spirituality - physics - conspiracy - philosophy - wisdom - and more...
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Noble Realms → General Discussion → excercising the question mark
BlackBox, this response is better than I could have "HOPED" for. I'd like to get back to how three evil SednaSpheres could possibly equal one good SednaSphere. This, too, would make a good movie, (which by the way I was not kidding about before) ! There's no accounting for HOPE. Heh Heh.
sedna
Hah! Dont get me started on movies. I'm trying right now to startup a company on producing CGI-based short-films, with themes ranging from Atlantis, Mirror Worlds, etc. I'm reading "Ancient Science" right now, which is part of my research for some of the plots etc, so that I can be as accurate with my upcoming fictional projects as possible. I feel if I'm accurate "here and there" with ancient-topics, resonation will occur, and the stadium will rock! 
Sedna, I kind of didn't really think about what you just said (until now)...I have a feeling it's connected to another conversation on another thread, but I wonder if what you say is true (3 evil = 1 good)...Not literally perhaps, but I wonder if composition weighs down a certain polarity. Like perhaps negative energy weighs more than positive energy? The word "weight" is not exactly what I mean to imply. It would definately be a good movie with this concept at play. As if 3 subjective atoms = 1 objective atom...
I don't have anything intelligent to add but I wanted to post my interest in the subject before I go to bed. With that said, nighty night.
A recent transcript from the Q'uo hits the mark:
We are of those of the principle known to you as Q’uo and we greet you in the love and in the light of the one infinite Creator, in Whose service we come to you this day. We thank you for calling us to your group to talk about the function of the third-density experience and we are delighted to share our opinions upon this subject, with the request beforehand to each of you to guard your powers of discrimination well. We would ask that each of you be responsible for that which you take in and that which you leave behind. We cannot possibly hit the mark on all of our remarks. Some of them are bound to be useless to each of you. We ask you not to take them in without considering carefully whether they resonate in your own process and whether they feel like something that you might have forgotten but knew all along. If it feels like that, and resonates, then it is your truth for this particular point in your particular process. Otherwise, it perhaps bears no use whatsoever and would be best left behind. If you each will guard your free will and the processes by which you take in new concepts and make them your own, we will feel free to speak our mind. We thank each of you for allowing us this consideration.
Q'uo...well I guess I'm behind in my friggin readings to not have read this delightful verse.
Is Q'uo Ra's sister or something?
I honestly love the way they express themselves. Sounds like poetry to me. I love analogies of this form:
We are those of Q’uo, and are aware of your query, my brother. The lessons of patience and tolerance are lessons that are slow, my brother. And therefore we encourage that feeling that you have for water to come forth for you, to picture within yourself the slow, slow movement of the breaking up of the ice of judgment and narrowness. Do not force the ice to melt, for it is spring, my brother, and the ice will melt. Rather, allow that process to take place even though it feels as if it were breaking you apart. For truly your nature must change from crystallized water to liquid water and from orthogonal angles to the spherical [drops] of the flowing water in which all things are able to rub along comfortably and make room for each other, whereas the crystallized nature of the ice is such that it must have a certain structure in order to exist in that form at all. You are experiencing, when you ask yourself to relax into non-judgment and patience, to move from that frozen condition to the liquid condition in which you do not have control such as you would feel that you had when you had that right-angled structure of the ice and its crystalline nature. It is not that you change from a crystalline nature. Water also is a crystal, yet it is able to radiate in a different way and is able to accept different structures in an enhanced way without disturbing its own nature.
(http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/i … 4_0418.htm)
Anyone know what "Adonai" means? Sounds like a form of saying "Namaste".
Well, I haven't caught up on the C. material, however my take on channeling is as follow (deeply subjective, obviously):
Picturing an entity, or even a thought form (i.e: artificially created entity, whether done consciously or not) as a circle one could assume the centre of it to be the essence of it (=divine spark, soul, I, Higher Self, God etc.) it is feasible to assume that not all "Channelers" can access that particular level simply because they are not ABLE to since this point is beyond their own comprehension. Meaning that somebody who believe to be channeling Jesus MIGHT be channeling some LOWER aspect of It/Him, providing that his own ego is not doing ALL the talking (while discretely pretending to be Jesus, always good for the self-esteem). Somebody with a minimal ego (or fluid assemblage point) and who is "closer" to Jesus in terms of evolutional stage will almost certainly be channeling a part of the Jesus thought form closer to its "I"-essence.
Makes it even more important to validate and practice cross + lateral referencing with all channeled information. I think when this is done routinely, the dangers of channeling are minimized.
Noble Realms → General Discussion → excercising the question mark
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.