16 (edited by Almeirhria 2007-01-01 19:44:24)

Re: 'unusual' weather

NOAA reports another hot year for 2006 after 2005 broke all records for hottest year of the globe on record (since 1880)
-Severe heatwaves and widespread drought for 2006 across North America
-Australia in drought crisis with water supplies dwindling (Reported as worst in 1000 years)
-More than 40 days of rain in Scotland produces floods and evacuations (Scotland experienced both wettest and hottest year on record)
-Flooding in Panama and in Somalia (Nov 25)
-Flash floods in Afganistan (Nov 21) affecting aroun 4500 families
-Floods in Peru more recently, several thousand homeless
-Floods in Somaila possibly affecting people close to a million
-162 earthquakes within 2 weeks over 4 on the Reichter scale in Ethiopia (32 Mile fissure created)
-Ice Free Baltic Sea for the new year
-Icebergs from Antarctica reaching the south coast of New Zealand
-Floods in Kuala Lumpur causes over 60,000 evacuees
-Lohachara island now submerged due to rise in sea level
-New island created not far from Tonga (volcanic island growth)
-Huge Ice shelf breaks free from Canada's Arctic (reportedly the size of around 11,000 football fields)
-Heaps of volcanic activity, especially dormant ones showing signs of life.

The above is a VERY small sample of what is happening.  (The above is mainly from only 2 months of 2006)

Lyra there was an X9 Solar flare at the start of November and start of December, not sure if they were record breakers apart from being a big one during a supposed 'solar minumum'.


Of course this is all perfectly normal and if it isn't then it's the result of a only a small amount of emissions and pollution from the human population cool  Now be good and go back to watching the TV and eating your fast food. tongue

Sorry I forgot, this is Noble Realms smile
That big yellow ball in the sky is the main (but not the only) factor folks.

Love is Knowledge is Light

Re: 'unusual' weather

Thanks for that post.

I'm watching the documentary An Inconvenient Truth and it's a good reminder for me of what's happening globally in terms of weather conditions.  Then I thought of how our society is at the moment like Almeirhria pointed out and it's completely accurate.  We just assume that the way we live will continue and we call it "reality".  Micheal Tsarion talked about Earth Changes a long time ago in our history around the time of Atlantis and if that really did happen, I know I'm not the only one that would want to see it all over again.  The Earth needs some positive vibrations!  Will that be enough?

"Beyond the stars a new world awaits me now" - Wintersun

Re: 'unusual' weather

Almeirhria wrote:

Lyra there was an X9 Solar flare at the start of November and start of December, not sure if they were record breakers apart from being a big one during a supposed 'solar minumum'.

Imagine the maximum... roll

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

Re: 'unusual' weather

Four of the past five biggest solar cycles have come in the last 50 years. 

NASA:  Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011 "looks like its going to be one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400 years ago," says solar physicist David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center.

I enjoyed the Inconvenient truth Natural Mystic - quite sad to see what is happening and being done to our Earth - but someone needs to tell Gore about Scalar weapons.  Oh yeah and the sun too.

Love is Knowledge is Light

Re: 'unusual' weather

Record warm winter in Michigan. Haven't seen any northern lights, at least not this year.  This could be due to solar flares, though the sun is supposed to be at low activity right now (according to 11 year cycle).  I heard awhile ago that there is something up with the earth's magnetism.  Magnetic north dancing all over the artic or something along those lines.  There was a program on Discovery channel or history channel or something a few months back that was talking about polar shifts and how we're due for one soon.

21 (edited by lyra 2007-01-03 07:06:49)

Re: 'unusual' weather

The Independent wrote:

World faces hottest year ever, as El Ni ±o combines with global warming

By Cahal Milmo
Published: 01 January 2007


A combination of global warming and the El Ni ±o weather system is set to make 2007 the warmest year on record with far-reaching consequences for the planet, one of Britain's leading climate experts has warned.

As the new year was ushered in with stormy conditions across the UK, the forecast for the next 12 months is of extreme global weather patterns which could bring drought to Indonesia and leave California under a deluge.

The warning, from Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, was one of four sobering predictions from senior scientists and forecasters that 2007 will be a crucial year for determining the response to global warming and its effect on humanity.

Professor Jones said the long-term trend of global warming - already blamed for bringing drought to the Horn of Africa and melting the Arctic ice shelf - is set to be exacerbated by the arrival of El Ni ±o, the phenomenon caused by above-average sea temperatures in the Pacific.

Combined, they are set to bring extreme conditions across the globe and make 2007 warmer than 1998, the hottest year on record. It is likely temperatures will also exceed 2006, which was declared in December the hottest in Britain since 1659 and the sixth warmest in global records..................http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2116873.ece

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

22 (edited by Pictus 2007-01-03 07:10:58)

Re: 'unusual' weather

We are(Brazil) at summer but it is raining and cold, El Ni ±o effect...
At least in +- Rio de Janeiro region to south I think.
Have to check the weather map to be sure.

Bye, Pictus

--------------------
http://pictus.co.nr

23 (edited by lyra 2007-01-03 07:17:59)

Re: 'unusual' weather

......and on the flip side, there's a story in this month's Nexus Magazine, (the January-February issue) called "Apocolypse Cancelled - The Global Warming Debate" by Christopher Monckton. 

It outlines how there was a "Medieval Warming Period" that was as warm as temps are now, and possibly up to 3 degrees C warmer;  it claims that records indicate that during the medieval period, south Greenland was in fact, green, hence the name wink and that there was signficantly less ice and snow in the arctic -sometimes none at all.  This was followed by what's known as "The Little Ice Age" from approx. 1400 - mid 1700s.  That's when supposedly Greenland developed permafrost and the arctic froze up again.  I've read this before, years back, but the reminder was timely.

It does make me wonder.   Part of me wants to get worried and anxious about the weird climate changes that people are reporting worldwide, but then articles like this give me pause.  For all we know, it's not natural for there to be glaciers and permafrost and a south pole ice cap.   Antarctica supposedly used to be ice free.  It's a chunk of land complete with mountains now buried under a mile+ of ice.   Too bad we can't know for certain.  It's stuff like this that magnifies how chaotic the world has been for so long that we don't have surviving records to show us what was going on in the distant past.  So many wars, craziness, chaos and "dark ages" have destroyed valuable records and keep us in a state of uncertainly, coupled with those powerful behind-the-scenes forces who want to horde knowledge and keep everybody else out of the loop.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

24 (edited by lyra 2007-01-03 10:38:04)

Re: 'unusual' weather

.....okay, third post, I know, but I just had to add this bit that I found. It's been a day of synchs, that's all I can say.  I'm still reading the current issue of Nexus, which I normally don't read or buy anymore, but I have this Jan./Feb. issue, and in it there's a Project Camelot interview - I'd never heard of Project Camelot until morningsun76 started a thread about it over the past day or so in the "Links" section - interviewing a guy named alias "Henry Deacon."  Henry talks about a number of secret black ops projects, including time loops, parallel timelines, time portals and the Manhatten Project and Montauk projects; aliens/UFOs, depopulation plans, chemtrails, etc. And in the paragraph about chemtrails he has this to say (bolded words my own emphasis):

Chemtrails and Weather Wars

Q:  Do you know anything about chemtrails?

A:  Okay.   Chemtrails were developed by Edward Teller and are basically the seeding of thousands of tons of microparticles of aluminum in the upper atmosphere to try to increase the albedo of the planet, the reflectivity of the planet, because of global warming.   Now, gold microparticles, real gold, were used once in a similar situation on another planet, but I guess they had lots of gold, and we used aluminum instead.  Global warming is partly because of the greenhouse effect, and that certainly makes things worse, but most of it is because of increased solar activity.  Solar activity is the real problem.

Q:  Why isn't this information in the public domain?  It seems like people  should know and would liek to know, and there's no security risk if what you say is true.

A:  Scientifically, it's just a total gamble.  Not nearly enough is understood.  It may work, or maybe it won't.  It could easily make things worse.  There may also be health side-effects, weather side-effects, God knows what.  It affects the whole planet and here you have a unilateral, non-democratic decision, unconnected with the political or democratic process, to launch a  huge technological special project that affects everyone on Earth. If that's not controversial, I don't know what is.  The solution is to keep it secret.  It's the usual knee-jerk solution, too.

Q:  Will it work?

A:   I don't know.

Q:  Is this also connected with weather wars?

A:  [Pause]  Yes, there are weather wars.  The air force will own the weather within two years.

And earlier in the interview he said this:

A:  ...What few people know is that radar reports for the National Weather Service are also airbrushed, so that certain radar images aren't released.   I don't mean airbrushed as in by hand:  the radar images are electronically filtered using software.   Some of these radar traces are huge.  In addition, the weather radar won't record traces that are moving faster than a certain high speed, a couple of thousand miles an hour.  But there are still traces which need to be removed.

Q:  UFOs?

A:  Sure.  They're often optically invisible, but usually show up on radar.  They're also visible in ultraviolet.  I don't think this is generally known by people.

http://www.projectcamelot.net/livermore_physicist.html
_____

Who knows if it's true, I mean, there's always somebody coming forward claiming to work for one of the three initial agencies, (as this guy claims) revealing "secret information."  Also, he answers several questions with "Sure" - not yes, not no. It's annoying, because it's an answer that just goes along with the questioner...sure....which in itself has implications. Saying "Sure" fits right in with the long pauses and "enigmatic smiles" he would give in lieu of answers to certain questions.  But, nevertheless, it's something to consider and ties into what was said earlier in this thread by Almeirhria, and how despite being in the supposed solar "minimum," the sun is actually going bonkers.  I think there's truth to the sun being off.  It appears blindingly, many times painfully, bright in a way that I don't remember it being as a kid, and it's either because of a change within the sun itself, or the atmosphere has changed, affecting the appearance of sunlight.
____

But then I have to wonder.....what about the people who've witnessed celestial bodies such as the sun and moon doing things that are impossible for this reality, indicating that things aren't what they seem to be? 

Ellie Crystal at www.crystalinks.com also noted several years ago that during an astral visit to the sun with one of her buddies, they discovered that basically...the sun isn't real, I guess is how to put it.  It's not what we think it is.  I wish I had the exact quote for what she reported, but I've combed through her website and can not find this particular post to save my life.

Anyway......

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: 'unusual' weather

Much of the data a lot of Global Warming studies are based on seems to be very questionable.  After all the sun is supposedly over 6+ billion years old, yet here humans are trying to say what its cycles should and shouldn't be based on 400~ years of data.

The same goes for Earth - although here there is more geological information readily available.  Even still, claims from the scientists and media who are still questioning the reality of climate change are over looking a lot of information that is available in literature, as well as living memories.

All of us can see how much things have changed in the past few decades - there are trees near here that are in blossom already!!  Anyway - I was looking into what is known currently about the sun's solar cycle and found this:

Mukul Sharma, Assistant Professor of Earth Sciences at Dartmouth, examined existing sets of geophysical data and noticed something remarkable: the sun's magnetic activity is varying in 100,000-year cycles, a much longer time span than previously thought, and this solar activity, in turn, may likely cause the 100,000-year climate cycles on earth.

This research helps scientists understand past climate trends and prepare for future ones.

Published in the June 10 issue of Earth and Planetary Science Letters (Elsevier, volume 199, issues 3-4), Sharma's study combined data on the varying production rates of beryllium 10, an isotope found on earth produced when high-energy galactic cosmic rays bombard our atmosphere, and data on the past variations in the earth's magnetic field intensity.

With this information, Sharma calculated variations in solar magnetic activity going back 200,000 years, and he noticed a pattern.

Over the last 1 million years, the earth's climate record has revealed a 100,000-year cycle oscillating between relatively cold and warm conditions, and Sharma's data on the sun's magnetic activity corresponded to the earth's ice age history.

"Surprisingly, it looks like solar activity is varying in longer time spans than we realized," says Sharma. "We knew about the shorter cycles of solar activity, so maybe these are just little cycles within a larger cycle. Even more surprising is the fact that the glacial and interglacial periods on earth during the last 200,000 years appear to be strongly linked to solar activity."

Sharma's calculations suggest that when the sun is magnetically more active, the earth experiences a warmer climate, and vice versa, when the sun is magnetically less active, there is a glacial period. Right now, the earth is in an interglacial period (in between ice ages) that began about 11,000 years ago, and as expected, this is also a time when the estimated solar activity appears to be high.

http://unisci.com/stories/20022/0606022.htm

I find this interesting, because it doesn't assume that we already know how the sun works.  I haven't looked much further into this, but I suspect there will be a lot more theories and data out there that bring the current beliefs of solar activity into question.

And a few more quotes, one of which speaks about the Greenland period that Lyra mentions:

Sami Solanki, Professor at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich Switzerland, says the Sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years than over the previous 1090 years.

    “We have to acknowledge that the Sun is in a changed state. It is brighter than it was a few hundred years ago, and this brightening started relatively recently – in the last 100 to 150 years. We expect it to have an impact on global warming,"  he told swissinfo.

The sun's brightness hasn't changed much over the last 20 years. But it has been brighter for the last 60 years than it has been at any time in the last 1,150 years.

    According to scientists, the Sun’s radiance has changed little during this period. But looking back over 1,150 years, Solanki found the Sun had never been as bright as in the past 60 years.

    The team studied sunspot data going back several hundred years. They found that a dearth of sunspots signalled a cold period - which could last up to 50 years - but that over the past century their numbers had increased as the Earth's climate grew steadily warmer. The scientists also compared data from ice samples collected during an expedition to Greenland in 1991. The most recent samples contained the lowest recorded levels of beryllium 10 for more than 1,000 years. Beryllium 10 is a particle created by cosmic rays that decreases in the Earth's atmosphere as the magnetic energy from the Sun increases. Scientists can currently trace beryllium 10 levels back 1,150 years.

Variations in sunspot activity are probably behind the increases and decreases in solar radiation and consequence changes in Earth's climate.
During the Medieval maximum of 1000-1300 there was an extremely large Sunspot which is believed to have warmed the Earth higher than normal. There were no accurate measurements of the weather to call upon during this time but the discovery and colonization of Greenland by Eric the Red supports this hypothesis. Eric was exiled from Iceland for manslaughter and sailed west discovering Greenland. He then led many ships, filled with people who wanted to make a fresh start, to this new land. For 300 years Greenland flourished, new communities settled, trade with other countries grew, and the population increased. Around 1325 the climate cooled down considerably, people started to abandon the northern settlements. By 1350 glaciers covered the northern settlements, and the southern most settlements were dying out as well.
The Sporer minimum of 1400-1510 and the Maunder minimum of 1645-1715 were each known as a "little ice age." They were both droughts in Sunspot activity, and a link to a time of abnormally cold weather on Earth. In addition to finishing off the Greenland colonies, the Sporer minimum showed increased rates of famine in the world, and the Baltic Sea froze solid in the winter of 1422-23. Some of the more notable effects of the Maunder minimum included the appearance of glaciers in the Alps advancing farther southward, the north sea froze, and in London there was the famous year without a summer where it remained cold for 21 consecutive months.

http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/002242.html


What I find compelling the more I look into this - is how quickly the climate has changed previously.  It would appear that current changes in the Earths climate aren't unusual - but rather normal!

Think about it.  In the past 100 years or so, technology as really taken off - this has driven a massive increase in communication and record keeping abilities.  So over the last century most of the world has been in constant global communication.  Also every country has had the ability to keep records on even the smallest of data and then send it across the globe; whether that be by ship, by Morse Code or by e-mail.

Compare that to 400 or 500 years ago.  Most of the countries were effectively isolated, for the most part the only record keeping would have been by monarchies or governments.  The average person certainly wouldn't have had access to that - so all they would have had would be stories and memories passed down through the generations.

To what extent would those people 500 years ago been able to say their current climate was normal compared to 20, 50 or 80 years previous?  And even if they could determine that - to what scale could they have sent that information to others?  Why would they even have bothered?

Today the situation is totally the opposite.  People are more aware of what the climate is "supposed" to be - not because of what they see with their own two eyes (the sun could fall out the sky and many would barely notice), but rather because of what the media and books tell them.

The average person has maybe 100 years tops of good visual and written information to look at.  When looking through that the climate no doubt looks pretty static and predictable.  The truth would appear to be very different...

So has our technology and recorded information given us a slanted view of history?  What length of time are we basing a belief in static climate upon? 

Thing is - this seems to a be pretty obvious realisation with even a small amount of research.  So it would appear constant climate fluctuation is normal - if so then is that what is continuing to happen now?

The change in Greenland from the above quote I would say is pretty dramatic.  But it may well be "normal".  Is what we are facing now any less dramatic or is it on a totally different scale?

Between all the BS, mis-direction and lack of decent records I think it is difficult to say with any certainty at all.

Re: 'unusual' weather

Yes, according to acceptable records there was a medieval warm period, which in a recent report promoting man made global warming was deliberately excluded from the data.

The Sun has numerous cycles, certainly not just the 11 year one most people are aware of.  But even so, with what our latest instruments (been a few new ones launched as of late btw) and what our top solar researchers know, I'm sure it is very little as far as the life of the sun goes.  It is, to my knowledge a living thing after all.

With regards to mother Earth - the man-made destruction is saddening, but there is change involved and the change is nothing to be upset about.  There is nothing to say Greenland should or should not have ice.  That's how mother Earth is now and if she is to change (even with other celestial bodies) then so be it.  Mankind should not be opposing everything with the view "We want it like this or this is how it should be".  Work with nature, rather than trying dictate how things are I say.

One more personal note - for me I have found it progressively harder to view in full daylight.  I actually had not considered it previously, but years ago I could view normally during the middle of the day.  Now I practically have to squint due to the intensity of the brightness, that is without sunglasses.  So unless my eyes are becoming more sensitive every day...

Love is Knowledge is Light

27 (edited by lyra 2007-01-08 10:12:26)

Re: 'unusual' weather

Found this article today:

www.canada.com wrote:

Wacky weather throws birds and bees off balance

Cheryl Cornacchia
CanWest News Service

Saturday, January 06, 2007

MONTREAL -- If you think you're confused by this winter's warmer than usual weather, take a moment to ponder our feathered friends and furry neighbours.

While this season's record-breaking temperatures have offered humans a welcomed reprieve, the unseasonal weather has played havoc with the lives of birds and animals.

The balmy winter weather has tricked many members of the wildlife community to alter their usual migration schedules, sleeping habits and feeding and breeding patterns.

Now, wildlife biologists, ornithologists and zoologists are concerned that the survival of some of these birds and animals could be threatened by the winter months ahead.

Among the anomalies reported in Eastern Canada:

-The Canada goose, which usually migrates south, staying put. An annual Montreal Christmas bird count found an all-time high number of the water fowl, 2,832, roosting on the open waters of the St. Lawrence.

- Raccoons and skunks foregoing their shorter but still important hibernation period and, burning up fat stores that they will need if and when a January or February deep freeze arrives.

-In Montreal, the eastern gray squirrel is feeding instead of nesting and getting fatter. At the same time, it has been joined by the Fox squirrel, a bigger and brown-reddish colored squirrel with a more southern range.

- Possums, a marsupial associated with the southern United States, have been spotted in southern Quebec.

"There's a pile of stuff going on," said Lynn Miller, a Montreal wildlife biologist based at Le Nichoir, a bird refuge in Hudson."There will be winners and losers," she added.

Miller recently had to euthanize a great blue heron because it couldn't stand up. Frostbite had destroyed its toes. The species usually migrates to Florida and other sunny climes for winter.

"The weather has been so warm, he thought he could stay," she said. "It was bloody awful."

With little snow, the white-tailed deer is having no trouble finding food this winter and, as a result, the species will be more successful come breeding season.

Coyotes, foxes and many birds of prey are also well positioned with a plentiful food supply. Turkey vultures, a bald-headed species usually seen much further south at this time of year, is now thriving in Canada.

In southern Ontario, spring-like temperatures have dandelions blooming and even frogs, flies and bees are out.

At the Ojibway Nature Centre in Windsor, Ont., people are reporting seeing frogs, snakes and turtles, said naturalist Paul Pratt.

Pratt says a sudden plummet in the mercury could be a killer.

"The biggest danger is a real sudden change in temperature. You don't want to go from plus 13 C one day to minus 20 the next," Pratt said Friday.

"You want to give them a chance to crawl back in their holes and get in the burrows and hollow logs or wherever they want to go when the weather's cold."

http://www.canada.com/components/print. … mp;k=97303

Montreal Gazette, with file from Windsor Star

Here in Virginia it's as warm as fall time, for the most part.  It hasn't snowed, there were bees in December,  the squirrels are out in full swing, when you walk outside you hear song birds like it's spring, we've captured quite a few spiders in the apartment that shouldn't be out this time of year and let them go outside, and now grass and other plants that don't arrive until spring have already started to sprout.   !!  I'm looking around half expecting to start hearing crickets again at night time or something.  It would be cool, except for like the article mentions, should winter finally arrive for real then these critters and plants are going to be up the creek.   sad

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

28 (edited by lyra 2007-01-08 10:27:10)

Re: 'unusual' weather

ps

.....and meanwhile, the Great Plains got whomped with a third snowstorm in only a month.  I was reading an article about that over the weekend, how there are still hundreds, maybe thousands of people who've been without power for over a week, and then the third snowstorm hit, further hampering efforts to restore things.    Meanwhile, thousands of cattle either starved or froze to death, and the National Guard was airdropping bales of hay to try to salvage what cattle were left out there...which the ranchers can't get to, because of all the snow.   

We were talking about this over the weekend, and wondered whether it isn't so much a case of "greenhouse effect global warming" due to fossil fuels so much as possibly artificially manipulated weather wars. 

Think about it.  Ranchers lost thousands of cattle.  Thousands. That is a LOT of $$$ for farmers. What's that going to do to the economy later this year?

What happens when fruit trees and other crops in the rest of the unnaturally warm country begin blooming early...only to get killed off come February or something when winter finally kicks in, off schedule?  More economic problems for farmers and everybody connected to agriculture.

Manipulate the weather/climate, which results in artificially created economic instability.  This problem is worldwide though, it's not just in the US/North America.   Worldwide things are all wrong. Europe, South America, and I was just reading that Australia is in a major drought, and is being hit the hardest in terms of heat, which they attribute to global warming, of course.  Farmers down there were committing suicide.   

But again, what if world wide this is being artificially cranked up a few notches, to help usher in their plans for whatever?  Problem-reaction-solution and all that.  Who knows.  Just something to consider.

"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit ... what a ride!"  - Anonymous
-----
"I get by with a little help from my (higher density) friends."
-----

Re: 'unusual' weather

Hey Lyra,  this is the angle we have been discussing round here for some time.  It all just seemed so shifty..  first Al Gore and his movie trotting around the world.  Then the Australian Government who have been just denying that there is any such thing as Global Warming suddenly turn around and say oh, yeah, global warming alright, and its going to cost you trillions.  Then Little Johnny Howard (aka the shrub) (Aussie Prime Minister for those that don't know) starts spouting Nuclear Power,  Must Have Nuclear Power...   You can see where this is going.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. Jimi Hendrix 

30 (edited by ontrack24 2007-01-08 19:56:00)

Re: 'unusual' weather

Weather was sort of strange here earlier today. As I've earlier mentioned, I live in Norway. Nothing dramatic though, except a tremendous drive(wind) in the clouds up above, coming from the south. Now, seeing as I've heard of Norway getting "dumped" with all the air pollution from much of Europe under such conditions, I don't like gray clouds blowing up from the south much.. And it seemed to be heading more or less straight to the north - as in the north pole btw - certainly felt like it at least.

Almost as soon as I noticed a feature in the uniform clouds of the completely overcast, very gray, sky, that feature was about to drop out of sight again practically the same instant (well, two-three seconds maybe), due to the clearly strong winds further up. Coupled with a few occasional wind "blasts" from time to time on the ground, and a somewhat annoying drizzle, especially coupled with said wind blasts, it all made a rather bleak day out there...
So, coming home from a few of todays activities, I was tired due to a couple of days of weak sleep, and laid down for three hours for a rest. On waking up, I found out that the whole weather system had simply vanished, and left a clear (dark)blue sky, no wind at all, just in time for the early dark to set upon us.. So two vastly different types of weather visited this place in one day, a quite ominous one (the fast-paced clouds) and a far more peaceful, wind- cloud- and rainless type of weather.

Also, going against the normal this whole winter, my area (I live in the Oslo area in the east/southeast part of the country) has barely seen snow, and the situation seems the same over most of the country except the extreme north. So much so that our wintersports centers are having problems (and they are mostly in interior parts of our country, where snow is usually a given every year. The few times some snow has fallen, it's been rained a way within a few days.
Norway all in all has little problems in the way of climactic problems like those well-known in the USA, like tornadoes and so on. But I feel I can from time to time sense some changes going on, myself.

Since we're on this topic, I'd like to mention a specially foreboding experience I had about a year or two ago. There was little wind on the ground, but I could clearly see more activity in that department in the skies. It was late (really late, like 4 am), and I was walking home from a friends place. The route I took was a little special, and almost needs to be explained briefly - I was walking down a street with some apartment buildings lining either side, which is located on the sides of a hill that - even if not too impressive - still is a noticeable geographic feature of mid-Oslo and also effects the way the area has been built up. So, the street leads up to a point, which, even if it isn't the highest point, has a nice eastern view and is like a very small "top" just for that local area. So I arrived there, and just before I was about to get to this point with a view, currently with a building on my right side - I actually heard a kind of "howl" of wind, coming in in such a direction that it would be blocked from hitting me, due to the building... However, if I walked some meters ahead, I would arrive at that "top," where the easterly wind could hit me freely. Well, I was about to do so, and then suddenly the "BLAST" came! I'm speaking of a sudden wind so intense it was close to bending over steel sign poles bolted to the ground. And it was so loud it almost "spoke." I was hiding behind the protective building, and I couldn't feel even a mild breeze, but just meters away from me, some of the most violent wind i've ever seen (on land at least), seemed to hit a very small area very hard.

I actually suspected it was like a strand of a "jet stream" that had dived down to ground level. And I must admit, right there, I was actually quite scared - it lasted for about a 40 seconds or so, too. The power was such that I was afraid that if I stepped into the windzone, I could potentially be dragged away forcefully by it. It was INTENSE. Also, further down the street from where I came, there's like a portal through the building, and I thought the wind might reach through there and "get me" anyway. So for some seconds, I felt kind of trapped between the wind I saw, and the potentiality of it coming through that portal too.
Well, after around 40-45 - for me, very long - seconds, the wind subsided, and I slowly started walking onwards, still a little fearful that more of those "blasts" of wind would turn up. But I soon found out, there was nothing more - it was all quiet. On the ground. But up in the skies, the very fast-moving clouds kept on going at it.

Looking back at that experience, I wonder about several things... One of them, could that extremely powerful "channel" of wind have been some form of wind/air entity? I also made myself some thoughts about the global warming and extreme weather thing....
But I tell you, this retelling of my experience did not do it full justice... It was rather terrible, and I'd prefer to never experience it again. I don't know, but I feel that wind was some kind of supernatural thing, warning or something, it certainly felt like it. For a few moments, I was so scared I actually leaned my whole body into the wall of the building next to me, almost as hard as I could. What was so special about it, was that the wind was going past in a specific direction, which the building I was next to, blocked. And so, I could go towards the end of that building - right next to the intense wind - if i wanted to, and not feel nothing of it! It was that powerful, as to just "blast by" and barely leaving traces of itself outside its "designated channel" so to say.

Well, that became long, but it was a little hard to explain. And PS: I'm not the most "weak" guy who fears getting two drops of rain on his coat - I've experienced tough weather a couple of times and it was no big deal for me. But this was nothing like that - there was something really weird about it. And I suspect it also relates to global warming/our abuse of the earth. Like nature spirits really starting to build up a form of "rage" or something like that, at what is happening and how we humans mistreat our planet.
The way that wind was behaving - I've never seen something comparable.