Re: Conspiracies = Distractions = Smoke-Screens = Control
Sedna writes:
I would like to know specifically what responses TV situations and responses can evoke in people.
and,
It's not the mostly inane subject matter of TV that is the main problem, I think, but there is also something in the psychology and symbolism of it....
Consider this--
If 9/11 had of happened before the advent of TV would there have resulted the same profound and sustained charge of emotional human reactions that ensued? For those glued to their TV sets at that time, for all the seeing and replaying of the "episode," there were such "Ever Ready" currents of rushing emotions like rage and deep sorrow, thoughts of false security and mortality, terror and fear (in a channeling session I once heard it said that Bush experienced "primal fear" as never before following 9/11), emotions some believe to be the mainstay of the 4D STS diet, or at least a coveted side dish... like a baked potato fully loaded with "the works." Of course, we do have the choice to be couch potatoes, or not, don't we? It's enough to deal with our own unique emotional issues as they naturally arise from the subconscious, without an "inane" tool further complicating that process. Especially if it's to an end that satisfies STS hunger.
And this--
Are "real" life family situations often aired on sitcom television? TV families most often resolve their issues, even big issues, in one half-hour. This is written with a healthy level of tongue-in-cheek irony--Well! Isn't that special, I wonder when my family is ever going to be that "good?" What is commonly represented on TV as the average family and family trials, is definitely not how family trials play out in the home court.
And as for TV as a psychological message delivery system? The systems message does not represent the human body image honestly, proportionate to the population. What one observes on TV, especially in commercials, and what one encounters when they walk out their front door into the public domain are two very different populations. One is usually aesthetically pleasing, ergo "the beautiful people," and therefore limiting, and the other is "just average," a horn of plenty of all the body types/images of our species in the world at large.
And SednaSphere--for all that we are educated and experienced, you and me--young children are not, and are in their formidable, foundling years. The ideals of body image perpetuated through TV forms ideas in their growing consciousnesses of how they conceptualize their fitting in or not fitting into the human landscape. For the love of my species, the little ones and the big ones, I heartfully write--No one soul on this Earth should have to worry about fitting in... really, it's more than enough to Just~Be, enough to come to life and walk the land without reservation for one's appearance therein.
--V
------
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance.
------
If you spin around on your chair really fast, things around here will make a lot more sense.