1 (edited by Piece_ofnothing 2007-02-12 11:19:21)

Topic: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

http://dsc.discovery.com/tvlistings/epi … hannel=DSC

The Discovey Channel is supposed to air a T.V. Show on Chemtrails Feb 22 at 9:00 P.M. eastern time and Feb 23 1L00 am .  Never thought I'd see a wacko conspiracy theory like this get covered on  mainstream T.V.   If they are allowed to show it that is(It was supposed to have been shown on Feb. 8, but never happened.

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

Cool.  Will be interesting to see
a) if it airs, and
b) the legitimacy of its content!

"The unknown does not incite fear, but dependence on the known does." - J. Krishnamurti

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

I'd like to think that viewers may come away with the truth. But, all to often on History Channel, TLC or Discovery it's "Some conspiracy theorists claim....." only for the supposed expert to follow that up with a concocted diatribe on why that can't be correct. Not trying to be negative, just don't get your hopes too high!

" The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it "

Ayn Rand

4 (edited by Piece_ofnothing 2007-02-12 14:28:40)

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

Well if this show airs I don't see the discovery channel giving just one side of the argument either for or against it , it maybe a bit unbalanced in its arguement but either way I see it as a good thing that it is getting this much attention.

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

Piece_ofnothing, can I ask a question?

Are you the same PIECE_OF_NOTHING that wrote this article?
 
http://www.geocities.com/freeyourbrain/ … AL%20INDEX

6

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

smile I was wondering when someone was going to ask me that question.   

No its not me, I stole his name.

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

Ah ! poo! I wanted to find ou how it ended.:D

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

ShineOn wrote:

I'd like to think that viewers may come away with the truth. But, all to often on History Channel, TLC or Discovery it's "Some conspiracy theorists claim....." only for the supposed expert to follow that up with a concocted diatribe on why that can't be correct. Not trying to be negative, just don't get your hopes too high!

That's what they did on their crop circle documentary. They lead you on and then, "it's just a hoax."

"There cannot be progress without expression. There cannot be expression without separation. There cannot be separation without progress."-Ouroboros

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

http://www.newswithviews.com/public_com … tary47.htm
THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL CHEMTRAIL COVERAGE

By Dr. Stephen C. L'Hommedieu, D.C.
March 4, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Saturday evening I was able to sit back and watch the Discovery channel chemtrail coverage originally presented on Thursday evening. With previous news of the upcoming broadcast I pondered what slant would be used to obscure the public’s understanding to what these really are. Sure enough, I wasn’t disappointed.

Immediately the deception began by directing the emphasis of the presentation to a faulty concept of an aluminum component present in commercial jet fuel. This ‘scientific investigation’ appeared very impressive on the surface. It seemed as if they were actually determined to go all-out to solve this chemtrail ‘mystery.’ Armed with $1M in research equipment to ‘sniff’ out the chemical culprits thought to be secretly hidden in commercial jet fuel; predictably, they found nothing. I suspect even the researchers knew they wouldn’t find anything in the commercial jet fuel because even I knew they wouldn’t. However, I did find it interesting that the military refused to provide a sample of their jet fuel for testing. Suggestive that something is obviously going on.

The material for this ‘investigation’ presented by the ‘Not to Discover’ channel was just as you would expect from a controlled media production. They presented carefully selected material arranged into a purposely crafted design. They started with an easily dismantled, implausible and ridiculous hypothesis from a collection of amateur opinions on chemtrails. The investigation then set the stage for discarding the validity of chemtrails from this bogus hypothesis. This is the kind of bad ‘science’ commonly implemented to dismantle any information that gets too close to the truth. It’s called discrediting.

Patrick Minnis, the senior researcher at the NASA Langley Research Center, provided the typical disparaging analysis that you would expect from insiders involved with a cover-up. For instance, he described Rosalind Peterson’s carefully documented findings and descriptions of these chemtrails as particularly creative and imaginative. The Discovery Channel announcer went on to emphasize where Minnis sees clouds and contrails, Peterson sees these chemtrails. Then to solidify the uncertainty necessary to obscure the truth, Minnis claimed that “the notion of chemtrails is ludicrous,” and continued with “it appears no one seems to agree on what these are other than they’re not contrails.” Well then, what are they? Would Minnis actually provide a thorough and scientific explanation to the question presented?

Unfortunately, the only answer extracted out of Minnis, an authority on the subject, was “there must be an explanation for each of Peterson’s photographs.” Thank you sir; yes, we already realize that. But again, the question is what exactly are they? Curiously, he didn’t bother to indulge us any further on this important topic to set all of us straight. Naturally!

Frankly, I am astounded that Minnis believes all of us have the stomach to swallow this garbage. I’m a highly skilled alternative health care practitioner and therefore can almost always provide on-target possibilities into the cause of complicated health disorders. So what’s his problem in his area of expertise? Possibly a conflict of interest?

But then we get some bits of the truth mixed with a measure of inconsistency. Journalist, William Thomas acknowledges these are not normal contrails and provides good examples of many detrimental health related incidents associated with the presence of chemtrails. However, he mistakenly believes it is entirely being used to slow down global warming when in fact it is probably a major contributing factor to the cause of our ‘global warming’ altered weather patterns. This altering of the weather plays other valuable roles within the not-so-secret agenda that he may or may not be aware of.

I can certainly verify the detrimental health affects from chemtrails in my practice. I see many patients, especially children that appear to be suffering symptoms of irritability, unusual periods of uncontrolled behavior, allergies, asthma, or infection. Instead, I find their symptoms to be a direct result of the heavy metal poisoning they have been exposed to from chemtrail activity. This ALWAYS occurs when chemtrail aerosoling is at high levels. To the amazement of the parents I give their children what they require for the toxic metals indicated and the symptoms magically disappear. Now they have begun to notice when their children spend more time outside when heavy chemtrail overcast is present these kids begin developing symptoms the next day or even the same day. Of course, skeptics will attribute this to the power of suggestion. For these people I usually recommend continued heavy doses of ignorance to maintain their comfort zones since the ability to recognize observable details repeated with 100% accuracy may be too overwhelming.

Dr. Wayne Evens, atmospheric scientist, actually hit the nail on the head when he said that these chemtrails are acting as cirrus cloud formations that radiate more heat energy to the earth rather than reflecting solar energy back into space as do normal clouds. Did any one happen to notice how warm it was last spring even when temperatures were only in the 80’s, never mind the entire summer? The intended disappointment was that his land-based spectrometer did not reveal the materials being used.

My main question throughout the entire coverage was how did they go from demonstrating aircraft using outside canister-like applicators and cartridges to release chemicals into the atmosphere to the spin on aluminum particles in commercial jet fuel? My guess is to insure you would be convinced chemtrails are purely a contrail con job.

There may or may not be something added to the military’s fuel supply but that is not the main issue. The massive aerosoling of the atmosphere is occurring separately from the fuel system. A telling example came from this coverage as was demonstrated when the researchers visited an air tower and witnessed two identified KC-135s making their big ‘X’ chemtrail in the sky. These aircraft have the ability to dispense huge quantities of these chemical solutions at will to create these massive designer clouds. I have personally observed aircraft to literally turn these chemical aerosols on and off like Morse code.

A key element of proof these are not contrails that was curiously omitted from the coverage was the many actual photographs of these trails coming from multiple places on the wings of aircraft, even those with only two engines. Why was such incriminating evidence so conveniently left out?

Also not surprisingly, there was very little coverage about the barium. It is certainly the major health concern that was almost totally side-stepped. What about the strontium associated with the barium? Strontium is very difficult to separate from barium. There was no mention of the use of titanium in the atmosphere, as well. There was no mention of how these positively charged ionized barium and strontium particles bond to fluoride and chloride in the upper atmosphere and drop them to the earth’s surface which is then inhaled by the public. These are typical elements I can easily find on all patients during the spring and summer months when these materials ionize more readily.

If you don’t think there is a problem with inhaling these toxic elements into your lungs, think about this. Barium and strontium fall in the same periodic table column as calcium and magnesium. That means these heavy metals can and do substitute for these extremely important macronutrients in your body. These heavy metals then quickly move into the skeletal system and soft tissues. These heavy metals will not work effectively in the body but will be utilized in place of them because of the availability. If you seem to notice more cardiac arrest, stroke and high blood pressure issues this summer and you think it is only the heat, think again.

Nanoparticles of titanium, used to absorb UV radiation, can damage the nervous system. That is the big reason to even avoid all sunscreen that incorporate titanium, as well. The damaging effects of fluoride and chloride are well established and I will not go into their immune destructive aspects.

The timing for this coverage was especially important in order to prepare us for the up and coming spring and summer flood of chemtrails that will work so effectively during these warmer months to dismantle your immune system. But by then the majority of the public will be programmed and desensitized enough into acceptance and the educated others will be labeled conspiracy theorists. Make no mistake, chemtrails are no theory.

© 2007 NWV - All Rights Reserved

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Stephen C. L’Hommedieu, D.C. practices in Wichita, KS and specializes in identifying underlying causes to complex and chronic health disorders and their effective treatments. With more than 30 years of study in natural healing and alternative medicine his professional experience draws from an extensive range of alternative healing approaches that help to restore normal balance and function to the individual.

E-Mail: doctorl@ihc.kscoxmail.com

Tim

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

Thanks Tim-nice find!

" The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it "

Ayn Rand

Re: Chemtrails on the Discovery Channel!

This is how to fight back against chemtrails:

http://tinyurl.com/yoxvjj

1.) record your own phone (incoming and out going)
2.) have a video camera w/tripod (with the proper date on it)
3.) have a list of questions ready
4.) call all nearby airports and run your checklist of questions by them
5.) weekly/monthly/yearly logs of multiple witnesses make for strong court cases

Hyperdimensional Blogging