Synchronicity and Number Sightings (Page 2 of 11)

Numbers overall have their symbolic meanings, when you study up on numerology.   1 is the number of beginnings, 2 is the number of partnership, 5 is the number of change, physical pleasures and materialism, 9 is the number of endings, etc. etc., and so on and so forth.  That would be "Numerology 101."    But when it comes to groupings of numbers, and sequences of numbers that follow people around, I think that's personalized / tailored towards the individual.   It has a special meaning, just for that person.     And that's why it's absolutely imperative to start a log like I mentioned earlier to keep track of when, where and under what circumstances one gets their number sighthings.  Without keeping track, I think for many it would be near impossible to figure out the pattern and the hidden meaning behind it these repeated number sightings.  If you want to figure out what your numbers mean, or why you get them at the certain times that you do, why you can have a dry spell with no number sightings, then all of a sudden get a whole cluster in a short time period..........keep a log.    It's really the only way to get to the bottom of this.   Nobody can give you the answers, you have to figure them out for yourself.   At this point in my life, I have the belief that before we incarnated we devised a little "reminder system", using numbers, to remind us of things.  It's up to us to remember what those numbers mean.   Also, I believe that other numbers are the sign of hyperdimensional influence in your reality.  I have direct proof for this in my own personal situation with my own number sightings.   I think in those cases it's either your hyperdimensional manipulators clueing you in to their meddling -- obeying the law of freewill --  or, it's your higher self clueing you in to their involvement.   Either way, SOMEONE'S clueing you in to the hyperdimensional involvement going on in your reality, and it's best to be alert and pay attention and take notes, so you can decipher the little code behind it.    It's not that hard.   Just takes a little bit of effort.

Hmm. Well in your former post you said this:

And you have emphasized this point again along with your uncertainty that a soul-pool exists.

I personally think the subconscious along with everything we have described for centuries as the higher-self, exists in multiple forms. One form that governs 3D existence among soul-fragmentation, which could be the most efficient way of experiencing existence from non-existence, is a soul-pool. It's so confusing because this would mean that 3-billion incarnates on earth are part of this soul-pool and that we are all fragmented entities from the same one being, and I'm not speaking of GOD.

So if I believe in this soul-pool idea, then I wouldn't agree with your above statement of 3D tailorized numbers. I think the numbers you see, in any case, are there from hyperdimensional triggers (like you have said) as little signs and road-maps of the MCS for those who are present for soul-pool interaction. I think that all numbers are of the same consequence to the entire adamic soul populace on earth.

Let me finish off with what you said contradicts:

I think I've cleared it up now, but I believe in individualized meaning that correlates with the same meaning for all individuals that are open to the signs and triggers. Meaning they are observant and watching. What I disagree with is not this but that it is "tailored" to the individual. If there is structure in the Universe and we (or so I think) belong to something that combines us collectively, then MATH as the Universal language would not tailor itself for the fragmented entity but rather be harmonious for the entire Universe...or so I would think. Math does not bend for our means. It is objective.

Thanks for your thoughts Lyra.

Think about synchronicities - sometimes they are close to archetypal. Other times they are specific to the individual. The same should be true for numbers, since they are just a numerical form of synchronicity.

Jung wrote that archetypes express themselves through symbols, and a collection of symbols point toward the essence of the archetype. Some symbols are more pure than others, meaning closer to describing the full essence of the archetype. The reason symbols differ is that the context in which an archetype is interpreted varies from person to person, culture  to culture. It's like a disco ball - a common light source reflecting off the disco ball results in different points of light. But variance in symbols doesn't mean the archetype itself is fragmented.

Synchronicities are meaningful coincidences. Whether a coincidence has meaning depends on its context. Because the context varies, different symbols may be used to get through the same mesage. Some symbols will be closer to the archetype, and therefore more universal (perhaps so universal that you can look them up in a dream dictionary because many different people have this symbol) and other times the symbol is more specific to the individual.

So as far as I see it, I agree with both BlackBox and Lyra. I think archetypes indicate some common soul connection between humans who experience their derivative symbols, but that symbols themselves can vary from purely specific to culturally universal depending on the context in which the archetype arises. Whatever works best.

BlackBox wrote:
"I agree with this but I think it's because it's a very confusing topic."

Are you saying that you agree with what Montalk said BECAUSE it's a confusing topic?  I'm a bit unclear here.

I was following your post until it hit this part and then you lost me.

Also, could you define how you are using the word "Adamic."  I found several very differing definitions and I'm not clear on this.

Thank you BlackBox - I have the feeling this is a very important topic but I can't quite wrap my wits around it because first of all there is some confusion just in the sentences and definitions for me. 

So, if you wouldn't mind going over it again...in littler steps, I'd appreciate it.

Christine B.

BlackBox, if I understand you correctly, you're attempting to investigate the possibility of mankind sharing a common soul pool at some higher level of metaphysical reality? And how this relates to synchronicities being universal?

I can follow that much, but you lost me in other parts of your last post. Language has its limitations, but through analogies and less formal phrasing you can be like McGuyver and be very resourceful with the limits of what you have. The limits of language is in how complicatedly you can phrase something. The limits of your wit is in how concisely and clearly you can phrase something

That aside, here is some additional info on the term "adamics" so that we're all on the same page:

Background:

"Adamic Man" and "Pre-Adamic Man" are terms invented by Boris Mouravieff (French philosopher and historian) to describe two types of humans.

These terms are derived from the Book of Genesis, which says that God first created earth, plants, animals and man, then later created Adam and Eve. This suggests a difference between pre-existing humans and Adam/Eve. The difference, according to the Bible, is that Adam/Eve and their descendants contained the breath of God, the divine spark of individualized consciousness also known as spirit. Other humans before them did not have spirit, only souls and bodies.

Therefore, "adamics" implies divine heritage, while "pre-adamics" implies something else. These two types of humans presently exist side by side in society and even within the same family.

As currently used, the terms mean the following:

pre-Adamics - those with souls and bodies, whose souls are extensions or recent graduates of 2nd Density. Those who are extensions are known as Organic Portals, and those who are recent graduates are beginning their evolution toward inheriting the divine spark of individualized consciousness.

Adamics - those with spirit, soul, and body. They are humans who "fell" into 3rd density STS from a once higher state. From the beginning of human existence, they always contained the divine spark of individualized consciousness, but after the "fall" they fell asleep and became little different from pre-Adamics.

It is toward Adamics that many schools and methods of spiritual evolution are directed, to wake up their higher chakras and help them regain their former power and awareness. Pre-Adamics are for the most part hopeless because there's nothing in them to "awaken." There are also Adamics who are so asleep that they cannot be awoken either.

For the most part, the Adamics in this world (half of humanity according to Mouravieff and the C's) are now no better than pre-Adamics as far as the decency of their behavior goes.  So I disagree with BlackBox saying "Adamics simply vibrate their FRV's (frequency resonance vibration) at a rate that is open to bending rules" -- I think this is only the case for those Adamics who make use of their divine abilities.

So now the question is - do Adamics share a common soul pool? If they have a common divine origin, how strong is the link between one Adamic person and another? This relates back to the universality of synchronistic symbols and numbers.

Here's a good link addressing this subject:

http://www.uppertriad.org/Volume1/jfset140.htm

There it talks about soul groups versus group souls. I think it's an important distinction. Don't have time right now to post excerpts, but will add them later.

BlackBox, it is a complicated subject, especially when attempting to consider the seeming all/one dichotomy. As an example of one cultural interpretation, that your comments made me think of, I found this:

The teachers of the Quetzal-al-Coatl-Atl Temple said:

Unification of the Self is the human's greatest healing. The Higher Self brings Pure Intellect from all higher numbers where the Higher Self dwells. The Higher Self is the balance of energy.

The teachers of the Temple of Chim-Atl-Lan-Helan said:

Madness results when humans are not present with their bodies and with Life. To be completely separated from the Self and totally separated from the presence of Life results in madness. Humans who have gone mad are separated from Life's energies and do not know how they relate to existence.

The Zero Chiefs of of old teach us that Ten is Intellect and Measure---the measure of all existence. Every human has the potential to measure Life and thought, and to reason,  because Creation has created Pure Intellect; this is our Ten.
     
To evolve and become a higher being, within Essence, is the Challenge for every Spirit born into Substance.

The Pure Intellect knows that Life is not long. Spirit does not fear Death. Pure Intellect is Spirit and is Deathless.

The center force of the Medicine Wheel can also be seen when we look at the example we have from the early Greeks. In this way we can understand the thinking of our Chiefs here in the Americas.

Ancient names within teaching stories like Psyche ("Circle") and Cupid ("Cube") described the the center force of the Wheel. The Circle and the Cube describe the ideas and realizations discovered through Mathematics.

It should not come as a suprise that Spirit and Substance were thought to have "fallen in love" as Psyche and Cupid.

Psyche is the beautiful Goddess. She is the Circle or Sphere. Cupid is the beautiful
God. He is the Cube or Square.

Like WahKahn and SsKwan, every angle or mathematical formula is born from the Sphere and the Cube, the Circle and the Square. This is Psyche-Circle and Cupid-Cube.

When they are centered in the Self, humans are a "true Five" according to the Zero Chiefs. A 5 person will consider all things from a five Self point of view first.

Sexuality is one. There are people who are driven by their sexuality; they place one before five.

For the Centered human, sexuality begins with the five.

Both figures express themselves in the Present, the six. But the approach, and the result, are very different.

It must be remembered that hundreds of combinations exist as relationships among the Numbers, but here are several:

A 2 + 5 (Will plus Self) person is not the same kind of being as a 5 + 2, a person who is centered in the Self first.

The woman or man who places emotions first, 3 + 5, is not a balanced person. It is better to be a 5 + 3.

When the equation is 4 + 5, instead of the 4 being courage, it becomes fear or rage. It is better to be a 5 + 4--- a human plus courage.

As you can see, placing the Self, 5, first is very important.

                                                                              Source: H. Storm

So the concept of facets, or number aspects, which are rarefactions of Pure Intellect/ Math/ Number, correspond to the Higher Self, and "adamics", or humans,
(as defined for this expirement purpose here), who are individualized identities with unique combinations of numbers manifested as substance.

Thus each human and his individual created form is a particular variegated creation and will percieve his numbers symbols and synchronicites in a unique way. So each one can be a human, or adamic, yet quite different type of being from other humans.

The Higher Self is Pure Intellect, but individual synchronistic expressions of number are our Selves. Numbers not as divisible fragments, synchronicities not as tailored, but as indestructible essential Essences created, drawn, "brought forth" by the Creator as indissoluble, unique and eternal.

                                                                            sedna