1

Topic: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

more treasure from cloakanddagger.ca:
       

            GEORGE W. BUSH!

             "...in which the soulcontracted son of the secret cell groped through life at the expense of the taxpayers, dejected into day and night with jesuit bark and bitter bite......"

         

 - James Joyce

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

Okay, I'm lost......

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

3

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

It's a quote from James Joyce, author of Finnegan's Wake. I don't know the source, but it's a fairly good summation of shrub. I don't think it's a comtemporary quote, which gives it a Nostradamus-style predictive quality. Pardon the cryptic nature, but I just post 'em as I find 'em.

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

Fits him very well!

5

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

I found that the quote is actually from Finnegan's Wake (1939), page 182. This work (which I've not read, still working on Gravity's Rainbow) has such a reputation for obscurity, and there are such timely quotes coming from it recently, that I think maybe it should be looked at closely for its predictive quality. Joyce invented a new language for Finnegan's Wake. Could it be that he needed a new language because he was receiving information from a transcendent source? Why would Nostrodamus be unique in this? Just a little food for thought (or is that thought for food?).

6

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

Galactic Blue Eagle wrote:

Joyce invented a new language for Finnegan's Wake. Could it be that he needed a new language because he was receiving information from a transcendent source? Why would Nostrodamus be unique in this? Just a little food for thought (or is that thought for food?).

If he was recieving information from a transcendent source, I wonder if the language was simply just downloaded through his crown-chakra, rather than invented.

I think such a language would already be ready on a floppy-disk, rather than needing to be created for the purpose of translation/interpretation.

7

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

BlackBox, your first statement makes sense to me. Your second stumps me. Do you mean that our brains already have a receptor for transcendent communication? Or do you mean an actual floppy disk?

8

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

Your first sentence is what I mean.

That's what made me resonate particularly from the C-transcripts. The pituitary gland via crown-chakra. Like for example at Stone-Henge: people could just go in the center and download information directly into his/her brain.

Other sources bring up the pineal gland and the endocrine system. When fully functional, the latter supposedly secretes chemicals that currently aren't ever produced.

--

Anyways, if one connects with a transcendent entity, I wonder if a language would be produced by a 3rd grader to speak to a 4th grader (or whatever level of density they are) or if a 4th grader would activate/restore/download the language to them...or something along these lines.

Sorry about the comment with the 'floppy-disk'. big_smile

9 (edited by BlackBox 2004-06-08 16:05:00)

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

Err, I wanted to add something but you're online and probably reading so I'll just post a follow-up.

BlackBox wrote:

Like for example at Stone-Henge: people could just go in the center and download information directly into his/her brain.

Imagine what this could imply...almost half of humanity are procrastinators. Most of them perhaps even turn into couch potatoes because of it. Is it because they are just lazy? Is it because they don't see any profit in doing things for the enjoyment of just doing them? OR are they subconciously in withdrawal to a way-of-life that was present in past reincarnations yet completely lacking in the present.

Imagine a life where the technicalities of acquiring knowledge were radically different. In modern-days we concentrate on the formula because we feel detached, alone, separate, individualized, etc. We are in search for answers, and most die without acquiring anything but theories. We are so exhausted with just finding the pieces of the puzzle, that we rarely ever get the chance of putting the puzzles together. One society finds puzzle pieces while the other can conveniently download all the pieces, and then experience life for the purpose of putting it all together instead of searching. The rest of their time could probably lead to creation rather than destruction due to ignorance. By ignorance I mean: When humans learn something new, it usually reveals answers that present flaws to certain technologies (like fossil fuels create pollution). Then they adapt to not make that mistake. Then when they create a new technology that fixes the flaws of the old, they find out more information in later generations that reveals further flaws again. And this continual flaw-finding way-of-life goes on for eternity in this type of society. Every next puzzle piece we find, makes us have to restructure the overall puzzle we have. I think this feels heavily inefficient for many of us subconciously, and maybe even alien to some.

If society lived within a foundation that already supported the opposite of all those things (the answers), would we study and think the same way we do now, or would we have other thoughts in our head? If a student could simply go to the center of a Stone-Henge mechanism or put on a crystal-hat (reminds me of Steven Gould's book: The Helm) and download information directly into their neural-net (Matrix-style), what would their lives lead to? Sounds so fictional yet so innately familiar.

I have a hard time describing what I mean. The best way I could probably say it right now is: Instead of society staring at the formula, they would stare at the answers.

Sorry if I'm unclear. I'll just post this and see if any comments come in, or if I can find some clarify myself.

I think I'm bringing up an important subject.

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

I think you are, too, BB.  We're backwards to the way we're intended to function because of being "reconfigured" to have a more intensive total 3D experience.  Before that we did know the answers, because our hyperdimensional part (soul) knows and we were aware of it and guided by it.  The whole point was for this "ethereal" part to use this knowledge of all to create a reality through a more physical interface in order to experience it.  We didn't die then, so it was a very natural symbiotic wholeness and ongoing "relationship".  After reconfiguration we were subject to death, we became disconnected from our "ethereal" part, we took over creating a reality based on false knowledge coming from hyperdimensional manipulators, and the resulting reality was geared totally toward our physical part.  "Cut off" from our soul, we had no answers and found ourselves confused and questioning, always trying to find meaning in our existence.

11

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

I just found out that the term "quark" first appeared in Finnegan's Wake by Joyce. It was borrowed by the discoverer, but I still wonder what else is in that book that might be applied to our present. I must get a copy!

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

No kidding, aaronfirebrand!  I'm intrigued now, too.

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

I'm doing a little on line research into it.  Very interesting.

http://www.fact-index.com/f/fi/finnegans_wake.html

The language is like that of a dream, not quite conscious or formed, shimmering with layers of possible meaning. Yet this is a return to possibility, shaped by the experiences of the world we have fallen (into sleep) from. One of the many sources Joyce drew from is the Ancient Egyptian story of Osiris, who was torn apart by his brother or son Set, the pieces gathered and reassembled by his sister or wife, Isis, with the help of their sister or daughter Nephthys; their other brother or son, Horus, emerges to slay Set and rise as the new day's sun, as Osiris himself. So in Finnegans Wake we have fragments and allusions and confusing messages that the reader must, like Isis, put together into a recognizable form as the book progresses towards dawn.
---------------------
Of course there are no coincidences so I'm not surprised this has come up the very week of the Venus conjunction and transit.  Yeah, you gotta read that book!  It couldn't be more obvious.   This could get heavy.

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

Joyce reads from the Wake

http://www.2street.com/joyce/gallery/joycevoice.html

Chief among the commonplace -- although by no means insignificant -- maxims of Wakean scholaship is the insistance that the text must be read aloud in order for the reader to appreciate -- if not understand -- Joyce's most linguistically playful work. Fortunately, one of the two extant recordings of Joyce's voice preserves a reading of the ALP chapter's conclusion.
A sample from this recording is reproduced here, along with the corresponding text (FW 215.22-216.5). If you have a 28.8 or faster connection to the Internet and a copy of the RealAudio player version 3.0 or higher on your system, you can hear Joyce read the entirety of the text below by clicking on the RealAudio icon. If you're not technically equipped to handle the RealAudio stream, you can still listen to portions of the text by clicking on one of the linked sentences below. These links are connected to 8 bit mono .AU files ranging in size from 30K to 75K; downloading should therefore not be an inordinately lengthy process.

--------------
I listened to the RealAudio stream. His voice isn't as I'd imagined.

Re: georgie porgie, puddin' & pie

http://www.mcluhaninstitute.org/baedeke … ders1.html

Bob Dobbs explains "Finnegans Wake". But his writings are equally as difficult to understand, so not much of a clarification sad

James Joyce said that his book "Ulysses" was day, and "Finnegans Wake" was night. He spent almost two decades working on that book, revising it over and over. My impression is that he wrote it in a semi-sleep state.

David Wilcock began his channelings this way:

Wilcock wrote:

I diligently studied all the material I could find on the protocols of remote viewing, and found that my multi-year experience with being able to recall dreams in specific detail was of great benefit to the process. The final key came to me from Joe Mason, now of www.greatdreams.com, who taught me about the “Dream Voice“? technique. In this process, you record the “junk“? going through your imagination, for better or for worse and without any judgment or analysis, when you are first waking up in the morning and can still remember the data from your dreams. Remaining as motionless as possible in bed, you don’t look back or show any interest in what you are hearing and writing until it is over, and then you go back and study it. The data often comes through in a very unusual and cryptic style, using the dream lingo of metaphor and symbolism to express itself. And from the very next morning, this is exactly what I started to get.

http://ascension2000.com/12.07.02.htm


I'm still laughing with what started this thread, a James Joyce quote that describes Bush, the point being that Bush bungles his sentences and words in a similar style big_smile

Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.