• Registered: 2004-11-15

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

Why is reality easier for me to see in an induced state?
Anythoughts

17 Reply by Moralman (edited by Moralman 2004-12-06 09:54:34)

  • Moralman
  • Guest

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

Adam wrote:

Why do so many people think something big is going to happen in 2012?

One thing about the New World Order is that they obviously don't have a plan to simply wipe out the population as they could easily have done that on a much grander scale already. So I don't think we're ever going to have a nuclear way. If there are people planning for a NWO then I think the only logical explanation is that they want a world where it is more easy to control people and stop them realising their spiritual nature. And the signs I see say that's not going to happen - more and more people are realising.

Dear Adam
kind regards
2012 is the year that the Mayans predicted would signal the end of the World as we know it.
Here is a link with more information about this.
1. http://www.2012.com.au/unlimited.html
I agree with your individual interpretation of the NWO-I thought that they might start a nuclear holocaust and they still might on a fairly minor scale.
I think that will use any impending big war to promote the NWO as a World government and convince the masses to bow to a false messiah.
The vast majority will goof and bow down to this false messiah therefore the NWO don't want to destroy mankind outright but they want to rule over them in the worst possible way.
I think that an awakening is definately occuring in all circles but don't be fooled into thinking that the average man walking the street isn't a brainwashed media puppet or a dupe for some sort of corrupt institution.
However your views on the impending trend of 2004 to 2012 is a pretty significent one.
Who knows what will happen-perhaps our interpretation is incorrect and Wandering1's is correct but I certainly think that the shift will occur.
The strange thing is though that every major authority on this subject either has your view or Wandering1's view on what will happen between 2004 to 2012.
Well at least we are close to the truth-either one or the other occurrence will happen.
We are indeed living in interesting times.
yours thankfully
John

  • Registered: 2004-10-15

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

blackcat wrote:

Why is reality easier for me to see in an induced state?
Anythoughts


Don't know.  Maybe when you are in an "induced state" you apply less rules to reality.

So maybe that says something significant about those "rules"...

Thought Manifestation

Marcus's Website

19 Reply by Alushe

  • Alushe
  • Guest

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

Induced states are often accompanied by ego-loss, which lets you view things without as much bias as a human being.

  • From: terra incognita
  • Registered: 2004-03-25

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

While I'm not sure that I've posted this to the right thread, the name of the thread, 2004 to 2012 trends, seemed like the best choice. I received this in my in-box today about the Mayan Calendar--

http://www.red-ice.net/specialreports/fourthday.html

I know so very little about the Mayan Calendar and even less about this person who wrote the piece (and therefore can't comment beyond just posting the link), but I thought some others may find it interesting.

Me personally? I have to echo some words lyra wrote on another page somewhere, though not the same exact words... I have a feeling, not a "knowing", that there's something off about the Mayan Calendar, that its timeline may be off. I think I wrote this concern somewhere else on another thread and the idea got poo-pooed by another member... heeheehee, at least I didn't get booed smile!

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
------
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance.
------
If you spin around on your chair really fast, things around here will make a lot more sense.

lol

21 Reply by bumblebee (edited by bumblebee 2004-12-09 16:17:06)

  • bumblebee
  • bumblebee
  • interdimensional intelligence analyst
  • Offline
  • From: tau ceti
  • Registered: 2004-10-18

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

morningsun76 wrote:

The calendar of the Mayan native Americans ends on December 21, 2012 and marks the time of a rare celestial alignment.

The particular celestial alignment that is rehashed has taken place around at around 1999 not at 2012. But since the sundisc is quite large the alignment takes place every year for a century or so.

the eyes of truth are always watching you
  • From: zerone
  • Registered: 2004-08-16

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

Booo!
(just kidden Auendove!)

all i can say is that nothing is set in stone.

the mayans probably were handed down this calendar by higher beings, and that 2012 date was the best and most probably outcome that these higher beings could project/envision.

alot has happened since then guys!

z

"...i was taken by the hand, from the ocean to the sand..."
nitin sawhney - 'eastern eyes'

zonabi's Website

  • From: terra incognita
  • Registered: 2004-03-25

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

zonabi wrote:

Booo!
(just kidden Auendove!)

big_smile

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
------
Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance.
------
If you spin around on your chair really fast, things around here will make a lot more sense.

lol
  • Registered: 2004-09-09

Re: 2004 to 2012 trends

I have just been into David Icke's site under "Headlines"
scroll down after Dec 8, 2004, go to TEXT (Hidden Mysteries site) it speakes about  all this at length...I have not had time to read it all as yet, but will later today.
With what I read No12 ...seems that he is on the mark!
I tried to go straight to Hidden Mysteries and find TEXT, but unfortunately I couldn't find it.  Let me know if you find it please.

Knowledge Protects