Montalk wrote:Truth Minion wrote:Oppressors do not care if their oppression are "true" or not. All they care is that they oppress people. It is a fetish.
Under fewer and better informed assumptions you might perceive fewer contradictions. Maybe it is not just a fetish, but an organized business requiring the proper timing of incremental steps toward desired goals. Oversimplifying could make for illusory contradictions. Example: why would a farmer wait until the end of the growing season to pull crops from the ground when near the beginning they are easier to uproot?
Your analogy is false. A farmer has to wait until the end of growing season to pull crops because the crops are not already developed. That does not apply to humans.
Aliens supposedly feed themselves with our emotions. The more primitive we are the more unable to control them (our emotions) due to our lack of knowledge. So the "younger" the crop, the more "nutritious" it is - to use your analogy.
Montalk wrote:That does not disqualify Bramley, nor is the number of books one has written is a reliable measure of credibility.
But it could be a single contract. The fact that he claims that he started with one intention does not mean it is the Truth. You must know that.
Montalk wrote:Truth Minion wrote:And if aliens are a psy-op what makes you think that he is not a part of that?
Because I have done my research and what he presents fits the data points better than many other books on why aliens are here. Also, there are other books which are clearly psy-ops and they have common identifying characteristics that Bramley's book does not have. It's obvious after you become a seasoned resarcher into this stuff and know how to look for holes and reconcile paradoxes. That's why I'm pointing out to you some further sources for your research. Well, assuming you are still up for researching some more.
I have read his book. In fact his book was the first one that I read. It does have some interesting theories in it. But it does not explain the question that I am putting forward.
Montalk wrote:Truth Minion wrote:Anyone can claim anything. It does not mean what they claim is true.
That is stating the obvious, but implying something false. What you are implying is that I think "Gods of Eden" is true solely because some guy named William Bramley claimed it. If so, then you are mistaken. I value the book because its claims are explanatory, correlative, interesting, and provide a set of working hypotheses that work well.
But they are still hypothesis.
It does not explain the questions that I am putting out here. And that is why I am making them. Had he answered them, I would not be posting here.
Montalk wrote:Truth Minion wrote:And that is my point. If advanced technology is being used nowadays covertly - and not so covertly: like tasers - what prevented them from using it in the past? NOTHING.
You contradict yourself by admitting that advanced technology is being used covertly nowadays. If so, then mainstream technology today is less advanced in comparison. Why? For the same reason that mainstream technology of the Dark and Middle Ages was less advanced than it could have been, less advanced than any covert technologies employed back then. And the reason, as I explained before, is that the permissibility of the proliferation of a particular technology depends entirely on the context of the age in which it is used. Polymer handguns are permissible today because it fits into the context of modern technology. But if permissible today, then not in the Middle Ages when polymer technology was unknown.
I do not contradict myself. I said that there are covert and not so covert technologies that are being used today. Why didn't they get to use them back then? All that they needed to have was one "leader" asking for the technologies that they displayed. After all they deal with one-on-one "free-will" agreements (or so it is claimed). Then those technologies - which would have been seen as "god like" could have been used by their human-minions to do "miracles" and the ignorant, highly religious monkeys would have believed them. And would have agreed to do whatever they asked them to do.
Or do you believe that their level of discernment was bigger than ours?
Isn't that what it is taught to us? That we must have KNOWLEDGE to be effective?
WHY would they wait until we could have this knowledge easier as we are able to have today, instead of convincing us very easily otherwise back then?
Completely absolutely UN-LOGICAL.
Montalk wrote:In the past, there weren't 6 billion people. There was no global government. There was no surveillance technology. The "crops" were not yet ripe for harvest. Enslaving such a world would have been more a liability than an asset. But today we are getting pretty close to maturing. Not only that, but an impending dimensional Shift would impose an urgent deadline for the final phases of the operation.
The answers to your questions exist, but not within the perimeter of your assumptions. The level of oppression we are talking about is far more complex; it involves layers of control that go beyond the physical. Do you have any idea how conquest is done on the metaphysical, occult, hyper-dimensional scale? A conquest of minds and souls, one that obeys metaphysical laws while operating within the physical environment? It is a more delicate process than brute physical oppression. There are subtleties here not to be overlooked. For more on these subtleties, I recommend reading the Allies of Humanity books -- the first one is a free PDF. I'd be glad to discuss this further after you've done more research and contemplation on the subtleties of what's involved.
I do not believe the crops were not ready to be harvested. They were more impressionable. More ignorant. More primitive than we are.
That there were not 6 billion people back then does not matter. What we hear is that they want to diminish the number o people on the planet in order for it to be more manageable. Why would then they wait until we were about this number so that they would depopulate us? So that they could have a big-bang-like "orgasm"? That does not sound like the "practical reptilians" that I have been reading about.
Now regarding the occult, hyper-dimentional scale... WHY do we need to change the old, trusted and true concept of EVIL to a completely proof-less story of "aliens"?
Would not be that helping TPTB in implementing their oppressive EVIL plans?
With Tesla-like technology they can pretend to materialize everything and anything. They have done it in the latest American Idol putting up Elvis on the screen - were the September 11 "attacks" the same kind of illusion optics? We will never know due to the passivity of the american public.
Again, I have read the link provided - thank you very much for the consciousness-expansion opportunity - and gave you my opinion about it. I have to reply to your reply but that will have to wait.
I just wanted to reply this one first. As it was in the line. Time-line that is.