Truth Minion wrote:"The visitors do not care how many of your people are destroyed so long as they have a primary allegiance amongst the majority."
If they do not care (as I had claimed in my "ignorance") why would they be concerned with "metaphysical agreements"?
The answer is in that very excerpt you just quoted. Why would they require primary allegiance amongst the majority? Why would they require it, if with their advanced technology they could easily overcome a military resistance by the majority of humanity, implying that it wouldn't matter that they don't have a majority allegiance? Again, it's because more than the crude idea of physical force is involved. It is because majority allegiance is what it takes to sign away the freewill of a planet. A majority constitutes a collective choice. When America "chooses" a President, maybe only 55% vote for him, and that the remaining 45% exist at all does not invalidate the idea that the process as a whole is supposed to constitute, through the electoral college, an agreement on who becomes President.
Truth Minion wrote:Why would they WAIT until we are able to communicate with each other, warning each other through the internet about all of this if they could have done their "persuasion" more effectively back then?
It is not a freewill agreement unless there exists an alternative to choose, and if a planet chooses what they offer anyway despite that alternative, that makes it all the more binding. That's part of it. The other part is that only starting in the 20th century has the world adopted technology and logistics secure enough to create a global surveillance society. Such an infrastructure is needed to minimize the amount of work and material aliens themselves would have to provide. It is a lot easier to come in and take control of a pre-made control system.
And if you notice, the persuasion began a long time ago with the proper pieces being put into place (genetic alteration, establishment of religious control systems, assistance given to elite human factions to construct the global control system, creation of problems that will eventually justify the solutions they present, etc...). Or do you think that they could just "show up" without ever having had influence here before, and by simply asking for allegiance get it? No, it doesn't work that way. They are patient, calculative, and do everything possible to minimize risk, thus the "persuasion" is a very drawn out thing, and the posed question of allegiance is only the final stroke.
Also, to take a civilization from mainstream technology X to mainstream technology Y, there must be time in between for assimilation and integration. Approaching middle-ages kings and giving them laser guns is too big a leap. No, first the age of enlightenment, then the industrial revolution, then nuclear physics, relativity and quantum mechanics, then the leap to laser guns. All through little nudges and inspirations here and there, technology given to the secret elitist groups which trickles into mainstream after some time. It is only now that mainstream tech has caught up enough to make that final leap into restricted alien control tech without it being perceived as "magic" or "witchcraft." People are ready for it now. Their minds have been tenderized by decades of science fiction, and they would welcome it. Yet there has been inertia to overcome, maturation of the population to wait for, thus the drawn out process.
Developments have occurred "without our agreement and without our permission" according to this source.
So why didn't they use this "violation of fundamental rights" to impose this on us waaay before now?
Because these are just developments for the sake of preparation and not the final thing that truly counts. The final thing is the collective acquiescence of freewill. Until then, preparations can be made without collective agreement because it does not yet require it. To illustrate what I mean concerning preparation, imagine someone wants to crash your place and stay there for a month. You would not agree to it and might eventually tell him flat out no, which would prevent him from doing so, but your saying no does not prevent him from still packing his bags and driving to your town. He would do all that preparation without your agreement, but it does not matter because his doing so is not the final thing that counts. The final thing is your saying sure come on in and stay a while.
That leads us back to my question that this might be a psy-op, due to the present nature of our technology.
Which leads to the next question about where this technology came from and how it developed so quickly. It's been slow enough that people don't question it, but relative to technological development in the rest of our recorded history it has been an insane progression. From horse-drawn carriages to the moon and from punch cards to holographic memory storage in under 75 years? And if this is a psy-op due to our modern technological capabilities, then how do you explain advanced manipulation throughout history that began way before this human technology ever came into existence? Ancient stuff is littered with anomalies, even the Bible has anomalies like the Ark of the Covenant, the wheel of Ezekiel, the burning bush of Moses. Did the human black-ops of that time invent those contraptions? Alien technology is the more likely explanation, and if they had it back then, then they have that or better today.
There is a psy-op today that uses advanced technology, where human military factions can abduct people, implant screen memories of grays, send communications to the heads of naive channelers and remote viewers, program highly credential people to push an agenda without them knowing it. But these can be identified by their fruits, by their characteristic language and fallacious reasoning, their connections to each other, and toward what goals and adoption of beliefs they are persuading. It's not that aliens don't exist and that it is all completely the work of human factions, rather it is human factions under the control of manipulative aliens working to seed disinformation concerning the true nature of themselves and these aliens. That part of the agenda is very active right now. Read up on works by Steven Greer, Courtney Brown, Alfred Webre, Lyssa Royal, Whitley Strieber, Dan Burisch, Lisette Larkins, Robert Dean, Bill Ryan, and Richard Boylan if you want to see the true face of psy-op. Until you check some of these out, you won't have a proper comparison of what constitutes good material and what makes up disinformation.
Acquiring fringe knowledge is like digging for diamonds in a mine field.
