Re: Who or What are the C's?

Auendove wrote:

cool

big_smile

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Party Crashers!  That's excellent.  Another version of system busters.  We will see.  I really don't know what is next.  I think that being ready for change is a possibility.  It seems that this is a period of change.  Lots of change.

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Ferit mumbling to himself:

"That's what I love about NR. You get away for only a day and when you come back you see lots of great info and comments!"

When I first found C's website last year, I printed the pages that I'm interested and prepared a "dossier" on C material. This thread surely will get into that dossier with the headline: Party Crushers!!  smile

Change we must, to live again
- Jon Anderson

34 (edited by Auendove 2005-03-02 06:24:50)

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Shawn wrote:
Auendove wrote:

cool

big_smile

Good to see you smilin' Shawn wink .

lyra wrote:

... for somebody who grew up in America in the first half of the 20th century, and probably had a straight laced, mainstream life, this would have been absolutely shocking.

My father was raised Southern Baptist by an overbearing southern matriarch... this adding up to a strict Southern Baptist upbringing. Yeah, it must've been a horror show for him.

And ya know what? I think it was "absolutely shocking" for our generations (as there are two generations of NR members here), but I think for my father it was literally mind-bending... especially given my mothers notation of his radical personality change.

LOL! I gotta laugh because there have been moments thorugh the years I've thought my head was totally bent... ahem, fortunately for me I was in the right place at the right time and had the experience of the C's to "buffer" the shock. My father didn't have such a luxury.

lyra wrote:

The other aspect of this which jumped out at me was Auendove's father saying that all of this is an "experiment."     Think of "Dark City."   Think of "The Forgotten."    And I vowed I wouldn't mention him anymore, but I'll give in and do it, but, my brother was told / shown the same thing by 'them.'   That things are an experiment.    When he first told me that and stuff that tied into it back in 2001, I took it with a grain of salt.   But a couple of months ago I finally independently figured out what he was talking about and realized that there is some truth to that.  I've finally seen / understood the proof for this myself, although it took another 3 years.     An experiment..............think about it.  Interesting.

Yeah, and the Cassiopaean sessions somewhere along through the years came to be called The Cassiopaean Experiment. I wonder at who's prompt this name adaptation arose from. Was it the C's themselves? Laura? Did the name come along with Ark? Does anybody off the top of their heads know the answer to this question?

I finally just saw Dark City last weekend. Actually I watched it twice big_smile. The weekend before that I watched The Forgotten and The Manchurian Candidate back-to-back... I'm surprised I didn't have a nervous tic at the end of those four hours tongue  , but that Dark City movie was something else. At the end of the movie I was looking at the Dark City in it's totality, basically looking like a flat space barge, even a Borg-like barge, and I thought, "Huhn! How funny will that be if we come to find that the earth is indeed flat, and not at all sphere-like."

wandering1 wrote:

It seems that this is a period of change.  Lots of change.

Big time agreement!  Do you also find that this period of change began about the same time as the gamma ray explosion (if I'm describing it correctly) cameron refers to here?--

http://noblerealms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1344

cameron posted some theories he was working on, one of his theories was this--

cameron wrote:

This is a cosmic event tied to the metaphysical event known as "The Wave" or the Cassiopaean term defined as a shift in "hyperkinetic sensate".  It occured opposite the galactic core from Earth.  The core may have acted as either an electromagnetic or gravity wave filter or enhancer.  If indeed consciousness 'ascends' from lower to higher densities, with higher density realm-goers serving those below in their progression towards Unity, perhaps a rare cosmic explosion might serve this goal.

wandering1, I don't want to get to far off the thread subject matter, but I'm just wondering if you noticed this period of change beginning at the end of 12/03?

Yea or Nay? big_smile

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
------
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance.
------
If you spin around on your chair really fast, things around here will make a lot more sense.

lol

35 (edited by lyra 2005-03-02 07:49:20)

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Auendove wrote:

  Yeah, and the Cassiopaean sessions somewhere along through the years came to be called The Cassiopaean Experiment. I wonder at who's prompt this name adaptation arose from. Was it the C's themselves? Laura? Did the name come along with Ark? Does anybody off the top of their heads know the answer to this question?

I don't know the answer, but yes, things definitely did change after Ark showed up, didn't they?   wink   You know what I always took the "experiment" thing to mean........it seemed to me that it was added on once Laura began having doubts about the validity of the source, after the big "Personality Change" occurred, and she began theorizing that the C's were all a figmant of her subconscious.   Then suddenly it became the Cassiopaean *experiment*, devaluing 8 years worth of work.    So that would be around 2002, if I remember correctly.    Sounds to me like heavy programming to bring about the about-face, the "experiment" tag add on, the 180 degree personality change and the subsequent removal of the transcripts from her site. 



Auendove wrote:

  I finally just saw Dark City last weekend. Actually I watched it twice big_smile. The weekend before that I watched The Forgotten and The Manchurian Candidate back-to-back... I'm surprised I didn't have a nervous tic at the end of those four hours tongue  , but that Dark City movie was something else. At the end of the movie I was looking at the Dark City in it's totality, basically looking like a flat space barge, even a Borg-like barge, and I thought, "Huhn! How funny will that be if we come to find that the earth is indeed flat, and not at all sphere-like."

Yes, "Dark City" is indeed one of my all time favorite movies.   The look of the movie, the plot, the way it all plays out, and the heavy duty symbolic metaphors for this reality are all just absolutely AMAZING.    It was one of the first movies I bought once I began purchasing DVD's.   An absolute must-own for anybody who's into these subjects.  smile    So if anybody is reading this who hasn't yet seen it.....go rent it!   Even buy it, I guarantee you will like it!   It's one of the most underrated over looked movies out there!!    Back when I was living in Portland Oregon with plans to move to South Florida I re-rented this movie on Montalk's suggestion, after having not seen it in 3 years.  The parallels to my own life at the time.....trying to get to "Shell Beach"...as well as how similar Portland looked to Dark City just left me VERY freaked out at the end.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: Who or What are the C's?

oh, another thing i noticed about Dark City, is the underground "bases" theme that is prominent. anyone else notice this? that movie is so damn good, i think i might go buy it! or at least rent it again (with all the times ive rented it, i could have bought it by now...hah) but its very symbolic, those pale dudes / aliens all have their secret base underground, and they all put their energy together in unison to manipulate the surface world...

... it makes me wonder: all of the Alien propaganda these days and SETI and all that mumbo jumbo- has us looking out to the stars for ET life (think: mars) -- yet the truth is probably right under our noses (underground) --- hollow earth anyone??!

so, lemme curve this back on topic:

what do the C's say about underground bases?

"...i was taken by the hand, from the ocean to the sand..."
nitin sawhney - 'eastern eyes'

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Yes Dark City is one of my favourite movies as well, absolutely love it.

I always wonder if the screen writers of these types of movies are consciously aware that their stories are a metaphor for what's actually going in our reality. Or is it somehow being channeled into them by higher sources without them being aware of it?

Auendove wrote:

wandering1, I don't want to get to far off the thread subject matter, but I'm just wondering if you noticed this period of change beginning at the end of 12/03?

I know the question wasn't targetted at me, but as I mentioned in the aya thread, I've definitely been feeling very positive that there are big changes on the cards, and that a shift really is about to happen, or more likely is in the process of happening. This is a feeling that's grown stronger and stonger since the beginning of the year, although I've little doubt we're going to hit a lot of turbulance before we land safely.  Fasten your seatbelts ladies and gentleman this is gonna be a helluva ride! big_smile

Andy

Join me in Peru to celebrate December 21st 2012 - Visit: http://2012awakeningretreat.com/

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Ayahuasca wrote:

I always wonder if the screen writers of these types of movies are consciously aware that their stories are a metaphor for what's actually going in our reality. Or is it somehow being channeled into them by higher sources without them being aware of it?

I've wondered this, too.  It's not just in movies, but in everything.  My guess is that they aren't aware, on the most part.  Sometimes you see some people, after listening to them talk for awhile, and you realize that the likelihood of them consciously knowing that they're displaying "truths" is very low.  In most cases, the message is a lot bigger than the messenger.  Could be archetypes, but it's definately deeper truths coming through a denser messenger.

Consequently, I think that the main reason for enlightenment, or to exist, even, is to witness reality.  I sometimes think that everything happens the way it happens regardless, and there's always going to be one more level where you just can't fathom that is motivating you beyond conscious control.  This might cause some to feel a little cheated, but once you let go of your delusions that you're above everything else, or that you're in control, or even that you can ever be in control, you learn to appreciate existence.

* When we start identifying wisdom with our ability to comprehend its form, what wisdom is that?
* Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
* People want platitudes, not progress.

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Very well put Haven.  If you talking about movies with the hidden truths.  Think about StarWars.  Yeah, it's surprising, but that is definite for me.  Not just with the force etc.  Ever compared Darth Maul to some reptilians?  Exaxtly the same.  And the whole thing about the Senator really being the evil Emeror in disguise making agreements with everyone on all sides and creating wars so he can be voted absolute control, to take away the rights of the systems.  In a time of chaos.  Sounds familiar doesn't it?  Just a thought anyways, I watched Episode 1 and 2 yesterday so it got me thinking about this thread.

40 (edited by wandering1 2005-03-03 20:22:12)

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Auendove,
Thank you for sharing your story of the dramatic experience that your father had while in Antarctica.  Your description strikes me as having a lot of validity and integrity.

I have been feeling the change since December 2003 and since December 2004.  I think that I would have felt something if I had been passively going through life, but actually I've been quite active with regard to reading and researching and trying to better understand what may be happening here on this planet Earth.  Participating in this forum has been part of that.

The greatest change may have occurred in my worldview, but I do notice body changes and experiences such as time speeding up.  Plus, over the past several years, I've been able to grow out of stagnant situations and move into new ones that are more appropriate.

It's very nice to share this forum with you and the others here.  I think that we are able to experience much more than "words on a screen" by participating here, and part of that may be in perceiving other people's "frequency resonance vibration."

With love, joy, and peace.

41 (edited by Auendove 2005-03-04 05:23:21)

Re: Who or What are the C's?

wandering1 wrote:

I think that we are able to experience much more than "words on a screen" by participating here, and part of that may be in perceiving other people's "frequency resonance vibration."

Oh yeah wink, I think so too.

wandering1 wrote:

I have been feeling the change since December 2003 and since December 2004.

BTW--DOH! I meant to write 12/04 instead of 12/03 in my question to you.

For sure, at least for me, 2003 was a mind blower, what with all the intergrating, and 2004 was just a trip, what with all the STS 3D/4D/5D forces crawling out of the woodwork, yet since the end of Dec., this past two months, it's been a whole new season of change... for me it's become blatantly obvious how different... no, different is too generic a term, it's become blatantly obvious the broad spectrum of potential available.

And to be fair,  in Jan. I wasn't all so "Wow, look at all this potential, isn't it simply marlvelous?", oh no, I was here feeling like I had been "stripped" naked, metaphorically speaking that is. Day after day, bare to the bone to no one but myself.... well, no one else except my mate, heeheehee, he got many a wild shot of my white and shiny hienie during that time. I'm glad I can laugh about it now.

It's all good though, because "All are lessons", and boy-howdy if I didn't learn a few things! Him too.

And, Snicker! Snort!... I've got some really cool new "clothes to wear" now! big_smile

Peace and Joy and Love to you too wandering1, thank you for your comments.

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
------
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance.
------
If you spin around on your chair really fast, things around here will make a lot more sense.

lol

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Shawn,

This reminds me of something else about the C's--

For all the serious nature of their transmissions, they seemed to love the laughs. They called our joyous, if sometimes nervous, laughter "mirth", and they joined in the mirth right along with us wink.

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
------
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance.
------
If you spin around on your chair really fast, things around here will make a lot more sense.

lol

43

Re: Who or What are the C's?

Fascinating and intense thread about Laura/the C's at Godlike Productions forum:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/m … ate=7/7/05

I'm not for or against them, but most of the posters are polarized  on the subject. It does seem that Laura has been involved in some very unsavory things. It's a little hard for me to reconcile the flashes of briliiance I've
seen in the C's transmissions, and in Laura's own writings, with all of that.

Jen

44 (edited by wandering1 2005-07-13 00:10:19)

Re: Who or What are the C's?

That's a long thread.  I had previously read negative things about Laura as a person, and there were quite a few mentions of that sort in there.

I can understand how the expectation would be that a person reflect the content of their channeling in the behavior of their own lives.


Here's something to consider from earlier in this thread. . .

Auendove wrote:

I have given so much thought to the Cassiopaean channelling sessions and their validity. I have looked the issue up one side and down the other, inside out and outside in, and I was doing as much as early as 1994. For 10 years I have practiced every bit of rational and objective reasoning I can muster to find a force negative interacting therein... and I cannot find one bit of evidence that would dictate that the C's channelled with intentions to harm. It's not that I just want to believe this, it's that I have no other recourse.... I simply cannot find any evidence of negative consequences. I was there to many times, I had my fingers on the planchette enough times before 1998 to know it was completely spontaneous. I've written it before here on NR, and I'll say it again--you'd have to be there to believe it.

45

Re: Who or What are the C's?

wandering1 wrote:

That's a long thread.  I had previously read negative things about Laura as a person, and there were quite a few mentions of that sort in there.

I can understand how the expectation would be that a person reflect the content of their channeling in the behavior of their own lives.

Here's something to consider from earlier in this thread. . .

Auendove wrote:

I have given so much thought to the Cassiopaean channelling sessions and their validity. I have looked the issue up one side and down the other, inside out and outside in, and I was doing as much as early as 1994. For 10 years I have practiced every bit of rational and objective reasoning I can muster to find a force negative interacting therein... and I cannot find one bit of evidence that would dictate that the C's channelled with intentions to harm. It's not that I just want to believe this, it's that I have no other recourse.... I simply cannot find any evidence of negative consequences. I was there to many times, I had my fingers on the planchette enough times before 1998 to know it was completely spontaneous. I've written it before here on NR, and I'll say it again--you'd have to be there to believe it.

Yes, I read that, and was impressed. In any case, I am not inclined to dismiss the C's channeling as being simply the detritus of an unbalanced mind, as some have said. 

On the other hand, it seems that Laura often edits the transcripts,  so they may end up being more from her consciousness than from the C's.

Agree with what you said re congruence of the message with the messenger...