• Registered: 2005-11-13

Topic: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index867.htm from a current events website I like.  It's translated from Russian.  Especially I like the second half of this article which goes beyond current events to more general matters.

January 2, 2006

2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Russian Subscribers

And Jesus said: "I took my place in the midst of the world, and I
appeared to them in flesh. I found all of them intoxicated." The Gospel
of Thomas Saying 28

I would today like to tell you good things about the future we are all
about to face, but this cannot be done.  There are no good things, or
visions, to impart to this intoxicated world we live in today.

Our warnings do not fall upon ears that cannot hear, they fall instead
upon ears too drunken with this world’s insanity to be able to discern
what truth is, and what are lies.

And this is how it must be.

Your free will does not lie within many Gods, or beliefs, but instead
lies within those many alternate worlds of choice that all mankind is
fully and freely able to choose from with each living second of time
available to them.

Of the greatest harm being done to all of humanity it would have to be
in not understanding the true nature of time itself and in a failing to
understand time there can be no true knowledge of the Truth of All
Things.

The absoluteness of this world, and so longed for by its people, can
never be as there are instead only probabilities….some to each of us as
individuals, others to all of humanity.

The abyss that stretches before all humankind today is one such
probability…but to fall into this catastrophic time is but one of many,
and yet similar, times we face together as Children of God.

Today we can tell you…warn you…of the probabilities of this Year of
2006, and of which we would say:

The outbreak of Total Global War begins within months after the United
States soon expected attack of Iran and the severe retaliation the
Americans, Europeans and Israelis will face upon their own Nations.

The increasing of violent Solar Activity, and its horrific effects upon
our Solar Systems, including Earth, magnetic fields….and thus
continuing
Global Weather Chaos on a scale unseen in all of human history.

The fracturing of many more of the Earths Tectonic Plates, including
many in the United States, resulting in catastrophic loss of life on a
scale not previously known to these people.

The final mutation of the H5N1 Avian Flu Virus and the beginning of a
World-Wide Pandemic, and which will usher into completion the vast
array
of new and draconian laws restricting the freedoms and movements of all
Western Nations.

The planned collapse of the present Worlds Economic System that will
ensure the economic enslavement of the peoples living in the Western
Nations, and which when combined with the effects of the Pandemic will
lesson the ability of the people in these Nations to revolt.

The mass micro chipping utilizing RFID technologies of Western people
will begin during the early stages of the Pandemic outbreak, and be
inserted into these people with the Avian Flu Vaccine they will ordered
by their Governments to accept.

Too just these few probabilities facing humankind this Year of 2006 it
is enough to cause such fear that one can begin to wonder if the
efforts
to oppose the grip of tyranny tightening its grip upon the World, and
the catastrophic Earth changes soon to overcome us, can be opposed, or
even altered.

And Jesus said: "The one who seeks should not cease seeking until he
finds. And when he finds, he will be dismayed. And when he is dismayed,
he will be astonished. And he will be king over the All."  The Gospel
of
Thomas Saying 2

In the Western World today, their millions of people go into their
churches topped by the ancient Pagan symbol of the Steeple, and end
their praying by the use of the word Amen, and which by the use of that
word invokes the ancient Egyptian god cult, yet they wonder why their
true God has seemed to desert them.

To the Steeple they have no knowledge of this most detested symbol to
God for the many children that had been sacrificed beneath this phallic
symbol topped by a cross, and dedicated to the god Baal.

To the word Amen they have no knowledge that in this word is curse to
God from the Cult of Amen of the ancient Egyptians.

Not to the seeking of the True Knowledge of All Things within them do
they seek, only to that which is outside of themselves do they turn for
comfort and community, but never find it….and always wondering why.

Jesus saw infants being suckled. He said to his disciples: "These
little
ones being suckled are like those who enter the kingdom."  They said to
him: "Then will we enter the kingdom as little ones?" Jesus said to
them: "When you make the two into one, and when you make the inside
like
the outside and the outside like the inside and the above like the
below
– that is, to make the male and the female into a single one, so that
the male will not be male and the female will not be female –  and when
you make eyes instead of an eye and a hand instead of a hand and a foot
instead of a foot, an image instead of an image,  then you will enter
the kingdom." The Gospel of Thomas Saying 22

I want to tell you a Mystery….you are the embodiment of perfection. 
The
knowing of the Truth of All Things is not something you have to search
for, it is what you can see and what you can hear, even now, even
today!

Take what you have, all that you have, and today give it away to the
poor…everything!  Tell no one of your doing this.  Do not even let the
poor whom you give to know your name. 

Take what you have, all that you have, and protect it, even to bury it
in the ground so that thieves cannot steal it.

To the doing of both of these things will the Truth of All Things be
revealed within you!

Jesus says: "I tell my mysteries to those who are worthy of my
mysteries. Whatever you right hand does, your left hand should not know
what it is doing." The Gospel of Thomas Saying 62

To the believing that you are but one thing then these things cannot be
done.  To your knowing that you are two all things are then possible.

But to your knowing of these things it is only possible by your
understanding that if God be true than this World cannot be. 

Either God is a lie and not really is, or this World you live in is the
lie and cannot be believed.

You are the one who has to decide this thing.

Jesus says: "If you bring it into being within you, then that which you
have will save you. If you do not have it within you, then that which
you do not have within you will kill you." The Gospel of Thomas Saying
70

Do you believe these words?  To believe them means that from only
within
yourself are you able to make yourself anew.  So, is it then possible
to
imagine yourself with riches today and tomorrow it will be so?  The
mystery of the answer is that for one of who you are it is done, the
other mystery then lies in you making the two of you one.

To the future probabilities and their likelihood of your having to face
them?  It is with certainty that this will be so and that is why they
are ridiculed by the people of this World.

For in each catastrophe that occurs, the two parts of every human
either
seeks reconciliation or becomes more separated. 

To reconciliation shows the truth of God, to separation shows the truth
of this World.  It is you, and only you, who are able to decide.

But to your belief that God and this World must compete against each
other before your decision can be made, as if your life were a contest,
you err in foolishness.

For the ‘contest’ has already occurred, the outcome has been
determined,
the words to the future of this World have already been spoken….

Jesus says: "Perhaps people think that I have come to cast peace upon
the earth. But they do not know that I have come to cast dissension
upon
the earth: fire, sword, war. For there will be five in one house: there
will be three against two and two against three, father against son and
son against father. And they will stand as solitary ones."             
                           The Gospel of Thomas Saying 16

2 Reply by Neo (edited by Neo 2006-01-02 23:09:39)

  • Neo
  • Neo
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: New Zealand
  • Registered: 2004-04-02

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Well, this is interesting timing. Last night while flipping through television channels in the early hours (yes, I do still partake of the loosh box sometimes, - shame - some would say) I happened upon a british documentary on The Bible Code.

It investigated the prophecies found and the means by which the Ukraninan mathematician came to discover them (a genius of a man who actually set himself on fire in an anti-war protest when he was about 20).

The first part of the show detailed his findings and the uncanny way in which they played out, the president of Iran being assasinated despite a warning from the American journalist who wrote The Bible Code book.

In short, the economic collapse and global war/armageddon prophecies allured to in The Bible Code are remarkably similar to those mentioned in the post above...

Next part of the documentary; enter the Australian journalist, who took up the mathematicians' challenge to try to find similar 'prophecies' in the 150 year old American classic novel, Moby Dick. The premise being, that if such information could be found in another text, that it might render the Ukranians' findings null and void.

The Australian professor does manage to find 'prophecies' described in a similar way to that of the Ukranian matematician, and indeed within Herman Melville's Moby Dick!

(You really need to see the documentary to see how the computer decryption works and how the resulting information appears - although my point in bringing alll this up here is that the same information appears in the 'probabilities' in the post above)

Challenges ensue, which culminate in the Ukranian mathematician and his Australian challenger devising some complicated experiments to prove whether there actually is any scientific weight to the 'hidden codes'.

The outcomes of the second set of collaborative experiments have never been published but the documentary makers took it upon themselves to reproduce the experiements from source data provided by the scientists who undertook the tests (with the unpublished results).

Whether the source data the second group of scientists was provided with was actually that that the first used was not addressed in the documentary, however this is a question which occurred to me.

One thing that occurred to me about prophecies all on my own and quite some time ago, is that they are probably only good for any kind of useful consideration in the brief 'time' period in which they were made, as the circumstances present when the predictions were made change and become obsolete as the timeline progresses.

Perhaps mine is a simplistic observation here, and I am open to the ideas of others, many of whom here have much more knowledge than myself.
However it would seem to me that one way to make sure certain prophecies are fulfilled would be with the implementation of:

a) The 'phropecies' being more of a 'plan' which has been laid and played out, or
b) Ensured by timeline manipulation.

I used to get all worked up about these things and whatever the case, I understand that the future is not set, or why would we be here. We might as well be all sitting watching a DVD of this carry-on.

Another in NR'er once wrote that the effect of such firmly described prophecies is that they may actually inherently fail, due to the amount of attention being placed on them which results on that reality not being able to manifest.

Time for dinner, (excuse spelling mistakes, was typing at pace), I look forward to your thoughts.

Peace.

"Would it help if I got out and pushed?"

"It might..."

3 Reply by montalk (edited by montalk 2006-01-03 23:45:02)

  • montalk
  • montalk
  • forum-keeper-upper
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2004-03-24

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Well, speaking of predictions and prophecies, you all might find this interesting:

http://www.briansprediction.com

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

montalk's Website

4 Reply by wandering1 (edited by wandering1 2006-01-03 23:57:26)

  • Registered: 2004-04-01

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Hey montalk, I looked quickly.  There seemed to be a lot there.

Any ideas that you had in mind?

5 Reply by montalk (edited by montalk 2006-01-04 00:44:47)

  • montalk
  • montalk
  • forum-keeper-upper
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2004-03-24

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Nah, nothing in particular... I just found this thought provoking since here is yet another source claiming to predict the future, yet regardless of claimed accuracy there is always room for debunking. Like the Bible Code. Food for thought, that's all.

I'll check that site from time to time, maybe there's something to it, maybe it's a scam. He has a page of predictions he claims came true. Haven't been familiar with his site long enough to know whether these were fabricated, edited after-the-fact, or what.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

montalk's Website

6 Reply by Jen

  • Jen
  • Guest

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Neo wrote:

I used to get all worked up about these things and whatever the case, I understand that the future is not set, or why would we be here. We might as well be all sitting watching a DVD of this carry-on.

Correct, the future is not set.  Neither is the past or the present, for that matter.

Another in NR'er once wrote that the effect of such firmly described prophecies is that they may actually inherently fail, due to the amount of attention being placed on them which results on that reality not being able to manifest.

Actually, the reverse is true.  The more energy focused on a possible outcome, the more likely it is to manifest.  This is in sync with the Law of Attraction.

But from a broader perspective, all predictions are materialized,
in one probability or another.  This is a probabilistic universe (see my post "Many Worlds Theory" in the Physics forum).

Currently I'm mulling over the possibility that all those deluded NESARA
fanatics may actually, through their diehard hope and faith,  not to mention their sheer numbers, be helping to create the reality symbolized by this non-existent bill.  I have a friend
who, although he previously held a very bleak vision of our planet and its future, is finding much upliftment through the channelings by one Mike Quinsey,  emamatng from the Four Winds site.  I think I'll post a couple of them in the NESARA thread here.

7 Reply by artichoke (edited by artichoke 2006-01-04 15:32:25)

  • Registered: 2005-11-13

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Jen wrote:

The more energy focused on a possible outcome, the more likely it is to manifest.  This is in sync with the Law of Attraction.

But from a broader perspective, all predictions are materialized,
in one probability or another.  This is a probabilistic universe (see my post "Many Worlds Theory" in the Physics forum).

This gets to the second half of the article I quoted which is what I found more interesting in the first place.  All the possible outcomes exist; the "trick" according to the article is to connect oneself to the desired outcome.

I read your physics thread and compared it to what I read from the C's.  The C's had the view that probability isn't the way to map the many possible futures into the actual one that appears, even though it is the approach of conventional quantum physics.  The C's said that probability itself is a "3rd density" view of things and they see things only in terms of what is and isn't.  But the selection among various possible futures is up to an individual's free will.

So the difference is that in the probabilistic view, an autonomous force (say a throw of the dice, as in God playing dice with the universe) decides among possible futures.  In the C's view, you can decide.  In Jesus' view in the Gospel of Thomas, you choose to bind to the "you" in the desired reality (it can be a "future" reality but maybe not necessarily), so that the two of you become one, and if you don't choose and let the dice fly instead, the dice's choice will kill you.  Anyway that is my reading of it.

8 Reply by Neo (edited by Neo 2006-01-04 15:57:17)

  • Neo
  • Neo
  • Member
  • Offline
  • From: New Zealand
  • Registered: 2004-04-02

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Neo wrote:

Another in NR'er once wrote that the effect of such firmly described prophecies is that they may actually inherently fail, due to the amount of attention being placed on them which results on that reality not being able to manifest.

Jen wrote:

Actually, the reverse is true.  The more energy focused on a possible outcome, the more likely it is to manifest.  This is in sync with the Law of Attraction.

I know what you are saying here but the article I saw elsewhere on this site gave a very good argument to the contrary - which was most intriguing.

I have been unable to find the piece I am referring to, perhaps Tom, Lyra or another might know to which posting I am referring?

"Would it help if I got out and pushed?"

"It might..."
  • montalk
  • montalk
  • forum-keeper-upper
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2004-03-24

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

Neo, I'm not sure which post or article in particular you are referring to, but it does ring a bell and it must be around here somewhere. Earlier today I was thinking about this very subject.

We gotta straighten out the similarities and differences between awareness/anticipation, and focus/intent/preoccupation, because they are different things with different effects. Getting them mixed up can cause problems. For instance, if awareness is mixed up with focus, then one might say that refusing to be aware of the darkside ensures that you don't empower them with your energy and is thus a protective move. This fails in application. Obsession with darkness can draw it in, but awareness keeps it away...therefore ignorance never protects, but neither does fruitless preoccupation.

Awareness, anticipation, and expectation tend to constrict the manifestation of probable futures. This should be obvious from experience. Things happen when you least expect them, and once you start anticipating them, they tend to happen less. Remote viewers, psychics, and prophets do best when less people are anticipating the outcome of their predictions. Once I have a good come back and anticipate the moment I get to use it, that moment never comes. When I go on a road trip, whatever things I anticipate might go wrong never do, and what does go wrong is the one thing I didn't expect. The watched pot never boils, we shall know not the hour nor the day, and so on.

Intent, fear, and obsession are types of focus that tend to draw things in. What I intend for, often manifests. What I obsessively fear, often comes true. The difference is that while awareness is more a neutral acknowledgment of possibilities, focus carries an emotional and volitional intensity that magickally attracts the object of focus.

Focus does seem to amplify things, but what simply must not be - or has zero validity to amplify - cannot be manifested by focus. The Nazis were involved in reality creation experiments where photos showing the swastika flag flying over Washington DC were focused upon by trained psychics, but that never manifested. Lots of people dumped huge amounts of emotional energy and anticipation into Y2k, and nothing cataclysmic happened then. I might suggest the same for NESARA. On the other hand, no one focused on the WTC attacks...yet they manifested. No one anticipated them either, which supports the idea that anticipation constricts manifestation while lack of awareness leaves the gate wide open.

Things to think about...

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

montalk's Website

  • Registered: 2005-11-13

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

I haven't been too good at the intent thing, it tends to morph into obsession or, if I resist that, just awareness.  I have a sign at my desk saying "Avoid Anticipation" and I intend that it will work!

Lack of awareness must still be the base "typical" state.  It must be impossible to have meaningful awareness of all but a very few of the possible futures.

11 Reply by Jen (edited by Jen 2006-01-04 19:40:37)

  • Jen
  • Guest

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

It can be a bit tricky to hold an intent without being attached to the outcome, but I think as montalk says, it's about staying neutral.  When it comes to anticipating a shift on or around 2012, for example, we could be open to positive change, but know that ultimately this is a very personal thing, and could manifest in subtle rather than dramatic fashion.  And that ultimately, we are the change.

I've had things manifest rather quickly once I state an intent.  At one of my forums, I typed this, from one of the P's books:  "I am open to being compensated in a variety of unexpected ways."  Then I went out for coffee, and on the way back, I found $40 on the sidewalk! I wasn't expecting that, for sure, but I was vibrating it.  And I've had lots of similar experiences.

montalk wrote:

On the other hand, no one focused on the WTC attacks...yet they manifested. No one anticipated them either, which supports the idea that anticipation constricts manifestation while lack of awareness leaves the gate wide open.

But this had been in the planning stages for some time in the government, right? I mean, they had drills for this. There was indeed focus involved.

By the way, montalk, I've found a watched pot does indeed boil. wink

  • Registered: 2004-06-24

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

There was an interesting character on GLP named "Gaia man" some months ago. I don't go that website much anymore as it has become trashed out, but this particular poster seemed different from the rest of the usual rants. He came across as being highly spiritually evolved. He spoke about a manmade virus killing many people, a great cold, and a great war. No specific dates however. Supposedly many of his smaller scale local predictions have come true. He hasn't posted anything in a while.

13 Reply by montalk (edited by montalk 2006-01-04 21:24:26)

  • montalk
  • montalk
  • forum-keeper-upper
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2004-03-24

Re: 2006, Probabilities From The Multiverse By Sorcha Faal

[nevermind that brianspredictions.com site, it now requires registration to view. Odd timing that I posted the link last night and today it went to members-only. I was going to comment on your post, Weopposedeception, that the site mentioned Tamiflu being responsible for causing a flu epidemic, but alas you can't even see the relevant page now without signing up.]

-----------

Could your awareness can constrict what I focus upon? If more had been aware of an impending 9/11, it would not have happened. I think that's why negs operate in the dark and come at you from the sides, because the less eyes are on them, the easier their actions, focus, and intent become manifest.

Applying this can come in handy. For instance, awareness does a marvelous job in stopping matrix trickery in its tracks. The matrix influence creeps up on this forum once or twice a month, but becoming aware of what precisely is intended to happen often stops it cold.

There's no doubt that consciousness influences reality, but as always the devil is in the details and the road to hell is paved with good intentions smile But let's remember that while thoughts and intentions are potent, our choices and actions are also powerful. Sometimes when you're up against a wall, no amount of intending or non-utilized awareness can stop what has already been set in motion. That's when action becomes necessary.

I believe the quality of our future can be shaped through a balanced use of both mental and physical means. It would be dangerous to rely upon one and exclude the other, but there are many belief systems that endorse such a thing.

One document I find interesting, which discusses probable futures, consciousness, and timelines would be "The 33 Arks" by the Nexus Seven. It has come up in discussion before.

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.

montalk's Website