subject gets raised, and it sure doesn't help anyone explore the issue.  So it's nice that people can express their views here. That said, I'm going to put my own views out there.

Keep in mind that this is simply my truth, and it may or not resonate with you, and I respect all views on the subject. I don't mean any disrespect to parents or people who are thinking about becoming parents, because they perform such an important and sacred duty. So none of what I am about to write is intended as a "slam." Please know that.

I'm childfree by choice and always will be.  Should I get pregnant via "oops," I know the herbs to take that will bring on my period. This information was a part of women's education for centuries until the Church finally intimidated many women into silence during the "witch burning" of the Middle Ages and afterwards.  Since then, women have helped maintain the conspiracy of silence by not sharing this information with their fellow women. Poo on them, I say.  Subjecting each other to lifetimes of having 10-12 children all because nobody would talk about this stuff and assert their right to have sovereignty over their reproductive systems. My grandparents came from families of 10- 12 children each. The burden on those families and on those women, physically, emotionally, financially, is simply unbelievable. And inexcusable, if you ask me.

The millions of women who were killed off in the Middle of Ages were the herbalists, midwives, and domestic mystics who knew how to invoke spiritual energy for healing, for medicine, for childbirth, and for contraception.  Very sad that that wisdom had to go underground to the point that it barely exists anymore.

Contraceptive herbs have always existed. Sylvestre was culled to the point of extinction during the Roman era because it was used as a contraceptive. Recently studies have proven that the herb chastetree reduces a man's sperm count, just as the American Indians have always claimed; and it also brings on a woman's period.  There are many herbs still available today that do the trick. Hint: go into a health food store and look for the herbs that are "contra-indicated for pregnancy" --  meaning, don't take them while pregnant because they will induce a miscarriage.  None should be taken in large amounts because they can be poisonous, but in small amounts they will bring on your period.  Disclaimer: I'm not attempting to give medical advice here, so be sure to research this on your own. Email me privately if you wish more info:  newagetalk (at) comcast.net. Additional note: Never take pennyroyal internally; there is some conflicting information on this but please know that that one is very toxic to the body.

So the truth of the matter is, between herbal contraception and also communicating directly with spirits of the unborn, we do have the ability to determine whether or not we will bring a child into this world. There's no real need for a "oops."

Many metaphysical types like to say, well, if you have a soul contract already in place to bring in a child to this world, you have to fulfill it....or you won't be fulfilling your karma or whatever.

Not true. At this point in humanity's evolution we all each pre-inserted, automatically, with a contract to bring two children in.  This is outworn, outmoded programming that was originally brought in at a time when the population was much smaller and if people didn't procreate, because of the prevalence of disease and war, humanity might die out.  So spiritually, en masse, humanity took on the agreement to each bring in a  minimum of two souls as their children....or to at least attempt to do so. 

Remember, at the time that the Bible was written, the entire WORLD population was roughly equivalent to the current population of the state of New Jersey.

Since then, we've moved on to have some 7 billion folks here.

No longer do we need to maintain these contracts to automatically bring in two children each. We're not on the Ark. We don't carry the burden of humanity's continual survival.

That's why I respectfully disagree with Lyra's statement here:

lyra wrote:

- Let's face it...having kids is a natural urge for mankind.  It's why we're all here;

(I realize I may be taking this out of context, Lyra, but I think it raises an interesting point and you raise a point of view that many people share.)

I believe that for many people, having kids is the ONLY way that they will ever tap into their powers as creators. But what we're really here for, is to come into our power as spiritually sovereign co-creators with God/Goddess/Great Spirit/Creator. 

Having kids is ONE way to tap into this energy. For many, it will be the only real opportunity for them to do this in their current lifetime.

But there are many, many other journeys available to us. The arts. Healing. Learning how to affect reality shifts and do power prayer. All of these also involve this same creationary energy and are other ways to express this urge.

You can talk to the souls of the kids you have soul contracts with and work shamanically to make other arrangements with those souls.  Just talk to them.  From a place of love. They will work with angels to make other arrangements to come into different bodies, no problem.  And sometimes they won't even incarante, they'll decide to hang out as spiritual guides or they'll go somewhere else on the timeline to pursue a different arrangement - possibly with you or with some aspect of you, or with somebody else. 

We have to remember that all contracts can be changed.  Usually, they were made from a place of less enlightenment than where we are now. So sometimes they really SHOULD be changed. You may have outgrown the need for the contract.

For instance, you may have an arrangement that you put in place before this lifetime to meet a romantic soulmate who is going to abuse you one day, so you can deal with some of your own karma.

But what if you clear out that karma on your own years ahead of time and no longer need to have that experience with that romantic partner? You should end that soul contract to prevent being with that person. 

These agreements are constantly flowing and evolving in the moment and are subject to change. you need only focus on everything coming together for the highest good of all, in a state of sincere loving kindness, and the Universe will create the perfect flow.

Here's a good invocation you can work with to make sure that any soul contracts you have in place right now are serving your highest good:

"I expel, cancel, and revoke all spiritual contracts that are not in alignment with my highest spiritual path, my spiritual purpose, and my spiritual immortality. I end all contracts that are not in alignment with the highest good."

Then, see what surfaces. You'll often feel some stuff shift around and may become aware of some crusty, outmoded contracts - especially surrounding relationships - that are now being transmuted into a higher, healthier form.

As a side effect, sometimes certain friends, associates, or family members may "disappear" from your life, while happier, lighter folks appear very suddenly out of the blue. This is a sign that you are shifting those contracts around and the effects are materializing on the physical plane.

To bring children into this world, by the way, creates tons of new karma.  I'm into travelling light, myself, because I'm not at all certain that I"ll be returning here.  That's not to say that I think I'm better than anyone or more evolved, because I don't think that at all.  But I am very aware that there are other realities, other places of a less dense vibration, that my energies are more in synch with. And by breeding and falling into the old human fallback position of creating layers and layers of karma on TOP of whatever karma I already need to work on, well, it's just not for me. 

Some of the children I have ended contracts with have come into my life in other ways, through other parents, which has still allowed me to having loving, productive bonds with these individual souls. So that's another neat and marvelous way that soul contracts can be shifted and altered and still be miraculous in a quasi-parenting way. It's like revising the entire framework of those old agreements and transmuting them into a higher, happier, more workable form for the benefit of all.  Doesn't mean there's any end to the love bond, as that always continues and is eternal.

Basically, my entire philosophy comes down to this:

It's not my job to make more people.

My job is to make people better.

And so I devote my focus to the healing path, and I hope in some small way to lighten the energies here for the benefit of the many wonderful spirits who are still choosing to incarnate here....babies and indigo spirits included, but parents and other adults as well.  Not to the mention the plant and animal kingdom and the Earth herself, who need massive amounts of healing right now.

Some days, I feel like I'm getting there, having some effect.

Most days, it feels like I still have a long, long way to go. But it's a wonderful process to be a part of, and I'm grateful for every moment of it.

Anyway, thanks for entertaining this rant!

Lipstick Mystic aka Jennifer

______
"He has no children, because every time he felt the paternal urges wash over him, he would lie down in a dark room with a cold flannel over his face until the feelings went away."

---Alex Gordon, http://www.ninedeadlyvenoms.com, author of Nine Deadly Venoms and shamanic healer from the UK -- check out his stuff, it's great!

18 (edited by lyra 2006-02-17 11:53:04)

Re: Having children

[EDIT:  Don't mean to take away from Lipstick Mystic's post...we posted at the same time!  big_smile  Sorry....]

tenetnosce wrote:

Yes, and prolly programmed on both ends!  Again I find your perspective interesting.  I totally agree with it, but simultaneoulsy I will admit that I have tended to think that most of the programming has centered around promoting population growth (more serfs to pay taxes) and preserving the family unit (fabulous mechanism for the transmission of abuse patterns).

Here's a thought that I just realized...................the middle and upper classes who live in urban areas tend to be having less kids it seems than those who live in rural areas.   For rural areas, it's totally cliche for teens to be popping out babies, and for people to marry young and have at least three or four kids....and then all the cliches that go with that - bowling, Wal*Mart, monster truck pulls, etc.  big_smile big_smile  haha   But in all seriousness, the more educated people are, the higher their class level, the less kids they tend to have, and the longer they put off marriage and family.   The whole NWO/ feminism/annhilation of the modern family is something that's running rampant in young, urban professionals.   And tying into what you wrote, I think for those of the lower class hierarchy with less money living in small towns and rural communities, indeed, it's all about popping out babies at a young age, and having big families, living on poverty wages - being serfs, just like you said.   

It's a split of sorts. 

hmm.


tenetnosce wrote:

I've always viewed the breakdown of the family unit as positive.

Funny you mention this, I was thinking something near identical to this last week.  The whole "there's two ways to view any situation" thing, in regards to religion and family.  Lately I've come across lamentations (in the written media) regarding again, the destruction of the modern family unit, and also how religion is dying and people are turning away from church and God and all that.  The first thing I thought of was "Maybe people are just wising up and turning away from outdated institutions that are founded on control?"  You know, maybe it's part of the whole Shift thing, and the dawn of a new age or whatever.   Out with the old mechanizations and in with freedom and personal sovereignty.   

Of course, like anything, there is the flip side, and I can also see how society seems to be getting more and more demonic, and there does seem to be a conspiracy centered around destroying the family unit.  Because the way to dismantle a society is through their families.   

So, there's a mix of both going on it seems.



tenetnosce wrote:

Though a rough transition, I feel that a more group-oriented approach to life, where we are all brothers and sisters and have equal responsibility toward each other regardless of genetic similarity, would be a more stable approach to raising children and caring for the elderly.

Yes!   Definitely.   I think we should be looking at indiginous tribes for our model of how a family - and a community - should co-exist and treat each other.  smile

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: Having children

Above all, to thine ownself be true. 

Everytime I have gone against my intuition or instinct, it's been wrong for me.

20 (edited by tenetnosce 2006-02-17 13:14:44)

Re: Having children

lyra wrote:

But in all seriousness, the more educated people are, the higher their class level, the less kids they tend to have, and the longer they put off marriage and family.   The whole NWO/ feminism/annhilation of the modern family is something that's running rampant in young, urban professionals.   And tying into what you wrote, I think for those of the lower class hierarchy with less money living in small towns and rural communities, indeed, it's all about popping out babies at a young age, and having big families, living on poverty wages - being serfs, just like you said.

Yeah there definitely appears to be multiple strategies targeting different elements of the population.  As regards the young, urban professionals, I think its wise to hold off on children until at least some modicum of financial stability is achieved.  Just when careers are starting to take off, here comes lil' Joey, and of course now you "need" a bigger house, and an SUV, etc.  More and more consumption.  More and more control.

A large disinformation point is the whole "biological clock" deal.  This is becoming more and more apparant to me as I approach 30.  I've had friends introduce me to women, etc., and then they throw in the caveat:  "Warning dude!  Her clock is ticking!"  That's a major turnoff to me in several respects.  IMO, it takes several years for two people to really figure out compatability issues, comparison of values, and the like.  Of course there are the reports of "I knew I was going to marry him/her from the moment I saw them."  And of course, many of those marriages have ended in divorce. 

As regards the "clock" it is just plain untrue that women should / need to have babies before they reach 35.  A healthy woman can carry a child well into her 40s.  Most of the evidence around birth defects and such for older women is in cases where the woman has already had several children, often without allowing for ample time for her body to recover in between.  Though not a particularly romanticized way to look at things, a fetus acts as a parasite on a woman's body, and a very efficient one at that.  It takes a lot for a woman to carry a baby, not to mention the toll of actually raising the child once it's born.

And another point on the control subject, the fact that most of the anti-abortion and anti-contraception arguments come from followers of organized religion makes it inherently suspect in my mind.

lyra wrote:

Funny you mention this, I was thinking something near identical to this last week.  The whole "there's two ways to view any situation" thing, in regards to religion and family.  Lately I've come across lamentations (in the written media) regarding again, the destruction of the modern family unit, and also how religion is dying and people are turning away from church and God and all that.  The first thing I thought of was "Maybe people are just wising up and turning away from outdated institutions that are founded on control?"  You know, maybe it's part of the whole Shift thing, and the dawn of a new age or whatever.   Out with the old mechanizations and in with freedom and personal sovereignty.

Of course, like anything, there is the flip side, and I can also see how society seems to be getting more and more demonic, and there does seem to be a conspiracy centered around destroying the family unit.  Because the way to dismantle a society is through their families.

I came from a family that wasn't particularly abusive, but also wasn't particularly supportive, either.  Things are ok with my parents now, but it's taken a lot of work.   

There's the whole metaphysical bit about experienced souls choosing to be born into an abusive family dynamic so that they can put an end to it once and for all, and I think that view has considerable value.

I still maintain that the "family unit" has been a primary control mechanism utilized to retard or prevent the personal growth process.  Think of all the grotesque forms of abuse that go on in families that would never occur if it wasn't such a closed system.  The idea that these are MY kids and I can raise them how I want represents the epitome of twisted ego-driven thinking, IMO.  Then there is always the case of the trouble child or the alcoholic relative that sucks all the life and resources out of an otherwise healthy family because we are programmed to believe that we owe a special responsilibity to those whose .005 percent of DNA more closely resembles our own as opposed to anybody else's.  Then consider all the people who never pursue their own values/goals/aspirations because they are not acceptable to mother or daddy.  Or even when they do, they are suddenly forced to drop their careers, relocate, or spend their life savings because a parent comes down with some illness at (usually) the most inopportune time.

I was recently told by an ex that one of the reasons she couldn't be with me was because of my disdain for "family values" meanwhile she allows herself to be verbally and emotionally abused by her parents on a daily basis, and has to lie to them about the smallest of things because she doesn't want to "upset" them. 

I may not have a close relationship with my parents, but at least it's honest and they are very clear that I will not tolerate any form of abuse or manipulation if they want to be a part of my life.  And it's made them better people for it. 

lyra wrote:

Yes!   Definitely.   I think we should be looking at indiginous tribes for our model of how a family - and a community - should co-exist and treat each other.  smile

Yup. . it makes one think twice about our ideas of "progress" doesn't it?

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

21 (edited by feritciva 2006-02-17 13:02:03)

Re: Having children

Wow! Some thoughts that I've not considered before!

Lyra, yes I don't have any abduction experience/memory but some parts of what you wrote ex-act-ly reflects what's in my mind. I've always seen having children as some kind of a interference that will "get in the way". But I think opposite about the programming of society. I've always seen the urge to have children and seeing this as a "biological urge" which I accept as a big lie, is a kind of programming.

And freeme, yes I think I have to consider past-life influences too. Because I felt this negativity against having children even from my childhood. And this has nothing to do with my family, which is a normal one. My parents were always loving and supportive.

I totally agree with tenetnoscoe on saying "I do feel that it is important to give proper attention to my own growth before I embark upon taking responsibility for another's". That's great statement. But you know tenet, this growth has no end/no limit!! So I think we come back to the same point written in various posts above; giving proper attention to one's own growth needs having children for some (learning to be a good sto) and exactly not having for some. As Lipstick wrote - which I definitely liked a lot- "It's not my job to make more people. My job is to make people better." This is great. Thanks for your fascinating post Lipstick. It really resonated well with me.


Having said this... Montalk's post mixed everything. smile

"Having kids is probably more a matter of mutual destiny and karma with a loved one than personal choice. If it happens, it happens.. " part is what I'm talking about.

C'mon Tom, I was just thinking I'm beginning to solve that looong problem in my mind, but you've taken all the power away again lol Seriously, this is very important thing you've wrote. Well, it's not my conscious choice to have one but I know that if a soul has chosen me as a mediator for coming to 3D, probably nothing I can do may prevent it.

Then comes some different things to my mind. At this last 10-15 years test-tube babies raised enormously. We know that men's sperm quality decreases and more and more people becomes infertile. Lots of people are going to test-tube baby centers trying to have children. Enter cospiracy. Why is that? What's the hyperdimensional plan for this? I have a lot of things in my mind for these but they are subject for another thread. Man, this gets coplicated..

Change we must, to live again
- Jon Anderson

Re: Having children

feritciva wrote:

I totally agree with tenetnoscoe on saying "I do feel that it is important to give proper attention to my own growth before I embark upon taking responsibility for another's". That's great statement. But you know tenet, this growth has no end/no limit!! So I think we come back to the same point written in various posts above; giving proper attention to one's own growth needs having children for some (learning to be a good sto) and exactly not having for some.

Oh I know!  The truth is I'm prolly in a better position for raising children than 99% of the people who are having them, but then again since I consider raising a child to be the greatest responsibility one could take upon themselves, I set my standards very high, both for myself, and for the potential mother of my children.

feritciva wrote:

C'mon Tom, I was just thinking I'm beginning to solve that looong problem in my mind, but you've taken all the power away again lol Seriously, this is very important thing you've wrote. Well, it's not my consciouss choice to have one but I know that if a soul chosed me as a mediator for coming to 3D, probably nothing I can do may prevent it.

Hmm I dunno bout this. It gets back to the whole soul contract issue.  Are they set in stone or are they negotiable?  I tend to think that the more aware one becomes, the more negotiable such contracts become as well.  Then again, perhaps the more aware one becomes, the more likely they will choose to consciously fulfill the contract!

I do know that it is possible to communicate with the soul of a potential child and let them know that now is not the right time for you to welcome them into the world, if that's how you truly feel.  Besides taking abortifacient herbs, this is one way to encourage spontaneous abortion. 

I think that most of the arguments against the choice not to carry a fetus to term comes out of the asinine belief that a soul not only has one incarnation, but only one chance at incarnation.  Life is eternal, and there are endless opportunities to take on a physical garment.  Ultimately, if a particular soul is that anxious to be born and the potential parent isn't ready, they are free to go pursue another host, or be patient and try again later!

It is not for us to understand love, but simply to make space for it.

Re: Having children

Great discussion indeed!

I agree with the ones that encourage you and your Mrs. to step aside alone and figure it out for yourselves. It is the "hive mentality" poking you. To decide to have kids doesn't mean you agree or are giving into the hive way IF you decide for yourself AND for your own reasons.

I am one that would have kids over again and hopefully I'd get the same kids:) My eyes were already "open" so to speak before I had kids and between marriage and having kids I have learned more of myself (been force to look into the mirror) than by all other means combined or individually!

I think the "breakdown" of the family unit as merely showing the "hive conditioning" and how immature/thoughtless people are getting by entering into anything so half heartedly and with failure already figured(expected) into the plan.

I did not have any special qualifications to have children and I have not earned any special qualifications. The one thing I did/do have is the desire to be the one to teach my kids about life. If I am to teach them I have to experience it.

Anyways say you decide to have kids, don't think the matrix can't find other ways to try to goad you too! I have three healthy girls. We were constantly asked by people if our first one was sick!!! After my third girl I was frequently asked ....Why?....what do you mean why?....Why do you have no boys?.... my response became " well only those truly secure in their masculinity get blessed with all girls....stopped the questions real quick:)

Much like the decision to get married was between the two of you, so is this decision.

Peace,
Teddy

"It means the Matrix can't tell you who you are" - Trinity

Re: Having children

I'm not a 'kid' person. I don't dislike kids per se, but I guess I never saw the big attraction to them. I admire those who know that being a parent is not for them and don't let societal expectations control their actions. To this day, there are many people who think that a woman who doesn't want kids is somehow off. To this I say there is a lot more to being a woman than becoming a mother. For those who decide to become parents, more power to them, and vice versa.

My uncle is in his late 40s and has never had a kid and never intends to. He's one of the most generous and loving people I've ever known but he couldn't reconcile bringing kids into this crazy, violent world and knew that being a father was not his kismet. I'm not averse to marrying at all, but my entire life never had the least desire to have children. I saw what my siblings and I did to my mom, what my friends did to their moms, etc. and decided I'd have none of it. However....

Lately I've been feeling this small twinge, but still a twinge, of desire to become a mother, not right now, but some day.  In my saner moments I think it must be my biological clock ticking (I'm only 26 but realize that I no longer have my entire youth ahead of me like when I was 18). I vacilate between wanting kids and between being horrified at such a thought. I'm way too self-involved I think to be a good mom. I don't say this with pride, no not at all. It's one of my greater weaknesses, this selfishness and desire to mold my life around my personal goals, and I know that kids would totally interfere with this. I recently became an Aunt for the first time and now have two nephews. I never in my life realized I could feel love this pure and beautiful for anyone and I think it's been this experience more than any other that has awakened these hitherto dormant maternal desires within me. At the same time though, I see what my brother and sister-in-law go through on a daily basis and the more I observe parents the more it seems to me that when you have children, your life ends. You no longer live your own life but are consumed with another. To this I say no thank you. I think that as I grow older I may decide that I truly want children, but not now, no way.

In short, I don't see anything wrong with having kids or not having kids, as long as it's truly what you want.

"A dream has power to poison sleep"
-Percy Bysshe Shelley

Re: Having children

Wow, a very hot topic obviously -- 23 replies in just one day!

I admit I havent read every post, but I skimmed pretty thoroughly.  But forgive me if I say what's already been said:

Children have been an ongoing debate in my mind for a long, long time now.  I think I do not want children.  But my reasons probably differ from most people.  It has less to do with me, and more to do with the child.  More specifically, I myself am very unhappy with the state of the world.  I'm pretty disappointed that I had to live at this time, in such a nasty place.

And with loving kids as I do, I don't think I could stand to bring a child into this world.  Not now, not the way it is now, not without seeing an improved world beforehand.  I couldn't stand knowing I could be bringing someone into a life of possibly worse circumstances than I've had to endure myself.

Is my stance on this nuts, or is there at least a bit of validity to it? lol

This is no time for the righteous
Only the wicked survive
Bake up a batch of the Yellow Cake
Bake up a batch of the lies
- - - - -[ Yellow Cake - Ministry - Rio Grande Blood (2006)

26 (edited by whywhywhy 2006-02-18 07:14:22)

Re: Having children

Tenetnosce,

I am afraid that if I would have waited until all things were perfect I would have never had my kids.  We could spend an entire lifetime trying to get things right and every time we think things are getting there another fork presents itself on the road ahead.  I like Tom's idea:  If it happens it happens......it was meant to be!

I also want to say that I was not the perfect parent and can honestly say I made a zillion mistakes.  But I believe that these mistakes were part of the contract with the soul I embarked to raise as my child.  We had bad & great experiences that one way or the other will have a lasting effect on this current life on planet Earth.  Hopefully, even the bad experiences promoted spiritual growth, evolution.

On the concept of family breakdown being a positive side effect of the maladies of our current condition I guess it all depends on the definition of the concept of "Family".  If one is referring to the condition of lack of parent involvement, abusive behavior whether physical or emotional and lack of love I will have to agree with it.  But my definition of family is the opposite of what I just listed.  So, if this is the family structure that is been broken up I find it distressing and sad.

I do respect your point of view and perhaps this is what was meant to be for you.

Lyra,

Lyra said,

"I think we should be looking at indigenous tribes for our model of how a family - and a community - should co-exist and treat each other."

This is an interesting concept and a variation of it was discussed in Conversations with God Part I.  I think is a worthwhile concept with a lot to be gained if applied properly.  Unfortunately, our society would look at that concept with terrified eyes saying “What, you do not want to raise your own blood?.....Shame on you!”   The usual guilt trip.

People in their 50's are better qualified and more patient to raise children.  They also have experienced a myriad of situations that can be used to nurture and guide these young souls in their early years.

Anyways, like Tom said,

Having kids is probably more a matter of mutual destiny and karma with a loved one than personal choice. If it happens, it happens.

I agree with all my heart!

Regards,

Lee

27

Re: Having children

tenetnosce wrote:

It gets back to the whole soul contract issue.  Are they set in stone or are they negotiable?  I tend to think that the more aware one becomes, the more negotiable such contracts become as well.  Then again, perhaps the more aware one becomes, the more likely they will choose to consciously fulfill the contract!

I do know that it is possible to communicate with the soul of a potential child and let them know that now is not the right time for you to welcome them into the world, if that's how you truly feel.  Besides taking abortifacient herbs, this is one way to encourage spontaneous abortion.

Absolutely, Tenetnosce, communicating with the soul is the preferred way of changing a birth contract with a spirit who is intending to come in as a child.  I don't think I expressed this well in my prior post.  I support doing lots of shamanic work and communication/negotiation with the soul and your guides and angelic helpers before resorting to taking any herbs that might cause miscarriage.  All of it needs to be done from a deeply aware, loving place.

But the herbs ARE available should a woman decide that she wants to remain childfree. 

I know three women who communicated with the soul of their child and renegotiated the contract.

Case in point - the two single women living at poverty level, just scraping by, with no family members to turn to or help them out, without any "fallback" position with their respective pregnancies....and without men in their lives who were sticking around to play the role of father in ANY way, spiritually, emotionally, physically, or financially. (One guy was a bohemian artist type who had immediately gone overseas and broken up with the woman after their fling, so he wasn't going to be in her life again. The other was an abusive boyfriend the woman had FINALLY been strong enough to kick out of her life, the type a woman shouldn't keep around.)

These women would have been in major dire straits should they have had to continue the pregnancy. No support, no money, no job, etc.  Each woman was headed for the abortion clinic but agonizing about doing it that way. They turned to many spiritual means  - prayer, tuning into the spirits of the baby, etc.  to see if they could make another choice and if that would be okay for the spirit. 

One woman had a miscarriage as she got in the cab to go to the clinic.

Another had her miscarriage at home.  Both women felt a loving, angelic presence as the cord between them and the babies were "cut," by mutual agreement between souls, not through the intervention of a doctor at the clinic. 

Another woman was pregnant with twins in a new marriage with precarious financial support beneath them.  While she was joyful about having a child and her relationship with her husband was great, the thought of twins absolutely overwhelmed her. Deep down, she just knew she wasn't going to be able to handle the double responsibility.  She was very sad, did tons of prayer and soul-searching, and in the end, left it the matter in God's hands.

A few weeks later she miscarried one twin.  Felt the same angelic sense that all was okay, and this was meant to happen.  Later she delivered one happy, healthy baby, and her family was balanced and able to work towards saving more money before attempting to have a second child.

I hear these stories from women all over the world, heard many of them back when I was in private practice.

So it is very true that prayer and communication with the spirit of the unborn, if done sincerely and loving, can sometimes result in the child withdrawing its energy....sometimes permanently, or sometimes to come back to that mother in the future when the timing is better for the mum.  And sometimes the soul will be born to a friend of the mother. I know one woman who had an abortion, and she was in agony about it, but she also somehow knew it was okay. The spirit of the child was later born to a friend of hers, and due to things that were going on in her life, she had the opportunity to essentially become this child's aunt.  So they could still work out karma in a familial way.

I find it all so interesting, the many ways we come here, the many contracts that are constantly changing, and how we are all evolving.

LipstickMystic

Re: Having children

Another woman was pregnant with twins in a new marriage with precarious financial support beneath them.  While she was joyful about having a child and her relationship with her husband was great, the thought of twins absolutely overwhelmed her. Deep down, she just knew she wasn't going to be able to handle the double responsibility.  She was very sad, did tons of prayer and soul-searching, and in the end, left it the matter in God's hands.

A few weeks later she miscarried one twin.  Felt the same angelic sense that all was okay, and this was meant to happen.  Later she delivered one happy, healthy baby, and her family was balanced and able to work towards saving more money before attempting to have a second child.

LipstickMystic - I enjoy your posts so much!  I just wanted to mention that when a twin is lost in utero, the surviving twin will most likely have some very intense buried emotions related to losing their twin.   It's estimated that 1 in 8 single births start out as twin, and one is miscarried or simply vanishes (gets absorbed by mom or the surviving fetus), and most never even realize they had a twin.

http://www.altheahayton.com/wombtwin/

http://vanishingtwin.com/

http://www.rainbowsunlimited.com/VanishingTwins.htm

29

Re: Having children

Mystical Girl wrote:

I just wanted to mention that when a twin is lost in utero, the surviving twin will most likely have some very intense buried emotions related to losing their twin.   It's estimated that 1 in 8 single births start out as twin, and one is miscarried or simply vanishes (gets absorbed by mom or the surviving fetus), and most never even realize they had a twin.

Very true, Mystical Girl. I did work with this particular lady and her new son to resolve some of these issues you mention.  Also, any mother who loses a child, through intention or not, has healing work to do to process the energies.  Many layers of energy are involved at all sides, so it's definitely not a simple subject.

Also, did you know that one in four "normal" pregnancies ends in fetal death or miscarriage? When I learned that, I was kind of shocked. It means that there is a lot going on with the body and the spirits of the two people involved.  Sometimes, a spirit decides to just have an experience being in utero rather than being born, for reasons of its own.  This is also the reason behind many infant deaths, too. The soul didn't want to reach maturity and perhaps needed to resolve some karma by dying as a youngster. Very heartbreaking to be the observer in that situation, because nobody can fathom that having a child die is 'right," but on a Higher Level, many things are going on.

Another interesting thing is how the spirit of the child does not enter the embryo. At least, not the full spirit. There is a physical shell that is animated by PART of the soul of the child, but the emotional body doesn't link in until the age of two (that's why we have no memories until the age of about two,) the mental body linkes in at about age 5 - 7, and the spiritual body doesn't link in until the age of 12 or just at the brink of puberty. (That's what bar and bat mitvahs and other spiritual ceremonies are really celebrating, the arrival of a child's spiritual body.)

There are other energy bodies that can link in later in life, but usually, the person has to be doing a fair amount of spiritual work on themselves for them to link in. These include the creationary  matrix body (which allows us faster manifestation of our thoughts, emotions, and desires) and the "christ" body, which is a high frequency energy body of the vibration Christ is from.  Many sages and spiritual masters have these bodies fully integrated and activated.  Most of us, however, are still in the process of working towards this. And it will happen naturaly when we have reached a point where our energy system can handle this refined energy coming in.

We are all such amazing, multidimensional creatures.

The other day I was getting this inspiration around the word "metadimensional."

That there should be some sort of operating manual for being a "metadimensional" being, conscious at many levels of reality, while still staying balanced in this 3-D reality.

Because I think that's really what all spiritual seekers are doing - becoming conscious across multiple selves, multiple levels of reality.

All right, it's back to work down here in 3-D for me!

Lipstick Mystic

Re: Having children

Hi Lipstick Mystic,

There was a piece of information you provided above I am concern with,

Also, did you know that one in four "normal" pregnancies ends in fetal death or miscarriage?

It just does not sound right that 25% of of normal pregnancies end in death or miscarriage.  I will check some sources to confirm but my gut feeling is telling me is too high.  Perhaps your source is mistaken.

Regards,

Lee