151

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

"Why hast thou forsaken me", I have always taken it to mean that Jesus was taking on the role of humanity while he was on the cross, which goes along with the story.  He had to take on the full burden of humanity's sins, and covered them by sacrificing his blood to act as a covering.  He can do this because he was resurrected, so his blood is always covering us, instead of covering us for only a year, as the Jews did it, because the animal sacrifices would die and stay dead.  (When I started learning this stuff, I was surprised that there were actually rules being followed!  But it makes sense, since the Jews were all about rules.)

Isn't that our chief gripe as humans when we're in a bad situation or when we wonder why such bad things can happen?  "Why hast thou forsaken me?"

* When we start identifying wisdom with our ability to comprehend its form, what wisdom is that?
* Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
* People want platitudes, not progress.

152 (edited by Jen 2005-11-27 14:46:13)

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Haven, I think we are on a different page here.  Or do you really
buy the concept that Jesus died for our sins?
And,  what do you think of the switcheroo that I posted?

I do agree with you that victim consciousness is predominant in
humankind--one reason why I dislike the orthodox interpretation of
that quote.

153

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

I posted my opinion on the phrase because it goes along more with what the story is about.  The Jesus story is a Jewish mystery religion, despite people trying to make it a New Age kind of concept.  There wouldn't be a Jesus story if it hadn't been adapted for the Jews, so it has to incorporate the Jewish beliefs, and that involves the idea of sacrifice and king-priests with their requirements of ritual and all that.

As for the switcheroo, I don't see any basis for it.  It's a meaningless hypothetical, in my opinion, because it doesn't go along with the Jesus story.  Official story, I guess I mean.

Let's see how it fits into the Jewish story of the OT:

http://www.carm.org/questions/why_forsake_me.htm

First of all, Jesus quoted Psalm 22:1 which begins with, "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?".  Jesus quoted this Psalm in order to draw attention to it and the fact that He was fulfilling it there on the cross.   Consider verses 11-18 in Psalm 22:

Be not far from me, for trouble is near; For there is none to help.12 Many bulls have surrounded me; Strong bulls of Bashan have encircled me.  13 They open wide their mouth at me,  As a ravening and a roaring lion.  14 I am poured out like water,  And all my bones are out of joint;   My heart is like wax;  It is melted within me.  15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd, And my tongue cleaves to my jaws;  And Thou dost lay me in the dust of death.  16 For dogs have surrounded me; A band of evildoers has encompassed me; They pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I can count all my bones. They look, they stare at me; 18 They divide my garments among them, And for my clothing they cast lots.

It was there in reference to the OT, in particular to that one Psalm, because it was a Jewish mystery religion.

* When we start identifying wisdom with our ability to comprehend its form, what wisdom is that?
* Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
* People want platitudes, not progress.

154

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Hmm, well, I guess I could contact the person who posted that
interpretation of the quote, but I don't think it's worth bothering
with.  As far as the Jesus story being a Jewish mystery religion,  I guess a case could be made for that as far as the "official story" is concerned, but since I don't put much stock in the official story,  I don't feel like pursuing that, either. 

Thanks for pointing out the source of the quote, though, I wasn't aware that it came from Psalm 22.

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Auendove wrote:

Since I thought lyra was taking a sabbatical I went ahead and scoured through some of the C's sessions to find transmitted information about Jesus and the Christed Consciousness.

What are the C's sessions ?

Can you direct me towards some information on that ?


Thanks.

156 (edited by Christine B. 2005-12-05 08:36:23)

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Google -- C's = Cassiopaea sessions.  You can see many posts about these channeled sessions by using the search feature on this forum. 

Or -- <grin> try google -- and look at the  cassiopaea website where there I believe you can access the sessions (maybe not, don't know) plus lots more stuff.  Conspiracy orientation as I recall.  It's been well over a year that I've been on that site -- not really my thing ...

BTW -- welcome to NR.

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Christine B. wrote:

Google -- C's = Cassiopaea sessions.  You can see many posts about these channeled sessions by using the search feature on this forum. 

Or -- <grin> try google -- and look at the  cassiopaea website where there I believe you can access the sessions (maybe not, don't know) plus lots more stuff.  Conspiracy orientation as I recall.  It's been well over a year that I've been on that site -- not really my thing ...

BTW -- welcome to NR.

Thanks and thanks !


(BTW   

I guess the file section from this website got removed.

Too bad, I was going to read all those books.  )

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

google wrote:
Christine B. wrote:

Google -- C's = Cassiopaea sessions.  You can see many posts about these channeled sessions by using the search feature on this forum. 

Or -- <grin> try google -- and look at the  cassiopaea website where there I believe you can access the sessions (maybe not, don't know) plus lots more stuff.  Conspiracy orientation as I recall.  It's been well over a year that I've been on that site -- not really my thing ...

BTW -- welcome to NR.

Thanks and thanks !


(BTW   

I guess the file section from this website got removed.

Too bad, I was going to read all those books.  )

Google,

I got the entire sessions on my PC.  Send me an e-mail and I will reply with the files.

Regards

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

I don't know if this was posted before, but here's the channeled stuff about the mystery of Jesus that I find so far the most likely to be true...

http://archive.tc/?x=713&y=3

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Mindfield, that's quite a link. Thanks for posting it. I just wished "This Awareness dealt with the issue of Paul and the formation of the gospels a little more, but still a nice take, and very instructive.

Another good book people interested in the early history of the Christianity, is "Gospel Fictions" by Randell Helms (Prometheus Books). In the opening paragraph he describes a religious leader from the first century who worships the one "true" god, works miracles, heals the sick, and and called himself, "The Son of God." He was accused of sedition and arrested and put to death, but later his disciples claimed he yet lived. This person was Apollonius of Tyana.

He then slowly deconstructs the legends of Jesus in the NT, pointing out that the art of the Gospels was simply "Theology as Fictional Narrative," and then showing how nearly every legend of Jesus was based on older OT and greco-roman stories. Noted biblical scholars like G.A. Wells, and Graham Stanton have maintained that the writings of "Paul" speaks so little of the historical Jesus. This is something that shouldn't be passed over. PAUL SAYS NOTHING OF THE HISTORICAL JESUS. In fact, he talks only of the risen CHRIST. There are no extracanonical, independent historical source of Jesus. and those supplied by Pliny, Josephus, and Tacitus are sadly only hearsay evidence, and therefore carries little weight. Surely the Gospels came into existence because of Paul's inconceivable silence concerning Jesus. A development and another layer of tradition was formed. However, Professor Wells does admit that such a legend of Jesus could not have spread without a kernel of historical truth.

There will be two Ages. The first: The Age of Power. The next: The Age of Equality.

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Well, here's something that you'll probably enjoy a lot... It was first published in the late 1800's, it's about the Jesus case, and contains tons of channelings/transmissions from all kinds of spirits who lived throughout history... As with all channelings, it's to be taken with a grain of salt, but it does contain a LOT of great information...

http://archive.tc/antiquity-unveiled/



Some excerpts about Paul:

"I salute you, sir:--For my own benefit and personal aggrandizement, I brought to Rome the Pauline Epistles. I obtained them in Antioch. I changed or interpolated them to suit myself; because, being a scholar, and understanding those epistles to contain facts that were not known by the world at large, I thought that they presented a rare opportunity to make myself great. These epistles were written or copied from the originals by Apollonius, Apollos, or Paulus; and in order to disguise the identity of their author, Apollonius of Tyana, I interpolated that description of Paul that was afterward copied by Lucian. The principal foundation of those epistles was the sign of the zodiac known as Aries, the Ram or Lamb. The early Christians, as will be proven by one who comes after me to-day (Lucian), all worshipped a lamb instead of a man on a cross. Those epistles were written in the Cappadocian or Samaritan tongue. It is my duty as a spirit here to-day, to state positively that I was the first person to introduce these epistles to public notice, in A.D. 130, and in the manner I have described. This communication is given for the benefit of all thinkers who wish to be enlightened upon the truth. I was a native of Cappadocia, the country of Apollonius of Tyana; and my name was Marcion."

"My salutation shall be, Death to Falsehood, whether in religion or in political affairs of spirits and mortals. The man who preceded me (Marcion) is the one from whom my description of St. Paul was taken, although never known to me by such a name. He was known to me as Apollos in the Greek tongue; as Paulus in the Roman; and it was understood by all scholars at the time I wrote, as relating to the life, travels and miracles of one Apollonius, the oracle of Vespasian. In fact I merely followed the statements of Marcion, although I knew his statement was incorrect, never for an instant thinking that my description of this person would be seized upon by Christians in after ages to perpetuate their fraud. I was of a satirical disposition of mind, and it made no difference to me if what I wrote was true or false. It was with me as with your dramatic writers of to-day; and it mattered not what events I sought to use, whether sacred or historical, so I could make them suit my purposes."

-- Lucian, a Greek satirist

"No Jew by the name of Jesus Christ was known at Rome in my day; nor did I ever hear from any of the embassadors of the order the name of Christians mentioned. I knew nothing of Paul, but I knew as a mortal and know as a spirit, that Pol was one of the names conferred upon Apollonius of Tyana. I have every reason to believe that the Paul of the Christian Scriptures is Apollonius of Tyana. I have had this view of the matter from one whom I knew in the mortal form, as the result of his investigation. I mean Pliny the Younger, with whom I was intimately acquainted. My name was Pompaeius Saturninus."

"The Christian story, as borne out by the facts, was derived from a Grecian tragedy the hero of which was a dying god, and the first man who taught such a doctrine was Apollonius of Tyana; and he, according to his own manuscripts, got the idea in India from the narrative regarding the Hindoo god Chrishna, which is in reality the Christ of the Christians. In fact you have, through the spirits that are coming to you, the key to all that relates to the Christian religion, in the fact that Apollonius was the Apostle Paul. These documents to which I allude, although opposed to their religion, the Catholics have not destroyed. Whatever originals they possess are in the hands of the Order of Jesus [Jesuits], and no priest is allowed to read them unless he takes the oath of eternal secrecy. There is not a learned Catholic to-day that is in the priesthood, or that has ever been at Rome, but that knows that Christianity is nothing more than an old pagan idea revived, but as it gives them power their lips are sealed. I might speak for an hour, but I could not tell you more than I have done because I have condensed what I had to say. I was librarian of the Vatican prior to A. D. 1607, when I died."

-- Cardinal Caesar Baronius

162 (edited by kid mongo 2005-12-08 11:38:52)

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

VERRRY INTERESTING. I'm going to have to re-read these more closely later, but what jumps out at me is that of Marcion's statement of presenting the letters of Paul to the Church in Rome. There is historical evidence that this indeed took place, and that Marcion sought to be Bishop, but was rejected due to his "herectical teachings" on his rejection of the OT and its God. The Church DID take his Letters of Paul and inserted them into the NT, but only after Marcion circulated HIS bible (which contained the letters of Paul and Luke only) first. Luke is written in koine Greek, the common languge of the Mediteranean. And Marcion came from the same area of Turkey as did Apollonius and Paul. Samaritan was a Palestinian-Arabic dialect, and none of these have come down to us. There seems to be some sort of confusion in my mind about merging Apollonius, Paul, Marcion, and Jesus together. Distortions invaribly occur in channelings, so you gotta go on intuition, right? But some of this smacks of the truth to me, so I'll check it out. Thanks, brah.

If you read alot about Marcion and Luke, scholarship always follows the orthodox line that Marcion stole from Luke and Paul. But a few think Marcion may have been been unfairly accused, and that actually the opposite occured. Some scholars have accused Luke of being a "crank." I wonder if this is the same "Lucian" who wrote a satire called "The Passing of Peregrinus", in which Peregrinus takes advantage of the generosity and gullibility of Christians. This is one of the earliest surviving pagan perceptions of Christianity. He was also from the same of Turkey as Marcion and Paul?Apollonius. Whew.

I have heard of the theory of Pol/Paul, and there are some details that are troubling.
(The companion of Apollonius, as well as scribe was Demis. As per  -2 Timothy 4:10  Demas was the companion of Paul See Also Philemon, Verse 24; I Corinthians, Chapter 3: Verses 4 -- 6 & Verse)
They both lived in Tarsus.

Most interesting in the LoA, is when Apollonius is brought before the emperor to be executed, instead of meekly submitting to torture and eventual death like Jesus, he lectured the king (like a philosopher should), and then promptly vanished from the court.

Read Philostratus and his "Life of Appolonius." In it, Apollonius does travel to India where there's an amazing story of him visiting the naked sages there, complete with tables that walked!

There will be two Ages. The first: The Age of Power. The next: The Age of Equality.

163

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Awesome insights from Seth on Christ and Christmas...

From The Early Sessions: Book 5 of the Seth Material, Session 213, Wednesday, December 01, 1965:

There were a few remarks that I intended to make concerning the Christmas season, and perhaps I should make them now.

If it seems to you that there is a great gap existing within Christianity, between ideals expressed, and actions, then let me tell you that conditions would indeed be far worse if these ideals had not initially been expressed, and if they were not yearly reaffirmed.

As you [Jane and Rob] both suppose, enough constructive psychic energy is generated during the holiday season to recharge psychic batteries, so to speak, for quite some time. Were it not for this your whole race would be in much more serious a predicament.

‘One of the reasons, Joseph [Rob], for your own lack of festive spirit in the past has been the result of your realization that this gap between idealism and action is great. You could not therefore enter into what you felt to be hypocrisy of the season. All the more, since you have no particular conviction, anymore than Ruburt [Jane] has, concerning the historic existence of a Christ.

To some extent, I have explored some of this, but it will do you well to join wholeheartedly into the very necessary spirit of the time, for it is constructive and most beneficial. And, in so doing, you help yourself and others.

Now: There was no historic Virgin Birth, and no historic Crucifixion. This does not mean that these do not represent symbolic realities.

... This feeling that Christmas represented hypocrisy has been one of the main reasons for your [Rob’s] own low spirits during the season, for it represented a rather deep disillusionment with the culture in which you were nurtured.

The legend of Christ is of great psychic import however, and is intrinsically true. This does not mean it is based in historical fact. In many ways it is more true than historic fact, for man himself created that which had not been provided. The creation nevertheless happened in quite real terms, and is part of mankind’s inner recognition of the pyramid gestalts of which I have spoken.

This was as close as man could come in his imagination to that which is, and this is all right. The basic idea behind Christmas is definitely important, whether or not the intellect is able to see its significance.

Now: Psychologically alone this is beneficial, for it acts against those feelings of despair that can creep up during the winter season. And by reminding men of a birth and a resurrection it hints at the innate abilities of the race to transcend physical time and space.

The getting out of oneself that is involved is excellent therapy, and therapy that does others good, as well as the self involved. There is much more here, however. Culturally speaking, there is a strong connection with pagan intuitions, deep and meaningful, that found newer and broader expression.

The character of Christ as it is portrayed is an excellent one, since it stressed human rather than specifically male qualities. Or should I say it stressed human qualities rather than those unfortunately considered male qualities. It stressed the best qualities of the race as a whole.

The personality of Christ is an idealization, and a clue to the entity of which each individual personality is composed. And as far as prayer is concerned, though I realize that neither of you pray in those terms, someone does indeed listen. The self who prays listens, and makes necessary adjustments and improvements. For the individual is part of All-That-Is, and therefore partakes of the abilities of the psychic gestalts of which we have so sketchily spoken.

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Apparently there's a movie about how Jesus never really existed.

http://www.thegodmovie.com/

No screenings in my state.  sad

I am as is Void.

165

Re: The Mystery of Jesus

Xenopope wrote:

Apparently there's a movie about how Jesus never really existed.

http://www.thegodmovie.com/

No screenings in my state.  sad

According to that site, it's available on DVD.

I guess the filmmakers would not go for Seth's idea that the Jesus story is intrinsically rather than historically true...