reason wrote:Atlantis! Brother!
I can't help but admire your enthusiasm for shotgunning some of the more end-game raves
forward for discussion, it's just that your syntax comes off a little noisy mate!
I agree, sometimes have to control myself in givin' not to much information,
My syntax was noisy last month, yes that's very true, because sometimes it's needed to shake a tree to get the some valuable apples (new serious subjects) fallin' in your hands.
I already pointed I take a rest, so after this I'll do.
You're among friends here.
I know
As for your Anti-christaic rave, better spell-check some of your imprints there.
If the DNA replicant were to be extracted from the Turin Shroud,
No, I didn't say that, let me be more clear:
The Mossad/Israeli's will confirm the DNA of the Shroud of Turin is of a person who lived in Israel about 2000 years ago, etc etc.
The DNA of the second Jezus-person will have the same DNA as the shroud of Turin,
BUT, his DNA is not TAKEN from this Shroud.
It is the DNA of a Jezus-person who lived also 2000 years ago, extracted/manipulated and taken/catched in time-space travelling.
With this DNA they then have CLONED (as like the "boys from Brazil" movie) a second Jezus-person, and his DNA matches the DNA of the Shroud of Turin.
So, it's total independent of the Shroud residuary.
Although, I'm very convinced this is their plan.
I can not tell this is the truth, because I have NO proofs.
But, I found last 3 years to many hints that this plan is not a just a Hollywood B-movie scenario.
And although David Icke is very good man, I'm very aware his glossary of the Christ religion and background is softly to say "not perfect".
(Don't make a mistake, I am not stating here the Bible-Jezus-Christ really did exist !)
But suffice to say maybe a little less aristotalean mandate in your discourses would serve you better in future.
No enemies or lessers to impress here mate, just deliver your POV as noise-free as possible and the flames will return to compassionate embers...
Oh yes, you're probably correct.
But sometimes, I have this aristotalean style to get the point much faster on the desk.
A little speculation will fit the optimum to get faster insights in the big picture, instead of slowly boring source giving protocols (which could also be dangerous for the Truth)
It's a trap to conform discussions 100 % like scientists do,
A little room for constructive speculation, say 5-10% can open many eyes.
Thanks.
Atlantean Magic: safe, simple and enjoying a good lifetime.