1 Topic by Racsouran

  • Racsouran
  • Guest

Topic: "no elemental particle" theory.

The theory that time is infinite reductable could have sense. I mean that when some relative point sees all normal, other point that works in a different frame of perceiving time, maybe can´t see or perceive that other relative point (of consciousness) that is in front of him. In one of our seconds, divided properly, could happen all the time of our frameline universe, maybe infinite millions of years; why?, because seems not to be any elemental particle of time, this does apply to all other elemental particles theories.

The "no elemental particle" theory seems to be a kind of insurance against unauthorized authority. A source of intelligence far advanced (but not advanced, simply intelligence essence) than i have ever read from any source ever.

  • Registered: 2004-04-21

Re: "no elemental particle" theory.

Here's an article that touches on that subject.  Many of the graphics are missing, but it should still be clear enough:

http://bel.150m.com/particle.htm#pss

3 Reply by Racsouran

  • Racsouran
  • Guest

Re: "no elemental particle" theory.

What i have exposed here is only a reminder of an alternative vision of consensus reality checking. Im not the first on thinking about that everything named, could be subdivided in subnamed parts who compose the named thing.

4 Reply by Racsouran

  • Racsouran
  • Guest

Re: "no elemental particle" theory.

Linear idea of time is the actual frame of perceive time itself. But i present, or only remind to the reader, the idea that time is not an non-dimensional line that goes from past to future, im talking about a conception of time so tasteful that u can touch it with your hands, and there, u still don´t touch it all, like infinite possibility seems to share with us.

  • Registered: 2004-04-21

Re: "no elemental particle" theory.

Yes, we are only aware of a small part of what is.  In fact I'm not sure we're even aware of a part at all.  What we perceive in 3D may only be the shadow, the frame as you say, of what is happening.  3D must, imho, be generated by those "unseen" parts and reality here has a "programmed" feel to it.  Like a holodeck.  And time is definitely not linear, because events happen in cycles, in a big loop-de-loop.