Topic: Uncyclopedia Wiki: Methods of Proof

Very funny!!! Even better if you have done maths proofs during your education.

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Proof

"The universe is on fire with wonder, beauty, and ecstasy." - From the Undines to Humanity

Re: Uncyclopedia Wiki: Methods of Proof

That was interesting.  It makes one think about infallible proof.  Maybe that is the feeling of being trapped many people have discussions upon.  It has been claimed that we only use a small percentage of our brain.  We have the rest of it locked in a loop of processing data to supply proof to many assertions regarding Reality.  Even as a small child we are presented with unanswerable questions.  It has been said that only an infallible person can submit infallible proof.  But maybe an individuals' mind does not see it that way and we all suffer the same problem likened to being on the internet and awaiting the arrival to an internet address that we entered.  Of course, broadband makes the wait pretty brief but I can still use that analogy because people still remember slow computers.

We want infallibly proven answers to all the questions we have posed concerning Reality.

Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement.
----------------------------------------------------------
You have to believe in the impossible in order to become.

Re: Uncyclopedia Wiki: Methods of Proof

That's the thing though, we have proven answers for a given state of development. After we evolve and develop, we will have different questions and different answers. We currently have three levels of rigor for proofs: subjective, objective and transjective (in Montalk's article Transcendence through intuitive thinking: http://montalk.net/metaphys/138/transce … thinking).

It's interesting though. Most of the proofs above are subjective ones so it just seems utterly ridiculous for them to be used in 'truth analysis'.

"The universe is on fire with wonder, beauty, and ecstasy." - From the Undines to Humanity