I am still undecided about Ahmadinejad's intentions, but really what do we have on him?
He is a bit sinister looking, which only helps the policymakers put an evil spin on him.
It seems we have passed hypocrisy, and gone into ultra-hypocrisy. Some of the questions directed to him were naturally about human rights violations. Well I wouldn't say the US fares any better in that regard. How many homeless do we have in the States? How many poor families? And that is leaving OUT any foreign policy abuses we have perpetrated over the last century or so.
He was denied the request to offer condolences at ground zero, obviously he cannot care more than GWB right?
The people are not falling for this fabricated image, it is clear from the 200+ comments I read on one msnbc piece. (actually quite shocked at what msnbc did not edit out!) So what now. are we gonna make up some incubator stories? The claim about Iranians aiding Iraqi insurgents is thin, at best.
He also made it clear that Iran maintains a defensive stance, not an offensive position, and that they are not expansionist.
The US only ad one reason to allow him here at all, and that is to paint him in any other color but well-meaning.
Now he may indeed have NWO ties, or may even be well entrenched, but this STILL does not mean the average Iranian has any desire to war. They may know as much about Americans as we know about them... which isn't much.
So what we have to go on as always, are fairy tales, and spin as far as I can see..
J
Happy to have been a part