Re: David Icke and Cassopiea teachings. The differences
but you guys are making it seem like having the desire to help make this world better is an ego issue. i can understand what you guys mean, but i dont really agree with that. i can see that what you all mean (or more specifically Sedna in the last post) by ' not caring is ego -free' but what i think you really mean is that 'not caring' means you trust everything to go perfectly, how it should.
I kept wanting to go back and further elaborate on mine, since it isn't clear. I do believe that you should try to make the world a better place, and not to live with the idea that this place is lacking, or unworthy, in some aspect. My opinion is that you should go with the flow here, meaning, to take everything into account, instead of only wanting your version of paradise. My opinion would include, of course, accepting the ego as not some child and something to destroy, but to help it become the tool it can be, something that isn't led by every emotion that comes in front of it, to not be the center of one's life. My objective is to focus on one's life on the here and now, in this world, to treat it just as enthusiastically, with its limits and all, as one treats the spiritual world.
I think the key to life is to just do whatever comes naturally to you. Whatever you enjoy doing. If it feels good in your heart then surely it is the will of the infinite that we're all apart of. So if you enjoy trying to make the world a better place then keep on doing it.
I also agree with this statement, but it's a slippery slope for myself. I can imagine that we are who we are, and that even blindness has its reason, so that we can pursue something as if it is more important that it actually is in the scheme of things. My opinion is that those more enlightened do tend to not do much, and that, for most people, it's a good idea that enlightenment comes in increments, so that they will pursue their passions, no matter how "ignorant" they are, because, only in ignorance, will they pursue their passions. As far as what is really the best, I don't know, and it's hard to tell where responsibilty comes in to make one's self more enlightened. I guess one could squirm out of this and say that they are ignorant when they are ignorant when it's time to be ignorant, and they are enlightened when it's time to be enlightened. After all, ignorance and enlightenment both have a purpose, and we must accept them both.
* Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
* People want platitudes, not progress.